scholarly journals The Goldilocks question: what size is 'just right' for social care providers?

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-87
Author(s):  
Jon Glasby ◽  
Catherine Needham ◽  
Kerry Allen ◽  
Kelly Hall ◽  
Steve McKay
Keyword(s):  
Social Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Just Right

scholarly journals Ownership Variation in Violated Regulations and National Care Standards: Evidence From Social Care Providers

2021 ◽  
pp. 089976402110014
Author(s):  
Anders M. Bach-Mortensen ◽  
Ani Movsisyan
Keyword(s):  
Social Care ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Third Sector ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Research Gap

Social care services are increasingly provisioned in quasi-markets in which for-profit, public, and third sector providers compete for contracts. Existing research has investigated the implications of this development by analyzing ownership variation in latent outcomes such as quality, but little is known about whether ownership predicts variation in more concrete outcomes, such as violation types. To address this research gap, we coded publicly available inspection reports of social care providers regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland and created a novel data set enabling analysis of ownership variation in violations of (a) regulations, and (b) national care standards over an entire inspection year ( n = 4,178). Using negative binomial and logistic regression models, we find that for-profit providers are more likely to violate non-enforceable outcomes (national care standards) relative to other ownership types. We did not identify a statistically significant difference between for-profit and third sector providers with regard to enforceable outcomes (regulations).

scholarly journals Using telemonitoring to support personal care planning for adults with learning disabilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 602-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Bramley ◽  
Catherine Mangan ◽  
Mervyn Conroy
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Theory Of Change ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Residential Setting ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Adults With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Just Right

IntroductionWe report on an evaluation of the Just Right approach for planning care for adults with learning disabilities and how it can support culture change. Just Right combines installing a telemonitoring system with training for care managers in person-centred care planning and the interpretation of charts that summarise activity data for their setting. By providing insights into the needs of individuals Just Right allows existing care provision to be reviewed to ensure it is ‘just right’. The Just Right approach can also potentially identify over-care and resources that can released.MethodsA mixed-methods approach was used, triangulating qualitative and quantitative baseline and follow-up data. Qualitative data were collected before and after implementation from focus groups on barriers, enablers, success outcomes and impacts. A theory of change was developed. Detailed data on individual adults with learning disabilities were collected before and after installation of equipment using a linked online survey completed by their care managers.ResultsNine commissioning local authorities were recruited with 33 care providers serving 417 adults with learning disabilities. Issues relating to implementation included staff acceptance, culture, consent, safeguarding, local authority engagement, interpretation of data and residential setting. Changes to care were identified for 20.3% of individuals, with 66% of providers not identifying any changes because Just Right confirmed that they were providing the right level of support.DiscussionBy combining telemonitoring and person-centred care planning, Just Right provides a holistic approach and necessary information for conversations amongst stakeholders about the care needs of adults with learning disabilities. Depending on how it is introduced, and the nature of conversations held, the Just Right approach can potentially change culture, leading to improved outcomes.

scholarly journals The barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia education and training in health and social care services: a mixed-methods study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire A. Surr ◽  
Sahdia Parveen ◽  
Sarah J. Smith ◽  
Michelle Drury ◽  
Cara Sass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
And Training ◽  
Dementia Education

Abstract Background The health and social care workforce requires access to appropriate education and training to provide quality care for people with dementia. Success of a training programme depends on staff ability to put their learning into practice through behaviour change. This study aimed to investigate the barriers and facilitators to implementation of dementia education and training in health and social care services using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B model of behaviour change. Methods A mixed-methods design. Participants were dementia training leads, training facilitators, managers and staff who had attended training who worked in UK care homes, acute hospitals, mental health services and primary care settings. Methods were an online audit of care and training providers, online survey of trained staff and individual/group interviews with organisational training leads, training facilitators, staff who had attended dementia training and managers. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic template analysis. Results Barriers and facilitators were analysed according the COM-B domains. “Capability” factors were not perceived as a significant barrier to training implementation. Factors which supported staff capability included the use of interactive face-to-face training, and training that was relevant to their role. Factors that increased staff “motivation” included skilled facilitation of training, trainees’ desire to learn and the provision of incentives (e.g. attendance during paid working hours, badges/certifications). “Opportunity” factors were most prevalent with lack of resources (time, financial, staffing and environmental) being the biggest perceived barrier to training implementation. The presence or not of external support from families and internal factors such as the organisational culture and its supportiveness of good dementia care and training implementation were also influential. Conclusions A wide range of factors may present as barriers to or facilitators of dementia training implementation and behaviour change for staff. These should be considered by health and social care providers in the context of dementia training design and delivery in order to maximise potential for implementation.

scholarly journals End-of-life care for homeless people: A qualitative analysis exploring the challenges to access and provision of palliative care

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Shulman ◽  
Briony F Hudson ◽  
Joseph Low ◽  
Nigel Hewett ◽  
Julian Daley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Homeless People ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Formerly Homeless

Background: Being homeless or vulnerably housed is associated with death at a young age, frequently related to medical problems complicated by drug or alcohol dependence. Homeless people experience high symptom burden at the end of life, yet palliative care service use is limited. Aim: To explore the views and experiences of current and formerly homeless people, frontline homelessness staff (from hostels, day centres and outreach teams) and health- and social-care providers, regarding challenges to supporting homeless people with advanced ill health, and to make suggestions for improving care. Design: Thematic analysis of data collected using focus groups and interviews. Participants: Single homeless people ( n = 28), formerly homeless people ( n = 10), health- and social-care providers ( n = 48), hostel staff ( n = 30) and outreach staff ( n = 10). Results: This research documents growing concern that many homeless people are dying in unsupported, unacceptable situations. It highlights the complexities of identifying who is palliative and lack of appropriate places of care for people who are homeless with high support needs, particularly in combination with substance misuse issues. Conclusion: Due to the lack of alternatives, homeless people with advanced ill health often remain in hostels. Conflict between the recovery-focused nature of many services and the realities of health and illness for often young homeless people result in a lack of person-centred care. Greater multidisciplinary working, extended in-reach into hostels from health and social services and training for all professional groups along with more access to appropriate supported accommodation are required to improve care for homeless people with advanced ill health.

scholarly journals Sharing a vision. Do participants in integrated care programmes have the same goals and objectives?

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-129
Author(s):  
Axel Kaehne
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Shared Vision ◽  
Window Of Opportunity ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Services ◽  
The North ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Goals And Objectives

Integrating health and social care services remains one of the most difficult undertakings in the field of care delivery. One of the key requirements for success in integration programmes is a shared vision amongst care providers. Shared visions may contain views as to what the new services should look like, how it should operate and what it should be able to achieve. The paper reports findings of an evaluation of a service integration programme in the North of England. It confirms that a programme consensus on issues such as aims and objectives and programme logics is seen by participants as a key to success. Yet, the study also found that there is a specific window of opportunity in integration programmes when participating organisations start on relatively high levels of commitment and enthusiasm which tend to tail off relatively quickly. The paper closes with a discussion about the implications of the findings for programme designers and service planners.

scholarly journals THE EVALUATION OF INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN PRIMARY CARE: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Linda C Smit ◽  
Jeroen Dikken ◽  
Nienke M Moolenaar ◽  
Marieke J Schuurmans ◽  
Niek J De Wit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Network ◽  
Social Network Analysis ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Older People ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Health And Social Care

Abstract Effective, safe, person-centred care relies on skilled interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and practice. Little is known about interprofessional education (IPE) to increase IPC in the context of care for frail older people in the community. This study evaluates the effectiveness of IPE on IPC of primary health and social care providers providing care to frail older people in three districts in the Netherlands. A before-after study among 55 health care professionals using social network analysis was performed. The number of contacts increased on average with two contacts. The reciprocity in the districts increased with 15%, 2% and 13%. The diversity of contacts increased between 6% and 10% (p <.001; p .055; p .371). The IPE effectuated a larger, more collaborative, and diverse interprofessional network of health and social care professionals providing care to frail older people suggesting a ripple-effect of networked interventions.

scholarly journals Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e022975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen ◽  
Paul Montgomery
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Third Sector ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Better Than

ObjectivesSocial services are increasingly commissioned to third and for-profit sector providers, but little is known about whether and how these changes influence quality indicators. We assessed quality-related outcomes across for-profit, public and third sector organisations delivering social care services.DesignA secondary analysis was conducted on publically available data collected by the independent regulator of social care organisations in Scotland. All outcomes are reported as predicted probabilities derived from multivariate logistic regression coefficients. Generalised ordered logit models are utilised for the quality domains and the risk assessment score and logistic regression for whether complaints or requirements were issued to organisations.SettingOrganisations inspected by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland.Population13 310 social care organisations (eg, nursing homes and day care organisations).Primary outcomesThe quality and risk domains collected by the Care Inspectorate and complaints and requirements issued to organisations within the last 3 years.ResultsControlling for multiple factors, we find that public and third sector providers performed consistently and statistically significantly better than for-profit organisations on most outcomes. For example, for-profit services were the most likely to be rated as high and medium risk (6.9% and 13.2%, respectively), and the least likely to be classified as low risk (79.9%). Public providers had the highest probability of being categorised as low risk (91.1%), and the lowest probability of having their services classified as medium (6.9%) and high risk (2%), followed by third sector providers (86%, 8.5% and 4.5%, respectively). Public providers performed better than third sector providers in some outcomes, but differences were relatively low and inconsistent.ConclusionPublic and third sector providers were rated considerably higher than their for-profit counterparts on most observed outcomes. Regulators might use this information to consider how social care providers across sector are incentivised to manage their resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document