Six-stage revision surgery of a triple periprosthetic joint infection due to a delayed diagnosis of a bilateral psoas abscess: a case report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Lucero ◽  
F Díaz-Dilernia ◽  
F Comba ◽  
G Zanotti ◽  
F Piccaluga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Psoas Abscess ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Left Knee ◽  
Complex Scenario

Case We present a case of a 70-year-old woman with simultaneous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of both hips and left knee due to a bilateral psoas abscess. The patient underwent debridement and implants removal with the consequent reimplantation in a sequential six-stage revision surgery. At four years of follow-up and in spite of the patient’s comorbidities and current PJI presentation, she maintains full activities of daily living without restrictions. Conclusion Accurate and early diagnosis of a psoas abscess is crucial. This case report provides experience of a complex scenario, the decision-making involved and the outcomes of an underdiagnosed complication.

scholarly journals Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 630-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A M Löwik ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Paul C Jutte ◽  
Wierd P Zijlstra ◽  
Bas A S Knobben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Time Point ◽  
Viable Treatment

Abstract Background The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty. Methods We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics. Results We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1–2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3–4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5–6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7–12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P < .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals. Conclusions DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.

scholarly journals Chilaiditi Syndrome: A Case Report Highlighting the Intermittent Nature of the Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esha M. Kapania ◽  
Christina Link ◽  
Joshua M. Eberhardt
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Radiographic Evidence ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Chilaiditi Syndrome

Background. Chilaiditi syndrome is a phenomenon where there is an interposition of the colon between the liver and the abdominal wall leading to clinical symptoms. This is distinct from Chilaiditi sign for which there is radiographic evidence of the interposition, but is asymptomatic. Case Presentation. Here, we present the case of a patient who, despite having clinical symptoms for a decade, had a delayed diagnosis presumably due to the interposition being intermittent and episodic. Conclusions. This case highlights the fact that Chilaiditi syndrome may be intermittent and episodic in nature. This raises an interesting question of whether previous case reports, which describe complete resolution of the syndrome after nonsurgical intervention, are perhaps just capturing periods of resolution that may have occurred spontaneously. Because the syndrome may be intermittent with spontaneous resolution and then recurrence, patients should have episodic follow-up after nonsurgical intervention.

scholarly journals Rare Occurrence of Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection Due to Fusobacterium Nucleatum in the Background of a Dental Procedure: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2026-2030
Author(s):  
Teng‐bin Shi ◽  
Xin‐yu Fang ◽  
Chao‐xin Wang ◽  
Yuan‐qing Cai ◽  
Wen‐bo Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Fusobacterium Nucleatum ◽  
Rare Occurrence ◽  
Dental Procedure

scholarly journals Salmonella Sp. as the Cause of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: Report of a Rare Case and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0004
Author(s):  
Asep Santoso ◽  
Iwan Budiwan Anwar ◽  
Tangkas Sibarani ◽  
Bintang Soetjahjo ◽  
Ismail Mariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Immunosuppressed Patient ◽  
Cement Spacer

Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip due to Salmonella sp. is rare. It is sometimes difficult to treat and needed a prolonged antibiotic treatment. We reported a case of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip in a 67 years old female who received prior left total hip arthroplasty. Two-stage revision surgery with antibiotic-loaded cement spacer has been performed to the patient and successfully control the infection. Review of the literatures also has been done. Salmonella Sp. has to be considered as one of differential etiology in the case of infected arthroplasty especially in an immunosuppressed patient. It showed still there has been no consensus in the treatment of choice for this particular case.

scholarly journals Pseudocyst of the Psoas: a case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2367
Author(s):  
C. Danny Darlington ◽  
S. Carbin Joseph ◽  
G. Fatima Shirly Anitha
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Percutaneous Drainage ◽  
Psoas Abscess ◽  
Acute Severe Pancreatitis ◽  
Severe Pancreatitis

Psoas abscess is usually tuberculous or pyogenic in etiology. Pancreatitis of the tail of pancreas can cause psoas pseudocyst, especially on the left side. Infection of such pseudocysts can mimic pyogenic psoas abscess, and is more common in diabetics. We report a 25-year-old non-diabetic man with acute severe pancreatitis, who developed infected left psoas abscess on follow up. The psoas abscess was managed successfully by percutaneous drainage and antibiotics.

scholarly journals Accidental Arthrotomy Causing Aseptic Monoarthritis Due to Agave Sap: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 246-248
Author(s):  
Sam Ontiveros ◽  
Alicia Minns
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Synovial Fluid ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Left Knee ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Blood Cell Count ◽  
Penetrating Injuries

Introduction: Aseptic inflammatory arthritis has been reported from thorns or cactus needles after inadvertent arthrotomy. Agave sap irritants may cause an aseptic inflammatory arthritis mimicking a septic joint. Case Report: A 27-year-old male presented with left knee pain and swelling two hours after suffering an accidental stab wound to his left lateral knee by an agave plant spine. Synovial fluid white blood cell count was 92,730 mm3 with 75% neutrophils and no crystals. Surgical washout was remarkable for turbid fluid and no foreign body. Synovial fluid and blood cultures remained without growth. At two-week follow-up, the patient had recovered. Conclusion: Penetrating injuries from agave thorns can cause an inflammatory arthritis that mimics septic arthritis.

scholarly journals Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection. A retrospective single-center experience

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Karsten D. Ottink ◽  
Stefan J. Gelderman ◽  
Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker ◽  
Joris J. W. Ploegmakers ◽  
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Nuclear Imaging ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract. Background: A low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may present without specific symptoms, and its diagnosis remains a challenge. Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) and white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy are incorporated into recently introduced diagnostic criteria for PJI, but their exact value in diagnosing low-grade PJI in patients with nonspecific symptoms remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients with a prosthetic joint of the hip or knee who underwent TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy between 2009 and 2016 because of nonspecific symptoms. We reviewed and calculated diagnostic accuracy of the TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy to diagnose or exclude PJI. PJI was defined based on multiple cultures obtained during revision surgery. In patients who did not undergo revision surgery, PJI was ruled out by clinical follow-up of at least 2 years absent of clinical signs of infection based on MSIS 2011 criteria. Results: A total of 373 patients were evaluated, including 340 TPBSs and 142 WBC scintigraphies. Thirteen patients (3.5 %) were diagnosed with a PJI. TPBS sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were 71 %, 65 %, 8 % and 98 %, respectively. Thirty-five percent of TPBS showed increased uptake. Stratification for time intervals between the index arthroplasty and the onset of symptoms did not alter its diagnostic accuracy. WBC scintigraphy sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 30 %, 90 %, 25 % and 94 %, respectively. Conclusion: Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection.

scholarly journals Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Steinicke ◽  
J. Schwarze ◽  
G. Gosheger ◽  
B. Moellenbeck ◽  
T. Ackmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Exchange Arthroplasty ◽  
Parametric Testing

Abstract Introduction Two-stage revision is a frequently chosen approach to treat chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, management of recurrent infection after a two-stage exchange remains debated and the outcome of a repeat two-stage procedure is unclear. This study investigates the success rates of repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty and analyzes possible risk factors for failure. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified 55 patients (23 hips, 32 knees) who were treated with repeat resection arthroplasty and planned delayed reimplantation for recurrent periprosthetic joint infection between 2010 and 2019 after a prior two-stage revision at the same institution. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a median follow-up time of 34 months (IQR 22–51). The infection-free survival, associated revision surgeries, and potential risk factors for further revision were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and comparative non-parametric testing. Results 78% (43/55) underwent reimplantation after a repeat implant removal. Of those who completed the second-stage surgery, 37% (16/43) underwent additional revision for infection and 14% (6/55) underwent amputation. The reinfection-free implant survivorship amounted to 77% (95% CI 64–89%) after 1 year and 38% (95% CI 18–57%) after 5 years. Patients with a higher comorbidity score were less likely to undergo second-stage reimplantation (median 5 vs. 3, p = 0.034). Furthermore, obese patients (p = 0.026, Fisher’s exact test) and diabetics (p < 0.001, log-rank test) had a higher risk for further infection. Most commonly cultures yielded polymicrobial growth at the repeat two-stage exchange (27%, 15/55) and at re-reinfection (32%, 9/28). Pathogen persistence was observed in 21% (6/28) of re-reinfected patients. Conclusion The success rates after repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty are low. Patients must be counseled accordingly and different modes of treatment should be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document