A Comparison of Two Graduate Student Clinical Performance Instruments in Speech-Language Pathology

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly F. Harris
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 104-112
Author(s):  
Karen A. Ball ◽  
Luis F. Riquelme

A graduate-level course in dysphagia is an integral part of the graduate curriculum in speech-language pathology. There are many challenges to meeting the needs of current graduate student clinicians, thus requiring the instructor to explore alternatives. These challenges, suggested paradigm shifts, and potential available solutions are explored. Current trends, lack of evidence for current methods, and the variety of approaches to teaching the dysphagia course are presented.


1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Erwick Roberts ◽  
Vicki McCready

This study investigated differences in causal attributions made by student clinicians taking actor and observer roles in good and poor therapy Sessions. One hundred thirty-four graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology were asked to imagine a hypothetical good or poor therapy session in which they took either the role of a clinician working with a client in a session or that of a clinician observing the session. To account for the session's hypothesized outcomes, clinicians taking the actor role cited client causes more frequently than other causes while clinicians taking the observer role cited clinician causes. These results are consistent with the actor-observer bias documented extensively in the psychological and educational literatures. Clinicians' causal attributions also differed for good and poor therapy sessions. Implications are discussed in terms of possible impact on the clinical training process in speech-language pathology.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Phillips

Abstract How do supervisors determine the level of clinical independence of graduate student clinicians before clinic practicum begins and how do supervisors determine the style of supervision used with each student clinician? A qualitative research methodology was used to investigate supervisory practices of clinical educators supervising graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology graduate training programs. Data was gathered through standardized open-ended interviews with 11 supervisors from five graduate training programs accredited by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). All 11 supervisors conducted a pre-practicum assessment, but none used a published program or model to assess the student clinicians. All participants met with the student clinicians prior to the start of therapy to discuss the client. Analysis of data revealed three distinct types of meetings: presentation of the client by the clinician, presentation of the clinician to the supervisor, and pre-practicum assessment using a form. Eight of the 11 supervisors interviewed for this study determined the level of clinical independence of the student clinician solely by asking the clinician to present the client to the supervisor. The supervisors then evaluated the manner, organization, accuracy, and completeness of the presentation to estimate the student's level of clinical independence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Howells ◽  
Elizabeth A. Cardell ◽  
Monique C. Waite ◽  
Andrea Bialocerkowski ◽  
Neil Tuttle

Abstract Background Simulation, as an activity in speech-language pathology training, can increase opportunities for students to gain required skills and competencies. One area that has received little attention in the simulation literature, yet is a growing area of clinical practice, is alternative and augmentative communication (AAC). Also growing, is the use of telepractice to deliver services. This exploratory study investigated graduate entry speech-language pathology student perceptions of a simulation learning experience working with an adult with complex communication needs via telepractice. Methods First year Master of Speech Pathology students completed a 1-day simulation using a videoconferencing delivery platform with an actor portraying an adult client with motor neurone disease requiring AAC. Quantitative and qualitative survey measures were completed pre- and post-simulation to explore students’ confidence, perceived impact on clinical performance, and perceived extent of learning, specifically, their interest, competence, and tension. Further, students’ perceptions about the telepractice system useability were explored. Fifty-two responses were received and analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results Post-simulation, students reported increased confidence and perceived positive impacts on their confidence and clinical skills across communication, assessment, and management domains. They felt better prepared to manage a client with a progressive neurological condition and to make AAC recommendations. For telepractice delivery, technology limitations were identified as impacting its use, including infrastructure (e.g., weak internet connection). In addition, some students reported feeling disconnected from the client. Conclusion This study supports the use of simulation in AAC through telepractice as a means of supporting Masters-level speech pathology student learning in this area of practice.


Author(s):  
James M. Mancinelli ◽  
Meredith Kneavel

Purpose The purpose of this phenomenological study was to describe and interpret the experiences of graduate students in communication sciences and disorders who experienced forms of incivility in the clinical practicum setting. There is precedent for identifying and handling incivility, such as bullying, harassment, and intimidation, in the nursing education, psychology education, medical education, and physical therapy literature. A literature search for incivilities such as bullying, harassment, and intimidation in graduate student education in communication sciences and disorders did not yield any systematic studies. Method Nineteen participants who were interested in participating contacted the researcher; of those, nine participants were ultimately interviewed. A thematic analysis of videotaped semistructured interviews was used to measure outcomes based on the five questions posed to the participants. The participants responded to the five questions designed to understand the lived experience of incivility for graduate students in speech-language pathology practicum settings. Conclusions This study fills a gap in the clinical education literature in speech-language pathology. It was a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach that described and interpreted speech-language pathology graduate students' experiences of bullying, harassment, and/or intimidation during clinical practicums across practice settings. Data analysis yielded five themes based on the participants' responses during the interview. The themes were communication, physical and/or psychological effects, interpersonal dynamics, clinical instruction, and lingering physical and psychological effects of the experience. The authors make recommendations to reduce the probability that incivility, bullying, and/or intimidation will occur during a student's clinical practicum experience.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Laughran ◽  
Jane Sackett

High quality clinical supervision is important for both student education and continued professional growth within the field of speech-language pathology. Face-to-face supervision is the traditional mode of supervision; however, with advances in technology, telesupervision or e-supervision, has been used to support graduate student clinicians and clinical fellows. This article provides an overview of clinical supervision with a focus on telesupervision and ASHA's thirteen tasks of supervision. The authors discuss literature from allied health professions in relation to the thirteen tasks of supervision to support a hybrid model of supervision.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-695
Author(s):  
Jennine Harvey ◽  
Ann Beck ◽  
Caleb T. Carr

PurposeThe current research was a pilot study of the #GoldenTweets social media training program. Specifically, the research sought to explore (a) how the program in general was perceived by 2 groups of participants, namely, normally aging adults and graduate clinicians, and (b) how both groups perceived the use of Twitter, the platform incorporated into the program, as a social media.MethodParticipants included normally aging adults and graduate student clinicians working with these individuals to implement the training program. The 13-week program was structured into 4 phases: (a) pre-assessment, (b) social media training, (c) social media engagement, and (d) postassessment. Participation outcomes were measured through qualitative data obtained from postprogram discussions and postprogram clinician surveys.ResultsAnalyses of participants' responses revealed changes across older adult and graduate student clinician skills in technology and communication applications, as well as perceptions of social media use. Both groups of participants indicated the intergenerational aspects of the program were the greatest strength of the program and their learning.ConclusionOur findings support the use of a cognitive social media training tool to promote intergenerational learning, communication, and stimulation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina F. Staltari ◽  
Annette Baft-Neff ◽  
Lori J. Marra ◽  
Gary J. Rentschler

Assessment of clinical documentation written by graduate student clinicians in the field of speech-language pathology has been viewed as a challenge for clinical instructors. Typically, instructor feedback included verbal and written comments or suggestions for modification and/or line by line edits. However, it was difficult to determine whether this feedback was useful in improving the clinical documentation skills of graduate student clinicians across semesters, given that students are rotated among clinical instructors, across disorders, and across populations. It has been well documented that verbal and written feedback to students has been inconsistent across clinical instructors (Dowling, 2001). Our University Clinic at Duquesne attempted to provide more formative and consistent feedback to students to improve clinical documentation skills. A “Grading Rubric for Clinical Documentation” developed at Duquesne's University Clinic identifies students' strengths and weaknesses in professional writing across three parameters: content, organization, and writing mechanics. Using this rubric, a “Clinical Documentation Checklist” was developed which provided a quantitative summary of performance. This checklist was given to students at various stages throughout their clinical practicum to provide quantitative information pertaining to writing skills in an effort to improve clinical documentation. In addition to this checklist, qualitative information was provided in the form of line-by-line edits and suggestions for modification of the document. Our goal was to provide both forms of information to assist students in understanding their strengths and weaknesses as they progress in their ability to document clinical encounters. This study found that most students benefitted from the verbal and written feedback provided by supervisors; however, the Documentation Checklist was also noted to be useful in improving clinical writing skills.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy F. Teten ◽  
Shari L. DeVeney ◽  
Mary J. Friehe

Low-incidence clinical disorders such as voice, nasal resonance, and fluency present challenging areas for graduate-level speech-language pathology training programs to help students acquire necessary knowledge and skills. A checklist of competencies for fluency disorders exists in the literature. The authors are presently collecting pretest/posttest data on the fluency disorders checklist over several cohorts of graduate students to determine student level of proficiency and confidence regarding these competencies. Preliminary data analysis suggests significant student perception of growth as a result of completing course requirements. These data have been useful to the second author, who teaches a course in fluency disorders and utilizes the checklist for purposes of course design and case-based project development to help students gain competence. The authors observed that a similar checklist of competencies for voice disorders would be useful for training programs as well as for other reasons described throughout this paper. Consequently, the authors compiled a checklist for assessing graduate student competencies for voice disorders. This checklist provides academic and clinical faculty with a comprehensive tool to guide the education of graduate clinicians and assist in the assurance of educational quality for speech-language pathologists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document