Periaortic air in native and post-operative aorta on computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansi Verma ◽  
Amit Ajit Deshpande ◽  
Niraj Nirmal Pandey ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Imaging Finding ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Catastrophic Event ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pictorial Review ◽  
Cross Sectional Imaging ◽  
Indispensable Tool

Periaortic air can be seen in various conditions which can be a benign imaging finding or harbinger of a catastrophic event. The causes vary in native aorta and post-operative aorta. A radiologist has an important part in the management process of these patients, as the treatment varies from conservative to radical surgery based on the aetiology. The presence of periaortic air seen in the light of various clinical, laboratory and radiological findings can guide the radiologist towards a particular aetiology. Cross-sectional imaging, mainly computed tomography, is an indispensable tool in recognising ectopic periaortic air and to identify the associated findings and eventually make an accurate diagnosis. We present a pictorial review of various causes of the periaortic air in native and postoperative aorta, the salient features and management of the described conditions.

Radiological findings of fibrocartilaginous coalition of the third tarsometatarsal joint: a retrospective cross-sectional study with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1541-1544
Author(s):  
Giancarlo MC Domingues ◽  
Taise T da Silva ◽  
André Y Aihara ◽  
Fabiano N Cardoso ◽  
Virgílio O Barreto
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
English Language ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Tarsal Coalition ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Third ◽  
Tarsometatarsal Joint

Background Fibrocartilaginous coalition of the third tarsometatarsal joint has been indicated as an extremely rare form of tarsal coalition in the radiological literature, and most articles concerned with tarsal coalition do not mention involvement of this joint. Only two reports written in the English language that approach this subject were found, an orthopedic report and an anthropological report. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of this finding and discuss and illustrate the radiological characteristics of this coalition. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis of 614 computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans of the ankle and/or foot, acquired at a health service within a period of three months, was performed to assess the prevalence of this coalition. Results Of the examinations characterized as valid for analysis for the purposes of the study, 17 cases compatible with fibrocartilaginous coalition of the third tarsometatarsal joint were found, thus indicating an involvement of approximately 2.97% of the examined feet. Conclusion Our radiological findings are typical, and the prevalence found in this study was statistically significant, being similar to that described in the anthropological report (3.2%–6.8%).

scholarly journals Imaging of the adrenal gland lesions

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Herr ◽  
Valdair F. Muglia ◽  
Walter José Koff ◽  
Antonio Carlos Westphalen
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Adrenal Gland ◽  
Photon Emission ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Cross Sectional Imaging ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Photon Emission Tomography

With the steep increase in the use of cross-sectional imaging in recent years, the incidentally detected adrenal lesion, or "incidentaloma", has become an increasingly common diagnostic problem for the radiologist, and a need for an approach to classifying these lesions as benign, malignant or indeterminate with imaging has spurred an explosion of research. While most incidentalomas represent benign disease, typically an adenoma, the possibility of malignant involvement of the adrenal gland necessitates a reliance on imaging to inform management decisions. In this article, we review the literature on adrenal gland imaging, with particular emphasis on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and photon-emission tomography, and discuss how these findings relate to clinical practice. Emerging technologies, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, dual-energy computed tomography, and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging will also be briefly addressed.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Radiological Assessment of Sub-axial Spinal Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Jawad Naqvi ◽  
Syed I Ali ◽  
Vinay Parmar ◽  
Chooi Oh ◽  
Simon Beardmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stability ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Image Interpretation ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pictorial Review ◽  
Thoracolumbar Injury ◽  
Cross Sectional Imaging

Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management. Several classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture. The aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.

Radiology of acute mastoiditis and its complications: a pictorial review and interpretation checklist

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 856-861
Author(s):  
M W Mather ◽  
P D Yates ◽  
J Powell ◽  
I Zammit-Maempel
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Acute Mastoiditis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Imaging Technology ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
Pictorial Review ◽  
Cross Sectional Imaging ◽  
Sectional Imaging

AbstractBackgroundMastoiditis is an otological emergency, and cross-sectional imaging has a role in the diagnosis of complications and surgical planning. Advances in imaging technology are becoming increasingly sophisticated and, by the same token, the ability to accurately interpret findings is essential.MethodsThis paper reviews common and rare complications of mastoiditis using case-led examples. A radiologist-derived systematic checklist is proposed, to assist the ENT surgeon with interpreting cross-sectional imaging in emergency mastoiditis cases when the opinion of a head and neck radiologist may be difficult to obtain.ResultsA 16-point checklist (the ‘mastoid 16’) was used on a case-led basis to review the radiological features of both common and rare complications of mastoiditis; this is complemented with imaging examples.ConclusionAcute mastoiditis has a range of serious complications that may be amenable to treatment, once diagnosed using appropriate imaging. The proposed checklist provides a systematic approach to identifying complications of mastoiditis.

scholarly journals Imaging review of the anterior skull base

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 205846011877648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Francies ◽  
Levan Makalanda ◽  
Dimitris Paraskevopolous ◽  
Ashok Adams
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Nasal Cavity ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Paranasal Sinuses ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Normal Anatomy ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cross Sectional Imaging ◽  
Sectional Imaging

The anterior skull base (ASB) is intimately associated with the unique soft tissue subtypes of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, orbits, and intracranial compartment. Pathology involving the ASB is rare but the causes are manifold and can be broadly subdivided into those intrinsic to the skull base and processes extending from below or above. Sinonasal pathology is the most commonly encountered and poses significant management challenges that rely heavily on accurate interpretation of the radiological findings. We illustrate the normal anatomy of the ASB and present a cross-sectional imaging review of the pathological entities that may be encountered, focusing on the specific features that will impact on clinical and surgical management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document