A Profile of Higher Education Doctoral Programs

1986 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Crosson ◽  
Glenn M. Nelson
2015 ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
Richard Skinner

International education has deep historical roots and has spurred relationships that persist for decades. In the case of the United States and the field of engineering, American dependence since the mid-1960s on other countries' students – especially Indian ones – for enrollments and graduates of engineering doctoral programs has been, is and will likely continue to be significant. But long-term trends portend a time when the appeal of American higher education may be less than has been the case.


10.28945/3713 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 001-019
Author(s):  
Sydney Freeman Jr. ◽  
Gracie Forthun

Aim/Purpose: Executive doctoral programs in higher education are under-researched. Scholars, administers, and students should be aware of all common delivery methods for higher education graduate programs. Background This paper provides a review and analysis of executive doctoral higher education programs in the United States. Methodology: Executive higher education doctoral programs analyzed utilizing a qualitative demographic market-based analysis approach. Contribution: This review of executive higher education doctoral programs provides one of the first investigations of this segment of the higher education degree market. Findings: There are twelve programs in the United States offering executive higher education degrees, though there are less aggressively marketed programs described as executive-style higher education doctoral programs that could serve students with similar needs. Recommendations for Practitioners: Successful executive higher education doctoral programs require faculty that have both theoretical knowledge and practical experience in higher education. As appropriate, these programs should include tenure-line, clinical-track, and adjunct faculty who have cabinet level experience in higher education. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers should begin to investigate more closely the small but growing population of executive doctoral degree programs in higher education. Impact on Society: Institutions willing to offer executive degrees in higher education will provide training specifically for those faculty who are one step from an executive position within the higher education sector. Society will be impacted by having someone that is trained in the area who also has real world experience. Future Research: Case studies of students enrolled in executive higher education programs and research documenting university-employer goals for these programs would enhance our understanding of this branch of the higher education degree market.


Author(s):  
Vera Boneva

The article systematizes information about the current cultural heritage programs in the Bulgarian higher education area. The data shows that in eleven Bulgarian universities a diploma of cultural heritage can be obtained. 17 master's and 3 bachelor's programs prepare over 500 students a year. Two doctoral programs are also accredited. The rich variety of curricula is an objective result of the complex structure of cultural heritage in itself. However, it is also an indicator for the fragmentation of the higher education system in Bulgaria. The conclusion proposes approaches to overcoming the mentioned fragmentation, as the interdisciplinarity of the scientific field requires pooling of competencies and efforts for better results.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Aliyul Amri ◽  
Agus Perdana Windarto ◽  
Anjar Wanto ◽  
Irfan Sudahri Damanik

Higher education is an education level that includes diplomat, undergraduate and doctoral programs. The purpose of higher education is to improve the quality of the workforce, to help improve the quality of the workforce each university must have the facilities needed in teaching and learning activities. This study discusses the Analysis of the K-Means Method in the Grouping of Universities by Province Based on the Facilities of the Village. Sources of data obtained from data collected based on documents from 2003 to 2018 through the website of the Indonesian Statistics Agency. Data is processed into 2 clusters, namely the highest facility level cluster (C1) and the lowest facility level cluster (C2). So that obtained from 34 provinces 3 provinces are grouped in high facility level clusters (C1) and 31 provinces are grouped in low facility level clusters (C2). This can be input to the government for provinces that have higher education institutions that still have inadequate facilities in each village and are of more concern to the government based on the cluster that is being conducted.Keywords: K-Means, Higher education, Grouping, Facilities


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-79
Author(s):  
Abdullah Alawadhi ◽  
Paul E. Byrnes

ABSTRACT Selecting prospective programs in higher education can be a problematic and inefficient task for applicants. In particular, one of the most significant challenges entails locating a specific subset of programs likely to be a good fit. In this paper, clustering techniques are employed in evaluating a specifically created data set of AACSB-accredited doctoral programs in accounting so as to aggregate them by type. In so doing, one is then better positioned to identify which schools best align with his/her relevant characteristics and objectives, thus gaining insight concerning the most appropriate subset of schools to initially consider for application purposes. This approach provides meaningful differentiation between the various program types, offers a means for improving productivity relative to the university application process, and demonstrates promise as an initial foundation for eventual construction of a program recommendation system for use in ostensibly any program application initiative within the higher education domain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472
Author(s):  
Christine Quinn Trank ◽  
Kyle Brink

What should doctoral education look like? Prior research has tended to focus on the broad curriculum, especially as it relates to the development of researchers, but with a (mostly) brief nod to the teaching role of future professors. Even if the traditional preparation of PhDs in management was appropriate before and may have even reflected engaged practice through involvement in research and teaching apprenticeships, that configuration no longer seems appropriate to changes we will continue to see in higher education. Doctoral instruction will need to rise to the challenge by creating approaches that engage these new learners while we capitalize on new platforms and environments. The possibilities for research in doctoral education have never been more promising, and the use of new approaches for engagement never more critical. In this themed section, we offer three articles that capture the excitement, tensions, and promise of engaged learning in doctoral education. Perhaps not surprisingly, each recognizes doctoral education as an often emotionally charged, and even difficult, experience. These reactions are likely intrinsic to the process of learning and the work of “becoming.”


Author(s):  
Kai Yung (Brian) Tam ◽  
Marilyn K. Rousseau

To ascertain possible reasons why few minority students apply for admission to doctoral programs in special education, and to determine the extent of their knowledge of higher education, a questionnaire was given to minority students in a master's degree special education program at an urban university. Finances, family responsibilities, intellectual challenge, and self-confidence are among the variables that affect the pursuit of doctoral study for many minority students. Nevertheless, many minority students set their career goals no higher than the master's degree level. They do not understand the culture and mores of academe or the requirements for tenure and promotion, and do not perceive themselves as potential college professors. Based on the results of this study, strategies for recruiting minority students into doctoral programs and for their retention are recommended.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Dane-Staples

As accountability and the nature of higher education are changing to an emphasis on teaching, it is critical for faculty to have pedagogical training to develop their classroom skills. Currently, most doctoral programs do not require pedagogical courses therefore faculty must independently seek knowledge on how to engage students and to teach the specifics of sport management. This article discusses the foundations of constructivist learning and some specific teaching strategies relevant for a sport management classroom. Drawing on educational and psychological theory, a six-element framework is outlined where instructors attempt to reach long-term learning, not just a memorization of facts. The overall framework and each element are discussed and then strategies such as the Fishbowl, Active Opinion, Talking in Circles, and group selection options are introduced. The benefit of this approach to the classroom is that it is not topic specific, and can be implemented in a variety of sport management classrooms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document