scholarly journals Differences in mortality and causes of death between STEMI and NSTEMI in the early and late phases after acute myocardial infarction

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259268
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Takeji ◽  
Hiroki Shiomi ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
Ko Yamamoto ◽  
Yukiko Matsumura-Nakano ◽  
...  

Background The detailed causes of death in non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have not been adequately evaluated compared to those in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods The study population was 6,228 AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (STEMI: 4,625 patients and NSTEMI: 1,603 patients). The primary outcome was all-cause death. Results Within 6 months after AMI, the adjusted mortality risk was not significantly different between NSTEMI patients and STEMI patients (HR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.67–1.03, P = 0.09). Regarding the causes of death within 6 months after AMI, mechanical complications more frequently occurred in STEMI patients than in NSTEMI patients, while proportions of post resuscitation status on arrival and heart failure were higher in in NSTEMI patients than in STEMI patients. Beyond 6 months after AMI, the adjusted mortality risk of NSTEMI relative to STEMI was not significantly different. (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.90–1.20, P = 0.59). Regarding causes of death beyond 6 months after AMI, almost half of deaths were cardiovascular causes in both groups, and breakdown of causes of death was similar between NSTEMI and STEMI. Conclusion The mortality risk within and beyond 6 months after AMI were not significantly different between STEMI patients and NSTEMI patients after adjusting confounders. Deaths due to post resuscitation status and heart failure were more frequent in NSTEMI within 6 months after AMI.

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Nepper-Christensen ◽  
Dan Eik Høfsten ◽  
Steffen Helqvist ◽  
Jens Flensted Lassen ◽  
Hans-Henrik Tilsted ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe Third Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction – Ischaemic Postconditioning (DANAMI-3-iPOST) did not show improved clinical outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with ischaemic postconditioning. However, the use of thrombectomy was frequent and thrombectomy may in itself diminish the effect of ischaemic postconditioning. We evaluated the effect of ischaemic postconditioning in patients included in DANAMI-3-iPOST stratified by the use of thrombectomy.MethodsPatients with STEMI were randomised to conventional primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or ischaemic postconditioning plus primary PCI. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure.ResultsFrom March 2011 until February 2014, 1234 patients were included with a median follow-up period of 35 (interquartile range 28 to 42) months. There was a significant interaction between ischaemic postconditioning and thrombectomy on the primary endpoint (p=0.004). In patients not treated with thrombectomy (n=520), the primary endpoint occurred in 33 patients (10%) who underwent ischaemic postconditioning (n=326) and in 35 patients (18%) who underwent conventional treatment (n=194) (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95%confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.89), p=0.016). In patients treated with thrombectomy (n=714), there was no significant difference between patients treated with ischaemic postconditioning (n=291) and conventional PCI (n=423) on the primary endpoint (adjusted HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.28), p=0.62).ConclusionsIn this post-hoc study of DANAMI-3-iPOST, ischaemic postconditioning, in addition to primary PCI, was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with STEMI not treated with thrombectomy.Trial registration numberNCT01435408.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Ilham Uddin ◽  
Anindia Wardhani ◽  
Misbah Hari Cahyadi ◽  
Desy Ayu Puspitasari ◽  
Pipin Ardhianto ◽  
...  

Background: Double coronary culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncommon. Despite successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in all culprit lesions, the clinical outcome remains unfavorable and the possible factors for the outcome are not fully understood.Cases Presentation: We reported four cases of double culprit lesions STEMI underwent PPCI. Patient A, a 62 y.o. male with extensive anterior-inferior STEMI, had total occlusion (TO) at both proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and mid right coronary artery (RCA). Patient B, a 42 y.o. male with extensive anterior-inferior STEMI, had subtotal occlusion (STO) at proximal RCA and TO at proximal LAD. Both of them had RBBB ECG pattern. Patient C, a 67 y.o. male with inferior STEMI had 90% thrombus occlusion at proximal–mid LAD and TO at proximal RCA. Patient D, a 65 y.o. male with anteroseptal STEMI, had STO at proximal LAD and 80% thrombus occlusion at mid left circumflex. The cardiomyocyte infarction biomarkers increased in all patients. Although all of them underwent successful PPCI in all of culprit lesions, they suffered from acute heart failure and two of them experienced recurrent ventricular arrhythmia episodes. One of them (patient A) died two days post PPCI. He was only patient who suffering from total occlusion in LAD and RCA with TIMI thrombus 5 and experienced a total atrioventricular block post-PPCI.Conclusion: STEMI with coronary double culprits have severe clinical outcome, regardless of the successful PCI. The degree of coronary occlusions might be linked to the patient clinical outcome. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document