scholarly journals Lessons that Last: LeaderShape-related Gains in Student Leadership Capacity over Time

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rosch ◽  
Clinton Stephens ◽  
Jasmine Collins
Keyword(s):  
Student Leadership ◽  
Leadership Capacity ◽  
Over Time

Disability and Dominant Leadership Models Over Time

2020 ◽  
pp. 274-293
Author(s):  
Melanie Lee
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Leadership Development ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Personal Narrative ◽  
Student Leadership ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Leadership Development Programs ◽  
Leadership Models ◽  
Models Of Disability ◽  
Over Time

This chapter is grounded in scholarly sources and personal narrative, and it concludes with recommended best practices about fostering more socially just higher education environments for college students. Specifically, the author focuses on the development of more equitable inclusion of students with disabilities in curricular and co-curricular leadership development programs. This chapter provides a context of major models of disability over time, a chronological scaffold of dominant student leadership models, and recommendations for educators inside and outside of classroom spaces. The intersection of models of disability and leadership models has not been explored. This chapter fills that gap in the literature.

The Empowering Role of Profession-Based Student Organizations in Developing Student Leadership Capacity

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (155) ◽  
pp. 83-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana J. Lebrón ◽  
Cheryl L. Stanley ◽  
Ariana J. Kim ◽  
Kieara H. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Student Leadership ◽  
Student Organizations ◽  
Leadership Capacity

Disability and Dominant Leadership Models Over Time

2022 ◽  
pp. 123-142
Author(s):  
Melanie Lee
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Leadership Development ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Personal Narrative ◽  
Student Leadership ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Leadership Development Programs ◽  
Leadership Models ◽  
Models Of Disability ◽  
Over Time

This chapter is grounded in scholarly sources and personal narrative, and it concludes with recommended best practices about fostering more socially just higher education environments for college students. Specifically, the author focuses on the development of more equitable inclusion of students with disabilities in curricular and co-curricular leadership development programs. This chapter provides a context of major models of disability over time, a chronological scaffold of dominant student leadership models, and recommendations for educators inside and outside of classroom spaces. The intersection of models of disability and leadership models has not been explored. This chapter fills that gap in the literature.

scholarly journals Measuring Mechanisms of Student Voice: Development and Validation of Student Leadership Capacity Building Scales

AERA Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 233285842090206
Author(s):  
Lindsay Lyons ◽  
Marc Brasof ◽  
Carol Baron
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Student Leadership ◽  
Leadership Competencies ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Leadership Capacity ◽  
Measurement Scales ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Voice Development ◽  
Development And Validation

This study developed measurement scales on student leadership capacity building through a survey of 280 students from nine U.S. high schools. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a personal, interpersonal, organizational, and overall scale for building student leadership capacity. The scales included eight mechanisms that schools can use to enhance student leadership: pedagogy, relationships, radical collegiality, governance structure, research, group makeup, consistency, and recognition. The scale items also reflected three leadership competencies: critical awareness, inclusivity, and positivity. Focus groups and interviews with students and teachers in these nine schools supported survey findings and suggested implications for practice.

Space, time, and the development of shared leadership networks in multiteam systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOPHIA D. SULLIVAN ◽  
ALINA LUNGEANU ◽  
LESLIE A. DECHURCH ◽  
NOSHIR S. CONTRACTOR
Keyword(s):  
Shared Leadership ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Leadership Capacity ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Virtual Experiments ◽  
Space And Time ◽  
Geographically Dispersed ◽  
Multiteam Systems ◽  
Generative Mechanisms ◽  
Over Time

AbstractDigital technologies have created the potential for new forms of organizing among geographically dispersed individuals by connecting their ideas across the time and space in complex multiteam systems (MTSs). Realizing this potential requires novel forms of shared leadership structures to shepherd divergent and convergent thinking necessary to nurture innovation. While there is limited research on how space influences leadership and how the time influences leadership, there is virtually no theorizing on how space and time interact together to influence the emergence of shared leadership structures that facilitates innovation. A key contribution of this study is to utilize an agent-based model (ABM) that draws upon the research on leadership, networks, and innovation to specify generative mechanisms (or micro-processes) through which shared leadership structures emerge over space and time. The parameters in this model were estimated from empirical data. Results of virtual experiments (VE) yielded testable hypotheses suggesting that, over time, leadership capacity and between-team ties are negatively influenced by space. Furthermore, the computational model suggests that space increases the concentration of divergent leadership but decreases the concentration of convergent leadership. The study concludes by discussing the implications for the design of effective leadership structures to nurture innovation in MTSs.

Social transmission bias and the cultural evolution of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hirshleifer ◽  
Siew Hong Teoh
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Evolution ◽  
Social Transmission ◽  
Cognitive Approach ◽  
Economic Problems ◽  
Economic Attitudes ◽  
The Social ◽  
Economic Beliefs ◽  
Over Time

AbstractEvolved dispositions influence, but do not determine, how people think about economic problems. The evolutionary cognitive approach offers important insights but underweights the social transmission of ideas as a level of explanation. The need for asocialexplanation for the evolution of economic attitudes is evidenced, for example, by immense variations in folk-economic beliefs over time and across individuals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document