scholarly journals Doses from cervical spine computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (1085) ◽  
pp. 20170834 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R Holroyd ◽  
Sue Edyvean

Objective: To review doses to patients undergoing cervical spine CT examinations in the UK. Methods: A data collection form was developed and distributed to medical physicists and radiographers via e-mail distribution lists. The form requested details of CT scanners, exposure protocols and patient dose index information. Results: Data were received for 73 scanners. It was seen that 97% of scanners used automatic exposure control, and 60% of scanners used an iterative reconstruction technique for cervical spine examinations. The majority of scans were taken at 120 kV. The average patient dose indicators in terms of CT dose index (CTDIvol) ranged from 3.5 to 39.7 mGy (mean value 16.7 mGy), and for the DLP, ranged from 87 to 1030 mGy cm (mean value 379 mGy cm) as quoted for the standard 32 cm phantom. Conclusion: The rounded third quartile value of the mean dose distributions from this study were a CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 20 mGy and a dose–length product of 440 mGy cm as quoted for a 32 cm body phantom. These are significantly higher than those in the 2011 Public Health England CT dose survey when adjusted for phantom size. It is suggested that the existing national diagnostic reference levels for cervical spine CT should be amended, both with the new values and also to quote according to the 32 cm phantom. Advances in knowledge: Proposed new national diagnostic reference levels are presented for cervical spine CT examinations.

Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia H. McCollough ◽  
Shuai Leng ◽  
Lifeng Yu ◽  
Dianna D. Cody ◽  
John M. Boone ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
T Amalaraj ◽  
Duminda Satharasinghe ◽  
Aruna Pallewatte ◽  
Jeyasingam Jeyasugiththan

Abstract The main purpose of this study was to establish the national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for common CT procedures for the first time in Sri Lanka. Patient morphometric, exposure parameters, and dose data such as volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were collected from 5666 patients who underwent 22 procedure types. The extreme dose values were filteblue before analysis to ensure that the data comes from standard size patients. The median of the dose distribution was calculated for each institution, and the third quartile value of the median distribution was consideblue as the NDRL. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4592 patients data from 17 procedure types were consideblue for NDRL establishment covering 41\% of the country's total CT machines. The proposed NDRLs based on CTDIvol and DLP for non-contrast (NC) head:82.2 mGy/1556 mGy.cm, contrast-enhanced (CE) head: 82.2 mGy/1546 mGy.cm, chest-NC:7.4 mGy/350 mGy.cm, chest-CE:8.3 mGy/464 mGy.cm, abdomen NC:10.5 mGy/721 mGy.cm, abdomen arterial (A) phase:13.4 mGy/398 mGy.cm, abdomen venous (V) phase:10.8 mGy/460 mGy.cm, abdomen delay (D) phase:12.6 mGy/487 mGy.cm, sinus NC:30.2 mGy/452 mGy.cm, lumbar spine--NC:24.1 mGy/1123 mGy.cm, neck-NC:27.5 mGy/670 mGy.cm, high resolutions CT (HRCT) of chest:10.3 mGy/341 mGy.cm, kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) NC:19.4 mGy/929 mGy.cm, chest to pelvis (CAP) NC:10.8 mGy/801 mGy.cm, CAP-A:10.4 mGy/384 mGy.cm, CAP-V:10.5 mGy/534 mGy.cm and CAP-D:16.8 mGy/652 mGy.cm. Although the proposed NDRLs are comparable with other countries, the observed broad dose distributions between the CT machines within the country indicate that dose optimisation strategies for Sri Lanka should be implemented for most of the CT facilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
Mohamed M Abuzaid ◽  
Wiam Elshami ◽  
A El Serafi ◽  
T Hussien ◽  
J R McConnell ◽  
...  

Abstract This multicenter study evaluated computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) to contribute to establishing computed tomography (CT) national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Data from 240 patients, who underwent CT head, chest, abdomen–pelvis and urography examinations, were analyzed, including patient age, sex and weight, CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm). The proposed DRLs for each examination were calculated as the third quartile. DRLs are proposed using CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for CT head (67 and 1189, respectively), chest (8 and 302, respectively), abdomen–pelvis (28 and 1122, respectively) and urography (20 and 714, respectively). These values are comparable with the initial NDRLs and published international DRLs. Baseline values for International Radiology Center (IRC) CT DRLs were calculated on frequently performed CT examinations. Implementation of DRL values improves dose optimization based on procedures, scanner type and patient characteristics while maintaining acceptable image quality and diagnostic confidence.


2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512096142
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Fukushima ◽  
Akira Matsuda ◽  
Koji Koizumi ◽  
Maya Honda ◽  
Kazutaka Masamoto ◽  
...  

Background The major problems of computed tomography (CT) imaging include radiation exposure and severe artifacts caused by operative implants. Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the metal artifact reduction algorithm and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in postoperative low-dose (LD) spine CT. Material and Methods A CT torso phantom was scanned at standard-dose (SD) and LD settings. The CT images were reconstructed by three methods: hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR); metal artifact reduction; and MBIR. The radiation dose of the phantom imaging was evaluated by volume CT dose index (mGy), dose length product (DLP, mGy × cm), and effective dose (mSv). The image quality of the six images was visually evaluated and analyzed using Scheffe’s paired comparison method. The average preference of each method was calculated based on the comparative scores. The task transfer function (TTF) and noise power spectrum for HIR and MBIR were also measured. Results The respective radiation-dose-related parameters of the SD and LD conditions were: volume CT dose index = 10.2 and 1.2 mGy; DLP = 277.9 and 33.9 mGy × cm; and effective dose = 4.2 and 0.5 mSv. The average preference for diagnostic acceptability of MBIR at LD was not significantly different from the other reconstructions of SD data. MBIR successfully reduced metal artifacts in the LD condition. The 10% TTF was higher for HIR at SD and higher for MBIR at LD. Conclusion MBIR is useful for LD spine CT after spine surgery with metal implant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Amir Syahmi Mat Razali ◽  
Muhamad Zabidi Ahmad ◽  
Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib ◽  
Noor Diyana Osman

Abstract The aim of this study was to propose local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for the most common computed tomography (CT) examinations (including contrast and non-contrast scan phase) performed at Advanced Medical and Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia. A retrospective CT dose survey of 1488 subjects from January 2015 until December 2018 was performed at AMDI USM, Malaysia. The proposed DRLs were established at 50th and 75th percentile of dose distribution for all dose metrics (CT dose index [CTDI]; CTDIvol, CTDIw and dose–length product). The proposed LDRLs were compared with national DRLs and other established DRLs. The 10 most common CT examinations at AMDI were thorax–abdomen–pelvis (TAP) CT (46%), followed by pelvis CT (17%), abdomen–pelvis CT (10%), brain/head CT (9%) and other CT protocols. The local DRLs were established using the third quartile values of dose distribution and were categorized based on CT region protocols. Most of the proposed DRLs were exceeded the national DRLs (63%) and other international DRLs (67%). From the dose auditing, almost half of the recent dose data (for year 2018) exceeded the proposed local DRLs and the unusual dose were observed in TAP, brain/head and pelvis CT examinations. The unusual higher dose could be due to higher mAs settings, higher number of scan phase for contrast study and higher pitch factor. The local DRLs should be established for dose optimization and reduction of the occurrence of excessive radiation exposure to the patients. The establishment of the Ads and LDRLs should also consider all the factors that affect the variation in DRLs such as CT technology, scanning protocols and population characteristics. The local dose distribution should always be revised for improvement of the current local practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Chanchal Kaushik ◽  
Inderjeet Singh Sandhu ◽  
A K Srivastava

Abstract The application of the kerma-area product (PKA) meter is increased rapidly in dosimetry. This study presents measurements of PKA in adherence to the International Atomic Energy Agency protocol for 300 adult patients in digital radiographic procedures. Effective doses (ED) were calculated from PKA measurements and conversion coefficients (E-103/PKA) obtained from the International Commission on radiological protection 103. In skull posteroanterior (PA), skull lateral (LAT), cervical spine anteroposterior (AP), cervical spine LAT, chest PA, abdomen AP, lumbar spine AP, pelvis AP and lumbar spine LAT, the third-quartile PKA values were found to be 0.2, 0.28, 0.33, 0.19, 0.26, 0.95, 0.93, 0.96 and 3.15 Gycm2, and estimated mean EDs were 0.005, 0.008, 0.056, 0.021, 0.037, 0.146, 0.165, 0.097 and 0.258 mSv, respectively. The third-quartile PKA values were suggested as local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs). Results were compared with the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of the UK, the European Commission, previously published LDRLs in Greece and China by Metaxas et al. and Zhang and Chu, respectively. The PKA (third-quartile) value for cervical spine AP was 120% higher than UK 2010 DRLs, lumbar spine LAT was 123% higher than LDRLs given by Metaxas et al. and chest PA was 160% higher than UK 2010 DRLs and 225% higher than Metaxas et al. provided LDRLs. The PKA results were lower than the UK, and two studies in Greece by Metaxas et al. except for chest PA, cervical spine AP and lumbar spine LAT showed the need for further optimization. The LDRLs reported in this study may further contribute to establishing future national DRLs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-451
Author(s):  
Ayşegül Yurt ◽  
İsmail Özsoykal ◽  
Recep Kandemir ◽  
Emel Ada

Abstract Purpose This study aims to develop local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the most common computed tomography (CT) examinations carried out around Izmir, Turkey. Methods Five common CT examinations (head, neck, chest, abdomen–pelvis (AP), chest–abdomen–pelvis (CAP)) from four different radiology centres have been included in the study. CT dose index-volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) values were recorded for 50 patients per exam in each centre. Third quartiles of CTDIvol and DLP values were determined as DRLs and compared with international findings. Results 51.3% of the patients were male and 48.7% were female, with a mean age of 57 (between 18 and 93). DRLs for CTDIvol were recorded as 70, 16, 15, 23 and 16 for head, neck, chest, AP and CAP examinations, respectively, while the corresponding DLPs were 1385, 604, 567, 998 and 1180 mGy.cm. Conclusion Results are mostly comparable to the latest international data, except for the head examinations, which were observed to slightly exceed the DRLs established by other countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document