scholarly journals Beyond behaviour as individual choice: A call to expand understandings around social science in health research

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
N Nakkeeran ◽  
Emma Sacks ◽  
Prashanth N Srinivas ◽  
Anika Juneja ◽  
Rakhal Gaitonde ◽  
...  

The focus of behavioural sciences in shaping behaviour of individuals and populations is well documented. Research and practice insights from behavioural sciences improve our understanding of how people make choices that in turn determine their health, and in turn the health of the population. However, we argue that an isolated focus on behaviour - which is one link in a chain from macro to the micro interventions - is not in sync with the public health approach which per force includes a multi-level interest. The exclusive focus on behaviour manipulation then becomes a temporary solution at best and facilitator of reproduction of harmful structures at worst. Several researchers and policymakers have begun integrating insights from behavioural economics and related disciplines that explain individual choice, for example, by the establishment of Behavioural Insight Teams, or nudge units to inform the design and implementation of public health programs. In order to comprehensively improve public health, we discuss the limitations of an exclusive focus on behaviour change for public health advancement and call for an explicit integration of broader structural and population-level contexts, processes and factors that shape the lives of individuals and groups, health systems and differential health outcomes.

Author(s):  
S. Rochford ◽  
P. Dodd ◽  
C. Austin

Abstract This article provides an overview of the public health approach to suicide in Ireland. The authors provide detail on the current suicide prevention strategy in Ireland, Connecting for Life, which is a whole-of-government, systemic, multicomponent national strategy. As the strategy enters its final extended phase of implementation over the period 2020–2024, the public health elements of Connecting for Life are presented, including the population level and more targeted approaches. The findings of an interim review of the strategy are discussed, in addition to the local and national implementation structures which are in place to assist implementation and monitoring of the strategy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 182 (S44) ◽  
pp. s3-s10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Coid

BackgroundThe public health problem-solving paradigm is a comprehensive method not previously applied to preventive interventions for personality disorder.AimsTo present an overview for clinical psychiatrists.MethodReview of epidemiological research into DSM–IV Axis II disorders and application to the paradigm.ResultsPersonality disorder affects a substantial proportion of the population. Burdens on health care, social and criminal justice agencies have yet to be accurately quantified. Debates continue over case definition, but there is increasing information on prevalence using ‘broad’ definitions and aetiology. A conceptual framework, based on development, suggests preventive interventions should be targeted in childhood. The public health approach also requires monitoring of risk factors operating at the population level.ConclusionsServices in England and Wales for persons with personality disorder are currently inadequate. The problem-solving paradigm suggests new preventive interventions. Psychiatrists should renegotiate their relationship with policy-makers and reconsider their preventive role.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Moreland-Russell ◽  
Emily Rodriguez Weno ◽  
Romario Smith ◽  
Margaret Padek ◽  
Louise Farah Saliba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Public health agencies are increasingly concerned with ensuring they are maximizing limited resources by delivering effective programs to enhance population-level health outcomes. Preventing mis-implementation is necessary to sustain public health efforts and resources needed to improve health and well-being. Because executive management is responsible for making decisions such as approving or disapproving the continuance of a program, it is important to understand the attributes of public health leaders in preventing program mis-implementation. The purpose of this paper is to identify the important qualities of leadership in preventing the mis-implementation of public health programs. Methods In Spring 2019, we selected eight state health departments (SHD) to participate in qualitative interviews on decision making around ending or continuing programs. Forty-four SHD chronic disease employees were interviewed via phone, audio-recorded, and the conversations transcribed verbatim. All transcripts were consensus coded, and themes were identified and summarized. This analysis focused on themes related to leadership. Results Participants were program managers or section directors who had on average worked 11 years at their agency and 15 years in public health. The following themes emerged from their interviews regarding the important leadership attributes to prevent mis-implementation: (1) engagement, use of quality improvement, and being adaptive; (2) transparent and bidirectional communication; and (3) ability to navigate political influences. Conclusion This first of its kind study showed the close inter-relationship between mis-implementation and leadership. Increased attention to public health leader attributes can help to reduce mis-implementation in public health practice and lead to more effective and efficient use of limited resources. A better understanding of those attributes can provide further direction to future areas of attention and capacity building among current and future public health practitioners. Future research should incorporate a mixed-methods approach to more comprehensively understand the relationships of leaders and practitioners.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Parenting programs have strong evidence in promoting positive changes in both parents and children and are considered as evidence-based treatments for children with externalising problems such as conduct problems and ADHD. It is expected that a public health approach to parenting - i.e., the availability of parenting programs to all parents regardless of their risk status - will reduce the number of children with externalising problems at the population level. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of this approach is inconclusive. This is largely due to difficulties in conducting the needed large population trials of universal parenting programs. The objective of the workshop is to facilitate a discussion on planning and conducting research projects to successfully evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions such as parenting programs when they are offered universally to everyone. We will describe three main challenges in evaluating a public health approach to parenting: difficulties in collecting data from the whole population (and not only those exposed to the intervention), lack of validated instruments to measure population-level impact, and low program exposure. To illustrate our points, we use a population-based cluster randomised controlled trial as an example. The aim of the project - Children and Parents in Focus - was to test the effectiveness of a universally offered parenting program in addressing emotional and behavioural problems in preschool children. The project was carried out for four years in a municipality with 200 000 inhabitants in Sweden. Data were collected from mothers, fathers and teachers of over 7 000 children aged 3 to 5 years. The workshop will include a brief introduction and three presentations. In the first presentation, we focus on recruitment of parents into the study. We discuss the rational for recruiting parents of all children aged 3-5 into the study through child health centres and the steps that we took to increase the number of parents who participated in the study. In the second presentation, we describe the primary outcome measure in the study i.e., the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) collected from fathers, mothers and preschool teachers. We discuss how we validated the SDQ for all the three informants and developed a guideline for using the SDQ during routine health check-ups. In the third presentation, we explain our challenges in recruiting parents to the intervention, particularly the restrictions imposed on us by the trial design and describe how we addressed low program participation. After each presentation, the participants will be invited to share their experiences, thoughts and ideas. Their comments will be first collected through a digital interactive platform and then discussed in the room. Key messages Successful evaluation of a public health interventions at the population-level requires ample attention to the recruitment of participants into research and intervention. Program uptake can be increased using simple low cost direct-to-consumer marketing strategies; however, it does take time to build demand for the program.


Author(s):  
John Coggon

This chapter examines arguments for framing and approaching depression as a public health question, paying attention to legal, regulatory, and practical issues. A public health approach focuses on effecting positive health changes through methods of socially coordinated, population-level intervention. Public health agendas aim to prevent or mitigate the incidence of ill health in the first place to promote broader concepts of well-being. This chapter explains a public mental health law approach to depression by addressing two sets of questions: why we would wish to take a public health approach and how we go about it. It presents and expands on a dominant understanding of public health before turning to a broad characterization of public health law, and considering some practicalities of taking a public health approach. It concludes with a discussion of why depression is apt to be framed and addressed as a matter for public health law.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilde Iversen ◽  
Torbjørn Rundmo ◽  
Hroar Klempe

Abstract. The core aim of the present study is to compare the effects of a safety campaign and a behavior modification program on traffic safety. As is the case in community-based health promotion, the present study's approach of the attitude campaign was based on active participation of the group of recipients. One of the reasons why many attitude campaigns conducted previously have failed may be that they have been society-based public health programs. Both the interventions were carried out simultaneously among students aged 18-19 years in two Norwegian high schools (n = 342). At the first high school the intervention was behavior modification, at the second school a community-based attitude campaign was carried out. Baseline and posttest data on attitudes toward traffic safety and self-reported risk behavior were collected. The results showed that there was a significant total effect of the interventions although the effect depended on the type of intervention. There were significant differences in attitude and behavior only in the sample where the attitude campaign was carried out and no significant changes were found in the group of recipients of behavior modification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document