Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Niederreither ◽  
J. Vermot ◽  
B. Schuhbaur ◽  
P. Chambon ◽  
P. Dolle
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Acid Synthesis ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Eph Receptor ◽  
Caudal Portion ◽  
Midbrain Region ◽  
Broad Domain

Targeted disruption of the murine retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Raldh2) gene precludes embryonic retinoic acid (RA) synthesis, leading to midgestational lethality (Niederreither, K., Subbarayan, V., Dolle, P. and Chambon, P. (1999). Nature Genet. 21, 444–448). We describe here the effects of this RA deficiency on the development of the hindbrain and associated neural crest. Morphological segmentation is impaired throughout the hindbrain of Raldh2−/− embryos, but its caudal portion becomes preferentially reduced in size during development. Specification of the midbrain region and of the rostralmost rhombomeres is apparently normal in the absence of RA synthesis. In contrast, marked alterations are seen throughout the caudal hindbrain of mutant embryos. Instead of being expressed in two alternate rhombomeres (r3 and r5), Krox20 is expressed in a single broad domain, correlating with an abnormal expansion of the r2-r3 marker Meis2. Instead of forming a defined r4, Hoxb1- and Wnt8A-expressing cells are scattered throughout the caudal hindbrain, whereas r5/r8 markers such as kreisler or group 3/4 Hox genes are undetectable or markedly downregulated. Lack of alternate Eph receptor gene expression could explain the failure to establish rhombomere boundaries. Increased apoptosis and altered migratory pathways of the posterior rhombencephalic neural crest cells are associated with impaired branchial arch morphogenesis in mutant embryos. We conclude that RA produced by the embryo is required to generate posterior cell fates in the developing mouse hindbrain, its absence leading to an abnormal r3 (and, to a lesser extent, r4) identity of the caudal hindbrain cells.

Negative effect of Hox gene expression on the development of the neural crest-derived facial skeleton

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 4301-4313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Creuzet ◽  
Gérard Couly ◽  
Christine Vincent ◽  
Nicole M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Distal Segment ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Hox Gene

Diencephalic, mesencephalic and metencephalic neural crest cells are skeletogenic and derive from neural folds that do not express Hox genes. In order to examine the influence of Hox gene expression on skull morphogenesis, expression of Hoxa2, Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 in conjunction with that of the green fluorescent protein has been selectively targeted to the Hox-negative neural folds of the avian embryo prior to the onset of crest cell emigration. Hoxa2 expression precludes the development of the entire facial skeleton. Transgenic Hoxa2 embryos such as those from which the Hox-negative domain of the cephalic neural crest has been removed have no upper or lower jaws and no frontonasal structures. Embryos subjected to the forced expression of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 show severe defects in the facial skeleton but not a complete absence of facial cartilage. Hoxa3 prevents the formation of the skeleton derived from the first branchial arch, but allows the development (albeit reduced) of the nasal septum. Hoxb4, by contrast, hampers the formation of the nasal bud-derived skeleton, while allowing that of a proximal (but not distal) segment of the lower jaw. The combined effect of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 prevents the formation of facial skeletal structures, comparable with Hoxa2. None of these genes impairs the formation of neural derivatives of the crest. These results suggest that over the course of evolution, the absence of Hox gene expression in the anterior part of the chordate embryo was crucial in the vertebrate phylum for the development of a face, jaws and brain case, and, hence, also for that of the forebrain.

Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hunt ◽  
D. Wilkinson ◽  
R. Krumlauf
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Homologous Genes ◽  
The Face ◽  
Facial Pattern ◽  
Restricted Pattern

The structures of the face in vertebrates are largely derived from neural crest. There is some evidence to suggest that the form of the facial pattern is determined by the crest, and that it is specified before migration as to the structures that is is able to form. The neural crest is able to control the form of surrounding, non-neural crest tissues by an instructive interaction. Some of this cranial crest is derived from a region of the hindbrain that expresses Hox 2 homeobox genes in an overlapping and segment-restricted pattern. We have found that neurogenic and mesenchymal neural crest expresses Hox 2 genes from its point of origin beside the neural plate, during migration and after migration has ceased and that rhombomeres 3 and 5 do not have any expressing neural crest beside them. Each branchial arch expresses a different combination or code of Hox genes in a segment-restricted way. The surface ectoderm over the arches initially does not express Hox genes, and later adopts an expression pattern that reflects that of neural crest that has come to underlie it. We suggest that initially the neural plate and neural crest are spatially specified, while the surface ectoderm is unpatterned. Subsequently some positional information could be transferred to the surface ectoderm as a result of an interaction with the neural crest. Given that the role of the homologous genes in insects is position specification, and that neural crest is imprinted before migration, we suggest that Hox 2 genes are providing part of this positional information to the neural crest and hence are involved in patterning the structures of the branchial arches.

Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 698-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Trainor ◽  
Robb Krumlauf
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch

Expression of AmphiHox-1 and AmphiPax-1 in amphioxus embryos treated with retinoic acid: insights into evolution and patterning of the chordate nerve cord and pharynx

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 1829-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.Z. Holland ◽  
N.D. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Nerve Cord ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Craniofacial Malformations ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Pharyngeal Endoderm ◽  
Cerebral Vesicle

Excess all-trans retinoic acid (RA) causes severe craniofacial malformations in vertebrate embryos: pharyngeal arches are fused or absent, and a rostrad expansion of Hoxb-1 expression in the hindbrain shows that anterior rhombomeres are homeotically respecified to a more posterior identity. As a corollary, neural crest migration into the pharyngeal arches is abnormal. We administered excess RA to developing amphioxus, the closest invertebrate relative of the vertebrates and thus a key organism for understanding evolution of the vertebrate body plan. In normal amphioxus, the nerve cord has only a slight anterior swelling, the cerebral vesicle, and apparently lacks migratory neural crest. Nevertheless, excess RA similarly affects amphioxus and vertebrates. The expression domain of AmphiHox-1 (homologous to mouse Hoxb-1) in the amphioxus nerve cord is also extended anteriorly. For both the amphioxus and mouse genes, excess RA causes either (1) continuous expression throughout the preotic hindbrain (mouse) and from the level of somite 7 to the anterior end of the nerve cord (amphioxus) or (2) discontinuous expression with a gap in rhombomere 3 (mouse) and a gap at the posterior end of the cerebral vesicle (amphioxus). A comparison of these expression patterns suggests that amphioxus has a homolog of the vertebrate hindbrain, both preotic and postotic. Although RA alters the expression of AmphiHox-1 expression in the amphioxus nerve cord, it does not alter the expression of AmphiHox-1 in presomitic mesoderm or of alkali myosin light chain (AmphiMlc-alk) in somites, and the axial musculature and notochord develop normally. The most striking morphogenetic effect of RA on amphioxus larvae is the failure of mouth and gill slits to form. In vertebrates effects of excess RA on pharyngeal development have been attributed solely to the abnormal migratory patterns of Hox-expressing cranial neural crest cells. This cannot be true for amphioxus because of the lack of migratory neural crest. Furthermore, expression of Hox genes in pharyngeal tissues of amphioxus has not yet been detected. However, the absence of gill slits in RA-treated amphioxus embryos correlates with an RA-induced failure of AmphiPax-1 to become down-regulated in regions of pharyngeal endoderm that would normally fuse with the overlying ectoderm. In vertebrates, RA might similarly act via Pax-1/9, also expressed in pharyngeal endoderm, to impair pharyngeal patterning.

Retinoic acid stage-dependently alters the migration pattern and identity of hindbrain neural crest cells

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 825-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. Lee ◽  
N. Osumi-Yamashita ◽  
Y. Ninomiya ◽  
C.K. Moon ◽  
U. Eriksson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Migration Pattern ◽  
Rat Embryos ◽  
Crabp I

This study investigates the migration patterns of cranial neural crest cells in retinoic acid (RA)-treated rat embryos using DiI labeling. Wistar-Imamichi rat embryos were treated at the early (9.0 days post coitum, d.p.c.) and late (9.5 d.p.c.) neural plate stages with all-trans RA (2 × 10(−7) M) for 6 hours and further cultured in an RA-free medium. RA exposure stage dependently induced two typical craniofacial abnormalities; that is, at 9.0 d.p.c. it reduced the size and shape of the first branchial arch to those of the second arch, whereas, in contrast, at 9.5 d.p.c. it induced fusion of the first and second branchial arches. Early-stage treatment induced an ectopic migration of the anterior hindbrain (rhombomeres (r) 1 and 2) crest cells; they ectopically distributed in the second branchial arch and acousticofacial ganglion, as well as in their original destination, i.e., the first arch and trigeminal ganglion. In contrast, late-stage treatment did not disturb the segmental migration pattern of hindbrain crest cells even though it induced the fused branchial arch (FBA); labeled crest cells from the anterior hindbrain populated the anterior half of the FBA and those from the preotic hindbrain (r3 and r4) occupied its posterior half. In control embryos, cellular retinoic acid binding protein I (CRABP I) was strongly expressed in the second branchial arch, r4 and r6, while weakly in the first arch and r1-3. CRABP I was upregulated by the early-stage treatment in the first branchial arch and related rhombomeres, while its expression was not correspondingly changed by the late-stage treatment. Moreover, whole-mount neurofilament staining showed that, in early-RA-treated embryos, the typical structure of the trigeminal ganglion vanished, whereas the late-stage-treated embryos showed the feature of the trigeminal ganglion to be conserved, although it fused with the acousticofacial ganglion. Thus, from the standpoints of morphology, cell lineages and molecular markers, it seems likely that RA alters the regional identity of the hindbrain crest cells, which may correspond to the transformation of the hindbrain identity in RA-treated mouse embryos (Marshall et al., Nature 360, 737–741, 1992).

Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Prince ◽  
A. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Population ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Crest Cell

In this study we have cloned the chick Hoxa-2 gene and analysed its expression during early development. We find that Hoxa-2 has a rostral limit of expression in the rhombencephalic neural tube corresponding precisely to the boundary between rhombomeres (r)1 and 2; a limit further rostral than any other Hox gene reported to date. Neural crest migrates from r2 to populate the first branchial arch, yet although Hoxa-2 is expressed down the full dorsoventral extent of r2 during the phase of neural crest emigration, there is no Hoxa-2 expression in either the emergent neural crest or in the first branchial arch. Conversely, at the level of r4, both the neural tube and the neural crest cells, which migrate out of this rhombomere to populate the second branchial arch, express Hoxa-2. Other Hox genes expressed in the rhombencephalic neural tube demonstrate a transfer of expression from neural tube to neural crest at all axial levels of expression. Hoxa-2 is thus unusual in demonstrating separate anterior expression limits in neural tube and neural crest; this allowed us to test whether Hox gene expression patterns in neural crest are determined by migratory pathways or are prespecified by the site of origin in the neuroepithelium. Grafting experiments in which pairs of rhombomeres were transplanted to ectopic sites at the time of rhombomere boundary formation reveal a prepatterning of the neural crest with respect to Hoxa-2 expression. The decision to down-regulate Hoxa-2 expression in r2-derived neural crest, but to maintain Hoxa-2 expression in r4-derived neural crest is intrinsic to the premigratory crest cell population. Thus, following grafting of r4 to the r2 site and vice-versa, Hoxa-2 expression is maintained in r4-derived neural crest, but lost in r2-derived neural crest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document