Evaluation of a Simple Pure Pursuit Path-Following Algorithm for an Autonomous, Articulated-Steer Vehicle

2014 ◽  
pp. 367-374 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol sceeer (3d) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Baqir Abdul-Samed ◽  
Ammar Aldair

The last few years Quadrotor became an important topic, many researches have implemented and tested concerning that topic. Quadrotor also called an unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), it's highly used in many applications like security, civil applications, aid, rescue and a lot of other applications. It’s not a conventional helicopter because of small size, low cost and the ability of vertical and takeoff landing (VTOL). The models kept an eye on quadrotors were presented, the advancement of this new kind of air vehicle is hindered for a very long while because of different reasons, for example, mechanical multifaceted nature, enormous size and weight, and challenges in charge particularly. Just as of late a lot of interests and endeavors have been pulled in on it; a quadrotor has even become a progressively discretionary vehicle for useful application. Quadrotor can be used in variable, different , outdoor and indoor missions; these missions should be implemented with high value of accuracy and quality. In this work two scenarios suggested for different two missions. First mission the quadrotor will be used to reach different goals in the simulated city for different places during one flight using path following algorithm. The second mission will be an indoor arrival mission, during that mission quadrotor will avoid obstacles by using only Pure pursuit algorithm (PPA). To show the benefit of using the new strategy it will compare with a victor field histogram algorithm (VFH) which is used widely in robotics for avoiding obstacles, the comparison will be in terms of reaching time and distance of reaching the goal. The Gazebo Simulator (GS) is used to visualize the movement of the quadrotor. The gazebo has another preferred position it helps to show the motion development of the quadrotor without managing the mathematical model of the quadrotor. The Robotic Operating System (ROS) is used to transfer the data between the MATLAB Simulink program and the Gazebo Simulator. The diversion results show that, the proposed mission techniques win to drive the quarter on the perfect route similarly at the limit with regards to the quadrotor to go without hitting any obstacle in the perfect way.


2020 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 107118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujiao Zhao ◽  
Xin Qi ◽  
Atilla Incecik ◽  
Yong Ma ◽  
Zhixiong Li

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 4412
Author(s):  
Kadeghe Fue ◽  
Wesley Porter ◽  
Edward Barnes ◽  
Changying Li ◽  
Glen Rains

This study proposes an algorithm that controls an autonomous, multi-purpose, center-articulated hydrostatic transmission rover to navigate along crop rows. This multi-purpose rover (MPR) is being developed to harvest undefoliated cotton to expand the harvest window to up to 50 days. The rover would harvest cotton in teams by performing several passes as the bolls become ready to harvest. We propose that a small robot could make cotton production more profitable for farmers and more accessible to owners of smaller plots of land who cannot afford large tractors and harvesting equipment. The rover was localized with a low-cost Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System (RTK-GNSS), encoders, and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)s for heading. Robot Operating System (ROS)-based software was developed to harness the sensor information, localize the rover, and execute path following controls. To test the localization and modified pure-pursuit path-following controls, first, GNSS waypoints were obtained by manually steering the rover over the rows followed by the rover autonomously driving over the rows. The results showed that the robot achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.04 m, 0.06 m, and 0.09 m for the first, second and third passes of the experiment, respectively. The robot achieved an MAE of 0.06 m. When turning at the end of the row, the MAE from the RTK-GNSS-generated path was 0.24 m. The turning errors were acceptable for the open field at the end of the row. Errors while driving down the row did damage the plants by moving close to the plants’ stems, and these errors likely would not impede operations designed for the MPR. Therefore, the designed rover and control algorithms are good and can be used for cotton harvesting operations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 1450028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behrouz Kheirfam

A corrector–predictor algorithm is proposed for solving semidefinite optimization problems. In each two steps, the algorithm uses the Nesterov–Todd directions. The algorithm produces a sequence of iterates in a neighborhood of the central path based on a new proximity measure. The predictor step uses line search schemes requiring the reduction of the duality gap, while the corrector step is used to restore the iterates to the neighborhood of the central path. Finally, the algorithm has [Formula: see text] iteration complexity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document