scholarly journals Diffraction as scattering under the Born approximation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Goswami ◽  
Gabriel Popescu
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Glaeser ◽  
Bing K. Jap

The dynamical scattering effect, which can be described as the failure of the first Born approximation, is perhaps the most important factor that has prevented the widespread use of electron diffraction intensities for crystallographic structure determination. It would seem to be quite certain that dynamical effects will also interfere with structure analysis based upon electron microscope image data, whenever the dynamical effect seriously perturbs the diffracted wave. While it is normally taken for granted that the dynamical effect must be taken into consideration in materials science applications of electron microscopy, very little attention has been given to this problem in the biological sciences.


Author(s):  
Pierre Moine

Qualitatively, amorphous structures can be easily revealed and differentiated from crystalline phases by their Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images and their diffraction patterns (fig.1 and 2) but, for quantitative structural information, electron diffraction pattern intensity analyses are necessary. The parameters describing the structure of an amorphous specimen have been introduced in the context of scattering experiments which have been, so far, the most used techniques to obtain structural information in the form of statistical averages. When only small amorphous volumes (< 1/μm in size or thickness) are available, the much higher scattering of electrons (compared to neutrons or x rays) makes, despite its drawbacks, electron diffraction extremely valuable and often the only feasible technique.In a diffraction experiment, the intensity IN (Q) of a radiation, elastically scattered by N atoms of a sample, is measured and related to the atomic structure, using the fundamental relation (Born approximation) : IN(Q) = |FT[U(r)]|.


2021 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 034105
Author(s):  
Taha Selim ◽  
Arthur Christianen ◽  
Ad van der Avoird ◽  
Gerrit C. Groenenboom

1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S377-S380 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Petrukhin ◽  
V. V. Shestakov

The cross section for the muon bremsstrahlung process is calculated as a function of the nuclear form factor in the Born approximation following the Bethe and Heitler theory. The influence of the nuclear form factor is greater than that taken by Christy and Kusaka. The simple analytical expression for the effect of the screening of the atomic electrons is found. The influence of a decrease in the cross section upon the interpretation of some experimental results is estimated.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 1357-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. REZAEE ROKN-ABADI ◽  
H. ARABSHAHI ◽  
M. R. BENAM

Temperature and doping dependencies of electron mobility in SiC and GaN structures have been calculated using an iteravive technique. The following scattering mechanisims, i.e. impurity, polar optical phonon, acoustic phonon, piezoelectric and electron–plasmon are included in the calculation. Ionized imurity scattering has been treated beyond the Born approximation using the phase-shift analysis. It is found that the electron mobility decreases monotonically as the temperature increases from 100 K to 600 K. The low temperature value of electron mobilty increases significantly with increasing doping concentration. The iterative results are in fair agreement with other recent calculations obtained using the relaxation-time approximation and experimental methods.


1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 1772-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Hsin ◽  
M. Lieber ◽  
R. E. Kletke ◽  
J. H. McGuire ◽  
N. C. Sil

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document