scholarly journals Forebrain ischemia-induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) induction, neuronal apoptosis and drug action in rats

1996 ◽  
Vol 108 (supplement) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki NOMURA ◽  
Tomohiro MIYASAKA ◽  
Itsuko BABA ◽  
Takashi UEHARA
1997 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1639-1647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine E Tseng ◽  
Malcolm V Brock ◽  
Mary S Lange ◽  
Mary E Blue ◽  
Juan C Troncoso ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 304 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kunz ◽  
G Walker ◽  
J Pfeilschifter

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is expressed in renal mesangial cells in response to two principal classes of activating signals that interact in a synergistic fashion. These two groups of activators comprise inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1 beta or tumour necrosis factor alpha and agents that elevate cellular levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP). We examined whether dexamethasone differentially affects iNOS induction in response to IL-1 beta and a membrane-permeable cAMP analogue, N6,O-2′-dibutyryladenosine 3′,5′-phosphate (Bt2cAMP). Nanomolar concentrations of dexamethasone suppress IL-1 beta- as well as Bt2cAMP-induced iNOS protein expression and production of nitrite, the stable end product of nitric oxide (NO) formation. In contrast, dexamethasone prevents induction of iNOS mRNA in response to Bt2cAMP without affecting IL-1 beta-triggered increase in iNOS mRNA levels. These data suggest that dexamethasone acts at different levels, depending on the stimulus used to suppress iNOS induction in mesangial cells.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 544
Author(s):  
Richi Nakatake ◽  
Masaya Kotsuka ◽  
Yuki Hashimoto ◽  
Masahiko Hatta ◽  
Morihiko Ishizaki ◽  
...  

Background: Intracellular glutathione (GSH) plays an important regulatory role in the host response to liver injury. However, there have been few scientific reports on the anti-inflammatory effects of GSH. In the inflamed liver, proinflammatory cytokines stimulate liver cells, followed by expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Excessive nitric oxide (NO) levels produced by iNOS are one of the factors involved in liver injury. Therefore, inhibiting iNOS induction is important for preventing liver injury. This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of GSH on the liver by examining interleukin (IL)-1β-stimulated hepatocytes.Methods: Primary cultured rat hepatocytes were treated with IL-1β in the presence or absence of GSH. Induction of iNOS and its signaling pathway were analyzed.Results: Addition of GSH decreased IL-1β-induced iNOS protein and mRNA expression levels, which resulted in inhibition of NO production. GSH also decreased tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6 mRNA expression. GSH blocked “type I IL-1 receptor upregulation”, one of the essential signaling pathways for iNOS induction, through inactivation of an upstream kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt. In contrast, GSH had no effects on degradation of IκB and activation of NF-ĸB (nuclear translocation and its DNA binding). Transfection experiments revealed that GSH reduced iNOS mRNA levels at the promoter transactivation and mRNA stabilization steps. Delayed administration of GSH after IL-1β addition also inhibited iNOS induction. Conclusions: Our study suggests that GSH affects induction of inflammatory mediators, including iNOS and TNF-α, indicating its therapeutic potential for organ injuries, especially for the liver.Keywords: glutathione, inducible nitric oxide synthase, liver injury, primary cultured hepatocytes, type I interleukin-1 receptor, tumor necrosis factor-α


1996 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude R. Roland ◽  
Bashoo Naziruddin ◽  
T. Mohanakumar ◽  
M. Wayne Flye

1997 ◽  
Vol 273 (5) ◽  
pp. G1101-G1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Long Zheng ◽  
Keith A. Sharkey ◽  
Morley D. Hollenberg

The induction in vitro of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in intact gastric circular (CM) and longitudinal (LM) smooth muscle preparations was evaluated 1) pharmacologically, by the appearance of 1 mM l-arginine (l-Arg)-induced relaxation in a precontracted tissue; 2) biochemically, according to the appearance of iNOS mRNA using a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; and 3) immunohistochemically, using an iNOS-specific antibody. Functionally, iNOS induction affected the contractile properties of the CM but not the LM preparation. The time course of iNOS induction monitored pharmacologically paralleled exactly the appearance of iNOS mRNA. The relaxant response to l-Arg in iNOS-induced CM tissues was blocked by the iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine and by the guanylyl cyclase inhibitor LY-83583. The addition of oxyhemoglobin to the organ bath also attenuated the relaxant response, but tetrodotoxin had no effect. The transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D completely blocked iNOS induction as assessed by both pharmacological and biochemical criteria. In iNOS-induced preparations the iNOS immunoreactivity was not detected in the smooth muscle elements but was localized in a layer of macrophage-related cells that were in apposition to the CM smooth muscle elements. We conclude that the spontaneous induction of iNOS in rat gastric tissue can affect the pharmacomechanical reactivity of the CM elements and that this regulation of the CM contractility is due to the induction of iNOS in a set of macrophage-related cells that are closely apposed to the CM elements so that they selectively affect only the contractility of the CM preparation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document