scholarly journals Use of Lyophilized Calibrant Plasmas for Simplified International Normalized Ratio Determination with a Human Tissue Factor Thromboplastin Reagent Derived from Cultured Human Cells

2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 2006-2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
Wim P M Houdijk
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Factor ◽  
Human Tissue ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Regression Line ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Cultured Human Cells ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: For monitoring of treatment with oral anticoagulants, the clotting time obtained in the prothrombin time (PT) test is transformed to the International Normalized Ratio (INR) with use of a system-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI). The calibrant plasma procedure (CPP) is an alternative approach to INR calculation based on the use of a set of lyophilized plasmas with assigned INRs. Methods: With the CPP, a linear relationship is established between log(PT) and log(INR), using orthogonal regression. CPP was validated for Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor reagent derived from cultured human cells. CPP precision was assessed as the CV of the slope of the regression line. The accuracy of the CPP was determined by comparing the INR obtained with the CPP with that obtained with the established ISI-based reference method. INRs of the calibrants were assigned by different routes: by manufacturer (consensus labeling) or by use of Simplastin HTF or International Reference Preparations (IRPs; rTF/95 or RBT/90). Results: The mean CV of the CPP regression slope ranged from 1.0% (Simplastin HTF reagent-specific INR) to 2.4% (INR assigned with rTF/95). INRs calculated with the CPP were similar to those obtained with the reference method, but when the routes for assigning INRs to the calibrant plasmas were compared, the mean difference in INR between CPP and the reference method was smaller with Simplastin HTF reagent-specific values. In several (but not all) cases, this difference was significant (P <0.05, t-test). Conclusion: CPP can be used for local INR determination, but better precision and accuracy are obtained with reagent-specific INRs compared with INR assignment by consensus labeling or IRP.

Multi-Center Study of Thromboplastin Calibration Precision – Influence of Reagent Species, Composition, and International Sensitivity Index (ISI)

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 035-040 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
R M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
The Other ◽  
World Health ◽  
Rabbit Brain ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Bovine Plasma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryFour thromboplastin reagents were tested by 18 laboratories in Europe, North-America, and Australasia, according to a detailed protocol. One thromboplastin was the International Reference Preparation for ox brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (coded OBT/79), and the second was a certified reference material for rabbit brain thromboplastin, plain (coded CRM 149R). The other two thromboplastin reagents were another rabbit plain brain thromboplastin (RP) with a lower ISI than CRM 149R and a rabbit brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (RC). Calibration of the latter two reagents was performed according to methods recommended by the World Health Organization (W. H. O.).The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: 1) Is the calibration of the RC reagent more precise against the bovine/combined (OBT/79) than against the rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R)? 2) Is the precision of calibration influenced by the magnitude of the International Sensitivity Index (ISI)?The lowest inter-laboratory variation of ISI was observed in the calibration of the rabbit/plain reagent (RP) against the other rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R) (CV 1.6%). The highest interlaboratory variation was obtained in the calibration of rabbit/plain (RP) against bovine/combined (OBT/79) (CV 5.1%). In the calibration of the rabbit/combined (RC) reagent, there was no difference in precision between OBT/79 (CV 4.3%) and CRM 149R (CV 4.2%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the precision of the ISI of RC obtained with CRM 149R (ISI = 1.343) and the rabbit/plain (RP) reagent with ISI = 1.14. In conclusion, the calibration of RC could be performed with similar precision with either OBT/79 or CRM 149R, or RP.The mean ISI values calculated with OBT/79 and CRM 149R were practically identical, indicating that there is no bias in the ISI of these reference preparations and that these reference preparations have been stable since their original calibration studies in 1979 and 1987, respectively.International Normalized Ratio (INR) equivalents were calculated for a lyophilized control plasma derived from patients treated with oral anticoagulants. There were small but significant differences in the mean INR equivalents between the bovine and rabbit thromboplastins. There were no differences in the interlaboratory variation of the INR equivalents, when the four thromboplastins were compared.

Multicentric Evaluation of a New PT Reagent Based on Recombinant Human Tissue Factor and Synthetic Phospholipids

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (03) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Bader ◽  
P M M Mannucci ◽  
A Tripodi ◽  
J Hirsh ◽  
F Keller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Factor ◽  
Human Tissue ◽  
Regression Line ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Phosphatidyl Serine ◽  
Factor Vii ◽  
Rabbit Brain ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Automated Instrument

SummaryA new PT reagent based on recombinant human tissue factor and synthetic phospholipids (phosphatidyl choline and phosphatidyl serine) with defined fatty acid side chains was calibrated against BCT/253 and CRM 149R. A small but consistent bias in the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) value was obtained using either the human or rabbit brain reference material. ISI values were around 1.0 or slightly lower depending on the respective instrument. Mixing studies with factor deficient plasmas showed a high factor sensitivity especially for factor VII as compared to commercial rabbit brain or human placenta thromboplastin. In an international field trial the reagent was tested using fully or semi automated Electra™ coagulometers in 4 different laboratories. Results with normal samples were in excellent agreement among the different laboratories. Mean values were 10.9, 10.9, 11.0, 11,7 s with a range of 9.5 to 12.5 s. Results of males and females were not different. In patients with liver disease very similar PT activities were found as compared to sensitive rabbit brain or human placental thromboplastins. In normals and patients with oral anticoagulation INR values correlated very well against BCT (r = 0.98, regression line y =-0.07 + 0.9 x). The distribution of samples was linear over the whole range. In the comparison against sensitive rabbit brain thromboplastin or human placental thromboplastin similar correlations were found. In a few cases higher INR values were observed for the recombinant reagent especially in patients with intensive treatment. Factor assays in those patients showed at least the strong reduction of one vitamin Independent coagulation factor. Over all the linearity was better against the rabbit brain reagent than against the human placental reagent which is slightly less factor VII sensitive as shown in mixing studies with normal and factor VII deficient plasma. Precision studies in the 4 laboratories showed excellent reproducibility of lyophilised controls or local patient plasma pools for all reagents with a better performance of the recombinant reagent. C. V. values from day to day ranged from 1.3% to 5% for normal and abnormal controls.These results show that the recombinant PT reagent, especially in conjunction with a precise automated instrument, may improve the results of PT testing and thus may lead to better patient care.

Are Capillary Whole Blood Coagulation Monitors Suitable for the Control of Oral Anticoagulant Treatment by the International Normalized Ratio?

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (06) ◽  
pp. 0921-0924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando Tripodi ◽  
Arnaldo A Arbini ◽  
Veena Chantarangkul ◽  
Donato Bettega ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Regression Line ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Rabbit Brain ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Calibration Model ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Treatment

SummaryThe 512 Coagulation Monitor is a portable coagulation photometer that uses disposable cartridges containing a lyophilized rabbit brain thromboplastin to measure the PT for capillary whole blood. It has been proposed as a suitable system for patient self monitoring at home, but its performance has never been thoroughly assessed for results expressed as International Normalized Ratio (INR). In particular, there is no available information about the adequacy of the WHO calibration model with the Monitor. The aims of the study were to determine the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) against the secondary International Reference Preparation for rabbit thromboplastin and to assess the precision of the INR. The study demonstrates that the Monitor can be calibrated with the WHO model, because log-transformed PTs for patients stabilized on oral anticoagulants and normal individuals are linearly related and because the same orthogonal regression line describes patient and normal data points adequately. However, the ISI calculated in this study (2.715) is higher than that adopted by the manufacturer (2.036). The between-assay reproducibility of the Monitor is acceptable (CV = 9.7%) with results expressed in seconds, but become unacceptably poor when the results are converted into INR (CV = 18.8%) because of the high ISI value of the thromboplastin used. We think that the Monitor might be suitable for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy if the manufacturer would provide a more sensitive thromboplastin in the cartridges.

scholarly journals Influence of Three Types of Automated Coagulometers on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of Rabbit, Human, and Recombinant Human Tissue Factor Preparations

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Houbouyan ◽  
M. F. Aillaud ◽  
K. W. E. Denson ◽  
M. Johnston ◽  
S. Kitchen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Factor ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
International Reference ◽  
Rabbit Tissue ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Automated Instruments ◽  
International Multicenter ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryFive tissue factor reagents and three types of automated instruments for prothrombin time (PT) determination were studied in an international multicenter collaborative exercise. The purpose of this work was to determine the international sensitivity index (ISI) for each combination of reagent and instrument against the international reference preparation RBT/90. Each type of instrument was used by 3 or 4 centers to assess the interlaboratory variation of the ISI. The interlaboratory variation of the ISI for each combination of reagent and instrument ranged between 0.4% and 7.8% coefficient of variation. For three reagents, the mean ISI values for ACL (nephelometric) and STA (mechanical) were practically identical, but the mean ISI values for MLA (photo-optical) were at least 10% higher. For two other reagents prepared from rabbit tissue, the mean ISI values increased in the order ACL, STA, MLA. The widest range of mean ISI values was noted with one rabbit tissue factor reagent: 1.68 for ACL and 2.00 for MLA. Exclusion of patient specimens with INR <1.5 and INR >4.5 determined by the international reference preparation resulted in a slight decrease of the mean ISI.The interlaboratory variation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was assessed from the results obtained with common lyophilized and deep-frozen plasmas. The use of instrument-specific ISI values resulted in reduced interlaboratory variation of the INR. It is recommended that thromboplastin manufacturers provide instrument-specific ISI values.

Effect of Concentration of Trisodium Citrate Anticoagulant on Calculation of the International Normalised Ratio and the International Sensitivity Index of Thromboplastin

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (01) ◽  
pp. 084-088 ◽  
Author(s):  
E M Duncan ◽  
C R Casey ◽  
B M Duncan ◽  
J V Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Reference Material ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Trisodium Citrate ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Orthogonal Regression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
International Normalised Ratio ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThe aim of this study was to determine whether the concentration of trisodium citrate used to anticoagulate blood has an effect on the INR of the sample and the ISI of the thromboplastin. Five thromboplastins including and Australian reference material were used to measure the prothrombin time of normal and patient samples collected into two concentrations of trisodium citrate - 109 mM and 129 mM. There was no effect of citrate concentration on the INRs determined with the reference material. However for the other four thromboplastins there was a significant difference between INRs for the two citrate groups. The prothrombin times of the samples collected into 129 mM were longer than those collected into 109 mM. This difference was only slight in normal plasma but more marked in patients receiving oral anticoagulants, causing the INRs for patient plasmas collected into 129 mM citrate to be higher then the corresponding samples collected into 109 mM citrate.From orthogonal regression of log prothrombin times by the reference method against each thromboplastin, we found that the ISI for each thromboplastin was approximately 10% lower when determined with samples collected into 129 mM citrate than with samples collected into 109 mM. These results suggest that the concentration of trisodium citrate used for collection of blood samples can affect the calculation of the INR and the calibration of the ISI of thromboplastin. This was found both for commercial thromboplastins prepared by tissue extraction and for a recombinant tissue factor.

In-house Calibration of the International Sensitivity Index or Calibration Curve for Determination of the International Normalized Ratio

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
William F. Brien ◽  
Linda Crawford ◽  
Anne Raby ◽  
Harold Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Calibration Curve ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Improve Performance ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Method Of Assessment ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

Abstract Context.—The international normalized ratio (INR) has been used since 1983 to standardize prothrombin time results for patients on oral anticoagulants. However, significant interlaboratory variations have been noted. Attempts have been made to address these differences with the use of instrument-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI) values and in-house calibration of ISI values. Objective.—To assess the performance of laboratories using a calibration curve for INR testing. Design.—Attempts to improve performance of the INR include the use of instrument-specific ISI values, model-specific ISI values, in-house calibration of ISI values, and more recently, the preparation of a calibration curve. Several studies have shown an improvement in performance using these procedures. In this study of licensed laboratories performing routine coagulation testing in the Province of Ontario, Canada, the determination of the INR by a calibration curve was compared with the laboratories' usual method of assessment. These methods were subsequently analyzed by comparing the results to instrument-specific ISI, model-specific ISI, and in-house calibrators. International normalized ratios derived by both methods were analyzed for accuracy and precision. The stability of a calibration curve was also investigated. Results.—Performance of INR testing has improved with use of a calibration curve or in-house calibrators. Conclusion.—The results confirm that either in-house calibrators or the calibration curve improve performance of INR testing. The calibration curve may be easier to use and appears stable up to 4 months.

Thrombin Generation Is Normal in Most Patients with Cirrhosis despite a Prolonged INR.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1826-1826
Author(s):  
Alexander Gatt ◽  
Anne Riddell ◽  
Vincenza Calvaruso ◽  
Michael Makris ◽  
Edward Tuddenham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Tissue Factor ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Thrombin Generation ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Clotting Factors ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Advanced liver disease is associated with prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT). In order to decrease the inter-laboratory variability of PT measurement, the international normalised ratio (INR) calculated as the ratio of patient’s PT to a normal (control) sample, raised to the power of the international sensitivity index (ISI) of the particular thromboplastin used was developed. However, the ISI is derived from PT results of patients on warfarin and results cannot be extrapolated to liver patients. Despite this, the INR is still commonly performed to assess bleeding risk in patients with liver disease worldwide. Furthermore the INR is only affected by factors I, II, V, VII, and X and is not influenced by other factors such as factor VIII which is usually raised in hepatic cirrhosis. Recently it has been reportd that thrombomodulin addition (to take into account the protein C pathway) normalises thrombin generation (TG)1 despite these patients having a low TG if thrombomodulin is not used. Aim: We speculated that TG, which is a global assay of coagulation and sensitive to all coagulation factors, when triggered by a low tissue factor (TF) concentration might not correlate with the INR in patients with liver disease and that contact inhibition with corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI) might better reflect the coagulation potential in this patient group. Results: 73 unselected patients with liver cirrhosis due to various diseases and 25 normal subjects were studied. INR and TG using the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) at 1pM tissue factor (TF) with CTI, 5pM without CTI and with and without Protac (a Protein C activator) were performed using platelet poor plasma (PPP). The INR range was 0.8–4.0 (mean 1.6). At 5pM TF without Protac, the patient group had a significantly lower endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) than the controls (mean ETP difference 752nM/min; P &lt;0.0001). With Protac, no significant differences could be detected between the 2 groups. However, if the ETP without Protac was divided by the ETP with Protac x 100, the liver group showed more resistance to PC activation (mean % difference 25.4; P 0.0002). At 1pM TF, the mean ETP in the cirrhosis cohort was slightly lower than the normal group (difference between means 216nM/min; P 0.03). However, only 7 (9.6%) patients had ETP values less than the normal range (mean±2SD). No correlation was found between the ETP at 1pM and the INR. The mean FVIII:C was raised at 185.6 (78–420U/dl). Conclusion: TG measured at low TF with CTI is normal in the majority of patients with cirrhosis. These patients are also more resistant to PC activation and have supranormal FVIII:C. Thus most patients have a normal or high thrombin potential despite an abnormal INR. These findings have important implications as in the absence of bleeding, “prophylactic” plasma and clotting factors are unnecessary.

scholarly journals Simplified Method for International Normalized Ratio (INR) Derivation Based on the Prothrombin Time/INR Line: An International Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1608-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Poller ◽  
Saied Ibrahim ◽  
Michelle Keown ◽  
Albert Pattison ◽  
Jørgen Jespersen
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
International Study ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Concerted Action ◽  
Total Proportion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Certified Values ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

BACKGROUND The need to perform local International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations and in particular the requirement for a manual method for prothrombin time (PT) determination, have proved to be obstacles to application of the WHO scheme for PT standardization. METHODS We used international normalized ratio (INR) derived with a set of only 5 European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) lyophilized calibrant plasmas, certified manually by expert centers with reference thromboplastins, to determine a local PT/INR Line. We compared results of an independent set of validation plasmas with INRs from conventional ISI calibrations and with manually certified INRs. RESULTS The mean certified INR of 5 lyophilized validation plasmas was 2.41 with human thromboplastin, 2.04 with bovine/combined, and 2.80 with rabbit. With 42 human reagents, the mean observed INR of the validation plasmas was 2.68 (11.2% deviation from certified INR). Deviation was reduced to 0.4% with both local ISI calibration and the PT/INR Line. Eight results based on bovine/combined thromboplastin gave an INR deviation of 4.9%, becoming 0.5% after ISI calibration and 2.4% with the PT/INR Line. Six results with rabbit reagents deviated from certified INR by 2.5%. After ISI calibration, deviation became 1.1%, and with the PT/INR Line, 0.7%. The PT/INR Line gave similar results with both linear and orthogonal regression analysis. The total proportion of validation plasmas giving INR within 10% deviation from certified values was 42.5% with uncorrected INR, which increased to 92.1% with local ISI calibration and 93.2% with the PT/INR Line. CONCLUSIONS The PT/INR Line procedure with 5 ECAA calibrant plasmas successfully substitutes for local ISI calibrations in deriving reliable INRs.

Thromboplastin Composition Affects the Sensitivity of Prothrombin Time (PT) Clotting Tests To Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 928-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Smith ◽  
James H. Morrissey
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Tissue Factor ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Assay Sensitivity ◽  
Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Normal Human ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

Abstract Introduction: Thromboplastin reagents used for prothrombin time (PT) clotting assays vary in their sensitivity to anticoagulant drugs that directly inhibit Factor Xa (FXa). The International Sensitivity Index (ISI)/International Normalized Ratio (INR) system was introduced for monitoring warfarin, and corrects for differences in PT assay sensitivity. However, it does not adequately correct for differences in assay sensitivity to direct FXa inhibitors. The objective of this study was to determine how the composition of thromboplastin reagents affects PT sensitivity to the novel oral, direct FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban and how this correlates with the INR. Methods: Several recombinant thromboplastin reagents were prepared using different concentrations of NaCl, tissue factor and phospholipids (PL). They also contained different % of phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC). These locally prepared thromboplastin reagents and five commercial thromboplastin assays were evaluated. PT ratios (PTR = PT with drug/PT without drug) were measured using normal human plasma to which rivaroxaban 1 μg/mL was added in vitro. Some PTRs were converted to INRs using locally determined ISI. Results: PT obtained with commercial thromboplastins was prolonged by rivaroxaban (Table), but the magnitude varied more than 3-fold, depending on the thromboplastin. Converting PTR to INR failed to normalize these results and made discrepancies more pronounced. Using locally prepared thromboplastin reagents, the PT sensitivity toward rivaroxaban was found to increase by decreasing the concentration of tissue factor or by increasing the concentration of PL or NaCl. Increasing the % PS generally decreased rivaroxaban sensitivity, while including PE generally increased rivaroxaban sensitivity. There was also a trend toward higher rivaroxaban sensitivity as the baseline PT increased. As with commercial thromboplastins, converting these PTR values to INR frequently made the discrepancies more pronounced. Conclusions: Changing the composition of thromboplastin reagents had disparate effects on the sensitivity of PT clotting tests to rivaroxaban. Furthermore, converting PTR values to INR failed to eliminate, and in some cases even exacerbated, the apparent differences in assay sensitivity of these PT clotting tests to rivaroxaban. This study sheds new light on the shortfall of the ISI/INR system to adequately correct for variation in the sensitivity of PT tests to direct FXa inhibitors. However, data show that other global clotting tests, such as PT, can be used to assess the efficacy of direct FXa inhibitors. Table 1: PT results for normal plasma spiked with 1 μg/ml rivaroxaban using commercial thromboplastins Commercial thromboplastins ISI PTR INR INR, International Normalized Ratio; ISI, International Sensitivity Index; PTR, prothrombin time ratio Recombiplastin 0.94 5.07 4.60 Innovin 0.98 2.25 2.22 Thromborel S 1.07 2.37 2.52 Neoplastine CL+ 1.09 7.32 8.76 Thromboplastin C+ 1.50 3.77 7.31

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document