scholarly journals Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e0173620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianfei Liu ◽  
Chenglong Luo ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Jie Ma ◽  
Dingming Shu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Meat Type

scholarly journals PSXII-22 Genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency related traits using different pseudo-phenotypes, prediction and validation methods in Nellore cattle

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 245-246
Author(s):  
Cláudio U Magnabosco ◽  
Fernando Lopes ◽  
Valentina Magnabosco ◽  
Raysildo Lobo ◽  
Leticia Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Body Weight Gain ◽  
Prediction Methods ◽  
Genomic Breeding ◽  
Validation Population ◽  
Nellore Cattle

Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate prediction methods, validation approaches and pseudo-phenotypes for the prediction of the genomic breeding values of feed efficiency related traits in Nellore cattle. It used the phenotypic and genotypic information of 4,329 and 3,594 animals, respectively, which were tested for residual feed intake (RFI), dry matter intake (DMI), feed efficiency (FE), feed conversion ratio (FCR), residual body weight gain (RG), and residual intake and body weight gain (RIG). Six prediction methods were used: ssGBLUP, BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ, BLASSO, and BayesR. Three validation approaches were used: 1) random: where the data was randomly divided into ten subsets and the validation was done in each subset at a time; 2) age: the division into the training (2010 to 2016) and validation population (2017) were based on the year of birth; 3) genetic breeding value (EBV) accuracy: the data was split in the training population being animals with accuracy above 0.45; and validation population those below 0.45. We checked the accuracy and bias of genomic value (GEBV). The results showed that the GEBV accuracy was the highest when the prediction is obtained with ssGBLUP (0.05 to 0.31) (Figure 1). The low heritability obtained, mainly for FE (0.07 ± 0.03) and FCR (0.09 ± 0.03), limited the GEBVs accuracy, which ranged from low to moderate. The regression coefficient estimates were close to 1, and similar between the prediction methods, validation approaches, and pseudo-phenotypes. The cross-validation presented the most accurate predictions ranging from 0.07 to 0.037. The prediction accuracy was higher for phenotype adjusted for fixed effects than for EBV and EBV deregressed (30.0 and 34.3%, respectively). Genomic prediction can provide a reliable estimate of genomic breeding values for RFI, DMI, RG and RGI, as to even say that those traits may have higher genetic gain than FE and FCR.

scholarly journals The impact of training on data from genetically-related lines on the accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits in pigs

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Aliakbari ◽  
Emilie Delpuech ◽  
Yann Labrune ◽  
Juliette Riquet ◽  
Hélène Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Feed Intake ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Target Line ◽  
The Other ◽  
Training Set ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Genomic Predictions ◽  
Training Sets

Abstract Background Most genomic predictions use a unique population that is split into a training and a validation set. However, genomic prediction using genetically heterogeneous training sets could provide more flexibility when constructing the training sets in small populations. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential of genomic prediction of feed efficiency related traits using training sets that combine animals from two different, but genetically-related lines. We compared realized prediction accuracy and prediction bias for different training set compositions for five production traits. Results Genomic breeding values (GEBV) were predicted using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method in six scenarios applied iteratively to two genetically-related lines (i.e. 12 scenarios). The objective for all scenarios was to predict GEBV of pigs in the last three generations (~ 400 pigs, G7 to G9) of a given line. For each line, a control scenario was set up with a training set that included only animals from that line (target line). For all traits, adding more animals from the other line to the training set did not increase prediction accuracy compared to the control scenario. A small decrease in prediction accuracies was found for average daily gain, backfat thickness, and daily feed intake as the number of animals from the target line decreased in the training set. Including more animals from the other line did not decrease prediction accuracy for feed conversion ratio and residual feed intake, which were both highly affected by selection within lines. However, prediction biases were systematic for these cases and might be reduced with bivariate analyses. Conclusions Our results show that genomic prediction using a training set that includes animals from genetically-related lines can be as accurate as genomic prediction using a training set from the target population. With combined reference sets, accuracy increased for traits that were highly affected by selection. Our results provide insights into the design of reference populations, especially to initiate genomic selection in small-sized lines, for which the number of historical samples is small and that are developed simultaneously. This applies especially to poultry and pig breeding and to other crossbreeding schemes.

scholarly journals Optimal breeding-value prediction using a Sparse Selection Index

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Lopez-Cruz ◽  
Gustavo de los Campos
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regularization Parameter ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Breeding Value ◽  
Data Set

Abstract Genomic prediction uses DNA sequences and phenotypes to predict genetic values. In homogeneous populations, theory indicates that the accuracy of genomic prediction increases with sample size. However, differences in allele frequencies and in linkage disequilibrium patterns can lead to heterogeneity in SNP effects. In this context, calibrating genomic predictions using a large, potentially heterogeneous, training data set may not lead to optimal prediction accuracy. Some studies tried to address this sample size/homogeneity trade-off using training set optimization algorithms; however, this approach assumes that a single training data set is optimum for all individuals in the prediction set. Here, we propose an approach that identifies, for each individual in the prediction set, a subset from the training data (i.e., a set of support points) from which predictions are derived. The methodology that we propose is a Sparse Selection Index (SSI) that integrates Selection Index methodology with sparsity-inducing techniques commonly used for high-dimensional regression. The sparsity of the resulting index is controlled by a regularization parameter (λ); the G-BLUP (the prediction method most commonly used in plant and animal breeding) appears as a special case which happens when λ = 0. In this study, we present the methodology and demonstrate (using two wheat data sets with phenotypes collected in ten different environments) that the SSI can achieve significant (anywhere between 5-10%) gains in prediction accuracy relative to the G-BLUP.

scholarly journals Estimation of genomic prediction accuracy from reference populations with varying degrees of relationship

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0189775 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hong Lee ◽  
Sam Clark ◽  
Julius H. J. van der Werf
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy

scholarly journals Increased genomic prediction accuracy in wheat breeding using a large Australian panel

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (12) ◽  
pp. 2543-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Norman ◽  
Julian Taylor ◽  
Emi Tanaka ◽  
Paul Telfer ◽  
James Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Wheat Breeding

scholarly journals The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan McKinnon Edwards ◽  
Jaap B. Buntjer ◽  
Robert Jackson ◽  
Alison R. Bentley ◽  
Jacob Lage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Population Design

scholarly journals Pitfalls and Remedies for Cross Validation with Multi-trait Genomic Prediction Methods

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Runcie ◽  
Hao Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Parametric Method ◽  
Multiple Traits ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Secondary Traits ◽  
Validation Strategy

ABSTRACTIncorporating measurements on correlated traits into genomic prediction models can increase prediction accuracy and selection gain. However, multi-trait genomic prediction models are complex and prone to overfitting which may result in a loss of prediction accuracy relative to single-trait genomic prediction. Cross-validation is considered the gold standard method for selecting and tuning models for genomic prediction in both plant and animal breeding. When used appropriately, cross-validation gives an accurate estimate of the prediction accuracy of a genomic prediction model, and can effectively choose among disparate models based on their expected performance in real data. However, we show that a naive cross-validation strategy applied to the multi-trait prediction problem can be severely biased and lead to sub-optimal choices between single and multi-trait models when secondary traits are used to aid in the prediction of focal traits and these secondary traits are measured on the individuals to be tested. We use simulations to demonstrate the extent of the problem and propose three partial solutions: 1) a parametric solution from selection index theory, 2) a semi-parametric method for correcting the cross-validation estimates of prediction accuracy, and 3) a fully non-parametric method which we call CV2*: validating model predictions against focal trait measurements from genetically related individuals. The current excitement over high-throughput phenotyping suggests that more comprehensive phenotype measurements will be useful for accelerating breeding programs. Using an appropriate cross-validation strategy should more reliably determine if and when combining information across multiple traits is useful.

SNP annotation-based whole genomic prediction and selection: An application to feed efficiency and its component traits in pigs1

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 2056-2063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duy Ngoc Do ◽  
Luc L. G. Janss ◽  
Just Jensen ◽  
Haja N. Kadarmideen
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Component Traits

Natural variation and genomic prediction of growth, physiological traits, and nitrogen-use efficiency in perennial ryegrass under low-nitrogen stress

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (20) ◽  
pp. 6670-6683
Author(s):  
Xiongwei Zhao ◽  
Gang Nie ◽  
Yanyu Yao ◽  
Zhongjie Ji ◽  
Jianhua Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Perennial Ryegrass ◽  
Nitrogen Use Efficiency ◽  
Ridge Regression ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Physiological Traits ◽  
Grass Species ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
Use Efficiency

Abstract Genomic prediction of nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) has not previously been studied in perennial grass species exposed to low-N stress. Here, we conducted a genomic prediction of physiological traits and NUE in 184 global accessions of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in response to a normal (7.5 mM) and low (0.75 mM) supply of N. After 21 d of treatment under greenhouse conditions, significant variations in plant height increment (ΔHT), leaf fresh weight (LFW), leaf dry weight (LDW), chlorophyll index (Chl), chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf N and carbon (C) contents, C/N ratio, and NUE were observed in accessions , but to a greater extent under low-N stress. Six genomic prediction models were applied to the data, namely the Bayesian method Bayes C, Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian Ridge Regression, Ridge Regression-Best Linear Unbiased Prediction, Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, and randomForest. These models produced similar prediction accuracy of traits within the normal or low-N treatments, but the accuracy differed between the two treatments. ΔHT, LFW, LDW, and C were predicted slightly better under normal N with a mean Pearson r-value of 0.26, compared with r=0.22 under low N, while the prediction accuracies for Chl, N, C/N, and NUE were significantly improved under low-N stress with a mean r=0.45, compared with r=0.26 under normal N. The population panel contained three population structures, which generally had no effect on prediction accuracy. The moderate prediction accuracies obtained for N, C, and NUE under low-N stress are promising, and suggest a feasible means by which germplasm might be initially assessed for further detailed studies in breeding programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document