scholarly journals Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations before and after an Energy-Restricted Diet Intervention in Obese Women

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. e23759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonatan R. Ruiz ◽  
Francisco B. Ortega ◽  
Gerardo Rodríguez ◽  
Pilar Alkorta ◽  
Idoia Labayen
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Restricted Diet ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Diet Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Resting Energy

scholarly journals Resting energy expenditure in obese women: comparison between measured and estimated values

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 1306-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Fadanelli Schoenardie Poli ◽  
Ricardo Badan Sanches ◽  
Amanda dos Santos Moraes ◽  
João Pedro Novo Fidalgo ◽  
Maythe Amaral Nascimento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Indirect Calorimetry ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Interdisciplinary Therapy ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Resting Energy

AbstractAssessing energy requirements is a fundamental activity in clinical dietetic practice. The aim of this study was to investigate which resting energy expenditure (REE) predictive equations are the best alternatives to indirect calorimetry before and after an interdisciplinary therapy in Brazilian obese women. In all, twelve equations based on weight, height, sex, age, fat-free mass and fat mass were tested. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry. The interdisciplinary therapy consisted of nutritional, physical exercise, psychological and physiotherapy support during the course of 1 year. The average differences between measured and predicted REE, as well as the accuracy at the ±10 % level, were evaluated. Statistical analysis included paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots. Validation was based on forty obese women (BMI 30–39·9 kg/m2). Our major findings demonstrated a wide variation in the accuracy of REE predictive equations before and after weight loss in non-morbid, obese women. The equations reported by Harris–Benedict and FAO/WHO/United Nations University (UNU) were the only ones that did not show significant differences compared with indirect calorimetry and presented a bias <5 %. The Harris–Benedict equation provided 40 and 47·5 % accurate predictions before and after therapy, respectively. The FAO equation provided 35 and 47·5 % accurate predictions. However, the Bland–Altman analysis did not show good agreement between these equations and indirect calorimetry. Therefore, the Harris–Benedict and FAO/WHO/UNU equations should be used with caution for obese women. The need to critically re-assess REE data and generate regional and more homogeneous REE databases for the target population is reinforced.

Reliability of resting energy expenditure in major burns: Comparison between measured and predictive equations

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 2763-2769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinwoo Jeon ◽  
Dohern Kym ◽  
Yong Suk Cho ◽  
Youngmin Kim ◽  
Jaechul Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Resting Energy

scholarly journals Resting energy expenditure in elite athletes: development of new predictive equations based on anthropometric variables and bioelectrical impedance analysis derived phase angle

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Marra ◽  
Olivia Di Vincenzo ◽  
Iolanda Cioffi ◽  
Rosa Sammarco ◽  
Delia Morlino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Phase Angle ◽  
Elite Athletes ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Sport Performance ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Anthropometric Parameters ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Good Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Resting Energy

Abstract Background An accurate estimation of athletes’ energy needs is crucial in diet planning to improve sport performance and to maintain an appropriate body composition. This study aimed to develop and validate in elite athletes new equations for estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) based on anthropometric parameters as well as bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-derived raw variables and to validate the accuracy of selected predictive equations. Methods Adult elite athletes aged 18–40 yrs were studied. Anthropometry, indirect calorimetry and BIA were performed in all subjects. The new predictive equations were generated using different regression models. The accuracy of the new equations was assessed at the group level (bias) and at the individual level (precision accuracy), and then compared with the one of five equations used in the general population or three athletes-specific formulas. Results One-hundred and twenty-six male athletes (age 26.9 ± 9.1 yrs; weight 71.3 ± 10.9 kg; BMI 22.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2) from different sport specialties were randomly assigned to the calibration (n = 75) or validation group (n = 51). REE was directly correlated with individual characteristics, except for age, and raw BIA variables. Most of the equations from the literature were reasonably accurate at the population level (bias within ±5%). The new equations showed a mean bias −0.3% (Eq. A based on anthropometric parameters) and −0.6% (Eq. B based on BIA-derived raw variables). Precision accuracy (individual predicted-measured differences within ±5%) was ~75% in six out of eight of the selected equations and even higher for Eq. A (82.4%) and Eq. B (92.2%). Conclusion In elite athletes, BIA-derived phase angle is a significant predictor of REE. The new equations have a very good prediction accuracy at both group and individual levels. The use of phase angle as predictor of REE requires further research with respect to different sport specialties, training programs and training level.

scholarly journals Accuracy and Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations in Middle-Aged Adults

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Amaro-Gahete ◽  
Lucas Jurado-Fasoli ◽  
Alejandro De-la-O ◽  
Ángel Gutierrez ◽  
Manuel Castillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Indirect Calorimetry ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Weight Status ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Middle Aged Adults ◽  
Resting Energy

Indirect calorimetry (IC) is considered the reference method to determine the resting energy expenditure (REE), but its use in a clinical context is limited. Alternatively, there is a number of REE predictive equations to estimate the REE. However, it has been shown that the available REE predictive equations could either overestimate or underestimate the REE as measured by IC. Moreover, the role of the weight status in the accuracy and validity of the REE predictive equations requires further attention. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the accuracy and validity of REE predictive equations in normal-weight, overweight, and obese sedentary middle-aged adults. A total of 73 sedentary middle-aged adults (53% women, 40–65 years old) participated in the study. We measured REE by indirect calorimetry, strictly following the standard procedures, and we compared it with the values obtained from 33 predictive equations. The most accurate predictive equations in middle-aged sedentary adults were: (i) the equation of FAO/WHO/UNU in normal-weight individuals (50.0% of prediction accuracy), (ii) the equation of Livingston in overweight individuals (46.9% of prediction accuracy), and (iii) the equation of Owen in individuals with obesity (52.9% of prediction accuracy). Our study shows that the weight status plays an important role in the accuracy and validity of different REE predictive equations in middle-aged adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document