vertebral deformities
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

142
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

37
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Bone Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 101050
Author(s):  
Margaret Paggiosi ◽  
Dharshan Giri Neelam Naganathan ◽  
Uzayr Undre ◽  
Nicola Peel ◽  
Richard Eastell

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 621
Author(s):  
Ignacio Fernández ◽  
Francisco Javier Toledo-Solís ◽  
Cristina Tomás-Almenar ◽  
Ana M. Larrán ◽  
Pedro Cárdaba ◽  
...  

Skeletal deformities reduce fish viability, growth, wellbeing, and feed efficiency but also degrade the consumer’s perception of aquaculture products. Herein, the skeletal development and the incidence of skeletal deformities in tench (Tinca tinca) reared in semi-extensive conditions has been described in detail for the first time. Larval skeletons were assessed through an acid-free double-staining procedure in 157 individuals, while 274 specimens at the juvenile stage were evaluated through X-ray analysis. The first skeletal structures to be formed were those related with breathing and feeding activities (e.g., Meckel’s cartilage and opercula) and were visible in larvae of 4 mm of standard length (SL). The axial skeleton was fully ossified in larvae of 12–17 mm of SL, and the caudal fin complex in larvae with 17–26 mm of SL. At the larval stage, no upper-jaw or opercula deformities were observed, while a low incidence (1–9%) of other severe deformities in the heads of the fish (e.g., lower-jaw deformities) were reported. The incidence of vertebral deformities in tench reared in natural ponds was considerable in larvae (54%) and juveniles (52%). Vertebral deformities (fusion and compression) were the most common deformities found in tench larvae (approximately 30%) and vertebral shape deformity in juveniles (around 10%), being mainly located in the caudal region. Thus, a regular monitoring of the skeletal deformities in tench might help to identify better rearing protocols and improve product quality sold at markets. Characterizing the skeletal development not only in semi-extensive systems such as artificial and natural ponds but also under intensive rearing conditions, seems vital for a sustainable and profitable European tench aquaculture.


Author(s):  
Melissa Fiscaletti ◽  
Mariia Samoilenko ◽  
Josée Dubois ◽  
Marie-Claude Miron ◽  
Geneviève Lefebvre ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prevalence of vertebral deformities in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown. Our objectives were to identify the prevalence of vertebral deformities and their risk factors among long-term childhood ALL survivors. Methods/Results We recruited 245 (49% male) long-term childhood ALL survivors from the Preventing Late Adverse Effects of Leukemia Cohort (French-Canadian ALL survivors treated between the years 1987 and 2010 with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute clinical trials protocols, who did not experience disease relapse and/or receive hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Median age at recruitment was 21.7 years (range, 8.5-41) and median time since diagnosis was 15.1 years (range, 5.4-28.2). All participants underwent spine radiograph and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. The prevalence of vertebral deformity was 23% with 88% classified as grade 1 according to the Genant method. The majority of vertebral deformities were clinically silent. Regression analysis confirmed male sex (risk ratio [RR] = 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-3.24; P = 0.011), higher glucocorticoid cumulative dose (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = 0.032), and back pain (RR = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.56-3.84; P < 0.001) as predictors of prevalent vertebral deformity. Sex differences in vertebral deformity predictors emerged. Conclusions We report a significant prevalence of vertebral deformities in this young cohort. Male sex, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, and back pain were identified as predictors of prevalent vertebral deformity. Back pain emerging as a strong predictor of vertebral deformity underscores the importance of ongoing bone health surveillance in survivors with persistent vertebral deformities treated with these earlier protocols.


Author(s):  
Thomas W. K. Fraser ◽  
Tom J. Hansen ◽  
Florian Sambraus ◽  
Per Gunnar Fjelldal

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Castelein ◽  
C. Hasler ◽  
I. Helenius ◽  
D. Ovadia ◽  
M. Yazici ◽  
...  

The severity of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), the associated reduced quality and quantity of collagen type I, the degree of bone fragility, ligamentous laxity, vertebral fractures and multilevel vertebral deformities all impair the mechanical integrity of the whole spinal architecture and relate to the high prevalence of progressive kyphoscoliotic deformities during growth. Bisphosphonate therapy may at best slow down curve progression but does not seem to lower the prevalence of deformities or the incidence of surgery. Brace treatment is problematic due to pre-existing chest wall deformities, stiffness of the curve and the brittleness of the ribs which limit transfer of corrective forces from the brace shell to the spine. Progressive curves entail loss of balance, chest deformities, pain and compromise of pulmonary function and eventually require surgical stabilization, usually around puberty. Severe vertebral deformities including deformed, small pedicles, highly brittle bones and chest deformities, short deformed trunks and associated issues like C-spine and cranial base abnormalities (basilar impressions, cervical kyphosis) as well as deformed lower and upper extremities are posing multiple peri- and intraoperative challenges. Hence, an early multidisciplinary approach (anaesthetist, pulmonologist, paediatric orthopaedic spine surgeon) is mandatory.This paper was written under the guidance of the Spine Study Group of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society. It highlights the most pertinent information given in the current literature and various practical aspects on surgical care of spine deformities in young OI patients based on the personal experience of the contributing authors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giangiacomo Osella ◽  
Adriano Massimiliano Priola ◽  
Sandro Massimo Priola ◽  
Antonio Piga ◽  
Filomena Longo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document