Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Prince ◽  
A. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Population ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Crest Cell

In this study we have cloned the chick Hoxa-2 gene and analysed its expression during early development. We find that Hoxa-2 has a rostral limit of expression in the rhombencephalic neural tube corresponding precisely to the boundary between rhombomeres (r)1 and 2; a limit further rostral than any other Hox gene reported to date. Neural crest migrates from r2 to populate the first branchial arch, yet although Hoxa-2 is expressed down the full dorsoventral extent of r2 during the phase of neural crest emigration, there is no Hoxa-2 expression in either the emergent neural crest or in the first branchial arch. Conversely, at the level of r4, both the neural tube and the neural crest cells, which migrate out of this rhombomere to populate the second branchial arch, express Hoxa-2. Other Hox genes expressed in the rhombencephalic neural tube demonstrate a transfer of expression from neural tube to neural crest at all axial levels of expression. Hoxa-2 is thus unusual in demonstrating separate anterior expression limits in neural tube and neural crest; this allowed us to test whether Hox gene expression patterns in neural crest are determined by migratory pathways or are prespecified by the site of origin in the neuroepithelium. Grafting experiments in which pairs of rhombomeres were transplanted to ectopic sites at the time of rhombomere boundary formation reveal a prepatterning of the neural crest with respect to Hoxa-2 expression. The decision to down-regulate Hoxa-2 expression in r2-derived neural crest, but to maintain Hoxa-2 expression in r4-derived neural crest is intrinsic to the premigratory crest cell population. Thus, following grafting of r4 to the r2 site and vice-versa, Hoxa-2 expression is maintained in r4-derived neural crest, but lost in r2-derived neural crest.

Negative effect of Hox gene expression on the development of the neural crest-derived facial skeleton

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 4301-4313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Creuzet ◽  
Gérard Couly ◽  
Christine Vincent ◽  
Nicole M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Distal Segment ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Hox Gene

Diencephalic, mesencephalic and metencephalic neural crest cells are skeletogenic and derive from neural folds that do not express Hox genes. In order to examine the influence of Hox gene expression on skull morphogenesis, expression of Hoxa2, Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 in conjunction with that of the green fluorescent protein has been selectively targeted to the Hox-negative neural folds of the avian embryo prior to the onset of crest cell emigration. Hoxa2 expression precludes the development of the entire facial skeleton. Transgenic Hoxa2 embryos such as those from which the Hox-negative domain of the cephalic neural crest has been removed have no upper or lower jaws and no frontonasal structures. Embryos subjected to the forced expression of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 show severe defects in the facial skeleton but not a complete absence of facial cartilage. Hoxa3 prevents the formation of the skeleton derived from the first branchial arch, but allows the development (albeit reduced) of the nasal septum. Hoxb4, by contrast, hampers the formation of the nasal bud-derived skeleton, while allowing that of a proximal (but not distal) segment of the lower jaw. The combined effect of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 prevents the formation of facial skeletal structures, comparable with Hoxa2. None of these genes impairs the formation of neural derivatives of the crest. These results suggest that over the course of evolution, the absence of Hox gene expression in the anterior part of the chordate embryo was crucial in the vertebrate phylum for the development of a face, jaws and brain case, and, hence, also for that of the forebrain.

Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1449-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
A.C. Burke ◽  
E. Laufer ◽  
E. DiMambro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Hind Limb ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Posterior Portion ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Hoxd Gene

The vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to be important for patterning the primary and secondary axes of the developing vertebrate embryo. The function of these genes along the primary axis of the embryo has been generally interpreted in the context of positional specification and homeotic transformation of axial structures. The way in which these genes are expressed and function during the development of the secondary axes, particularly the limb, is less clear. In order to provide a reference for understanding the role of the Hox genes in limb patterning, we isolated clones of 23 Hox genes expressed during limb development, characterized their expression patterns and analyzed their regulation by the signalling centers which pattern the limb. The expression patterns of the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes have previously been partially characterized; however, our study reveals that these genes are expressed in patterns more dynamic and complex than generally appreciated, only transiently approximating simple, concentric, nested domains. Detailed analysis of these patterns suggests that the expression of each of the Hoxa and Hoxd genes is regulated in up to three independent phases. Each of these phases appears to be associated with the specification and patterning of one of the proximodistal segments of the limb (upper arm, lower arm and hand). Interestingly, in the last of these phases, the expression of the Hoxd genes violates the general rule of spatial and temporal colinearity of Hox gene expression with gene order along the chromosome. In contrast to the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes, which are expressed in both the fore and hind limbs, different sets of Hoxc genes are expressed in the two limbs. There is a correlation between the relative position of these genes along the chromosome and the axial level of the limb bud in which they are expressed. The more 3′ genes are expressed in the fore limb bud while the 5′ genes are expressed in the hind limb bud; intermediate genes are transcribed in both limbs. However, there is no clear correlation between the relative position of the genes along the chromosome and their expression domains within the limb. With the exception of Hoxc-11, which is transcribed in a posterior portion of the hind limb, Hoxc gene expression is restricted to the anterior/proximal portion of the limb bud. Importantly, comparison of the distributions of Hoxc-6 RNA and protein products reveals posttranscriptional regulation of this gene, suggesting that caution must be exercised in interpreting the functional significance of the RNA distribution of any of the vertebrate Hox genes. To understand the genesis of the complex patterns of Hox gene expression in the limb bud, we examined the propagation of Hox gene expression relative to cell proliferation. We find that shifts in Hox gene expression cannot be attributed to passive expansion due to cell proliferation. Rather, phase-specific Hox gene expression patterns appear to result from a context-dependent response of the limb mesoderm to Sonic hedgehog. Sonic hedgehog (the patterning signal from the Zone of Polarizing Activity) is known to be able to activate Hoxd gene expression in the limb. Although we find that Sonic hedgehog is capable of initiating and polarizing Hoxd gene expression during both of the latter two phases of Hox gene expression, the specific patterns induced are not determined by the signal, but depend upon the temporal context of the mesoderm receiving the signal. Misexpression of Sonic hedgehog also reveals that Hoxb-9, which is normally excluded from the posterior mesenchyme of the leg, is negatively regulated by Sonic hedgehog and that Hoxc-11, which is expressed in the posterior portion of the leg, is not affected by Sonic hedgehog and hence is not required to pattern the skeletal elements of the lower leg.

scholarly journals Dorsoventral decoupling of Hox gene expression underpins the diversification of molluscs

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pin Huan ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Sujian Tan ◽  
Baozhong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Dorsal Side ◽  
The Other ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Shell Formation ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Evolutionary Diversification

In contrast to the Hox genes in arthropods and vertebrates, those in molluscs show diverse expression patterns with differences reported among lineages. Here, we investigate 2 phylogenetically distant molluscs, a gastropod and a polyplacophoran, and show that the Hox expression in both species can be divided into 2 categories. The Hox expression in the ventral ectoderm generally shows a canonical staggered pattern comparable to the patterns of other bilaterians and likely contributes to ventral patterning, such as neurogenesis. The other category of Hox expression on the dorsal side is strongly correlated with shell formation and exhibits lineage-specific characteristics in each class of mollusc. This generalized model of decoupled dorsoventral Hox expression is compatible with known Hox expression data from other molluscan lineages and may represent a key characteristic of molluscan Hox expression. These results support the concept of widespread staggered Hox expression in Mollusca and reveal aspects that may be related to the evolutionary diversification of molluscs. We propose that dorsoventral decoupling of Hox expression allowed lineage-specific dorsal and ventral patterning, which may have facilitated the evolution of diverse body plans in different molluscan lineages.

Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 1225-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Hughes ◽  
Thomas C. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Body Plan ◽  
Phylogenetic Position ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Fushi Tarazu ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Gaining Insight

The diversity of the arthropod body plan has long been a fascinating subject of study. A flurry of recent research has analyzed Hox gene expression in various arthropod groups, with hopes of gaining insight into the mechanisms that underlie their evolution. The Hox genes have been analyzed in insects, crustaceans and chelicerates. However, the expression patterns of the Hox genes have not yet been comprehensively analyzed in a myriapod. We present the expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede, Lithobius atkinsoni, and compare our results to those from studies in other arthropods. We have three major findings. First, we find that Hox gene expression is remarkably dynamic across the arthropods. The expression patterns of the Hox genes in the centipede are in many cases intermediate between those of the chelicerates and those of the insects and crustaceans, consistent with the proposed intermediate phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. Second, we found two ‘extra’ Hox genes in the centipede compared with those in Drosophila. Based on its pattern of expression, Hox3 appears to have a typical Hox-like role in the centipede, suggesting that the novel functions of the Hox3 homologs zen and bicoid were adopted somewhere in the crustacean-insect clade. In the centipede, the expression of the gene fushi tarazu suggests that it has both a Hox-like role (as in the mite), as well as a role in segmentation (as in insects). This suggests that this dramatic change in function was achieved via a multifunctional intermediate, a condition maintained in the centipede. Last, we found that Hox expression correlates with tagmatic boundaries, consistent with the theory that changes in Hox genes had a major role in evolution of the arthropod body plan.

Expression of the Emx-1 and Dlx-1 homeobox genes define three molecularly distinct domains in the telencephalon of mouse, chick, turtle and frog embryos: implications for the evolution of telencephalic subdivisions in amniotes

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (11) ◽  
pp. 2099-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Fernandez ◽  
C. Pieau ◽  
J. Reperant ◽  
E. Boncinelli ◽  
M. Wassef
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Longitudinal Axis ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Stages Of Development ◽  
Dorsal Aspect ◽  
Brain Expression ◽  
The Brain

Homologies between vertebrate forebrain subdivisions are still uncertain. In particular the identification of homologs of the mammalian neocortex or the dorsal ventricular ridge (DVR) of birds and reptiles is still a matter of dispute. To get insight about the organization of the primordia of the main telencephalic subdivisions along the anteroposterior axis of the neural tube, a fate map of the dorsal prosencephalon was obtained in avian chimeras at the 8- to 9-somite stage. At this stage, the primordia of the pallium, DVR and striatum were located on the dorsal aspect of the prosencephalon and ordered caudorostrally along the longitudinal axis of the brain. Expression of homeobox-containing genes of the Emx, Dlx and Pax families were used as markers of anteroposterior developmental subdivisions of the forebrain in mouse, chick, turtle and frog. Their expression domains delineated three main telencephalic subdivisions in all species at the onset of neurogenesis: the pallial, intermediate and striatal neuroepithelial domains. The fate of the intermediate subdivisions diverged, however, between species at later stages of development. Homologies between forebrain subdivisions are proposed based on the conservation and divergence of these gene expression patterns.

Homeobox genes and models for patterning the hindbrain and branchial arches

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hunt ◽  
Jenny Whiting ◽  
Ian Muchamore ◽  
Heather Marshall ◽  
Robb Krumlauf
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Homeobox Genes ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
The Body ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Hox Code ◽  
Branchial Region

Antennapedia class homeobox genes, which in insects are involved in regional specification of the segmented central regions of the body, have been implicated in a similar role in the vertebrate hindbrain. The development of the hindbrain involves the establishment of compartments which are subsequently made distinct from each other by Hox gene expression, implying that the lineage of neural cells may be an important factor in their development. The hindbrain produces the neural crest that gives rise to the cartilages of the branchial skeleton. Lineage also seems to be important in the neural crest, as experiments have shown that the crest will form cartilages appropriate to its level of origin when grafted to a heterotopic location. We show how the Hox genes could also be involved in patterning the mesenchymal structures of the branchial skeleton. Recently it has been proposed that the rhombomererestricted expression pattern of Hox 2 genes is the result of a tight spatially localised induction from underlying head mesoderm, in which a prepattern of Hox expression is visible. We find no evidence for this model, our data being consistent with the idea that the spatially localised expression pattern is a result of segmentation processes whose final stages are intrinsic to the neural plate. We suggest the following model for patterning in the branchial region. At first a segment-restricted code of Hox gene expression becomes established in the neuroepithelium and adjacent presumptive neural crest. This expression is then maintained in the neural crest during migration, resulting in a Hox code in the cranial ganglia and branchial mesenchyme that reflects the crest's rhombomere of origin. The final stage is the establishment of Hox 2 expression in the surface ectoderm which is brought into contact with neural crest-derived branchial mesenchyme. The Hox code of the branchial ectoderm is established later in development than that of the neural plate and crest, and involves the same combination of genes as the underlying crest. Experimental observations suggest the idea of an instructive interaction between branchial crest and its overlying ectoderm, which would be consistent with our observations. The distribution of clusters of Antennapedia class genes within the animal kingdom suggests that the primitive chordates ancestral to vertebrates had at least one Hox cluster. The origin of the vertebrates is thought to have been intimately linked to the appearance of the neural crest, initially in the branchial region. Our data are consistent with the idea that the branchial region of the head arose in evolution before the more anterior parts, the development of the branchial region employing the Hox genes in a more determinate patterning system. In this scenario, the anterior parts of the head arose subsequently, which may explain the greater importance of interactions in their development, and the fact that Antennapedia class Hox genes are not expressed there.

HOX Genes Expression Pattern Is Related to Phenotypical and Genotypical Subgroups but Not to Treatment Response in Pediatric ALL.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1288-1288
Author(s):  
Julia Starkova ◽  
Blanka Vicenova ◽  
Roman Krejci ◽  
Harry A. Drabkin ◽  
Jan Trka
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Genes Expression ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 1288 Poster Board I-310 Homeodomain (HOX) genes encode transcription factors important for embryonic development. They are involved in normal hemopoiesis regulation and likely also in leukemogenesis as a result of translocations and other aberrations present in leukemias. In previous work Drabkin et al. demonstrated that HOX gene expression patterns differentiate major cytogenetic groups in acute myeloid leukemias. In this study we focused on HOX gene expression in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL). We were interested if certain HOX genes or expression pattern could distinguish subpopulations of ALL. We analyzed the expression pattern of 21 HOX genes from HOXA and HOXB clusters and non-cluster HOX genes, CDX1 and CDX2 using qRT-PCR approach. We looked at 54 patients chosen according to phenotypic (T-ALL, BCP-ALL), prognostic (PGR – prednisone good responders, PPR – prednisone poor responders) and genotypic (BCR/ABL, MLL/AF4, TEL/AML1, hyperdiploid) characteristics. Overall analysis comparing all studied groups showed that HOXA7 (Kruskal-Wallis test p=0.000045), HOXA3 (p=0.000098), HOXB3 (p=0.00015), HOXA4 (p=0.000619) and HOXB4 (p=0.001925) genes were differently expressed among groups. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric statistical analysis comparing two groups against each other, showed that HOXA3, A4 and B3 distinguish BCP-ALL (w/o fusion gene) and T-ALL. Interestingly, particular HOX genes expression showed significant difference among the groups: HOXA7 gene is significantly downregulated in hyperdiploid ALL (p=0.03) compared to all other subgroups. Furthermore, HOXB7 gene is specifically upregulated in TEL/AML-positive patients (p=0.0048 vs BCP-ALL w/o fusion gene) and CDX2 is downregulated in BCR/ABL-positive patients (p=0.001 vs hyperdiploid; p=0.006 vs TEL/AML1; p=0.03 vs MLL/AF4). Suprisingly, TEL/AML1-positive patients have similar expression of HOXA1-A4 as T-ALL patients. HOX genes expression pattern seemed to differ in MLL/AF4-positive patients according to the age at diagnosis. Three patients younger than 2 months at presentation clustered together in clear contrast to the MLL/AF4-positive patient diagnosed at the age of 13 years with secALL who presented with very low overall expression of all HOX genes. Next, we looked for diversity and similarity between groups. We determined how many HOX genes were expressed differently (p<0.05) and similarly (p=1.0) between particular ALL subtypes. The most outlying couples were T-ALL vs PPR (11 genes differently expressed), T-ALL vs PGR (9 genes) and T-ALL vs TEL/AML1 (6 genes). In contrast, the closest groups were BCR/ABL vs PPR, MLL/AF4 vs T-ALL and MLL/AF4 vs PPR. Our data demonstrate that BCP-ALL (w/o known fusion gene) can be distinguished from T-ALL by the HOX gene expression (in particular HOXA3, HOXB3, HOXA4). Like in AML, expression pattern differs also among the major cytogenetical subgroups of ALL. On the other hand, within the BCP-ALL subgroup, no expression difference was found between patients with good (PGR) and poor (PPR) response to the initial steroid therapy which is known to be an excellent predictor of outcome. HOX genes of interest emerged from our analysis: low expression of HOXA7 in hyperdiploid ALL, highly expressed HOXB7 in TEL/AML1-positive ALL and specifically downregulated CDX2 in BCR/ABL-positive ALL. Age-related differences in expression in MLL/AF4-positive ALL seem to link the expression pattern rather with the relative maturity of the cell undergoing (pre)malignant transformation than with the specific changes caused by the leukemogenesis itself. This hypothesis must be tested in comparison to the HOX genes expression in sorted subtypes of normal T and B precursors. This work was supported by MSM0021620813, IGA NR/9526 and GACR 301/08/P532. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Quantitative Analysis of Differential Expression of HOX Genes in Multiple Cancers

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1572
Author(s):  
Orit Adato ◽  
Yaron Orenstein ◽  
Juri Kopolovic ◽  
Tamar Juven-Gershon ◽  
Ron Unger
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Cancer Types

Transcription factors encoded by Homeobox (HOX) genes play numerous key functions during early embryonic development and differentiation. Multiple reports have shown that mis-regulation of HOX gene expression plays key roles in the development of cancers. Their expression levels in cancers tend to differ based on tissue and tumor type. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis comparing HOX gene expression in different cancer types, obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), with matched healthy tissues, obtained from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx). We identified and quantified differential expression patterns that confirmed previously identified expression changes and highlighted new differential expression signatures. We discovered differential expression patterns that are in line with patient survival data. This comprehensive and quantitative analysis provides a global picture of HOX genes’ differential expression patterns in different cancer types.

scholarly journals A Model for Initiation of Mosaic HOX Gene Expression Patterns by Non-Coding RNAs in Early Embryos

RNA Biology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Petruk ◽  
Yurii Sedkov ◽  
Hugh W. Brock ◽  
Alexander Mazo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

scholarly journals Dorsal hindbrain ablation results in rerouting of neural crest migration and changes in gene expression, but normal hyoid development

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (14) ◽  
pp. 2729-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Saldivar ◽  
J.W. Sechrist ◽  
C.E. Krull ◽  
S. Ruffins ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
The Third ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Or Gene ◽  
Dorsal Hindbrain

Our previous studies have shown that hindbrain neural tube cells can regulate to form neural crest cells for a limited time after neural fold removal (Scherson, T., Serbedzija, G., Fraser, S. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1993). Development 188, 1049–1061; Sechrist, J., Nieto, M. A., Zamanian, R. T. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1995). Development 121, 4103–4115). In the present study, we ablated the dorsal hindbrain at later stages to examine possible alterations in migratory behavior and/or gene expression in neural crest populations rostral and caudal to the operated region. The results were compared with those obtained by misdirecting neural crest cells via rhombomere rotation. Following surgical ablation of dorsal r5 and r6 prior to the 10 somite stage, r4 neural crest cells migrate along normal pathways toward the second branchial arch. Similarly, r7 neural crest cells migrate primarily to the fourth branchial arch. When analogous ablations are performed at the 10–12 somite stage, however, a marked increase in the numbers of DiI/Hoxa-3-positive cells from r7 are observed within the third branchial arch. In addition, some DiI-labeled r4 cells migrate into the depleted hindbrain region and the third branchial arch. During their migration, a subset of these r4 cells up-regulate Hoxa-3, a transcript they do not normally express. Krox20 transcript levels were augmented after ablation in a population of neural crest cells migrating from r4, caudal r3 and rostral r3. Long-term survivors of bilateral ablations possess normal neural crest-derived cartilage of the hyoid complex, suggesting that misrouted r4 and r7 cells contribute to cranial derivatives appropriate for their new location. In contrast, misdirecting of the neural crest by rostrocaudal rotation of r4 through r6 results in a reduction of Hoxa-3 expression in the third branchial arch and corresponding deficits in third arch-derived structures of the hyoid apparatus. These results demonstrate that neural crest/tube progenitors in the hindbrain can compensate by altering migratory trajectories and patterns of gene expression when the adjacent neural crest is removed, but fail to compensate appropriately when the existing neural crest is misrouted by neural tube rotation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document