scholarly journals Prognostic value of the common tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242173
Author(s):  
Benchao Chen ◽  
Heng Li ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Xudong Xiang ◽  
Shuting Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
High Density ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumour Nest ◽  
Disease Specific

Background Many previous studies have revealed that tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are significantly associated with prognosis in various tumours. However, this finding remains controversial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed this meta-analysis systematically to evaluate the prognostic value of TILs in NSCLC. Methods The references were collected by searching the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were summarized using random or fixed effects models to evaluate the association between TILs and NSCLC survival outcomes. Results A total of 45 interrelated studies were eligible that included 11,448 patients. Pooled analysis showed that a high density of TILs indicated a better overall survival (HR = 0.80, 0.70–0.89) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.73, 0.61–0.85) for patients with NSCLC; a high density of CD3+ TILs in the tumour nest indicated a better overall survival (HR = 0.84, 0.69–0.99) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.57, 0.34–0.80); a high density of CD4+ TILs in the tumor nest indicated a favourable overall survival (HR = 0.86, 0.76–0.96); a high density of CD8+ TILs indicated a favourable overall survival (HR = 0.995, 0.99–1.0), progression-free survival (HR = 0.52, 0.34–0.71), disease-free survival (HR = 0.64, 0.43–0.85), relapse/recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.42, 0.18–0.67) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.56, 0.35–0.78); and a high density of CD20+ TILs in the tumour nest indicated a favourable overall survival (HR = 0.65, 0.36–0.94). However, a high density of Foxp3+ TILs in the tumour stroma indicated a worse relapse/recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.90, 1.05–2.76) in NSCLC. Conclusions Our meta-analysis confirmed that high densities of TILs, CD3+TILs, CD4+TILs, CD8+TILs and CD20+TILs in the tumour nest are favourable prognostic biomarkers for patients with NSCLC, and Foxp3+TILs in the tumour stroma are a poor prognostic biomarker.

Prognostic value of peripheral naive CD8+ T cells in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Zhenlin Gao ◽  
Yaguang Han
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of peripheral naive and memory CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and other immune cells in patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A total of 142 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC treated with RT were enrolled, and their blood samples were collected within 3 days before RT. Immune cells were identified by flow cytometry. Results: Patients with high levels of naive CD8+ T cells had longer overall survival (p = 0.004) and progression-free survival (p = 0.001) than those with low levels of naive CD8+ T cells. Multivariate analyses revealed that naive CD8+ T cells were independently correlated with overall survival (p = 0.019) and progression-free survival (p = 0.024). Conclusion: The results suggest that peripheral naive CD8+ T cells may be an independent prognostic indicator for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC undergoing RT.

scholarly journals PIOS (Patras Immunotherapy Score) Score Is Associated with Best Overall Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Post-Immunotherapy Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with Anti-Program Cell Death-1 (PD-1) Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1257
Author(s):  
Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos ◽  
Achilleas Nikolakopoulos ◽  
Anastasia Kottorou ◽  
Fotini Kalofonou ◽  
Elias Liolis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Program Cell Death

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) over the last decade. However, there is an unmet need for clinically useful biomarkers in this patient subgroup. The aim of this study was to combine baseline clinical characteristics of aNSCLC patients, in the form of a scoring system, and to investigate its predictive and prognostic value in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. A total of 112 patients with advanced (stages IIIA to IV) NSCLC, treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, were enrolled in this study. Patras Immunotherapy Score (PIOS) was developed based on four of the studied parameters (performance status (PS), body mass index (BMI), age, and lines of treatment (LOT), which were incorporated into our formula (PS × BMI/ LOT × age). PIOS score was strongly associated with best overall responses (BOR), with those patients having benefit/good response (stable disease (SD) or partial (PR) or complete response (CR), achieving a higher score compared to patients who developed progressive disease (PD) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, PIOS score was associated with progression-free survival (PFS), since high-score patients had longer PFS (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.469). Moreover, PIOS was associated with post-immunotherapy overall survival (OS), with high-score patients having improved OS (log-rank p = 0.019). This study suggests that a combination of baseline parameters, which give rise to PIOS score, may predict the best response of NSCLC patients treated with anti-program cell death -1 (PD-1) monotherapy as well as it may have a potent prognostic value for PFS and post immunotherapy OS.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (27) ◽  
pp. 2045-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Kim ◽  
Mark Oremus ◽  
Helen H Chen ◽  
Thomas McFarlane ◽  
Devanshi Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Background: The effectiveness of immunotherapies for non-small-cell lung cancer under real-world clinical settings remains uncertain. Materials & methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were conducted. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled median overall survival and progression-free survival estimates. Results: 36 studies of nivolumab were included for narrative synthesis and 11 of these studies were included for meta-analysis. Age, sex, histology and prior lines of treatment did not affect survival outcomes, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and brain metastasis were inversely associated with survival. In the meta-analysis, nivolumab was associated with 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.4–10.9) of overall survival and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6–3.6) of progression-free survival. Conclusion: Very-low-certainty evidence suggested the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab was consistent with those observed in the clinical trials.

scholarly journals Comparison of Chemotherapy With PD-1/L1 or CTLA-4 Inhibitors Alone Or In Combination In Advanced Or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta- Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihu Gu ◽  
Jiali Liang ◽  
Wei Dai ◽  
Jiayu Li ◽  
Yuexiu Si ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc

Abstract Background: In spite of the wide use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether ICIs or conventional chemotherapy is more effective still remains controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of giving patients programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) alone or in their combination (PD-1/L1 + CTLA-4) versus simply applying chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted from PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2021 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint was adverse events (AEs). Results: The search process has identified 13 studies containing 7918 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The benefit of PD-1/L1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors alone or in combination compared with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC was elucidated in both overall survival (OS) [HR=0.75, 95%CI (0.70-0.80), P<0.001] and progression-free survival (PFS) [HR=0.83, 95%CI (0.73-0.95), P<0.001]. Sex is another vital factor that affects the efficacy of ICIs. Male [HR=0.71, 95%CI (0.63-0.81)] benefits more from ICIs than the female [HR 0.80, 95%CI (0.68-0.94)] in OS. Besides, ICIs were associated with fewer AEs compared to chemotherapy.Conclusion: PD-1/L1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors alone or in combination, with fewer AEs, was associated with significant improvements in terms of OS and PFS than chemotherapy in treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document