scholarly journals Biphasic recruitment of TRF2 to DNA damage sites promotes non-sister chromatid homologous recombination repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (23) ◽  
pp. jcs219311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Gladys Mae Saquilabon Cruz ◽  
Sally Loyal Trinh ◽  
Xu-Dong Zhu ◽  
Michael W. Berns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair

scholarly journals Biphasic recruitment of TRF2 to DNA damage sites promotes non-sister chromatid homologous recombination repair

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Gladys Mae Saquilabon Cruz ◽  
Sally Loyal Trinh ◽  
Xu-Dong Zhu ◽  
Michael W. Berns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Mre11 Complex ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Step Mechanism

AbstractTRF2 binds to telomeric repeats and is critical for telomere integrity. Evidence suggests that it also localizes to non-telomeric DNA damage sites. However, this recruitment appears to be precarious and functionally controversial. We find that TRF2 recruitment to damage sites occurs by a two-step mechanism: the initial rapid recruitment (phase I) and stable and prolonged association with damage sites (phase II). Phase I is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent and requires the N-terminal basic domain. The phase II recruitment requires the C-terminal MYB/SANT domain and the iDDR region in the hinge domain, which is mediated by the MRE11 complex and is stimulated by hTERT. PARP-dependent recruitment of intrinsically disordered proteins contributes to transient displacement of TRF2 that separates two phases. TRF2 binds to the I-PpoI-induced DNA double-strand break sites, which is enhanced by the presence of complex damage and is dependent on PARP and the MRE11 complex. TRF2 depletion affects non-sister chromatid homologous recombination (HR) repair, but not HR between sister chromatids or non-homologous endjoining pathways. Our results demonstrate a unique recruitment mechanism and function of TRF2 at non-telomeric DNA damage sites.Summary StatementTRF2 is recruited to DNA double-strand break damage sites by a two-step mechanism and functions in non-sister chromatid homologous recombination repair

scholarly journals PARP1-dependent recruitment of the FBXL10-RNF68-RNF2 ubiquitin ligase to sites of DNA damage controls H2A.Z loading

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergely Rona ◽  
Domenico Roberti ◽  
Yandong Yin ◽  
Julia K Pagan ◽  
Harrison Homer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Complex ◽  
Recombination Repair

The mammalian FBXL10-RNF68-RNF2 ubiquitin ligase complex (FRRUC) mono-ubiquitylates H2A at Lys119 to repress transcription in unstressed cells. We found that the FRRUC is rapidly and transiently recruited to sites of DNA damage in a PARP1- and TIMELESS-dependent manner to promote mono-ubiquitylation of H2A at Lys119, a local decrease of H2A levels, and an increase of H2A.Z incorporation. Both the FRRUC and H2A.Z promote transcriptional repression, double strand break signaling, and homologous recombination repair (HRR). All these events require both the presence and activity of the FRRUC. Moreover, the FRRUC and its activity are required for the proper recruitment of BMI1-RNF2 and MEL18-RNF2, two other ubiquitin ligases that mono-ubiquitylate Lys119 in H2A upon genotoxic stress. Notably, whereas H2A.Z is not required for H2A mono-ubiquitylation, impairment of the latter results in the inhibition of H2A.Z incorporation. We propose that the recruitment of the FRRUC represents an early and critical regulatory step in HRR.

scholarly journals Proton Irradiation Increases the Necessity for Homologous Recombination Repair Along with the Indispensability of Non-Homologous End Joining

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaudia Szymonowicz ◽  
Adam Krysztofiak ◽  
Jansje van der Linden ◽  
Ajvar Kern ◽  
Simon Deycmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Proton Irradiation ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Particle Therapy ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
End Joining ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Technical improvements in clinical radiotherapy for maximizing cytotoxicity to the tumor while limiting negative impact on co-irradiated healthy tissues include the increasing use of particle therapy (e.g., proton therapy) worldwide. Yet potential differences in the biology of DNA damage induction and repair between irradiation with X-ray photons and protons remain elusive. We compared the differences in DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and survival of cells compromised in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR) or both, after irradiation with an equal dose of X-ray photons, entrance plateau (EP) protons, and mid spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) protons. We used super-resolution microscopy to investigate potential differences in spatial distribution of DNA damage foci upon irradiation. While DNA damage foci were equally distributed throughout the nucleus after X-ray photon irradiation, we observed more clustered DNA damage foci upon proton irradiation. Furthermore, deficiency in essential NHEJ proteins delayed DNA repair kinetics and sensitized cells to both, X-ray photon and proton irradiation, whereas deficiency in HRR proteins sensitized cells only to proton irradiation. We assume that NHEJ is indispensable for processing DNA DSB independent of the irradiation source, whereas the importance of HRR rises with increasing energy of applied irradiation.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Damage Response and Homologous Recombination Repair by microRNA in Human Cells Exposed to Ionizing Radiation

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1838
Author(s):  
Magdalena Szatkowska ◽  
Renata Krupa
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Radiation Induced

Ionizing radiation may be of both artificial and natural origin and causes cellular damage in living organisms. Radioactive isotopes have been used significantly in cancer therapy for many years. The formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is the most dangerous effect of ionizing radiation on the cellular level. After irradiation, cells activate a DNA damage response, the molecular path that determines the fate of the cell. As an important element of this, homologous recombination repair is a crucial pathway for the error-free repair of DNA lesions. All components of DNA damage response are regulated by specific microRNAs. MicroRNAs are single-stranded short noncoding RNAs of 20–25 nt in length. They are directly involved in the regulation of gene expression by repressing translation or by cleaving target mRNA. In the present review, we analyze the biological mechanisms by which miRNAs regulate cell response to ionizing radiation-induced double-stranded breaks with an emphasis on DNA repair by homologous recombination, and its main component, the RAD51 recombinase. On the other hand, we discuss the ability of DNA damage response proteins to launch particular miRNA expression and modulate the course of this process. A full understanding of cell response processes to radiation-induced DNA damage will allow us to develop new and more effective methods of ionizing radiation therapy for cancers, and may help to develop methods for preventing the harmful effects of ionizing radiation on healthy organisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document