Three proteins required for early steps in the protein secretory pathway also affect nuclear envelope structure and cell cycle progression in fission yeast

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-431
Author(s):  
Anna Matynia ◽  
Sandra S. Salus ◽  
Shelley Sazer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Block ◽  
Er Membrane

The Ran GTPase is an essential protein that has multiple functions in eukaryotic cells. Fission yeast cells in which Ran is misregulated arrest after mitosis with condensed, unreplicated chromosomes and abnormal nuclear envelopes. The fission yeast sns mutants arrest with a similar cell cycle block and interact genetically with the Ran system. sns-A10, sns-B2 and sns-B9 have mutations in the fission yeast homologues of S. cerevisiae Sar1p, Sec31p and Sec53p, respectively, which are required for the early steps of the protein secretory pathway. The three sns mutants accumulate a normally secreted protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), have an increased amount of ER membrane, and the ER/nuclear envelope lumen is dilated. Neither a post-ER block in the secretory pathway, nor ER proliferation caused by overexpression of an integral ER membrane protein, results in a cell cycle-specific defect. Therefore, the arrest seen in sns-A10, sns-B2 and sns-B9 is most likely due to nuclear envelope defects that render the cells unable to re-establish the interphase organization of the nucleus after mitosis. As a consequence, these mutants are unable to decondense their chromosomes or to initiate of the next round of DNA replication.

scholarly journals Compartmentalized nodes control mitotic entry signaling in fission yeast

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1872-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Deng ◽  
James B. Moseley
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Entry

Cell cycle progression is coupled to cell growth, but the mechanisms that generate growth-dependent cell cycle progression remain unclear. Fission yeast cells enter into mitosis at a defined size due to the conserved cell cycle kinases Cdr1 and Cdr2, which localize to a set of cortical nodes in the cell middle. Cdr2 is regulated by the cell polarity kinase Pom1, suggesting that interactions between cell polarity proteins and the Cdr1-Cdr2 module might underlie the coordination of cell growth and division. To identify the molecular connections between Cdr1/2 and cell polarity, we performed a comprehensive pairwise yeast two-hybrid screen. From the resulting interaction network, we found that the protein Skb1 interacted with both Cdr1 and the Cdr1 inhibitory target Wee1. Skb1 inhibited mitotic entry through negative regulation of Cdr1 and localized to both the cytoplasm and a novel set of cortical nodes. Skb1 nodes were distinct structures from Cdr1/2 nodes, and artificial targeting of Skb1 to Cdr1/2 nodes delayed entry into mitosis. We propose that the formation of distinct node structures in the cell cortex controls signaling pathways to link cell growth and division.

scholarly journals Cpc2, a Fission Yeast Homologue of Mammalian RACK1 Protein, Interacts with Ran1 (Pat1) Kinase To Regulate Cell Cycle Progression and Meiotic Development

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 4016-4027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen McLeod ◽  
Boris Shor ◽  
Anthony Caporaso ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Anchoring Protein ◽  
Signal Transduction Proteins ◽  
Green Fluorescent

ABSTRACT The Schizosaccharomyces pombe ran1/pat1 gene regulates the transition between mitosis and meiosis. Inactivation of Ran1 (Pat1) kinase is necessary and sufficient for cells to exit the cell cycle and undergo meiosis. The yeast two-hybrid interaction trap was used to identify protein partners for Ran1/Pat1. Here we report the identification of one of these, Cpc2. Cpc2 encodes a homologue of RACK1, a WD protein with homology to the β subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. RACK1 is a highly conserved protein, although its function remains undefined. In mammalian cells, RACK1 physically associates with some signal transduction proteins, including Src and protein kinase C. Fission yeast cells containing a cpc2 null allele are viable but cell cycle delayed. cpc2Δ cells fail to accumulate in G1 when starved of nitrogen. This leads to defects in conjugation and meiosis. Copurification studies show that although Cpc2 and Ran1 (Pat1) physically associate, Cpc2 does not alter Ran1 (Pat1) kinase activity in vitro. Using a Ran1 (Pat1) fusion to green fluorescent protein, we show that localization of the kinase is impaired in cpc2Δ cells. Thus, in parallel with the proposed role of RACK1 in mammalian cells, fission yeast cpc2 may function as an anchoring protein for Ran1 (Pat1) kinase. All defects associated with loss of cpc2 are reversed in cells expressing mammalian RACK1, demonstrating that the fission yeast and mammalian gene products are indeed functional homologues.

scholarly journals Fission Yeast Ste9, a Homolog of Hct1/Cdh1 and Fizzy-related, Is a Novel Negative Regulator of Cell Cycle Progression during G1-Phase

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1065-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kitamura ◽  
Hiromi Maekawa ◽  
Chikashi Shimoda
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin

When proliferating fission yeast cells are exposed to nitrogen starvation, they initiate conjugation and differentiate into ascospores. Cell cycle arrest in the G1-phase is one of the prerequisites for cell differentiation, because conjugation occurs only in the pre-Start G1-phase. The role ofste9 + in the cell cycle progression was investigated. Ste9 is a WD-repeat protein that is highly homologous to Hct1/Cdh1 and Fizzy-related. The ste9 mutants were sterile because they were defective in cell cycle arrest in the G1-phase upon starvation. Sterility was partially suppressed by the mutation in cig2 that encoded the major G1/S cyclin. Although cells lacking Ste9 function grow normally, the ste9 mutation was synthetically lethal with the wee1 mutation. In the double mutants ofste9 cdc10 ts, cells arrested in G1-phase at the restrictive temperature, but the level of mitotic cyclin (Cdc13) did not decrease. In these cells, abortive mitosis occurred from the pre-Start G1-phase. Overexpression of Ste9 decreased the Cdc13 protein level and the H1-histone kinase activity. In these cells, mitosis was inhibited and an extra round of DNA replication occurred. Ste9 regulates G1 progression possibly by controlling the amount of the mitotic cyclin in the G1-phase.

scholarly journals Novel Response to Microtubule Perturbation in Meiosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 4767-4781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hochwagen ◽  
Gunnar Wrobel ◽  
Marie Cartron ◽  
Philippe Demougin ◽  
Christa Niederhauser-Wiederkehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Surveillance Mechanism

ABSTRACT During the mitotic cell cycle, microtubule depolymerization leads to a cell cycle arrest in metaphase, due to activation of the spindle checkpoint. Here, we show that under microtubule-destabilizing conditions, such as low temperature or the presence of the spindle-depolymerizing drug benomyl, meiotic budding yeast cells arrest in G1 or G2, instead of metaphase. Cells arrest in G1 if microtubule perturbation occurs as they enter the meiotic cell cycle and in G2 if cells are already undergoing premeiotic S phase. Concomitantly, cells down-regulate genes required for cell cycle progression, meiotic differentiation, and spore formation in a highly coordinated manner. Decreased expression of these genes is likely to be responsible for halting both cell cycle progression and meiotic development. Our results point towards the existence of a novel surveillance mechanism of microtubule integrity that may be particularly important during specialized cell cycles when coordination of cell cycle progression with a developmental program is necessary.

scholarly journals The puc1 Cyclin Regulates the G1 Phase of the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle in Response to Cell Size

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Martı́n-Castellanos ◽  
Miguel A. Blanco ◽  
José M. de Prada ◽  
Sergio Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Close Relative ◽  
Cell Cycle Distribution ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
A Cell

Eukaryotic cells coordinate cell size with cell division by regulating the length of the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In fission yeast, the length of the G1 phase depends on a precise balance between levels of positive (cig1, cig2, puc1, and cdc13 cyclins) and negative (rum1 and ste9-APC) regulators of cdc2. Early in G1, cyclin proteolysis and rum1 inhibition keep the cdc2/cyclin complexes inactive. At the end of G1, the balance is reversed and cdc2/cyclin activity down-regulates both rum1 and the cyclin-degrading activity of the APC. Here we present data showing that the puc1 cyclin, a close relative of the Cln cyclins in budding yeast, plays an important role in regulating the length of G1. Fission yeast cells lacking cig1 and cig2 have a cell cycle distribution similar to that of wild-type cells, with a short G1 and a long G2. However, when thepuc1 + gene is deleted in this genetic background, the length of G1 is extended and these cells undergo S phase with a greater cell size than wild-type cells. This G1 delay is completely abolished in cells lacking rum1. Cdc2/puc1 function may be important to down-regulate the rum1 Cdk inhibitor at the end of G1.

scholarly journals Checkpoint Adaptation Precedes Spontaneous and Damage-Induced Genomic Instability in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Galgoczy ◽  
David P. Toczyski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Checkpoint Adaptation ◽  
Block Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Despite the fact that eukaryotic cells enlist checkpoints to block cell cycle progression when their DNA is damaged, cells still undergo frequent genetic rearrangements, both spontaneously and in response to genotoxic agents. We and others have previously characterized a phenomenon (adaptation) in which yeast cells that are arrested at a DNA damage checkpoint eventually override this arrest and reenter the cell cycle, despite the fact that they have not repaired the DNA damage that elicited the arrest. Here, we use mutants that are defective in checkpoint adaptation to show that adaptation is important for achieving the highest possible viability after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, but it also acts as an entrée into some forms of genomic instability. Specifically, the spontaneous and X-ray-induced frequencies of chromosome loss, translocations, and a repair process called break-induced replication occur at significantly reduced rates in adaptation-defective mutants. This indicates that these events occur after a cell has first arrested at the checkpoint and then adapted to that arrest. Because malignant progression frequently involves loss of genes that function in DNA repair, adaptation may promote tumorigenesis by allowing genomic instability to occur in the absence of repair.

scholarly journals The p21WAF1/CIP1 Promoter Is Methylated in Rat-1 Cells: Stable Restoration of p53-Dependent p21WAF1/CIP1 Expression after Transfection of a Genomic Clone Containing the p21WAF1/CIP1 Gene

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1291-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey A. Allan ◽  
Trevor Duhig ◽  
Moira Read ◽  
Mike Fried
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Uv Treatment ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Cpg Dinucleotides ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Block ◽  
Inducible Gene

ABSTRACT Rat-1 cells are used in many studies on transformation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Whereas UV treatment of Rat-1 cells results in apoptosis, X-ray treatment does not induce either apoptosis or a cell cycle block. X-ray treatment of Rat-1 cells results in both an increase of p53 protein and expression of the p53-inducible geneMDM2 but not the protein or mRNA of the p53-inducible p21WAF1/CIP1 gene, which in other cells plays an important role in p53-mediated cell cycle block. The lack of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression appears to be the result of hypermethylation of the p21WAF1/CIP1 promoter region, as p21WAF1/CIP1 protein expression could be induced by growth of Rat-1 cells in the presence of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine. Furthermore, sequence analysis of bisulfite-treated DNA demonstrated extensive methylation of cytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides in a CpG-rich island in the promoter region of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene. Stable X-ray-induced p53-dependent p21WAF1/CIP1 expression and cell cycle block were restored to a Rat-1 clone after transfection with a P1 artificial chromosome (PAC) DNA clone containing a rat genomic copy of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene. The absence of expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene may contribute to the suitability of Rat-1 cells for transformation, cell cycle, and apoptosis studies.

scholarly journals The Small Subunit Processome Is Required for Cell Cycle Progression at G1

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 5038-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Relay Cell ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

Without ribosome biogenesis, translation of mRNA into protein ceases and cellular growth stops. We asked whether ribosome biogenesis is cell cycle regulated in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and we determined that it is not regulated in the same manner as in metazoan cells. We therefore turned our attention to cellular sensors that relay cell size information via ribosome biogenesis. Our results indicate that the small subunit (SSU) processome, a complex consisting of 40 proteins and the U3 small nucleolar RNA necessary for ribosome biogenesis, is not mitotically regulated. Furthermore, Nan1/Utp17, an SSU processome protein, does not provide a link between ribosome biogenesis and cell growth. However, when individual SSU processome proteins are depleted, cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This arrest was further supported by the lack of staining for proteins expressed in post-G1. Similarly, synchronized cells depleted of SSU processome proteins did not enter G2. This suggests that when ribosomes are no longer made, the cells stall in the G1. Therefore, yeast cells must grow to a critical size, which is dependent upon having a sufficient number of ribosomes during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, before cell division can occur.

Deregulated expression of the RanBP1 gene alters cell cycle progression in murine fibroblasts

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (19) ◽  
pp. 2345-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Battistoni ◽  
G. Guarguaglini ◽  
F. Degrassi ◽  
C. Pittoggi ◽  
A. Palena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Gtpase Cycle

RanBP1 is a molecular partner of the Ran GTPase, which is implicated in the control of several processes, including DNA replication, mitotic entry and exit, cell cycle progression, nuclear structure, protein import and RNA export. While most genes encoding Ran-interacting partners are constitutively active, transcription of the RanBP1 mRNA is repressed in non proliferating cells, is activated at the G1/S transition in cycling cells and peaks during S phase. We report here that forced expression of the RanBP1 gene disrupts the orderly execution of the cell division cycle at several stages, causing inhibition of DNA replication, defective mitotic exit and failure of chromatin decondensation during the telophase-to-interphase transition in cells that achieve nuclear duplication and chromosome segregation. These results suggest that deregulated RanBP1 activity interferes with the Ran GTPase cycle and prevents the functioning of the Ran signalling system during the cell cycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document