scholarly journals Vertebral Deformities and Functional Impairment in Men and Women

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Burger ◽  
P. L. A. Van Daele ◽  
K. Grashuis ◽  
A. Hofman ◽  
D. E. Grobbee ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S671-S671
Author(s):  
Richard E Chunga ◽  
Haowei Wang ◽  
Deborah Carr

Abstract Health-related declines that affect physical functioning are a common stressor among older adults. Functional impairment can take a toll on older adults’ psychological well-being as it limits one’s capacities to independently carry out meaningful daily activities. The extent to which impairment affects mental health may vary based on the levels of support and strain in one’s personal relationships. Stress buffering perspectives suggest that support mitigates the detrimental psychological consequences of impairment, whereas stress amplification perspectives predict that strain will amplify these consequences. We use data from 2012 and 2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (N=3800) to explore: (a) the direct effects of functional limitation on depressive symptoms (CES-D); (b) the extent to which these associations are moderated by spouse, child, other relative, and friend support/strain; and (c) gender and marital status differences therein. Using lagged endogenous regression models, we find that impairment significantly increases depressive symptoms among men and women, and these effects are intensified by marital strain for both married men and women. However, buffering effects are found for women only, such that marital support mitigates against depressive symptoms in the face of current impairment. These results may reflect the gendered nature of marriage, where men with impairment uniformly benefit from marriage although women may experience protective effects of only in highly supportive unions. Results for other strain and support moderators also reveal gender differences, reflecting the distinctive ways that men and women interact with kin and friends over the life course.


1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Jones ◽  
C. White ◽  
T. Nguyen ◽  
P. N. Sambrook ◽  
P. J. Kelly ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S6-S10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hsun Wu ◽  
Ching-Yu Chen ◽  
Yin-Chang Wu ◽  
Li-Jen Weng ◽  
Hurng Baai-Shyun

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 769-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Delmonico ◽  
Tamara B. Harris ◽  
Jung-Sun Lee ◽  
Marjolein Visser ◽  
Michael Nevitt ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHANNES W.G. JACOBS ◽  
JOSÉ A.P. DA SILVA ◽  
GABRIELE ARMBRECHT ◽  
JOHANNES W.J. BIJLSMA ◽  
SUZANNE M.M. VERSTAPPEN

Objective.To investigate basic assumptions of prediction models for future vertebral fractures.Methods.Lateral radiographs of the spine were obtained from 314 Portuguese individuals aged 60 years or older (205 women and 109 men) with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at several sites. Associations between BMD at various sites, participant characteristics, and vertebral fractures were investigated. For men and women separately, logistic regression analyses and analyses of areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to determine the accuracy of BMD measurment at predicting the presence of vertebral deformities.Results.BMD measurements at all sites significantly predicted the presence of osteoporotic vertebral deformities in women but not in men. Similarly, in analyses of areas under ROC curves, BMD assessments were statistically significantly related to vertebral deformities in women but not in men. In multivariate analyses, BMD measurements of the lumbar spine and of the forearm, adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index, significantly predicted the presence of vertebral deformity, but BMD of the hip sites did not.Conclusion.Prediction of fractures is specific for gender and site of BMD measurement. This challenges the use of similar algorithms for men and women as well as the use of hip BMD data to accurately estimate future vertebral fracture risk.


2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Leidig-Bruckner ◽  
B. Limberg ◽  
D. Felsenberg ◽  
T. Bruckner ◽  
S. Holder ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document