MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer patients: outcome comparison between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus TME and TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy or TME alone

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1120) ◽  
pp. 20201221
Author(s):  
Xiaoxuan Jia ◽  
Peiyi Xie ◽  
Liang Bi ◽  
Xiaochun Meng ◽  
Ziqiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Venous Invasion ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Outcome Comparison

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) would improve the outcome of patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) or TME alone. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 362 patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer who were treated with NCRT plus TME, TME plus ACT, or TME alone between January 2008 and August 2018. Cases with a high-risk tumor stage, positive extramural venous invasion, or mesorectal fascia involvement on baseline MRI were considered cases of high-risk rectal cancer. We matched patients treated with NCRT plus TME to patients treated with TME plus ACT and to those treated with TME alone. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: The cumulative 3 year LR rate in the matched NCRT plus TME group was more favorable than in the TME plus ACT group (0% vs 5.1%; p = 0.037; n = 98) and in the TME alone group (0% vs 11.5%; p = 0.016; n = 61). Patients who received NCRT plus TME demonstrated better cumulative 3 year DFS rates than patients treated with TME plus ACT (85.7% vs 65.3%; p = 0.009) or with TME alone (86.9% vs 68.9%; p = 0.046). No difference in OS was observed among the groups. Conclusion: NCRT may improve DFS and LR rates in patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer when compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone. Advances in knowledge: This study illustrated the specific benefit of NCRT on the outcome measures of MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone, which was not clearly clarified in previous studies enrolling all patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer.

Tumor Diameter Is an Easy and Useful Predictor of Recurrence in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiyo Maeda ◽  
Eiji Hidaka ◽  
Yuichi Mori ◽  
Shumpei Mukai ◽  
Hideyuki Miyachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Venous Invasion ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

Background/Aims: Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) can generally be administered to high-risk subgroups. To better identify these patients, we aimed at assessing factors that affect recurrence. Methods: In our hospital, 432 colon and 96 rectal stage II cancer patients who underwent surgical resection between 2001 and 2011 were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Age, sex, lymphatic vessel invasion, venous invasion, tumor diameter, tumor depth, histological type, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, number of sampled nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy, morphology, surgical approach, anastomotic leakage, preoperative bowel obstruction, and preoperative perforation were retrospectively compared between the groups. Results: For colon cancer, multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between tumor diameter ≥40 mm and recurrence (p = 0.039). For rectal cancer, multivariate analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥50 mm (p = 0.001) and ≤12 sampled nodes (p = 0.021) were associated with recurrence. Tumor diameter in rectal cancer was associated with worse disease-free survival (p = 0.026). Conclusion: Tumor diameter is a significant predictor of recurrence in stage II CRC. This is an important finding because tumor diameter is easy to evaluate clinically and might help to identify candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Impact on overall survival and disease-free survival of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14173-e14173
Author(s):  
Rafael amaral de Castro ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Paiva ◽  
Rogerio Saad-Hossne ◽  
Odair Carlito Michelin ◽  
Cristiano de padua Souza
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Group 1

e14173 Background: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer with 2,4 million people diagnosed. The rectal cancer (RC) is 27% of these cases. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has become standard but brought controversy in the adjuvant treatment. The objective was to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after NCRT. Methods: Between mar/96 and Oct/2010, 84 patients received NCRT, and 58 patients underwent resection of the rectum. The NCRT consisted of 5-FU 350mg/m2, D1-D5 (50% of cases) or 5-FU 425mg/m2, D1-D3 (43%) with LV 20mg/m2 bolus in the 1st and 5th week of the 25 sessions of radiotherapy in linear accelerator (total 45 - 50 Gy). When performed, Adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJC) consisted of 5-FU 425mg/m2, LV 20mg/m2, both on D1-D5 for 4 cycles. Evaluation of Overall Survival (O.S) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) performed using Kaplan-Meier curve in SPSS version 13.0 Results: Of the 58 patients who underwent surgery, 90% were stage II, 51% occurred in the lower rectum and 66% were ECOG 1. Pathologic Complete Response (PCR) was obtained in 25.8% (15) of patients (group 1). Of these, 20% (3) received ADJC. Patients without PCR (group 2) received ADJC in 51% of the cases (22). The mean follow-up was 41 months. Both the DFS (HR: 2.594, 95% CI: 1134-5938, p = 0.024) and OS (HR: 2.615, 95% CI: 1005-6807, p = 0.0488) were higher in patients with PCR independent of the use of ADJC. On the other hand, patient treated with ADJC vs without ADJC, independent of presence of PCR, did not alter DFS (p = 0.74) or OS (p = 0.32). In PCR patients, ADJC do not interfere in the outcome (DFS, p = 0.76; SG, p = 0.73). In group 2 (patients without PCR), the subgroup with ADJC, there was a trend towards better SLD (p = 0.06) and OS (p = 0.06). Those who did not receive ADJC in group 2 had worse SLD (p = 0.011) and OS (p = 0.028) compared with group-1. Conclusions: Adjuvant treatment after NCRT did not increase OS or DFS. Patients without PRC had worse results without ADJC, compared to those with PCR. The first, probably, the subgroup of patients who benefited most from the use of ADJC. PCR improves OS and DFS regardless of ADJC, being perhaps the group that does not deserve ADJC.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Gemcitabine-Oxaliplatin (GeMOX) after Curative Surgery in High-risk Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. CMO.S3360
Author(s):  
Bernard Paule ◽  
Paola Andreani ◽  
Marie-Pierre Bralet ◽  
Catherine Guettier ◽  
René Adam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival Rate ◽  
Disease Free

Background There is no standard adjuvant chemotherapy to prevent recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare cancer with poor prognosis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of GEMOX on intrahepatic and hilar CCA with high-risk factors after curative surgery. Patients and Methods Twenty two patients (mean age: 57 years old) with CCA received 6 cycles of GEMOX: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 2, q3w after a curative surgery. Results All patients completed 6 cycles of GEMOX. EGFR membranous expression was present in 20 CCA. The 5-year survival rate was 56% (CI 95%: 25.7–85.4); 2-year disease free survival rate was 28% (CI 95%: 3.4–52.6). Median time to progression was 15 months. The rate of recurrence after surgery and chemotherapy was 63% (14/22). Two patients died of disease progression. Twelve patients received cetuximab/GEMOX at the time of relapse. Six died after 12 months (9–48 months), three are still alive suggesting a clinical applicability of EGFR inhibitors in CCA. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy with GEMOX alone seems ineffective in intrahepatic and hilar CCA with a high risk of relapse. Additional studies including targeted therapies to circumvent such poor chemosensitivity are needed.

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy for bladder cancer: an update.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 1590-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
C J Logothetis ◽  
D E Johnson ◽  
C Chong ◽  
F H Dexeus ◽  
A Sella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Nodal Metastases ◽  
Pathological Findings ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Disease Free

Seventy-one patients received adjuvant Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide; Bristol-Myers Co, Evansville, IN), Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cisplatin (CISCA) chemotherapy between March 1981 and March 1986. Patients received adjuvant CISCA chemotherapy if they had pathological findings that were thought to predict for high likelihood of relapse. These included the presence of resected nodal metastases, extravesicular involvement of tumor, lymphatic/vascular permeation of the primary tumor, or pelvic visceral invasion. Sixty-two patients at a similar high risk for recurrence did not receive adjuvant CISCA chemotherapy because they refused, had medical contraindications to therapy, or were not referred for chemotherapy. Two-hundred six patients had a cystectomy performed during the same study period but had none of the poor prognostic features suggesting a high risk for relapse. Sixty-two percent of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy are alive and disease-free for a mean follow-up of 118 weeks (range, 28 to 310 weeks). A survival advantage exists for the adjuvant-treated patients when compared with those with unfavorable pathological findings who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (70% v 37%) (P = .00012): no difference exists in long-term disease-free survival for those with favorable pathological findings (long-term disease-free survival 76%) v those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (70%) (P = .33). Adjuvant CISCA chemotherapy prolongs the disease-free survival of some patients following a cystectomy. Patients who benefitted from adjuvant CISCA chemotherapy included those with resected nodal metastases, extra-vesicular involvement of tumor, and direct invasion of the pelvic viscera. Patients not benefitting from adjuvant CISCA chemotherapy in this analysis included those with lymphatic/vascular invasion in their primary tumor as the sole manifestation of high risk for relapse.

Efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant therapy in ≥70-year-old patients with T3N0M0 colorectal cancer: An observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-631
Author(s):  
Abdullah Sakin ◽  
Nurgul Yasar ◽  
Suleyman Sahin ◽  
Serdar Arici ◽  
Saban Secmeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy in ≥70-year-old patients with stage IIA (T3N0M0) colorectal cancer. Methods Lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, margin positivity, dissected lymph node count of <12, and presence of perforation/obstruction were accepted as risk factors. Those patients with at least one risk factor were regarded as having high risk. Results The study included 168 patients, among which 95 (56.5%) were male and 73 (43.5%) were female. The median age of patients was 73 years (range: 70–94). One hundred one (60.1%) patients were identified to have high risk. Eighty-one (87%) patients received 5-flourouracil+leucovorin and 12 (13%) patients received capecitabine regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients receiving capecitabine regimen had significantly higher rates of dose reduction at initiation and during the treatment. Among low-risk group, there was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival (p = 0.528 and p = 0.217, respectively). In high-risk group, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy significantly differed from those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of median disease-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). While the grade, lymph node status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as the most significant independent factors for disease-free survival, the most significant factors for overall survival were the age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and recurrence. Conclusion The findings of our study showed improved disease-free survival and overall survival in high-risk ≥70-year-old patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy due to T3N0M0 colorectal cancer. We believe that 5-flourouracil+leucovorin or capecitabine regimens should be recommended for these older high-risk patients who could receive adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of age.

Evaluation of response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer as a predictive factor for the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2,724 individual patients.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 361-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Beets ◽  
M. Maas ◽  
P. J. Nelemans ◽  
V. Valentini ◽  
C. H. Crane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

361 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for rectal cancer increasingly results in pathologic response. It has been suggested that patients with different degrees of response might not have the same benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim was to determine whether patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR), ypT1-2 or ypT3-4 tumor after CRT for rectal cancer have different benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for disease-free survival. Methods: Authors from studies evaluating different degrees of response to CRT were contacted to share individual patient data. The collected individual patient data were pooled into one dataset. To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival multivariate analyses according to the Cox proportional hazards model were performed. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for 3 subgroups: patients with pCR(ypT0N0), ypT1-2 tumor and ypT3-4 tumor after CRT. To determine benefit of adjuvant chemo for different pathologic N-stages we performed subgroup analyses. Results: 2,724 patients were included. 811 had pCR (28%), 863 had ypT1-2 (30%) and 1050 had ypT3-4 (37%). Median follow-up was 50 months (range 0-277). 41% underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, which consisted mostly of 5-FU based chemotherapy. The HR with 95%CI for disease-free survival for adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.94 (0.50-1.78) for patients with pCR, 0.61 (0.40-0.92) for patients with ypT1-2 tumors and 0.97 (0.75-1.25) for patients with ypT3-4 tumors. ypT1-2N0 patients benefited most from adjuvant chemo: HR 0.45 (0.27-0.75) vs. 0.79 (0.31-1.95) for patients with ypT1-2N+. For ypT3-4 patients pN-stage did not alter benefit of adjuvant chemo. Conclusions: Patients with pCR or ypT3-4 residual tumor after CRT do not seem to benefit from adjuvant chemo. This might be due to the already good prognosis of patients with pCR and less responsiveness to 5-FU based chemotherapy in the poor responders (the ypT3-4 tumors). Possibly adjuvant chemotherapy can be omitted or adapted for these patients. Patients with ypT1-2N0 benefit most from adjuvant chemo. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Systematic Review: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with respect to Stage of Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shahab Hajibandeh ◽  
Shahin Hajibandeh
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background. Recent meta-analysis of 21 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) supports the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma. In order to define a subgroup of patients who can potentially benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, this study aims to review trials investigating adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to stage of disease in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone surgery for cure (stage II and stage III). Methods. We searched electronic information sources to identify randomised trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stages II and III rectal cancer with overall survival or disease-free survival as outcomes. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network notes on methodology were used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. Eight studies reporting total of 5527 patients were selected for analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival compared to surgery alone in both stage II and stage III cancer. Conclusions. This study indicates that both stage II and stage III rectal cancer patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who already had neoadjuvant chemoradiation still remain unknown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document