Subsurface Drainage in Soils with High Hydraulic Conductivity Layers

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 0515-0521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. K. Tang ◽  
R. W. Skaggs
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Subsurface Drainage ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

Estimating high hydraulic conductivity locations through a 3D simulation of water flow in soil and a resistivity survey

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Inoue ◽  
Hiroomi Nakazato ◽  
Tomijiro Kubota ◽  
Koji Furue ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshisako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
3D Simulation ◽  
Resistivity Survey ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

Effect of a front high hydraulic conductivity zone on hydrological behavior of subsea tunnels

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Soo Hong ◽  
Eui-Seob Park ◽  
Hee-Soon Shin ◽  
Hyung-Mok Kim
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. I: Field observations

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1526-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Xia Wu ◽  
Shui-Long Shen ◽  
Ye-Shuang Xu ◽  
Zhen-Yu Yin
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Clayey Soil ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Confined Aquifer ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sandy Gravel ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

This paper presents a case history of the leakage behavior during dewatering tests in the gravel strata of an excavation pit of a metro station in Hangzhou, China. The groundwater system at the test site is composed of a phreatic aquifer underlain by an aquitard and a confined aquifer with coarse sand and gravel. The sandy gravel stratum has very high hydraulic conductivity. The maximum depth of the excavation is 24 m below the ground surface, which reaches the middle of the aquitard strata, where the thickness of the clayey soil is insufficient to maintain the safety of the base of the excavation. To understand the hydrological characteristics of gravel strata, single- and double-well pumping tests were conducted, where a cut-off wall was installed 43 m deep with its base penetrating 2 to 3 m into the aquifer. Test results show that this partial cut-off of the aquifer cannot effectively protect the base of the excavation from the upward seepage force of the groundwater during excavation. Therefore, a new cut-off wall (second phase) was constructed to a depth of 54 m to cut off the confined aquifer. A second pumping test was conducted after the construction of the second phase cut-off wall, and test results show that this full cut-off combined with dewatering can control groundwater effectively during excavation. This finding indicates that when a deep excavation is conducted in a confined aquifer with high hydraulic conductivity, determination of the depth of the retaining wall should be based on three factors: the stability of the base, the upward seepage stability, and settlement control.

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND DRAINABLE POROSITY OF TWO SOUTHERN ALBERTA SOILS

1986 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. BUCKLAND ◽  
D. B. HARKER ◽  
T. G. SOMMERFELDT
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Subsurface Drainage ◽  
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Drainage Design ◽  
Moisture Characteristic ◽  
Constant Head ◽  
Subsurface Drains ◽  
Drainable Porosity

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and drainable porosity (f) determined by different methods and for different depths were compared with those determined from the performance of drainage systems installed at two locations. These comparisons were made to determine which methods are suitable for use in subsurface drainage design. Auger hole and constant-head well permeameter Ks were 140 and 110%, respectively, of Ks determined from subsurface drains. Agreement of horizontal or vertical Ks, from in situ falling-head permeameters; to other methods was satisfactory providing sample numbers were large. Ks by Tempe cells was only 3–10% of drain Ks and in one instance was significantly lower than Ks determined by all other methods. At one site a profile-averaged value of f determined from the soil moisture characteristic curve (0–5 kPa) of semidisturbed cores agreed with that determined from drainage trials. At the other site, a satisfactory value of f was found only when the zone in which the water table fluctuated was considered. Results indicate that Ks determined by the auger hole and constant-head well permeameter methods, and f determined from the soil moisture characteristic curve of semidisturbed cores, are sufficiently reliable and practical for subsurface drainage design. Key words: Subsurface drainage, hydraulic conductivity, drainable porosity

Resistance of ascending vasa recta to transport of water

1991 ◽  
Vol 260 (3) ◽  
pp. F303-F310 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Pallone
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Single Injection ◽  
Fluorescein Isothiocyanate ◽  
Free Flow ◽  
Volume Flux ◽  
Group I ◽  
Vasa Recta ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

A study was undertaken to determine the effect of increasing capillary pressure on volume flux in ascending vasa recta (AVR). In one experiment (group I), AVR were blocked by a single injection of paraffin wax and subjected to free-flow microperfusion at 10 nl/min. Collected fluid was obtained from the perfused vessels by micropuncture. In a second experiment (group II), AVR segments were isolated between two paraffin blocks and perfused at 10 nl/min. In group II, the collection pipette was pressurized to 0, 10, or 20 mmHg. Transmembrane volume flux was determined by measuring the change in concentration of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran (2 x 10(6) mol wt) from perfusate to collected fluid. In group I, measurements revealed a capillary pressure of 10.3 +/- 0.5 (SE) mmHg and volume flux of 4.3 +/- 1.0 nl.mm-1.min-1. In group II, volume flux was 1.8 +/- 1.3, 5.9 +/- 1.0, and 11.2 +/- 1.1 nl.mm-1.min-1 at collection pressures of 0, 10, or 20 mmHg, respectively. Based on these data and an AVR diameter of 20 microns, AVR hydraulic conductivity is between 12.5 x 10(-6) and 18.7 x 10(-6) cm.s-1.mmHg-1. The papillary AVR have a high hydraulic conductivity. This is consistent with their role as the sole conduit for removal of water from the papillary interstitium.

Using High Hydraulic Conductivity Nodes to Simulate Seepage Lakes

Ground Water ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary P. Anderson ◽  
Randall J. Hunt ◽  
James T. Krohelski ◽  
Kuopo Chung
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH NILAI KONDUKTIVITAS HIDRAULIK DAN DISPERSIVITAS DINAMIK TERHADAP REMEDIASI AIR TANAH MENGGUNAKAN SIMULASI NUMERIK

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-118
Author(s):  
Agus Mochamad Ramdhan ◽  
Arifin Arifin ◽  
Erik Hermawan ◽  
Lambok M. Hutasoit
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Groundwater Remediation ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Pumping Wells ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Close Distance ◽  
High Hydraulic Conductivity

Groundwater remediation is one of the solutions to restore the contaminated groundwater. This study was conducted to determine the effect of hydraulic conductivity and dynamic dispersivity on the groundwater remediation effectiveness. As a case study, in 2020, in an area located in Balikpapan, groundwater remediation will be carried out by injecting water containing NaOH through five wells and pumping it back through five wells to form a cycle. The method used is a numerical simulation consisting of groundwater flow simulation, mass transport, and sensitivity analysis. The results show that it takes 124 to 300 days for the injected NaOH to arrive at the pumping wells. The sensitivity analysis results show that when the hydraulic conductivity value is ten times greater, the time required is reduced to 84 to 172 days. Meanwhile, when the dynamic dispersivity is twice larger, the time required is reduced to 75 to 189 days. These results indicate that the groundwater remediation method will be effective for aquifers with high hydraulic conductivity and dynamic dispersivity values. For the study area, the groundwater remediation is suggested to be carried out by increasing the number of injection and pumping wells with a relatively close distance, i.e., around 10 meters, so that NaOH arrives at the pumping wells more quickly.Keywords: groundwater, remediation, hydraulic conductivity, dynamic dispersivity, numerical simulation

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document