Effects of Soil Management Practices and Tillage Systems on Soil Moisture Conservation and Maize Yield on a Sandy Loam in Semiarid Kenya

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. T. Gicheru ◽  
C. K. K. Gachene ◽  
J. P. Mbuvi
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Luiza Privado Martins ◽  
Glécio Machado Siqueira ◽  
Emanoel Gomes de Moura ◽  
Raimunda Alves Silva ◽  
Anágila Janenis Cardoso Silva ◽  
...  

Soil fauna play an important role in ecosystems, and in this context, it is important to better understand how the abiotic and biotic drivers of these organisms interact. We hypothesize that soil fauna are affected by different soil management practices, which has an influence on maize grain yields. The aim of this study was to evaluate the structure of soil fauna under different soil management practices and their associations with maize grain yield. The experiment was conducted in Maranhão, Brazil, in an area divided into 24 plots of 4 × 10 m in a randomized block design with six treatments with four replicates (R). Pitfall traps were placed in the area. The treatments were Leucaena leucocephala-Leucaena (L), nitrogen (N), humic acid + nitrogen (HA + N), nitrogen + Leucaena (N + L), humic acid + Leucaena (HA + L) and humic acid + nitrogen + Leucaena (HA + N + L). The soil fauna dominance, abundance, richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index and maize grain yield were determined. Formicidae was clearly affected by management with Leucaena, while Coleoptera was affected by management with nitrogen. Despite this, Isopoda and Diplura were the only groups associated with the maize yield. Although fauna abundance did not differ among treatments, it was related to the yield. This study confirms that the abundance and some taxa of soil fauna can influence yield and that these organisms can be used to increase agricultural sustainability.


Biologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Milics ◽  
Attila J. Kovács ◽  
Attila Pörneczi ◽  
Anikó Nyéki ◽  
Zoltán Varga ◽  
...  

AbstractSoil moisture content directly influences yield. Mapping within field soil moisture content differences provides information for agricultural management practices.In this study we aimed to find a cost-effective method for mapping within field soil moisture content differences. Spatial coverage of the field sampling or TDR method is still not dense enough for site-specific soil management. Soil moisture content can be calculated by measuring the apparent soil electrical conductivity (Soil moisture map was also compared to yield map showing correlation (


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hasan Hussein

<p dir="RTL" align="right"> </p><p dir="RTL" align="right">More than 50% of the rainfed region in northernIraqfalls within the low rainfall zone receiving between 300 and 400 mm of mean seasonal rainfall. Several natural runoff plots with access tubes were used to measure soil moisture distribution in depth and time. Measurements during two consecutive rainfall seasons were used to forecast the rainfed farming prospects in the low rainfall zone. The first season is considered wet because it received 568 mm of mean seasonal rainfall; the second rainfall season is considered dry because it received 256 of mean seasonal rainfall. The prospects of tillage systems, fertilization and soil moisture conservation for a successful rainfed farming (wheat and barley crops) venture in the low rainfall zone were explored and  a rainfed farming guide for this zone was suggested. </p><p dir="RTL" align="right"><strong><br /></strong></p><p dir="RTL" align="right"> </p>


Author(s):  
Khaoula ABROUGUI ◽  
Sayed CHEHAIBI ◽  
Jean-Noël LOUVET ◽  
Cherif HANNACHI ◽  
Marie-France DESTAIN

To indentify the best soil management practices, it is necessary to quantify the modifications to the soil structure. Three different management practices were compared for short time: superficial tillage, medium tillage and conventional deep tillage. Tests were carried out over a sandy loam soil in the Higher Institute of Agronomy of Chott Meriem (Tunisia). Tillage was followed by a first resumption 10 days after tillage and a second one 20 days after. The studied parameters were measured at initial state and after each operation. Soil structure was characterized by its resistance to penetration using an electronic penetrometer and its bulk density. In soil tilled by conventional system with mouldboard ploughing, soil resistance decreased for a depth of 50 cm. In contrast, medium tillage with discs plow showed higher values of soil resistance in both the surface layer (10 cm) and the plowing depth (20 cm). Superficial tillage using discs harrow (Offset), showed higher values of soil resistance than the other tillage techniques. This study will be followed up to assess the evolution of these parameters over time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 823-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Porwollik ◽  
Susanne Rolinski ◽  
Jens Heinke ◽  
Christoph Müller

Abstract. Tillage is a central element in agricultural soil management and has direct and indirect effects on processes in the biosphere. Effects of agricultural soil management can be assessed by soil, crop, and ecosystem models, but global assessments are hampered by lack of information on the type of tillage and their spatial distribution. This study describes the generation of a classification of tillage practices and presents the spatially explicit mapping of these crop-specific tillage systems for around the year 2005. Tillage practices differ by the kind of equipment used, soil surface and depth affected, timing, and their purpose within the cropping systems. We classified the broad variety of globally relevant tillage practices into six categories: no-tillage in the context of Conservation Agriculture, traditional annual, traditional rotational, rotational, reduced, and conventional annual tillage. The identified tillage systems were allocated to gridded crop-specific cropland areas with a resolution of 5 arcmin. Allocation rules were based on literature findings and combine area information on crop type, water management regime, field size, water erosion, income, and aridity. We scaled reported national Conservation Agriculture areas down to grid cells via a probability-based approach for 54 countries. We provide area estimates of the six tillage systems aggregated to global and country scale. We found that 8.67 Mkm2 of global cropland area was tilled intensively at least once a year, whereas the remaining 2.65 Mkm2 was tilled less intensely. Further, we identified 4.67 Mkm2 of cropland as an area where Conservation Agriculture could be expanded to under current conditions. The tillage classification enables the parameterization of different soil management practices in various kinds of model simulations. The crop-specific tillage dataset indicates the spatial distribution of soil management practices, which is a prerequisite to assess erosion, carbon sequestration potential, as well as water, and nutrient dynamics of cropland soils. The dynamic definition of the allocation rules and accounting for national statistics, such as the share of Conservation Agriculture per country, also allow for derivation of datasets for historical and future global soil management scenarios. The resulting tillage system dataset and source code are accessible via an open-data repository (DOIs: https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.009 and https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.010, Porwollik et al., 2019a, b).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document