scholarly journals Accreditation System and Standards for Medical Education in Pakistan: It’s time we raise the bar

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahsan Sethi ◽  
Arshad Javaid
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Accreditation System

scholarly journals Osteopathic students and graduates matching into pathology residency, 2011–2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Ryan Philip Jajosky ◽  
Hannah C. Coulson ◽  
Abric J. Rosengrant ◽  
Audrey N. Jajosky ◽  
Philip G. Jajosky
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Senior Year ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Past ◽  
Residency Match

Abstract Context In the past decade, two changes have affected the pathology residency match. First, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) Match, which did not offer pathology residency, became accredited under a single graduate medical education (GME) system with the Main Residency Match (MRM), which offers pathology residency. Second, substantially fewer United States senior-year allopathic medical students (US MD seniors) matched into pathology residency. Objective To determine whether there were major changes in the number and percentage of osteopathic students and physicians (DOs) matching into pathology residency programs over the past decade. Methods Pathology match outcomes for DOs from 2011 to 2020 were obtained by reviewing AOA Match data from the National Matching Services and MRM data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). The number of DOs that filled pathology positions in the MRM was divided by the total number of pathology positions filled in the MRM to calculate the percentage of pathology positions taken by DOs. Results Over the past decade, there was a 109% increase in the total number of DOs matching into pathology residency (34 in 2011 vs. 71 in 2020). During this time, there was a 23.3% increase in the total number of pathology positions filled in the MRM (476 in 2011 vs. 587 in 2020). Thus, the percentage of pathology residency positions filled by DOs increased from 7.1% in 2011 to 12.1% in 2020. The substantial increase of DOs in pathology occurred simultaneously with a 94.2% increase in the total number of DOs filling AOA/MRM “postgraduate year 1” (PGY-1) positions (3201 in 2011 vs. 6215 in 2020). Thus, the percentage of DOs choosing pathology residency has remained steady (1.06% in 2011 and 1.14% in 2020). In 2020, pathology had the third lowest percentage of filled PGY-1 residency positions taken by DOs, out of 15 major medical specialties. Conclusion The proportion of DOs choosing pathology residency was stable from 2011 to 2020 despite the move to a single GME accreditation system and the stark decline in US MD seniors choosing pathology. In 2020, a slightly higher percentage of DOs (1.14%) chose pathology residency than US MD seniors (1.13%). Overall, DOs more often choose other medical specialties, including primary care. Additional studies are needed to determine why fewer US MD seniors, but not fewer DOs, are choosing pathology residency.

The Single Graduate Medical Education Accreditation System

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyd R. Buser ◽  
James Swartwout ◽  
Cheryl Gross ◽  
Maura Biszewski
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Graduate Medical

Understanding ACGME Scholarly Activity Requirements for General Surgery Programs in the Era of Single Accreditation and the Next Accreditation System

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Stella ◽  
Donna L. Lamb ◽  
Steven C. Stain ◽  
Paula M. Termuhlen
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Show Evidence ◽  
Next Accreditation System ◽  
Training Of Surgeons ◽  
To Receive

Becoming compliant with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements for scholarly activity and remaining compliant over time requires time and attention to the development of an environment of inquiry, which is reflected in detailed documentation submitted in program applications and annual updates. Since the beginning of the next accreditation system, all ACGME programs have been required to submit evidence of scholarly activity of both residents and faculty on an annual basis. Since 2014, American Osteopathic Association–accredited programs have been able to apply for ACGME accreditation under the Single Graduate Medical Education Accreditation initiative. The Residency Program Director, Chair, Designated Institutional Official, Faculty, and coordinator need to work cohesively to ensure compliance with all program requirements, including scholarly activity in order for American Osteopathic Association–accredited programs to receive Initial ACGME Accreditation and for current ACGME-accredited programs to maintain accreditation. Fortunately, there are many ways to show the type of scholarly activity that is required for the training of surgeons. In this article, we will review the ACGME General Surgery Program Requirements and definitions of scholarly activity. We will also offer suggestions for how programs may show evidence of scholarly activity.

scholarly journals A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation in Korea

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Ki-Young Lim
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Postgraduate Medical Education ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Systems Science ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
The Future ◽  
Basic Medical Education ◽  
Basic Medical

For the past 20 years, the medical education accreditation program of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) has contributed significantly to the standardization and improvement of the quality of basic medical education in Korea. It should now contribute to establishing and promoting the future of medical education. The Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 (ASK2019) have been adopted since 2019, with the goal of achieving world-class medical education by applying a learner-centered curriculum using a continuum framework for the 3 phases of formal medical education: basic medical education, postgraduate medical education, and continuing professional development. ASK2019 will also be able to promote medical education that meets community needs and employs systematic assessments throughout the education process. These are important changes that can be used to gauge the future of the medical education accreditation system. Furthermore, globalization, inter-professional education, health systems science, and regular self-assessment systems are emerging as essential topics for the future of medical education. It is time for the medical education accreditation system in Korea to observe and adopt new trends in global medical education.

scholarly journals Experiences of Accreditation of Medical Education in Taiwan

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Wan Lai
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Council ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
Future Goals

This review aims to introduce the Taiwanese Medical Accreditation System: its history, role and future goals. In 1999, the Ministry of Education, Taiwanese Government commissioned the non-profit National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) to develop a new medical accreditation system. According to that policy, the Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council (TMAC) was established in the same year. The council serves a similar function to that of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) of the United States and the Australian Medical Council (AMC). The accreditation process consists of a self-assessment plus a four-day site visit by a team of eight medical educators that are headed by one of the council members of the TMAC. The first cycle of initial visits was completed from 2001 to 2004. Subsequent follow-up visits were arranged according to the results of the survey with smaller-sized teams and shorter periods. There is evidence to suggest that the majority (seven of eleven) of the medical schools in Taiwan have made good progress. TMAC?占퐏 next step will be to monitor the progress and raise the standard of medical education in individual schools with a homogenous, superior standard of medical education.

Challenges in Implementation of the New Accreditation System

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri B. Feist ◽  
Julia L. Campbell ◽  
Julie A. LaBare ◽  
Donald L. Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Administrative Support ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Child Neurology ◽  
High Turnover ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Next Accreditation System

Despite major changes in US Graduate Medical Education, from Core Competencies (2002) to the Next Accreditation System (2012), few studies have evaluated the role of the Residency Coordinator in program accreditation. This role may be especially challenging in child neurology, which involves separate, accredited child and adult neurology residencies. The present study of Child Neurology Program Coordinators evaluated workforce factors and first-year implementation of new training requirements. The response rate was 65% (48/74). Concerning workforce features included high turnover, unpaid overtime, inconsistent job titles, limited career paths, inadequate training, and nonacademic supervision. Programs’ average implementation of 14 new accreditation items averaged 7.5 (standard deviation 2.5). This survey demonstrated that greater Next Accreditation System implementation is linked to increased coordinator experience, supervision within Graduate Medical Education, and greater administrative support for the coordinator role. Changes in these areas could improve future compliance of US child neurology programs with Graduate Medical Education accreditation requirements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document