scholarly journals Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e0203156 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gabrielle Breugelmans ◽  
Guillaume Roberge ◽  
Chantale Tippett ◽  
Matt Durning ◽  
David Brooke Struck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
International Collaboration ◽  
Scientific Impact ◽  
Related Disease

scholarly journals How the scientific community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: A subject-level time-trend bibliometric analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0258064
Author(s):  
Mohammad-Reza Malekpour ◽  
Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari ◽  
Sina Azadnajafabad ◽  
Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari ◽  
Negar Rezaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Low Income ◽  
International Collaboration ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Response Patterns ◽  
Physical Sciences ◽  
General Internal ◽  
Publication Count ◽  
Bibliographic Records

Background COVID-19 has triggered an avalanche of research publications, the various aspects of which need to be assessed. The objective of this study is to determine the scientific community’s response patterns to COVID-19 through a bibliometric analysis of the time-trends, global contribution, international collaboration, open-access provision, science domains of focus, and the behavior of journals. Methods The bibliographic records on COVID-19 literature were retrieved from both PubMed and Scopus. The period for searching was set from November 1, 2019, to April 15, 2021. The bibliographic data were coupled with COVID-19 incidence to explore possible association, as well as World Bank indicators and classification of economies. Results A total of 159132 records were included in the study. Following the escalation of incidences of COVID-19 in late 2020 and early 2021, the monthly publication count made a new peak in March 2021 at 20505. Overall, 125155 (78.6%) were national, 22548 (14.2%) were bi-national, and 11429 (7.2%) were multi-national. Low-income countries with 928 (66.8%) international publications had the highest percentage of international. The open-access provision decreased from 85.5% in February 2020 to 62.0% in April 2021. As many as 82841 (70.8%) publications were related to health sciences, followed by life sciences 27031 (23.1%), social sciences 20291 (17.3%), and physical sciences 15141 (12.9%). The top three medical subjects in publications were general internal medicine, public health, and infectious diseases with 28.9%, 18.3%, and 12.6% of medical publications, respectively. Conclusions The association between the incidence and publication count indicated the scientific community’s interest in the ongoing situation and timely response to it. Only one-fifth of publications resulted from international collaboration, which might lead to redundancy without adding significant value. Our study underscores the necessity of policies for attraction of international collaboration and direction of vital funds toward domains of higher priority.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Lophomonas sp. in Scopus (1933-2019)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Keighobadi ◽  
Maryam Nakhaei ◽  
Ali Sharifpour ◽  
Ali Akbar Khasseh ◽  
Sepideh Safanavaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
International Collaboration ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Us ◽  
The World ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Global Research

Background: This study was designed to analyze the global research on Lophomonas spp. using bibliometric techniques. Methods: A bibliometric research was carried out using the Scopus database. The analysis unit was the research articles conducted on Lophomonas spp. Results: Totally, 56 articles about Lophomonas spp. were indexed in the Scopus throughout 1933-2019 ( 87 years ) with the following information: (A) The first article was published in 1933; (B) 21 different countries contributed in studies related to Lophomonas spp.; (C) China ranked first with 16 publications about Lophomonas spp.; and (D) “Brugerolle, G” and “Beams, H.W.” from France and the US participated in 4 articles respectively, as the highest number of publications in the Lophomonas spp. network. Discussion: After 87 years, Lophomonas still remains unknown for many researchers and physicians around the world. Further studies with high quality and international collaboration are urgently needed to determine different epidemiological aspects and the real burden of the mysterious parasite worldwide.

scholarly journals An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Ruggieri ◽  
Fabrizio Pecoraro ◽  
Daniela Luzi
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Research Council ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Scientific Production ◽  
Italian National Research Council ◽  
European Research ◽  
Research And Innovation

AbstractGender equality and Open Access (OA) are priorities within the European Research Area and cross-cutting issues in European research program H2020. Gender and openness are also key elements of responsible research and innovation. However, despite the common underlying targets of fostering an inclusive, transparent and sustainable research environment, both issues are analysed as independent topics. This paper represents a first exploration of the inter-linkages between gender and OA analysing the scientific production of researchers of the Italian National Research Council under a gender perspective integrated with the different OA publications modes. A bibliometric analysis was carried out for articles published in the period 2016–2018 and retrieved from the Web of Science. Results are presented constantly analysing CNR scientific production in relation to gender, disciplinary fields and OA publication modes. These variables are also used when analysing articles that receive financial support. Our results indicate that gender disparities in scientific production still persist particularly in STEM disciplines, while the gender gap is the closest to parity in medical and agricultural sciences. A positive dynamic toward OA publishing and women’s scientific production is shown when disciplines with well-established open practices are related to articles supported by funds. A slightly higher women’s propensity toward OA is shown when considering Gold OA, or authorships with women in the first and last article by-line position. The prevalence of Italian funded articles with women’s contributions published in Gold OA journals seems to confirm this tendency, especially if considering the weak enforcement of the Italian OA policies.

scholarly journals How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited

Publications ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Christer Björk ◽  
Sari Kanto-Karvonen ◽  
J. Tuomas Harviainen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Random Sample ◽  
Academic Publishing ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Scientific Impact ◽  
Predatory Journals ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Citation Statistics

Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author payments. In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in such journals in 2014 and found an average of 2.6 citations per article, and that 56% of the articles had no citations at all. For comparison, a random sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals included in the Scopus index had an average of 18, 1 citations in the same period with only 9% receiving no citations. We conclude that articles published in predatory journals have little scientific impact.

scholarly journals Forests’ First Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis Overview

Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Uribe-Toril ◽  
José Ruiz-Real ◽  
Julia Haba-Osca ◽  
Jaime de Pablo Valenciano
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Forest Ecology ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Open Access Journal ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Graphical Visualization ◽  
Interdisciplinary Knowledge ◽  
Knowledge Area

Forests is a Swiss open access journal in the field of forestry and forest ecology founded in 2010. Currently, the journal celebrates its 10th anniversary. Therefore, the purpose of this research for the special issue A Decade of Forests Open Access Publishing is to present a whole bibliometric overview of the journal and highlight the state of the art of forestry as an interdisciplinary knowledge area. A bibliometric analysis of 2094 articles, reviews, editorials and corrections was conducted using two different scientific information platforms which publish indexes in online databases: Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The most influential countries and their relationship with funding institutions, the most leading and outstanding authors and the most significant articles published in Forests have been analyzed. A complete keyword concurrence network with a graphical visualization and a cluster analysis are adopted for identifying the main trends and opening issues to address in the coming decade, such as genetic diversity, forest productivity, resistance or resilience. This article has identified climate change, remote sensing, biomass and forest management as the main trends in forestry research during the last ten years.

scholarly journals Reflections following the ASAPbio Peer Review conference

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lidsky
Keyword(s):  
Biological Sciences ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Scientific Impact ◽  
Publishing Practices

The ASAPbio initiative makes a major call for renovation in scientific publishing in biological sciences. The suggested reforms include open access preprints and a fully transparent review process. If introduced into practice, these changes should result in a dramatic cultural change in scientific publishing, probably making it more predictable and consistent. Innovate ways for evaluation of scientific impact were also discussed during the meeting in February 2018. The aim of this essay is to discuss possible developmental trajectories and a possible strategy of changing publishing practices to make citation-based indexes more reliable, fair and informative and thus to complement the ASAPbio proposals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document