scholarly journals Single and Dual-Task Tandem Gait Performance Throughout Concussion Recovery

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5S) ◽  
pp. 478
Author(s):  
Jessie R. Oldham ◽  
Melissa S. DiFabio ◽  
Kelsey Bryk ◽  
Ryan M. DeWolf ◽  
Thomas W. Kaminski ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie R. Oldham ◽  
David R. Howell ◽  
Christopher A. Knight ◽  
Jeremy R. Crenshaw ◽  
Thomas A. Buckley

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. P764-P764
Author(s):  
Mei Sian Chong ◽  
Laura Tay ◽  
Peng Chew Mark Chan ◽  
Noorhazlina Ali ◽  
Pamela Chew ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1254-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Howell ◽  
Anna N. Brilliant ◽  
William P. Meehan

Context The tandem gait test is a method for assessing dynamic postural control and part of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, versions 3 and 5. However, its reliability among child and adolescent athletes has yet to be established. Objective To examine the test-retest reliability of the single-task and dual-task tandem gait test among healthy child and adolescent athletes. Design Descriptive laboratory study. Setting Sports injury-prevention center. Patients or Other Participants Uninjured and healthy athletes between the ages of 9 and 18 years. Intervention(s) Tandem gait measures repeated 3 times across the period of approximately 1 month. Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants completed the tandem gait test under single-task and dual-task (ie, while simultaneously executing a cognitive task) conditions. Our primary outcome measure was completion time during the single-task and dual-task conditions. We also assessed cognitive accuracy and response rate while participants completed the dual-task tandem gait test. Results Thirty-two child and adolescent athletes completed the study (mean age = 14.3 ± 2.4 years; females = 16). Single-task tandem gait times were similar across the 3 testing sessions (14.4 ± 4.8, 13.5 ± 4.2, and 13.8 ± 4.8 seconds; P = .45). Dual-task tandem gait times steadily improved across the test timeline (18.6 ± 6.9, 16.6 ± 4.5, and 15.8 ± 4.7 seconds; P = .02). Bivariate correlations indicated moderately high to high agreement from test 1 to test 2 (single-task r = .627; dual-task r = 0.655) and from test 2 to test 3 (single-task r = 0.852; dual-task r = 0.775). Both the single-task (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC [3,1] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73, 0.93) and dual-task (ICC [3,1] = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.69, 0.92) conditions demonstrated high reliability across testing sessions. Conclusions Tandem gait outcome measures demonstrated high test-retest reliability in both the single- and dual-task conditions. The overall reliability was within the acceptable range for clinical practice, but improvements across tests suggested a moderate practice effect. Tandem gait represents a reliable, dynamic, postural-control test that requires minimal space, cost, and time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7590
Author(s):  
Kazushige Oshita ◽  
Sumio Yano

This study investigated the effects of haptic sensory input by different types of clothing worn on gait performance. Twelve healthy men performed normal and tandem gait tests with blindfolds under three different clothing conditions: (1) wearing only half tights (HT); (2) wearing a skirt-like draped outfit such as a cotton cloth wrapped around the waist and extended to the lower leg (DC); and (3) wearing a trouser-like outfit such as tracksuit bottoms (TS). Although gait speed was significantly increased in DC as compared with HT, this was not observed in TS. Missteps during tandem gait were significantly reduced with DC. In addition, DC made walking easier for individuals as compared with TS. These findings suggest that wearing a skirt-like outfit such as kilts in Scotland or the hakama in Japan may provide haptic sensory cues to enhance individuals’ perceptions of their body orientation as compared with trouser-like clothing that is in continuous contact with the legs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Gaßner ◽  
Franz Marxreiter ◽  
Simon Steib ◽  
Zacharias Kohl ◽  
Johannes C. M. Schlachetzki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gu Eon Kang ◽  
Mohsen Zahiri ◽  
Brian Lepow ◽  
Nimrah Saleem ◽  
Bijan Najafi

Objective: People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) have impaired gait and balance performance. The aim of this study is to investigate therapeutic effectiveness of mechanical stimulation through a wearable foot compression device equipped in a shoe insole on vibration perception, balance control and gait performance in people with DPN. Methods: Using a single-arm 4-week intervention study design, we examined effectiveness of daily use of shoes equipped with the foot compression device (Footbeat™, AVEX, Grand Junction, CO, USA) on improving vibration perception threshold (VPTmax), skin perfusion pressure (SPP), ankle brachial index (ABI), lower extremities edema (circumferences in the calf and ankle), and motor performance (postural sway with eyes open and closed conditions, and gait performance during normal, dual-task and fast walking). Thirty people with type 2 diabetes and symptoms of PN completed the experimental protocol. Results: Improvements in VPTmax (before = 27.4 V, after = 23.3 V, P = .007, d = 0.33, where d denotes effect size), center-of-mass sway in the mediolateral direction with both eyes open and closed conditions (before = 0.94 cm, after = 0.76 cm, P = .020, d = 0.47; before = 1.10 cm, after = 0.83 cm, P = .033, d = 0.66, respectively), and stride velocity for normal walking, dual-task walking and fast walking tasks (before = 0.87 m/s, after = 0.96 m/s, P = .017, d = 0.41; before = 0.75 m/s, after = 0.91 m/s, P = .001, d = 0.77; before = 1.10 m/s, after = 1.20 m/s, P = .043, d = 0.33, respectively) were found post treatment. There was no significant improvement in SPP, ABI, and circumferences in the calf and ankle. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the wearable foot compression device may be effective for reducing neuropathic symptoms and enhancing motor performances in people with DPN.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S335-S335
Author(s):  
Inbar Hillel ◽  
Laura Avanzino ◽  
Andrea Cereatti ◽  
Marcel Olde Rikkert ◽  
Silvia Del Din ◽  
...  

Abstract We compared in-lab usual-walking (UW) and dual-task walking (DTW) to daily-living measures of gait obtained during 24/7 monitoring. In-lab gait features (e.g., gait speed, step and stride regularity) derived from UW and DTW were compared to the same gait features during daily-living in 150 elderly fallers (age: 76.5±6.3 years, 37.6% men). Features were extracted from a lower-back accelerometer. In daily-living setting, subjects wore the device for one week and pre-processing detected 30-second walking bouts. A histogram of all walking bouts was determined for each walking feature for each subject, then each subject’s typical, worst and best values were determined. Statistics of reliability were assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman. As expected, in-lab gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity were worse during DTW, compared to UW. Gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity during UW were significantly higher (i.e., better) from the typical daily-living values (p<0.0001) and different (p<0.000) from the worst and best values. DTW values tended to be similar to typical daily-living values (p=0.205, p=0.053, p=0.013 respectively). ICC assessment and Bland-Altman plots indicated that in-lab values do not reliably reflect the daily-walking values. Gait values during relatively long daily-living walking bouts are more similar to the corresponding values obtained in the lab during DTW, as compared to UW. Still, gait performance during most daily-living walking bouts are worse than that measured in-lab and do not reliably reflect each other. That is, an older adult’s typical daily-living gait cannot be estimated by simply measuring walking in a structured, laboratory setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document