Invited Review Article: The Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) Model: An Emerging Tool for Landscape and Watershed Environmental Analyses

2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. Gassman ◽  
J. R. Williams ◽  
X. Wang ◽  
A. Saleh ◽  
E. Osei ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Feng Pan ◽  
Qingyu Feng ◽  
Ryan McGehee ◽  
Bernard A. Engel ◽  
Dennis C. Flanagan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 615 ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Mi Hong ◽  
Yongeun Park ◽  
Richard Muirhead ◽  
Jaehak Jeong ◽  
Yakov A. Pachepsky

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyu Feng ◽  
Bernard A. Engel ◽  
Dennis C. Flanagan ◽  
Chi-hua Huang ◽  
Haw Yen ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirreza Sharifi ◽  
Sangchul Lee ◽  
Gregory McCarty ◽  
Megan Lang ◽  
Jaehak Jeong ◽  
...  

The Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model has been widely used to assess changes in agrochemical loadings in response to conservation and management led by US Department of Agriculture (USDA). However, the existing APEX model is limited in quantification of wetland water quality functions. This study improved the current model capacity to represent wetland water quality functions by addition of a new biogeochemical module into the APEX model. The performance of an enhanced APEX model was tested against five observed outgoing water quality variables (e.g., sediment, organic N, NO3, NH4 and PO4) from a wetland within the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) was implemented to assess model uncertainty. The enhanced APEX model demonstrated that it could effectively represent N and P cycling within the study wetland. Although improvement of model performance was limited, the additions of wetland biogeochemical routines to the APEX model improved our understanding of inner mass exchanges within N and P cycling for the study wetland. Overall, the updated APEX model can provide policymakers and managers with improved means for assessment of benefits delivered by wetland conservation.


Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goehring ◽  
Verburg ◽  
Saito ◽  
Jeong ◽  
Meki

Cultivation of highly salt-tolerant plants (i.e., halophytes), may provide a viable alternative to increase productivity compared to conventional salt-sensitive crops, increasing the economic potential of salt-affected lands that comprise ~20% of irrigated lands worldwide. In this study the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model was adapted to simulate growth of the halophyte quinoa, along with salt dynamics in the plant-soil-water system. Model modifications included salt uptake and salt stress functions formulated using greenhouse data. Data from a field site were used to further parameterize and calibrate the model. Initial simulation results were promising, but differences between simulated and observed soil salinity and plant salt values during the growing season in the calibration suggest that additional improvements to salt uptake and soil salinity algorithms are needed. To demonstrate utility of the modified APEX model, six scenarios were run to estimate quinoa biomass production and soil salinity with different irrigation managements and salinities. Simulated annual biomass was sensitive to soil moisture, and root zone salinity increased in all scenarios. Further experiments are needed to improve understanding of crop salt uptake dynamics and stress sensitivities so that future model updates and simulations better represent salt dynamics in plants and soils in agricultural settings.


Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Qingquan Chu ◽  
Mengjie Shang ◽  
Manyowa N. Meki ◽  
Nicole Norelli ◽  
...  

Spring peanut is a valuable alternative crop to mitigate water scarcity caused by excessive water use in conventional cropping systems in the North China Plain (NCP). In the present study, we evaluated the capability of the Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to predict spring peanut response to sowing dates and seeding rates in order to optimize sowing dates, seeding rates, and irrigation regimes. Data used for calibration and validation of the model included leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass (ABIOM), and pod yield data collected from a field experiment of nine sowing dates and seeding rate combinations conducted from 2017 to 2018. The calibrated model was then used to simulate peanut yield responses to extended sowing dates (5 April to 4 June with a 5-day interval) and seeding rates (15 plants m−2 to 50 plants m−2 with a 5 plants m−2 interval) using 38 years of weather data as well as yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and water stress days under different irrigation regimes (rainfed, one irrigation before planting (60 mm) or at flowering (60 mm), and two irrigation with one time before planting and one time at flowering (60 mm each time) or at pod set (60 mm each time)). Results show that the model satisfactorily simulates pod yield of peanut based on R2 = 0.70, index of agreement (d value) being 0.80 and percent bias (PBIAS) values ≤4%. Moreover, the model performed reasonably well in predicting the emergence, LAI and ABIOM, with a R2 = 0.86, d = 0.95 and PBIAS = 8% for LAI and R2 = 0.90, d = 0.97 and PBIAS = 1% for ABIOM, respectively. Simulation results indicate that the best combination of sowing dates and seeding rates is a density of 35–40 plants m−2 and dates during early-May to mid-May due to the influence of local climate and canopy structure to the growth and yield of peanut. Under the optimal sowing date and plant density, an irrigation depth of 60 mm during flowering gave a pod yield (5.6 t ha−1) and ET (464 mm), which resulted in the highest water use efficiency (12.1 kg ha−1 mm−1). The APEX model is capable of assessing the effects of management practices on the growth and yield of peanut. Sowing 35–40 plants m−2 during early-May to mid-May with 60 mm irrigation depth is the recommended agronomic practice for peanut production in the water-constrained NCP.


1966 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 348-349
Author(s):  
Th. Schmidt-Kaler

This is only an informal remark about some difficulties I am worrying about.I have tried to recalibrate the MK system in terms of intrinsic colour (B–V)0and absolute magnitudeMv. The procedures used have been described in a review article by Voigt (Mitt. Astr. Ges.1963, p. 25–35), and the results for stars of the luminosity classes Ia-O,I and II have been given also in Blaauw's article on the calibration of luminosity criteria in vol. III (Basic Astronomical Data, p. 401) ofStars and Stellar Systems.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanhong Ma ◽  
Shao-Jie Lou ◽  
Zhaomin Hou

This review article provides a comprehensive overview to recognise the current status of electron-deficient boron-based catalysis in C–H functionalisations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document