scholarly journals Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 630-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A M Löwik ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Paul C Jutte ◽  
Wierd P Zijlstra ◽  
Bas A S Knobben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Time Point ◽  
Viable Treatment

Abstract Background The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty. Methods We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics. Results We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1–2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3–4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5–6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7–12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P < .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals. Conclusions DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.

scholarly journals Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Deng ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Hongyi Shao ◽  
Baozhan Yu ◽  
Jiying Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Sinus Tract ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

Abstract Background The relevance between the presence of a sinus tract and the failure risk after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the success rate of DAIR between patients with or without a sinus tract and to explore the possible risk factors for failure after DAIR in patients with a sinus tract. Methods Consecutive DAIR cases for PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and June 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up in two tertiary joint arthroplasty centers were included. Patients were classified into the sinus tract group and the non-sinus tract group according to the presence of a sinus tract. The success rate after DAIR were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Potential risk factors for failure in the sinus group were also explored. Results One hundred seven patients were included. At a median 4.4 years of follow-up, 19 of 52 (36.5%) cases failed in the sinus tract group, while 15 of 55 (27.3%) cases failed in the non-sinus tract group. The 1-year and 5-year cumulative success rates were 71.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.8-84.6%) and 56.8% (95% CI: 42.6-75.7%) in the sinus tract group, respectively, which were similar to the counterparts in the non-sinus tract group (P = 0.214). Among patients with a sinus tract, DAIR with the exchange of modular components showed a higher success rate (75.8% versus 47.4%, P = 0.038). Conclusions The presence of a sinus tract does not affect the success rate of DAIR. Modular component exchange in DAIR was proposed for patients with a sinus tract for an improved infection control rate.

scholarly journals 255. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Failure of DAIR (Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention) for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S234-S234
Author(s):  
Milan Kapadia ◽  
Alissa Burge ◽  
Eric Bogner ◽  
Peter Sculco ◽  
Alberto V Carli
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Adjacent Tissue ◽  
Implant Retention

Abstract Background Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is commonly utilized to treat acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where thorough debridement of affected tissues is considered essential. Small case series describe occurrences where PJI spreads into adjacent tissues (iliopsoas recess in hips; neurovascular bundle in knees) and bone (osteomyelitis). Surgeons often cite adjacent tissue/bone infiltration as a poor predictor for DAIR. We sought to evaluate if the presence of adjacent tissue/bony lesions on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was associated with poorer DAIR outcomes. Methods MSIS criteria-positive hip (n=22) and knee (n=12) PJI cases in our institution from 2010-2020, with preoperative MRI prior to DAIR treatment, were evaluated. Demographics, microbiology, chronicity, and host grade were recorded. MRIs were assessed by two board-certified radiologists blinded to treatment outcomes, scoring images based on the presence of 18 distinct findings. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using bias adjusted Kappa scores. Failure was defined as repeat surgery for PJI. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to determine predictors of DAIR success at 90 days and 2 years. Results When comparing successful and non-successful hip PJI cases, the presence of a psoas recess fluid collection on MRI was significantly predictive of a higher rate of treatment failure at 2 years (odds ratio=0.12; p = 0.045), with a moderate adjusted kappa score of 0.5. With regard to knee PJI cases, capsular disruption (40% [2/5] vs 100% [7/7], p= 0.046) and patellar tendon disruption (25% [1/4] vs 100% [8/8], p = 0.018) were independently associated with higher 90-day failure. However, knee MRI findings were not predictive of failure using regression. Conclusion In this preliminary study, preoperative MRI findings anecdotally linked with PJI treatment failure could be reliably identified. However, few predicted DAIR failure. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of MRI in predicting PJI treatment success. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention for Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Analysis of Implant Survival after Cure of Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Martin Clauss ◽  
Christof Hunkeler ◽  
Isabella Manzoni ◽  
Parham Sendi
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Radiographic Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
The Difference

Abstract. Background: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a valuable option for treating early and acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The inflammation caused by the infection and the surgical intervention during DAIR may influence the long-term stability of the implant. In this study, we analyzed the sequelae of DAIR on implant survival in hip PJI after cure of infection.Methods: Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from our database implanted between 1992 and 2016 were included in a retrospective double-cohort study. THAs were exposed (DAIR cohort) or not exposed to DAIR (control cohort). The control cohort comprised patients matched 3:1 to the DAIR cohort. The outcome was implant failure over time. It was evaluated for (i) revision for any reason, (ii) aseptic loosening of any component, and (iii) radiographic evidence of loosening.Results: 57 THAs (56 patients) were included in the DAIR cohort and 170 THAs (168 patients) in the control cohort. The mean follow-up periods in the DAIR and control cohorts were 6.1 and 7.8 years, respectively. During follow-up, 20 (36%) patients in the DAIR cohort and 54 (32%) in the control cohort died after a mean of 4.1 and 7.2 years, respectively. Revision for any reason was performed in 9 (16%) THAs in the DAIR cohort and in 10 (6%) THAs (p=0.03) in the control cohort, and revision for aseptic loosening of any component in 5 (9%) and 8 (5%) THAs (p=0.32), respectively. Radiological analysis included 56 THAs in the DAIR cohort and 168 THAs in the control cohort. Two (4%) stems and 2 (4%) cups in the DAIR cohort and 7 (4%) and 1 (0.6%) in the control cohort, respectively, demonstrated radiological signs of failure (p=1).Conclusions: THAs exposed to DAIR were revised for any reason more frequently than were THAs in the control cohort. The difference was mainly caused by septic failures. After cure of PJI, the difference in revisions for aseptic loosening was not significant. There was no significant difference in radiographic evidence of loosening of any component between cohorts. These data suggest that cured hip PJI previously exposed to DAIR do not fail more frequently for aseptic reasons than do THAs not exposed to DAIR.

Long-term antimicrobial suppression prevents treatment failure of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Renz ◽  
Anastasia Rakow ◽  
Michael Müller ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Andrej Trampuz
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection

One-stage exchange should be avoided in periprosthetic joint infection cases with massive femoral bone loss or with history of any failed revision to treat periprosthetic joint infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (7) ◽  
pp. 1247-1253
Author(s):  
Pablo A. Slullitel ◽  
José I. Oñativia ◽  
Gerardo Zanotti ◽  
Fernando Comba ◽  
Francisco Piccaluga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Periprosthetic Fracture ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Femoral Bone ◽  
One Stage

Aims There is a paucity of long-term studies analyzing risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the mid- to long-term septic and non-septic failure rate of single-stage revision for PJI after THA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Mean follow-up was seven years (1 to 14). Septic failure was diagnosed with a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any reoperation for mechanical causes in the absence of evidence of infection was considered as non-septic failure. A competing risk regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic and non-septic failures. A Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to analyze mortality. Results The cumulative incidence of septic failure was 8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 15) at one year, 13.8% (95% CI 7.6 to 22) at two years, and 19.7% (95% CI 12 to 28.6) at five and ten years of follow-up. A femoral bone defect worse than Paprosky IIIA (hazard ratio (HR) 13.58 (95% CI 4.86 to 37.93); p < 0.001) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; HR 3.88 (95% CI 1.49 to 10.09); p = 0.005) were significantly associated with septic failure. Instability and periprosthetic fracture were the most common reasons for mechanical failure (5.7% and 4.5%, respectively). The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was 2% (95% CI 0.4 to 7) at two years, 9% (95% CI 4 to 17) at five years, and 12% (95% CI 5 to 22) at ten years. A previous revision to treat PJI was significantly associated with non-septic failure (HR 9.93 (95% CI 1.77 to 55.46); p = 0.009). At the five-year timepoint, 93% of the patients were alive (95% CI 84% to 96%), which fell to 86% (95% CI 75% to 92%) at ten-year follow-up. Conclusion Massive femoral bone loss was associated with greater chances of developing a further septic failure. All septic failures occurred within the first five years following the one-stage exchange. Surgeons should be aware of instability and periprosthetic fracture being potential causes of further aseptic revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1247–1253.

scholarly journals Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion in patients with acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection of the knee

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pruk Chaiyakit ◽  
Surapoj Meknavin ◽  
Natthapong Hongku ◽  
Ittiwat Onklin
Keyword(s):  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Recommended Treatment ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Antibiotic Infusion

Abstract Background Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, DAIR is associated with a high percentage of unsuccessful outcomes. Since 2007, direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion, which can provide a high concentration of intra-articular antibiotic, has been used in combination with DAIR to improve treatment outcomes among patients in our institution. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion in patients who presented with acute hematogenous PJI after TKA. Methods We reviewed the data of all patients diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI after primary TKA (from 2008 to 2015) who received DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Results In total, 15 knees in 12 patients were semi-urgently treated with this method. The mean follow-up time was 93.3 (minimum: 56) months, and the longest follow-up time was 11 years. Two patients (n = 3 knees) had a well-functioning, non-infected prosthesis 6 and 10 years after the procedure. Two patients (n = 2 knees) had re-infection 2 and 5 years after surgery, and they required two-stage revision. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. Finally, 13 (86.6%) of 15 infected knees were successfully treated with this method. Conclusions DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion is an effective treatment for acute hematogenous PJI after TKA.

scholarly journals Long-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Eva Benavent ◽  
Laura Morata ◽  
Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal ◽  
Esteban Alberto Reynaga ◽  
Laura Soldevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Osteoarticular Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Lower Drug ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction ◽  
Staphylococcus Spp

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017–March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51; 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%); where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47; S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%); median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15–44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079; and 240 × 109/L to 239 × 109/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%; among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.

scholarly journals Determining transition readiness in Swiss childhood cancer survivors – a feasibility study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Otth ◽  
Patrick Wechsler ◽  
Sibylle Denzler ◽  
Henrik Koehler ◽  
Katrin Scheinemann
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survivors ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Time Point

Abstract Background The successful transition of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) from pediatric to adult long-term follow-up care is a critical phase, and determining the right time point can be challenging. We assessed the feasibility of the use of existing transition readiness tools in the context of the Swiss health care system, assessed partly transition readiness in Swiss CCSs, and compared our findings with Canadian CCSs for which these tools were originally developed. Methods We officially translated the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and Self-Management Skill Scale (SMSS) into German and integrated them into this cross-sectional study. We included CCSs attending the long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic in the Division of Oncology-Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Kantonsspital Aarau. We used descriptive statistics to describe transition readiness. Results We randomly recruited 50 CCSs aged ≥18 years at participation. The CCSs had a median CWS score of 62 (interquartile range 55–71), indicating a moderate level of cancer-related worry. Despite high self-management skills, some answers showed a dependency of CCSs on their parents. Our experience shows that the CWS and SMSS are easy for Swiss CCSs to use, understand, and complete. The interpretation of the results must take differences in health care systems between countries into account. Conclusions The translated CWS and SMSS are appropriate additional measures to assess transition readiness in CCSs. These scales can be used longitudinally to find the individual time point for transition and the completion by CCSs enables the health care team to individualize the transition process and to support the CCSs according to their individual needs.

Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) in Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): what predicts success or failure?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xiang Toh ◽  
Zhen Ning Yeo ◽  
Ming Han Lincoln Liow ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
Seng-Jin Yeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Implant Retention
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document