Reducing risk in equine anaesthesia part 2: specific risk factors, human factors and safety checklists

UK-Vet Equine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
Kate R Loomes

Performing general anaesthesia in horses carries an inherent risk. Knowledge of the physiological, pharmacological and practical considerations unique to horses is important to be able to minimise this risk and to address complications should they arise. This article discusses the physiological considerations of subsets of the equine population; aspects of human and patient safety; and methods to reduce human error.

UK-Vet Equine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate R Loomes

Performing general anaesthesia in horses carries an inherent risk. Knowledge of the physiological, pharmacological and practical considerations unique to horses is important to be able to minimise this risk and to address complications should they arise. This article discusses the factors known to increase and to reduce anaesthetic risk, and some of the common complications encountered; part 2 will address the physiological considerations of subsets of the equine population; aspects of human and patient safety; the importance of close observation and monitoring; and methods to reduce human error.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
Sanjay Saproo ◽  
◽  
Dr. Sanjeev Bansal ◽  
Dr. Amit Kumar Pandey

This chapter focuses on preventable anesthesia mishaps caused by human error or equipment malfunctions by asking the question: How does human error contribute to preventable anesthesia mishaps, and are there patterns in frequently occurring incidents that need prospective investigation and prevention measures? This study established a framework for assessing patient safety in anesthesiology and exposed patterns of frequently occurring preventable incidents. Anesthesia personnel were asked to describe mishaps that they observed or were directly involved in at any point in their professional careers. Information collected during pilot interviews was used to develop an initial incident classification scheme. These data also suggested that the application of human-factors principles could be used in anesthesia.


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Woods ◽  
Jane L. Holl ◽  
Jack P. Shonkoff ◽  
Munisha Mehra ◽  
Edward S. Ogata ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter A. Brennan ◽  
Rachel S. Oeppen

AbstractHuman error and organisational mistakes are a significant cause of morbidity for patients. It is important to recognise and address human factors (HF) in the context of our own performance optimisation, enhancing team working to improve patient safety, and better working lives for clinicians across surgery and medicine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 1012-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebru Yazgan

PurposeContemporary management and strategy mean optimization of ingredient factors such as human factors, systems, operations and equipment. With system approach in management and strategy, human risk factor as input has considerable potential to change results as airworthiness in aviation management. The managers of aviation business also optimize their functions to act safe while making contribution to development in triple of sustainability as economic development and its sustainability; social development and its sustainability; and environmental development and its sustainability. Corporate sustainability can be accomplished via supporting workforce which is the human risk factor. To support (empowerment) workforce, researchers should identify human risk or error factors which are important to this research. The purpose of this study is to suggest holistic framework for working environment system of aircraft maintenance technicians (AMTs) within two respects such as human performance (ergonomics) and corporate performance (sustainability). The secondary purpose of this system is to develop human risk taxonomy by determining the factors affecting both human and work by taking ergonomic aspects in aviation.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, a taxonomy of human risk factors for AMTs is developed. These human factors divided into groups and subfactors are obtained from an extensive literature review and experts’ opinions in the field of human performance in aviation. Taxonomy developed will be useful to both sharing and using corporate sources in sustainable way.FindingsHuman risk factors can be considered or accepted as factors that cause human error. This may result in the optimum way to managing human risk factor via minimizing human-based error. Personality, hazardous attitudes, individual characteristics, physical/psychological condition of AMTs and corporate social responsibility factors are human-related risk variables in this study. The risks and error can be reduced by recognizing these factors and revealing their relation to ergonomic design.Originality/valueThe results of this study are intended to constitute a guide for managers to manage risk factors and to take corrective and preventive actions for their maintenance operations. It is believed that this study is highly important for the aviation sector in terms of raising awareness or providing awareness for similar practices. As taxonomy of the risk factors contributes to the managing human error, corrective actions related to these factors must be taken by managers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bashkin Osnat

The issue of patient safety and medical human error has been arousing growing concern around the world. Attempts to reduce the rate of human error present a great challenge, and there is an increased understanding that the issue of patient safety in healthcare systems is a complex one that requires in-depth analysis and understanding. Despite the many programs and interventions designed to reduce the rate of human medical errors, various publications that expose the extent of this phenomenon point to a high percentage of human errors that causes injury, and to the difficulties in improving patient safety. The understanding that the focus must be on prevention and the growing need for practical solutions have led to the involvement of disciplines such as human-factors engineering in an attempt to understand the root causes of safety problems and find ways to prevent them. Human-factors engineering is a proactive approach that may contribute to the planning of safe medical systems by taking into account the diverse needs, capabilities, and limitations of the human beings involved in these systems. This article reviews the benefits and challenges in applying the principles of human-factors engineering to promote patient safety, as well as the implications for policy in the field


2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Messier ◽  
Lizabeth A. Austen

This paper reports on a study that examines the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors on auditors' inherent risk and control risk assessments in an experimental setting. Two hypotheses concerning the significance of inherent and control risk factors on auditors' inherent risk (IR) and control risk (CR) assessments were tested by having 124 senior auditors and managers provide risk assessments on eight cases. The results show that the pervasive and specific risk factors included in the experiment were significant to both the auditors' IR and CR assessments. For the case used in this study, there was a significant positive association between auditors' IR and CR assessments. Taken together, these findings are consistent with Waller's (1993) notion of a knowledge-based dependency between IR and CR assessments. The findings are not consistent with Kinney's (1989) reformulation of the (IR×CR) component of the audit risk model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document