scholarly journals The G(2) DNA damage checkpoint targets both Wee1 and Cdc25

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (10) ◽  
pp. 1727-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Raleigh ◽  
M.J. O'Connell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

The onset of mitosis is controlled by the cyclin dependent kinase Cdc2p. Cdc2p activity is controlled through the balance of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of tyrosine-15 (Y15) by the Wee1p kinase and Cdc25p phosphatase. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, detection of DNA damage in G(2) activates a checkpoint that prevents entry into mitosis through the maintenance of Y15 phosphorylation of Cdc2p, thus ensuring DNA repair precedes chromosome segregation. The protein kinase Chk1p is the endpoint of this checkpoint pathway. We have previously reported that overexpression of Chk1p causes a wee1(+)-dependent G(2) arrest, and this or irradiation leads to hyperphosphorylation of Wee1p. Moreover, Chk1p directly phosphorylates Wee1p in vitro. These data suggested that Wee1p is a key target of Chk1p action in checkpoint control. However, cells lacking wee1(+) are checkpoint proficient and sustained Chk1p overexpression arrests cell cycle progression independently of Wee1p. Therefore, up-regulation of Wee1p alone cannot enforce a checkpoint arrest. Chk1p can also phosphorylate Cdc25p in vitro. These phosphorylation events are thought to promote the interaction with 14–3-3 proteins the cytoplasmic retention of the 14–3-3/Cdc25p complexes. However, we show here that the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint is intact in cells that regulate mitotic entry independently of Cdc25p. Further, these cells are still sensitive to Chk1p-mediated arrest, and so down-regulation of Cdc25p is also insufficient to regulate checkpoint arrest. Conversely, inactivation of both wee1(+) and cdc25(+)abolishes checkpoint control. We also show that activation of the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint induces a transient increase in Wee1p levels. We conclude that the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint simultaneously signals via both up-regulation of Wee1p and down-regulation of Cdc25p, thus providing a double-lock mechanism to ensure cell cycle arrest and genomic stability.

scholarly journals PHF2 histone demethylase prevents DNA damage and genome instability by controlling cell cycle progression of neural progenitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (39) ◽  
pp. 19464-19473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella Pappa ◽  
Natalia Padilla ◽  
Simona Iacobucci ◽  
Marta Vicioso ◽  
Elena Álvarez de la Campa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Neural Progenitors ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Biochemical Assays

Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation (H3K9me) is essential for cellular homeostasis; however, its contribution to development is not well established. Here, we demonstrate that the H3K9me2 demethylase PHF2 is essential for neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and for early neurogenesis in the chicken spinal cord. Using genome-wide analyses and biochemical assays we show that PHF2 controls the expression of critical cell cycle progression genes, particularly those related to DNA replication, by keeping low levels of H3K9me3 at promoters. Accordingly, PHF2 depletion induces R-loop accumulation that leads to extensive DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. These data reveal a role of PHF2 as a guarantor of genome stability that allows proper expansion of neural progenitors during development.

scholarly journals Computational Model of G2-M DNA Damage Checkpoint Regulation in Normal and p53-null Cancer Cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwoon Jung ◽  
Pavel Kraikivski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Computational Model ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest

AbstractCancer and normal cells can respond differently to the same stressful conditions. Their dynamic responses under normal and stressful conditions are governed by complex molecular regulatory networks. We developed a computational model of G2-M DNA damage checkpoint regulation to study normal and cancer cell cycle progression under normal and stressful conditions. Our model is successful in explaining cancer cell cycle arrest in conditions when some cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint regulators are inhibited, whereas the same conditions only delay entry into mitosis in normal cells. We use the model to explain known phenotypes of gene deletion mutants and predict phenotypes of yet uncharacterized mutants in normal and cancer cells. We also use sensitive analyses to identify the ranges of model parameter values that lead to the cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. Our results can be used to predict the effect of a potential treatment on cell cycle progression of normal and cancer cells.

scholarly journals Crosstalk between Plk1, p53, cell cycle, and G2/M DNA damage checkpoint regulation in cancer: computational modeling and analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwoon Jung ◽  
Pavel Kraikivski ◽  
Sajad Shafiekhani ◽  
Scott S. Terhune ◽  
Ranjan K. Dash
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Gene Perturbations

AbstractDifferent cancer cell lines can have varying responses to the same perturbations or stressful conditions. Cancer cells that have DNA damage checkpoint-related mutations are often more sensitive to gene perturbations including altered Plk1 and p53 activities than cancer cells without these mutations. The perturbations often induce a cell cycle arrest in the former cancer, whereas they only delay the cell cycle progression in the latter cancer. To study crosstalk between Plk1, p53, and G2/M DNA damage checkpoint leading to differential cell cycle regulations, we developed a computational model by extending our recently developed model of mitotic cell cycle and including these key interactions. We have used the model to analyze the cancer cell cycle progression under various gene perturbations including Plk1-depletion conditions. We also analyzed mutations and perturbations in approximately 1800 different cell lines available in the Cancer Dependency Map and grouped lines by genes that are represented in our model. Our model successfully explained phenotypes of various cancer cell lines under different gene perturbations. Several sensitivity analysis approaches were used to identify the range of key parameter values that lead to the cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. Our resulting model can be used to predict the effect of potential treatments targeting key mitotic and DNA damage checkpoint regulators on cell cycle progression of different types of cancer cells.

scholarly journals A Novel Interaction of Ecdysoneless (ECD) Protein with R2TP Complex Component RUVBL1 Is Required for the Functional Role of ECD in Cell Cycle Progression

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 886-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riyaz A. Mir ◽  
Aditya Bele ◽  
Sameer Mirza ◽  
Shashank Srivastava ◽  
Appolinaire A. Olou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Ecdysoneless (ECD) is an evolutionarily conserved protein whose germ line deletion is embryonic lethal. Deletion ofEcdin cells causes cell cycle arrest, which is rescued by exogenousECD, demonstrating a requirement ofECDfor normal mammalian cell cycle progression. However, the exact mechanism by which ECD regulates cell cycle is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that ECD protein levels and subcellular localization are invariant during cell cycle progression, suggesting a potential role of posttranslational modifications or protein-protein interactions. Since phosphorylated ECD was recently shown to interact with the PIH1D1 adaptor component of the R2TP cochaperone complex, we examined the requirement of ECD phosphorylation in cell cycle progression. Notably, phosphorylation-deficient ECD mutants that failed to bind to PIH1D1in vitrofully retained the ability to interact with the R2TP complex and yet exhibited a reduced ability to rescueEcd-deficient cells from cell cycle arrest. Biochemical analyses demonstrated an additional phosphorylation-independent interaction of ECD with the RUVBL1 component of the R2TP complex, and this interaction is essential for ECD's cell cycle progression function. These studies demonstrate that interaction of ECD with RUVBL1, and its CK2-mediated phosphorylation, independent of its interaction with PIH1D1, are important for its cell cycle regulatory function.

scholarly journals Requirement for TAFII250 Acetyltransferase Activity in Cell Cycle Progression

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1134-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Dunphy ◽  
Theron Johnson ◽  
Scott S. Auerbach ◽  
Edith H. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Acetyltransferase Activity ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Protein Encoding ◽  
Acetyltransferase Domain ◽  
Mutant Cells

ABSTRACT The TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor TAFII250 is the largest component of the basal transcription factor IID (TFIID). A missense mutation that maps to the acetyltransferase domain of TAFII250 induces the temperature-sensitive (ts) mutant hamster cell lines ts13 and tsBN462 to arrest in late G1. At the nonpermissive temperature (39.5°C), transcription from only a subset of protein encoding genes, including the G1 cyclins, is dramatically reduced in the mutant cells. Here we demonstrate that the ability of the ts13 allele of TAFII250 to acetylate histones in vitro is temperature sensitive suggesting that this enzymatic activity is compromised at 39.5°C in the mutant cells. Mutagenesis of a putative acetyl coenzyme A binding site produced a TAFII250 protein that displayed significantly reduced histone acetyltransferase activity but retained TBP and TAFII150 binding. Expression of this mutant in ts13 cells was unable to complement the cell cycle arrest or transcriptional defect observed at 39.5°C. These data suggest that TAFII250 acetyltransferase activity is required for cell cycle progression and regulates the expression of essential proliferative control genes.

Down-regulation of nuclear protein ICBP90 by p53/p21Cip1/WAF1-dependent DNA-damage checkpoint signals contributes to cell cycle arrest at G1/S transition

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Arima ◽  
Toru Hirota ◽  
Christian Bronner ◽  
Marc Mousli ◽  
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Cycle Arrest

scholarly journals DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Xiao Chao ◽  
Cere E. Poovey ◽  
Ashley A. Privette ◽  
Gavin D. Grant ◽  
Hui Yan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

scholarly journals Cdc25A Serine 123 Phosphorylation Couples Centrosome Duplication with DNA Replication and Regulates Tumorigenesis

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 7442-7450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sathyavageeswaran Shreeram ◽  
Weng Kee Hee ◽  
Dmitry V. Bulavin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Centrosome Duplication ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cdc25a Phosphatase

ABSTRACT The cell division cycle 25A (Cdc25A) phosphatase is a critical regulator of cell cycle progression under normal conditions and after stress. Stress-induced degradation of Cdc25A has been proposed as a major way of delaying cell cycle progression. In vitro studies pointed toward serine 123 as a key site in regulation of Cdc25A stability after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). To address the role of this phosphorylation site in vivo, we generated a knock-in mouse in which alanine was substituted for serine 123. The Cdc25 S123A knock-in mice appeared normal, and, unexpectedly, cells derived from them exhibited unperturbed cell cycle and DNA damage responses. In turn, we found that Cdc25A was present in centrosomes and that Cdc25A levels were not reduced after IR in knock-in cells. This resulted in centrosome amplification due to lack of induction of Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation after IR specifically in centrosomes. Further, Cdc25A knock-in animals appeared sensitive to IR-induced carcinogenesis. Our findings indicate that Cdc25A S123 phosphorylation is crucial for coupling centrosome duplication to DNA replication cycles after DNA damage and therefore is likely to play a role in the regulation of tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Critical role of SMG7 in activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis in response to genotoxic stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Ho ◽  
Hongwei Luo ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yi Tang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Essential Step

AbstractCHK1 is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint kinase and its activation, which requires ATR and RAD17, leads to inhibition of DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Recently, we reported that SMG7 stabilizes and activates p53 to induce G1 arrest upon DNA damage; here we show that SMG7 plays a critical role in the activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis. Following genotoxic stress, SMG7-null cells exhibit deficient ATR signaling, indicated by the attenuated phosphorylation of CHK1 and RPA32, and importantly, unhindered DNA replication and fork progression. Through its 14-3-3 domain, SMG7 interacts directly with the Ser635-phosphorylated RAD17 and promotes chromatin retention of the 9-1-1 complex by the RAD17-RFC, an essential step to CHK1 activation. Furthermore, through maintenance of CHK1 activity, SMG7 controls G2-M transition and facilitates orderly cell cycle progression during recovery from replication stress. Taken together, our data reveals SMG7 as an indispensable signaling component in the ATR-CHK1 pathway during genotoxic stress response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document