scholarly journals Conservation of A-to-I RNA editing in bowhead whale and pig

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260081
Author(s):  
Knud Larsen ◽  
Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process in which nucleotide changes are introduced into an RNA sequence, many of which can contribute to proteomic sequence variation. The most common type of RNA editing, contributing to nearly 99% of all editing events in RNA, is A-to-I (adenosine-to-inosine) editing mediated by double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR) enzymes. A-to-I editing at ‘recoding’ sites results in non-synonymous substitutions in protein-coding sequences. Here, we present studies of the conservation of A-to-I editing in selected mRNAs between pigs, bowhead whales, humans and two shark species. All examined mRNAs–NEIL1, COG3, GRIA2, FLNA, FLNB, IGFBP7, AZIN1, BLCAP, GLI1, SON, HTR2C and ADAR2 –showed conservation of A-to-I editing of recoding sites. In addition, novel editing sites were identified in NEIL1 and GLI1 in bowhead whales. The A-to-I editing site of human NEIL1 in position 242 was conserved in the bowhead and porcine homologues. A novel editing site was discovered in Tyr244. Differential editing was detected at the two adenosines in the NEIL1 242 codon in both pig and bowhead NEIL1 mRNAs in various tissues and organs. No conservation of editing of KCNB1 and EEF1A mRNAs was seen in bowhead whales. In silico analyses revealed conservation of five adenosines in ADAR2, some of which are subject to A-to-I editing in bowheads and pigs, and conservation of a regulatory sequence in GRIA2 mRNA that is responsible for recognition of the ADAR editing enzyme.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Dudley ◽  
Heather Hundley ◽  
Suba Rajendren

Background and Hypothesis:  Over two thirds of human mRNAs contain adenosine(A)-to-inosine (I) editing sites indicating that RNA editing significantly alters the flow of genetic information. RNA editing is required for normal development and proper neuronal function in all animals. Aberrant RNA editing is identified in several neurological disorders and cancers.   A-to-I RNA editing is catalyzed by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) proteins. These enzymes commonly bind to double stranded RNA (dsRNA) and catalyze the conversion of adenosine to inosine. However, it is unknown whether these different regions of mRNA are edited by ADARs in the cytoplasm or nucleus. Early research has shown that inosines are present in the nucleus, while new additional evidence shows activity in cytoplasm as well. What dictates the location of the editing is yet unknown.   Experimental Design:   The subcellular localization of the ADAR editing enzyme will be determined by performing western blots of fractionated Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Unlike mammals, ADAR editing is not essential in C. elegans, thus making it an easy system to address mechanistic questions about RNA editing. Embryos will be attained from wild-type, ADR-1 and ADR-2 knockout worms, and biochemical techniques will be used to obtain nuclei and cytoplasmic fractions. These fractions will be subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting for the ADAR editing enzyme, ADR-2. I will also use positive controls of a nuclear protein (histone) and a cytoplasmic protein (Tubulin) to test the fractionation.  Anticipated Results:   That there will be more ADR-2 enzyme in the nucleus than the cytoplasm.  Potential Impact:  Knowing the location of the edited RNA will allow researchers to have a better idea of what mechanisms influence the editing of ADAR, and what dictates the localization of dsRNA. Current theories involve the number of inosine groups, cellular conditions which effect localization, and nuclear retention molecules other than inosine. 


2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (35) ◽  
pp. 26828-26833
Author(s):  
Yang-Gyun Kim ◽  
Ky Lowenhaupt ◽  
Stefan Maas ◽  
Alan Herbert ◽  
Thomas Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Z Dna ◽  

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ba-Bie Teng ◽  
Scott Ochsner ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Kizhake V. Soman ◽  
Paul P. Lau ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 550-552
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Moore ◽  
Ghazal Sadri ◽  
Annalara G. Fischer ◽  
Tyler Weirick ◽  
Giuseppe Militello ◽  
...  

Structure ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Placido ◽  
Bernard A. Brown ◽  
Ky Lowenhaupt ◽  
Alexander Rich ◽  
Alekos Athanasiadis

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 6726-6734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Miyamoto ◽  
Junichi Obokata ◽  
Masahiro Sugiura

ABSTRACT RNA editing in higher-plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversions at specific sites. Although in vivo analyses have been performed, little is known about the biochemical aspects of chloroplast editing reactions. Here we improved our original in vitro system and devised a procedure for preparing active chloroplast extracts not only from tobacco plants but also from pea plants. Using our tobacco in vitro system, cis-acting elements were defined for psbE and petB mRNAs. Distinct proteins were found to bind specifically to each cis-element, a 56-kDa protein to the psbE site and a 70-kDa species to the petB site. Pea chloroplasts lack the corresponding editing site in psbE since T is already present in the DNA. Parallel in vitro analyses with tobacco and pea extracts revealed that the pea plant has no editing activity for psbE mRNAs and lacks the 56-kDa protein, whereas petB mRNAs are edited and the 70-kDa protein is also present. Therefore, coevolution of an editing site and its cognate trans-factor was demonstrated biochemically in psbE mRNA editing between tobacco and pea plants.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel-Marie Plonski ◽  
Emily Johnson ◽  
Madeline Frederick ◽  
Heather Mercer ◽  
Gail Fraizer ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundAs the number of RNA-seq datasets that become available to explore transcriptome diversity increases, so does the need for easy-to-use comprehensive computational workflows. Many available tools facilitate analyses of one of the two major mechanisms of transcriptome diversity, namely, differential expression of isoforms due to alternative splicing, while the second major mechanism - RNA editing due to post-transcriptional changes of individual nucleotides – remains under-appreciated. Both these mechanisms play an essential role in physiological and diseases processes, including cancer and neurological disorders. However, elucidation of RNA editing events at transcriptome-wide level requires increasingly complex computational tools, in turn resulting in a steep entrance barrier for labs who are interested in high-throughput variant calling applications on a large scale but lack the manpower and/or computational expertise.ResultsHere we present an easy-to-use, fully automated, computational pipeline (Automated Isoform Diversity Detector, AIDD) that contains open source tools for various tasks needed to map transcriptome diversity, including RNA editing events. To facilitate reproducibility and avoid system dependencies, the pipeline is contained within a pre-configured VirtualBox environment. The analytical tasks and format conversions are accomplished via a set of automated scripts that enable the user to go from a set of raw data, such as fastq files, to publication-ready results and figures in one step. A publicly available dataset of Zika virus-infected neural progenitor cells is used to illustrate AIDD’s capabilities.ConclusionsAIDD pipeline offers a user-friendly interface for comprehensive and reproducible RNA-seq analyses. Among unique features of AIDD are its ability to infer RNA editing patterns, including ADAR editing, and inclusion of Guttman scale patterns for time series analysis of such editing landscapes. AIDD-based results show importance of diversity of ADAR isoforms, key RNA editing enzymes linked with the innate immune system and viral infections. These findings offer insights into the potential role of ADAR editing dysregulation in the disease mechanisms, including those of congenital Zika syndrome. Because of its automated all-inclusive features, AIDD pipeline enables even a novice user to easily explore common mechanisms of transcriptome diversity, including RNA editing landscapes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document