scholarly journals Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance and Differences in Visit Type for a Population of Patients with Diabetes after Medicaid Expansion

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Angier ◽  
David Ezekiel-Herrera ◽  
Miguel Marino ◽  
Megan Hoopes ◽  
Elizabeth A Jacobs ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Jingxuan Zhao ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Zhiyuan Zheng ◽  
Leticia Maciel Nogueira ◽  
Paul C. Nathan ◽  
...  

143 Background: Childhood cancer survival varies by race/ethnicity in the United States. This study evaluated the impact of potentially modifiable characteristics - health insurance and area-level social deprivation - on racial/ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival nationwide. Methods: We identified 65,113 childhood cancer patients aged < 18 years newly diagnosed with any of 10 common cancer types (e.g. central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Hodgkin lymphoma) from the 2004-2014 National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival probabilities by race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white (NHW) vs non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other (NH other)) for each cancer type. We conducted mediation analyses by the mma R package to evaluate the racial/ethnic survival disparities mediated by health insurance (private, Medicaid, and uninsured) and social deprivation index (SDI) quartile. SDI is a composite measure of deprivation based on seven characteristics (e.g. income, education, employment). Results: Compared to NHW, worse survival were observed for NHB (HR (hazard ratio): 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3-1.5), Hispanic (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2), and NH other (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3) for all cancer sites combined after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics other than health insurance and SDI. Health insurance explained 20% of the survival disparities and SDI explained 19% of the disparity between NHB vs NHW; health insurance explained 48% of the survival disparities and SDI explained 45% of the disparity between Hispanic vs NHW. For ALL, health insurance significantly explained 15% and 18% of the survival disparities between NHB and Hispanic vs NHW, respectively. SDI significantly explained 19% and 31% of the disparities, respectively. Conclusions: Health insurance and SDI mediated racial/ethnic survival disparities for several childhood cancers. Expanding insurance coverage and improving healthcare access in disadvantaged areas may effectively reduce disparities for these cancer sites.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5004-5004
Author(s):  
Maria E Santaella ◽  
Michelle L Witkop ◽  
Cynthia Nichols ◽  
Rosaura Vidal ◽  
Leonard A. Valentino

Abstract Background: Community Voices in Research (CVR) is the National Hemophilia Foundation's community-powered registry designed to provide researchers with a firsthand, 360-degree view of what it means to live with an inherited bleeding disorder (IBD) by providing insight on a wide range of areas previously not evaluated or under-evaluated in this population. Since 2019, information has been collected from those with an IBD as well as their immediate family members/caregivers. Previous QOL data-collection efforts have been narrow in scope or duration and/or relied on HCP-reported data. The self-reported, confidential, de-identified aggregate CVR data are used to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life for people with IBDs and identify research questions important to the community. Methods : Participants complete an enrollment survey followed by the baseline then annual surveys. Additional surveys focused on specific areas of interest are issued periodically. Participants provide demographic data including race, ethnicity, level of education, household income, employment, and health-insurance status. External researchers of various collaborations may apply for access to the de-identified, aggregate data, launch individual surveys, or invite participants to virtual advisory panels. All research findings are communicated to its participants through a personalized CVR dashboard. Results : White/Caucasians make up 86.9% of registrants; (11.3%) include Black/African American; Asian; South Asian; Alaska Native; American Indian; Middle Eastern; and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and any combination of those who identify as white/Caucasian plus another race; 1.8% indicated that their race was unknown or that they preferred not to answer. Ethnicity was reported as Hispanic/Latino(a) (51%), not Hispanic/Latino(a) (46.6%), and unknown/prefer not to answer (2.4%). Demographic data reveal significant disparities between white/Caucasian/non-Hispanic (WCNH) and other CVR participants in key social determinants of health, including education level, household income, employment, and health-insurance status. Tables 1-4 provide a detailed breakdown. Education: The majority of WCNH participants (64.2%) reported having college/graduate/professional-level education, while among others, most (59.4%) reported having a trade/vocational school-level education. Annual household income: The majority of WCNHs participants (57.5%) reported earnings between $50K-$149K. In contrast, the large majority (71.2%) of others reported earning $35K-$49K annually. For WCNHs participants, the midpoint of income range divided by number of people in the household was more than double that of other participants ($31,249 vs. $14,166). Employment: Significant differences between the groups in employment were seen. WCNH participants were more likely to be employed full-time (58.6%), disabled (30%), retired (30%), homemaker (15.7%), or a student (11.4%). Other participants were more likely to be employed part-time (32.5%) or unemployed (51.3%), or able to work but were unemployed (75.2%). Health insurance: A particularly stark disparity was noted in health-insurance type. Among WCNHs, 50.1% reported insurance through an employer or union, while only 15.8% of others fit this category. Among others, the majority (76.9%) reported enrollment in Medicaid or other public income-based insurance (vs. 13% of WCNHs). Conclusions: The demographic disparities between WCNHs and other participants in the CVR are critical and emphasize the need to focus on correlations between known social determinants of health and self-reported health outcomes and quality-of-life information. It is well known that education level and type of insurance, for example, can have a significantly negative impact on factors such as access to treatments and healthcare and medication adherence. CVR recruitment efforts must focus on enrolling racially and ethnically diverse participants to better understand their patient journey. This will enable the characterization of the links between racial/ethnic disparities and differences in access to care, quality of life, and related issues in the IBD community, and tailor education and advocacy efforts. As CVR data are extracted to answer a host of research questions, ensuring the inclusion of demographic disparities will benefit all members of the IBD community. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Witkop: Teralmmune, Inc.: Consultancy. Valentino: Spark: Ended employment in the past 24 months.


Author(s):  
Hyunjung Lee ◽  
Dominic Hodgkin ◽  
Michael P. Johnson ◽  
Frank W. Porell

Since 2014, 32 states implemented Medicaid expansion by removing the categorical criteria for childless adults and by expanding income eligibility to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) for all non-elderly adults. Previous studies found that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion improved rates of being insured, unmet needs for care due to cost, number of physician visits, and health status among low-income adults. However, a few recent studies focused on the expansion’s effect on racial/ethnic disparities and used the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) disparity approach with a limited set of access measures. This quasi-experimental study examined the effect of Medicaid expansion on racial/ethnic disparities in access to health care for U.S. citizens aged 19 to 64 with income below 138% of the federal poverty line. The difference-in-differences model compared changes over time in 2 measures of insurance coverage and 8 measures of access to health care, using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2010 to 2016. Analyses used the NAM definition of disparities. Medicaid expansion was associated with significant decreases in uninsured rates and increases in Medicaid coverage among all racial/ethnic groups. There were differences across racial/ethnic groups regarding which specific access measures improved. For delayed care and unmet need for care, decreases in racial/ethnic disparities were observed. After the ACA Medicaid expansion, most access outcomes improved for disadvantaged groups, but also for others, with the result that disparities were not significantly reduced.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251353
Author(s):  
Teal W. Benevides ◽  
Henry J. Carretta ◽  
George Rust ◽  
Lindsay Shea

Background Research on children and youth on the autism spectrum reveal racial and ethnic disparities in access to healthcare and utilization, but there is less research to understand how disparities persist as autistic adults age. We need to understand racial-ethnic inequities in obtaining eligibility for Medicare and/or Medicaid coverage, as well as inequities in spending for autistic enrollees under these public programs. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study of U.S. publicly-insured adults on the autism spectrum using 2012 Medicare-Medicaid Linked Enrollee Analytic Data Source (n = 172,071). We evaluated differences in race-ethnicity by eligibility (Medicare-only, Medicaid-only, Dual-Eligible) and spending. Findings The majority of white adults (49.87%) were full-dual eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. In contrast, only 37.53% of Black, 34.65% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 35.94% of Hispanic beneficiaries were full-dual eligible for Medicare and Medicare, with most only eligible for state-funded Medicaid. Adjusted logistic models controlling for gender, intellectual disability status, costly chronic condition, rural status, county median income, and geographic region of residence revealed that Black beneficiaries were significantly less likely than white beneficiaries to be dual-eligible across all ages. Across these three beneficiary types, total spending exceeded $10 billion. Annual total expenditures median expenditures for full-dual and Medicaid-only eligible beneficiaries were higher among white beneficiaries as compared with Black beneficiaries. Conclusions Public health insurance in the U.S. including Medicare and Medicaid aim to reduce inequities in access to healthcare that might exist due to disability, income, or old age. In contrast to these ideals, our study reveals that racial-ethnic minority autistic adults who were eligible for public insurance across all U.S. states in 2012 experience disparities in eligibility for specific programs and spending. We call for further evaluation of system supports that promote clear pathways to disability and public health insurance among those with lifelong developmental disabilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
Michelle Ju ◽  
James-Michael Blackwell ◽  
Patricio Polanco ◽  
John C. Mansour ◽  
Sam C. Wang ◽  
...  

2039 Background: The receipt of timely, guideline concordant cancer amongst racial/ethnic and socioeconomic vulnerable populations remains a significant health policy issue. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) with implementation of Medicaid Expansion sought to reduce cancer disparities by reducing uninsured rates, theoretically improving healthcare access and delivery. We assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of timely guideline concordant cancer care. Methods: We identified patients between 40-64 years of age with all stages of cancer (lung, colorectal, breast, uterine, and cervical) in the National Cancer Database, 2012-2015. Patients were assigned to Medicaid expansion cohort based on state of residence and whether Medicaid expansion was enacted at date of diagnosis in that state. Guideline concordant care was defined based on NCCN guidelines. We constructed an ecological model with multivariate regression analysis on rate of guideline concordant care receipt with covariates including race/ethnicity, Medicaid expansion, SES, gender, Charlson-Deyo score, and treatment facility type. Results: We identified 445,952 patients, 12% Black, 6% Hispanic white, median age 55 years. Patients in the lowest SES quartile following Medicaid expansion had the greatest increase in rates of insured status, although all SES quartiles had increased insured rates compared to non-Medicaid expansion regardless of race/ethnicity. In our ecological model, the rate of receipt of guideline concordant care declined by 0.5% per year between 2012-2015. After adjusting for covariates, Asians were 2.8% less likely to receive guideline concordant care than non-Hispanic whites, Blacks 3.8% less likely, and Hispanics 6.3% less likely (p < 0.0001). Racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of guideline concordant cancer care remained after Medicaid expansion with no differential benefit. Conclusions: Insurance gains under the ACA Medicaid expansion did not affect the rate of guideline concordant care receipt. Significant racial disparities persist in the likelihood of receiving guideline concordant care, particularly among Hispanics. Further studies are needed to determine additional barriers to cancer care access/delivery and identify key targets aimed at improving equity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2019869
Author(s):  
Lauren D. Nephew ◽  
Kelly Mosesso ◽  
Archita Desai ◽  
Marwan Ghabril ◽  
Eric S. Orman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document