Supramolecular Architectures Constructed by Strong Hydrogen Bonds. Crystal Structures of Novel One-Dimensional Polycatenane and Three-Dimensional Interpenetrated Network

2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 898-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Fang Zhu ◽  
Jian Fan ◽  
Taka-aki Okamura ◽  
Wei-Yin Sun ◽  
Norikazu Ueyama
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Supramolecular Architectures

scholarly journals Topological study of diverse hydrogen-bonded patterns found in a system of a nickel(II) complex and the sulfate anion

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-359
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Harvey ◽  
Sebastián Suarez ◽  
Pavel N. Zolotarev ◽  
Davide M. Proserpio ◽  
Ricardo Baggio
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Sulfate Anion ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Space Groups ◽  
Striking Resemblance ◽  
The Third ◽  
Reference Framework ◽  
Hydrogen Bonded

A nickel(II) coordination complex, bis[2,6-bis(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl-κN3)pyridine-κN]nickel(II) sulfate, [Ni(C19H13N5)2]SO4or [Ni(H2L)2]SO4, having four peripheral tetrahedrally oriented N—H donor units, combines with sulfate bridges to create hydrogen-bonded structures of varied dimensionality. The three crystal structures reported herein in the space groupsP212121,I\overline{4} andPccnare defined solely by strong charge-assisted N—H...O hydrogen bonds and contain disordered guests (water and dimethylformamide) that vary in size, shape and degree of hydrophilicity. Two of the compounds are channelled solids with three-dimensional structures, while the third is one-dimensional in nature. In spite of their differences, all three present a striking resemblance to the previously reported anhydrous relative [Guoet al.(2011).Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.27, 1517–1520], which is considered as the reference framework from which all three title compounds are derived. The hydrogen-bonded frameworks are described and compared using crystallographic and topological approaches.

Different supramolecular architectures mediated by different weak interactions in the crystals of three N-aryl-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamides

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 833-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Shakuntala ◽  
S. Naveen ◽  
N. K. Lokanath ◽  
P. A. Suchetan ◽  
M. Abdoh
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Intermolecular Interactions ◽  
Weak Interactions ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Shape Index ◽  
Intramolecular Interactions ◽  
Molecular Conformations ◽  
Supramolecular Architectures ◽  
The Relationship

The synthesis and evaluation of the pharmacological activities of molecules containing the sulfonamide moiety have attracted interest as these compounds are important pharmacophores. The crystal structures of three closely related N-aryl-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamides, namely N-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C14H13Cl2NO4S, (I), N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C14H13Cl2NO4S, (II), and N-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C16H19NO4S, (III), are described. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of two symmetry-independent molecules, while those of (II) and (III) contain one molecule each. The molecular conformations are stabilized by different intramolecular interactions, viz. C—H...O interactions in (I), N—H...Cl and C—H...O interactions in (II), and C—H...O interactions in (III). The crystals of the three compounds display different supramolecular architectures built by various weak intermolecular interactions of the types C—H...O, C—H...Cl, C—H...π(aryl), π(aryl)–π(aryl) and Cl...Cl. A detailed Hirshfeld surface analysis of these compounds has also been conducted in order to understand the relationship between the crystal structures. The d norm and shape-index surfaces of (I)–(III) support the presence of various intermolecular interactions in the three structures. Analysis of the fingerprint plots reveals that the greatest contribution to the Hirshfeld surfaces is from H...H contacts, followed by H...O/O...H contacts. In addition, comparisons are made with the structures of some related compounds. Putative N—H...O hydrogen bonds are observed in 29 of the 30 reported structures, wherein the N—H...O hydrogen bonds form either C(4) chain motifs or R 2 2(8) rings. Further comparison reveals that the characteristics of the N—H...O hydrogen-bond motifs, the presence of other interactions and the resultant supramolecular architecture is largely decided by the position of the substituents on the benzenesulfonyl ring, with the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring exerting little effect. On the other hand, the crystal structures of (I)–(III) display several weak interactions other than the common N—H...O hydrogen bonds, resulting in supramolecular architectures varying from one- to three-dimensional depending on the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring.

scholarly journals A Survey of Supramolecular Aggregation Based on Main Group Element⋯Selenium Secondary Bonding Interactions—A Survey of the Crystallographic Literature

Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward R. T. Tiekink
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Group Element ◽  
The Other ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Supramolecular Architectures ◽  
Main Group Element ◽  
Supramolecular Aggregation ◽  
Secondary Bonding

The results of a survey of the crystal structures of main group element compounds (M = tin, lead, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, and tellurium) for intermolecular M⋯Se secondary bonding interactions is presented. The identified M⋯Se interactions in 58 crystals can operate independent of conventional supramolecular synthons and can sustain zero-, one-, two, and, rarely, three-dimensional supramolecular architectures, which are shown to adopt a wide variety of topologies. The most popular architecture found in the crystals stabilized by M⋯Se interactions are one-dimensional chains, found in 50% of the structures, followed by zero-dimensional (38%). In the majority of structures, the metal center forms a single M⋯Se contact; however, examples having up to three M⋯Se contacts are evident. Up to about 25% of lead(II)-/selenium-containing crystals exhibit Pb⋯Se tetrel bonding, a percentage falling off to about 15% in bismuth analogs (that is, pnictogen bonding) and 10% or lower for the other cited elements.

scholarly journals Crystal structures of isomeric 3,5-dichloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide, 3,5-dichloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide and 3,5-dichloro-N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 673-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Shakuntala ◽  
S. Naveen ◽  
N. K. Lokanath ◽  
P. A. Suchetan
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Molecular Conformation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Aromatic Rings ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Π Interactions ◽  
Hydrogen Bonded

The crystal structures of three isomeric compounds of formula C14H13Cl2NO2S, namely 3,5-dichloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-benzenesulfonamide (I), 3,5-dichloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide (II) and 3,5-dichloro-N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide (III) are described. The molecules of all the three compounds are U-shaped with the two aromatic rings inclined at 41.3 (6)° in (I), 42.1 (2)° in (II) and 54.4 (3)° in (III). The molecular conformation of (II) is stabilized by intramolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π interactions. The crystal structure of (I) features N—H...O hydrogen-bondedR22(8) loops interconnectedvia C(7) chains of C—H...O interactions, forming a three-dimensional architecture. The structure also features π–π interactions [Cg...Cg= 3.6970 (14) Å]. In (II), N—H...O hydrogen-bondedR22(8) loops are interconnectedviaπ–π interactions [intercentroid distance = 3.606 (3) Å] to form a one-dimensional architecture running parallel to theaaxis. In (III), adjacentC(4) chains of N—H...O hydrogen-bonded molecules running parallel to [010] are connectedviaC—H...π interactions, forming sheets parallel to theabplane. Neighbouring sheets are linkedviaoffset π–π interactions [intercentroid distance = 3.8303 (16) Å] to form a three-dimensional architecture.

scholarly journals Crystal structures of 4-methoxy-N-(4-methylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide andN-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1388-1391
Author(s):  
Vinola Z. Rodrigues ◽  
C. P. Preema ◽  
S. Naveen ◽  
N. K. Lokanath ◽  
P. A. Suchetan
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Crystal Packing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Supramolecular Architecture ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Ring Form ◽  
Benzene Rings

Crystal structures of twoN-(aryl)arylsulfonamides, namely, 4-methoxy-N-(4-methylphenyl)benzenesulfonamide, C14H15NO3S, (I), andN-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide, C13H12FNO3S, (II), were determined and analyzed. In (I), the benzenesulfonamide ring is disordered over two orientations, in a 0.516 (7):0.484 (7) ratio, which are inclined to each other at 28.0 (1)°. In (I), the major component of the sulfonyl benzene ring and the aniline ring form a dihedral angle of 63.36 (19)°, while in (II), the planes of the two benzene rings form a dihedral angle of 44.26 (13)°. In the crystal structure of (I), N—H...O hydrogen bonds form infiniteC(4) chains extended in [010], and intermolecular C—H...πarylinteractions link these chains into layers parallel to theabplane. The crystal structure of (II) features N—H...O hydrogen bonds forming infinite one dimensionalC(4) chains along [001]. Further, a pair of C—H...O intermolecular interactions consolidate the crystal packing of (II) into a three-dimensional supramolecular architecture.

scholarly journals Crystal structures ofN-(3-fluorobenzoyl)benzenesulfonamide andN-(3-fluorobenzoyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-431
Author(s):  
P. A. Suchetan ◽  
S. Naveen ◽  
N. K. Lokanath ◽  
H. N. Lakshmikantha ◽  
K. S. Srivishnu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Stacking Interactions ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Π Interactions ◽  
Π Stacking ◽  
Benzene Rings

The crystal structures of twoN-(arylsulfonyl)arylamides, namelyN-(3-fluorobenzoyl)benzenesulfonamide, C13H10FNO3S, (I), andN-(3-fluorobenzoyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide, C14H12FNO3S, (II), are described and compared with related structures. The dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 82.73 (10)° in (I) compared to 72.60 (12)° in (II). In the crystal of (I), the molecules are linked by C—H...O and C—H...π interactions, resulting in a three-dimensional grid-like architecture, while C—H...O interactions lead to one-dimensional ribbons in (II). The crystals of both (I) and (II) feature strong but non-structure-directing N—H...O hydrogen bonds withR22(8) ring motifs. The structure of (I) also features π–π stacking interactions.

scholarly journals Crystal structures of [Mn(bdc)(Hspar)2(H2O)0.25]·2H2O containing MnO6+1capped trigonal prisms and [Cu(Hspar)2](bdc)·2H2O containing CuO4squares (Hspar = sparfloxacin and bdc = benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate)

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Zhe An ◽  
Jing Gao ◽  
William T. A. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Water Molecule ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Metal Ion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Trigonal Prism ◽  
Planar Geometry ◽  
Cationic Complex ◽  
Counter Ion ◽  
Square Planar

The syntheses and crystal structures of 0.25-aqua(benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato-κ2O,O′)bis(sparfloxacin-κ2O,O′)manganese(II) dihydrate, [Mn(C8H4O4)(C19H22F2N4O3)2(H2O)0.25]·2H2O or [Mn(bdc)(Hspar)2(H2O)0.25]·2H2O, (I), and bis(sparfloxacin-κ2O,O′)copper(II) benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate dihydrate, [Cu(C19H22F2N4O3)2](C8H4O4)·2H2O or [Cu(Hspar)2](bdc)·2H2O, (II), are reported (Hspar = sparfloxacin and bdc = benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate). The Mn2+ion in (I) is coordinated by twoO,O′-bidentate Hspar neutral molecules (which exist as zwitterions) and anO,O′-bidentate bdc dianion to generate a distorted MnO6trigonal prism. A very long bond [2.580 (12) Å] from the Mn2+ion to a 0.25-occupied water molecule projects through a square face of the prism. In (II), the Cu2+ion lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and a CuO4square-planar geometry arises from its coordination by twoO,O′-bidentate Hspar molecules. The bdc dianion acts as a counter-ion to the cationic complex and does not bond to the metal ion. The Hspar ligands in both (I) and (II) feature intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds, which closeS(6) rings. In the crystals of both (I) and (II), the components are linked by N—H...O, O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, generating three-dimensional networks.

scholarly journals Crystal structures of the dioxane hemisolvates ofN-(7-bromomethyl-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl)acetamide and bis[N-(7-dibromomethyl-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl)acetamide]

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1409-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Rosin ◽  
Wilhelm Seichter ◽  
Monika Mazik
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Lone Electron Pair ◽  
Electron Pair ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Supramolecular Network ◽  
Halogen Bonds ◽  
Host Interactions ◽  
Compound Ii ◽  
Noncovalent Bonding

The syntheses and crystal structures ofN-(7-bromomethyl-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl)acetamide dioxane hemisolvate, C11H10BrN3O·0.5C4H8O2, (I), and bis[N-(7-dibromomethyl-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl)acetamide] dioxane hemisolvate, 2C11H9Br2N3O·0.5C4H8O2, (II), are described. The molecules adopt a conformation with the N—H hydrogen pointing towards the lone electron pair of the adjacent naphthyridine N atom. The crystals of (I) are stabilized by a three-dimensional supramolecular network comprising N—H...N, C—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, as well as C—Br...π halogen bonds. The crystals of compound (II) are stabilized by a three-dimensional supramolecular network comprising N—H...N, C—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, as well as C—H...π contacts and C—Br...π halogen bonds. The structure of the substituent attached in the 7-position of the naphthyridine skeleton has a fundamental influence on the pattern of intermolecular noncovalent bonding. While the Br atom of (I) participates in weak C—Br...Oguestand C—Br...π contacts, the Br atoms of compound (II) are involved in host–host interactionsviaC—Br...O=C, C—Br...N and C—Br...π bonding.

Crystal structures and Hirshfeld surface analysis of four 1,4-bis(methoxyphenyl)-2,3-diazabuta-1,3-dienes: comparisons of the intermolecular interactions in related compounds

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligia R. Gomes ◽  
John N. Low ◽  
Nathasha R. de L. Correira ◽  
Thais C.M. Noguiera ◽  
Alessandra C. Pinheiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Intermolecular Interactions ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Π Interactions ◽  
Isomeric Compound ◽  
Related Compounds

Abstract The crystal structures of four azines, namely 1-3-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,3-diaza-1,4-butadiene, 1, 1,3-bis(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,3-diaza-1,4-butadiene, 2, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2,3-diaza-1,4-butadiene, 3, and 1,3-bis(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2,3-diaza-1,4-butadiene, 4, are reported. Molecules of 3 and 4, and both independent molecules of 2, Mol A and Mol B, possess inversion centers. The central C=N–N=C units in each molecule is planar with an (E,E) conformation. The intermolecular interactions found in the four compounds are C–H···O, C–H–N, C–H---π and π---π interactions. However, there is no consistent set of intermolecular interactions for the four compounds. Compound, 1, has a two-dimensional undulating sheet structure, generated from C–H···O and C–H···N intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The only recognized intermolecular interaction in 2 is a C–H···O hydrogen bond, which results in a zig-zag chain of alternating molecules, Mol A and Mol B. While 3 forms a puckered sheet of molecules, solely via C–H···π interactions, its isomeric compound, 4, has a more elaborate three-dimensional structure generated from a combination of C–H···O hydrogen bonds, C–H···π and π···π interactions. The findings in this study, based on both PLATON and Hirshfeld approaches, for the four representative compounds match well the reported structural findings in the literature of related compounds, which are based solely on geometric parameters.

Polysulfonylamine, CLXXXIX [1]. Weitere Beispiele für die O-Protonierung von Harnstoffen mit Di(organosulfonyl)aminen: Bildung und Kristallstrukturen von 1,1-Dimethyluroniumdi( 4-fluorbenzolsulfonyl)amid und Di(1-methylharnstoff)- hydrogen(I)-di(4-fluorbenzolsulfonyl)amid/ Polysulfonylamines, CLXXXIX. Additional Examples of the O-Protonation of Ureas by Di(organosulfonyl)amines: Formation and Crystal Structures of 1,1-Dimethyluronium Di(4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl)amide and Di(1-methylurea)hydrogen(I)Di(4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl) amide

2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1363-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Wölper ◽  
Alejandra Rodríguez-Gimeno ◽  
Katherine Chulvi Iborra ◽  
Peter G. Jones ◽  
Armand Blaschette
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Proton Transfer ◽  
Petroleum Ether ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Monoclinic Space Group ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Bond Lengths ◽  
Ionic Compounds ◽  
Specific Elongation

Co-crystallization of N-methyl-substituted ureas with di(organosulfonyl)amines, (RSO2)2NH, leads unpredictably to either molecular co-crystals or, via proton transfer, to uronium salts. As a sequel to former reports, this communication describes the formation and the crystal structures of the new ionic compounds 1,1-dimethyluronium di(4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl)amide (1, monoclinic, space group P21/c, Z´ = 1) and di(1-methylurea)hydrogen(I) di(4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl)amide (2, triclinic, P1̄, Z´ = 1); both salts were obtained from dichloromethane/petroleum ether. In the structure of 2, the urea moieties of the cationic homoconjugate are connected by a very short [O-H· · ·O]+ hydrogen bond [d(O· · ·O) = 244.6(2) pm, θ (O-H· · ·O)≈170°, bridging H atom asymmetrically disordered over two positions]. The O-protonation induces a specific elongation of the C-O bond lengths to 131.2(2) pm in 1 or 129.5(2) and 127.4(2) pm in 2, as compared to literature data of ca. 126 pm for the unprotonated ureas. Both crystal structures are dominated by conventional two- and threecentre hydrogen bonds, which involve the OH and all NH donors and give rise to one-dimensional cation-anion arrays. In particular, the ionic entities of 1 are alternatingly associated into simple chains propagated by glide-plane operations parallel to the c axis, whereas the donor-richer structure of 2 displays inversion symmetric dimers of formula units, which are further hydrogen-bonded into strands propagated by translation parallel to the a axis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document