Strong Kichwa Women are Made, Made Up, and Make Others: Feminist Theory Meets Amazonian Ethnography of Gender, Bodies, and Social Change

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-34
Author(s):  
Jamie E. Shenton
2022 ◽  
pp. 026540752110657
Author(s):  
Katherine R. Allen

Feminism provides a worldview with innovative possibilities for scholarship and activism on behalf of families and intimate relationships. As a flexible framework capable of engaging with contentious theoretical ideas and the urgency of social change, feminism offers a simultaneous way to express an epistemology (knowledge), a methodology (the production of knowledge), an ontology (one’s subjective way of being in the world), and a praxis (the translation of knowledge into actions that produce beneficial social change). Feminist family science, in particular, advances critical, intersectional, and queer approaches to examine the uses and abuses of power and the multiple axes upon which individuals and families are privileged, marginalized, and oppressed in diverse social contexts. In this paper, I embrace feminism as a personal, professional (academic), and political project and use stories from my own life to illuminate broader social-historical structures, processes, and contexts associated with gender, race, class, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, nationality, and other systems of social stratification. I provide a brief history and reflections on contemporary feminist theory and activism, particularly from the perspective of my disciplinary affiliation of feminist family science. I address feminism as an intersectional perspective through three themes: (a) theory: defining a critical feminist approach, (b) method: critical feminist autoethnographic research, and (c) praxis: transforming feminist theory into action. I conclude with takeaway messages for incorporating reflexivity and critical consciousness raising to provoke thought and action in the areas of personal, professional, and political change.


1997 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haithe Anderson ◽  
Patti Lather

Can accessible and clear writing styles unlock the power of feminist theory? Can clearly articulated ideas change the world? Some academic feminists think so. They feel that feminist theory should be measured against its ability to contribute to social change. Anything less and their work would look merely academic. Patti Lather's work, judging by her recent article, "Troubling Clarity: The Politics of Accessible Language" (Fall 1996), has been criticized by other feminists precisely because her desire to appeal to intramural readers appears to overshadow her commitment to extramural change. Gaby Weiner (1993), for example, implies that Lather's use of dense prose denies equal access to the interesting ideas that her complicated style of writing contains. Weiner assumes, as do other feminists, that feminist theory in education should be written in a clear and accessible way so that it can reach beyond the classroom to edify the world. Lather responds to this call for clarity by defending her complex writing style and her desire "to be heard," as she writes, "in the halls of High Theory." She justifies her position by pointing out that academic feminists "can't do everything and that the struggle demands contestation on every front" (p. 526).


1989 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Felski

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Mara Viveros Vigoya

Resumen: Las teorías feministas han sido fundamentales en laconformación de los estudios contemporáneos sobrehombres y masculinidades como tentativas intelectualesy asuntos académicos y como problemas sociales. Estetrabajo analiza el impacto que ha tenido la teoríafeminista en sus distintas vertientes en los estudios sobrelos varones y las masculinidades, así como los presupuestosde estas teorías y sus principales vacíos. Porúltimo, se cuestiona cierto optimismo compartido enrelación con los cambios que se han producido en lasrelaciones de género. Uno de los retos más importantesque tiene el feminismo actualmente es mostrar que los logrosadquiridos por las mujeres en la democratización de lasrelaciones de género no deben darse por un hechoincontestable y que las relaciones de género, como relacionesde fuerza dependen de la acción y reacción de lasfuerzas presentes en ellas. Para abordar este tema sehará referencia a una serie de trabajos que evidencianlas resistencias masculinas al cambio social y las luchasque libran actualmente los varones por mantener yconsolidar su dominación sobre las mujeres.Palabras clave: Teoría feminista, masculinidades,relaciones de género, estudios de géneroAbstract: Feminist theories have been fundamental in givingshape to contemporary studies of men and masculinitiesas intellectual and academic projects as well as socialproblems. This paper analyzes the impact feminist theoryin its different currents has had on these studies, as wellas the presuppositions on which these theories are basedand their major gaps. Finally, a certain optimism aboutchanges in gender relations is questioned. One of themajor challenges feminism faces at present is to showthat women’s achievements in democratizing genderrelations cannot be taken for granted, and that theircontinuation depends on actions and reactions of forces that are at play in them. To tackle this subject, reference is made to a series of studies that show masculine resistances to social change and the struggles that males wage at present to maintain and consolidate theirdomination of women.Keywords: Feminist theory, masculinities, genderrelations, gender studies


Hypatia ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Elliot

This essay engages in a debate with Nancy Fraser and Dorothy Leland concerning the contribution of Lacanian-inspired psychoanalytic feminism to feminist theory and practice. Teresa Brennan's analysis of the impasse in psychoanalysis and feminism and Judith Butler's proposal for a radically democratic feminism are employed in examining the issues at stake. I argue, with Brennan, that the impasse confronting psychoanalysis and feminism is the result of different conceptions of the relationship between the psychical and the social. I suggest Lacanian-inspired feminist conceptions are useful and deserve our consideration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 159-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella Sandford

This article addresses the question of the relation between disciplines and transdisciplinary practices and concepts through a discussion of the relationship between philosophy and the emblematically transdisciplinary practice of feminist theory, via a discussion of interdisciplinarity and related terms in gender studies. It argues that the tendency of philosophy to reject feminist theory, as alien to it as a discipline, is in a sense correct, to the extent that the two defining features of feminist theory – its constitutive tie to a political agenda for social change and the transdisciplinary character of many of its central concepts – are indeed at odds with, and pose a threat to, the traditional insularity of the discipline of philosophy. If feminist philosophy incorporates feminist theory, its transdisciplinary aspects thus open it up to an unavoidable contradiction. Nonetheless, I will argue, this is a contradiction that can and must be endured and made productive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document