Effect of Concentration of Trisodium Citrate Anticoagulant on Calculation of the International Normalised Ratio and the International Sensitivity Index of Thromboplastin

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (01) ◽  
pp. 084-088 ◽  
Author(s):  
E M Duncan ◽  
C R Casey ◽  
B M Duncan ◽  
J V Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Reference Material ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Trisodium Citrate ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Orthogonal Regression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
International Normalised Ratio ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThe aim of this study was to determine whether the concentration of trisodium citrate used to anticoagulate blood has an effect on the INR of the sample and the ISI of the thromboplastin. Five thromboplastins including and Australian reference material were used to measure the prothrombin time of normal and patient samples collected into two concentrations of trisodium citrate - 109 mM and 129 mM. There was no effect of citrate concentration on the INRs determined with the reference material. However for the other four thromboplastins there was a significant difference between INRs for the two citrate groups. The prothrombin times of the samples collected into 129 mM were longer than those collected into 109 mM. This difference was only slight in normal plasma but more marked in patients receiving oral anticoagulants, causing the INRs for patient plasmas collected into 129 mM citrate to be higher then the corresponding samples collected into 109 mM citrate.From orthogonal regression of log prothrombin times by the reference method against each thromboplastin, we found that the ISI for each thromboplastin was approximately 10% lower when determined with samples collected into 129 mM citrate than with samples collected into 109 mM. These results suggest that the concentration of trisodium citrate used for collection of blood samples can affect the calculation of the INR and the calibration of the ISI of thromboplastin. This was found both for commercial thromboplastins prepared by tissue extraction and for a recombinant tissue factor.

Multi-Center Study of Thromboplastin Calibration Precision – Influence of Reagent Species, Composition, and International Sensitivity Index (ISI)

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 035-040 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
R M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
The Other ◽  
World Health ◽  
Rabbit Brain ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Bovine Plasma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryFour thromboplastin reagents were tested by 18 laboratories in Europe, North-America, and Australasia, according to a detailed protocol. One thromboplastin was the International Reference Preparation for ox brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (coded OBT/79), and the second was a certified reference material for rabbit brain thromboplastin, plain (coded CRM 149R). The other two thromboplastin reagents were another rabbit plain brain thromboplastin (RP) with a lower ISI than CRM 149R and a rabbit brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (RC). Calibration of the latter two reagents was performed according to methods recommended by the World Health Organization (W. H. O.).The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: 1) Is the calibration of the RC reagent more precise against the bovine/combined (OBT/79) than against the rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R)? 2) Is the precision of calibration influenced by the magnitude of the International Sensitivity Index (ISI)?The lowest inter-laboratory variation of ISI was observed in the calibration of the rabbit/plain reagent (RP) against the other rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R) (CV 1.6%). The highest interlaboratory variation was obtained in the calibration of rabbit/plain (RP) against bovine/combined (OBT/79) (CV 5.1%). In the calibration of the rabbit/combined (RC) reagent, there was no difference in precision between OBT/79 (CV 4.3%) and CRM 149R (CV 4.2%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the precision of the ISI of RC obtained with CRM 149R (ISI = 1.343) and the rabbit/plain (RP) reagent with ISI = 1.14. In conclusion, the calibration of RC could be performed with similar precision with either OBT/79 or CRM 149R, or RP.The mean ISI values calculated with OBT/79 and CRM 149R were practically identical, indicating that there is no bias in the ISI of these reference preparations and that these reference preparations have been stable since their original calibration studies in 1979 and 1987, respectively.International Normalized Ratio (INR) equivalents were calculated for a lyophilized control plasma derived from patients treated with oral anticoagulants. There were small but significant differences in the mean INR equivalents between the bovine and rabbit thromboplastins. There were no differences in the interlaboratory variation of the INR equivalents, when the four thromboplastins were compared.

Questions and Answers on Prothrombin Time Standardisation in Oral Anticoagulant Control

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (02) ◽  
pp. 515-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Loeliger ◽  
L Poller ◽  
M Samama ◽  
J M Thomson ◽  
A M H P Van den Besselaar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Sample ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
International Normalised Ratio ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Tissue Thromboplastin ◽  
The Individual ◽  
International Sensitivity Index ◽  
New System

SummaryOne of the reasons why oral anticoagulants fell into disrepute is the absence of internationally accepted standardised procedures for controlling the level of anticoagulatiori. This deplorable situation resulted in over- and under-coagulation and uncertainty in the therapeutic range. International conformity can now be obtained by using an International Normalised Ratio (INR) which is derived from the individual result obtained in a given plasma sample and the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the tissue thromboplastin reagent used. Any thromboplastin reagent can be calibrated against an international primary or secondary W.H.O. reference preparation, so as to obtain its International Sensitivity Index. The new system of reporting the level of anticoagulation was designed and can only safely be applied in patients taking oral anticoagulants.

A Simplified Procedure for Thromboplastin Calibration -The Usefulness of Lyophilized Plasmas Assessed in a Collaborative Study

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tripodi ◽  
V Chantarangkul ◽  
C Manotti ◽  
M Poggi ◽  
M Braga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Orthogonal Regression ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThe International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of thromboplastins is determined by calibration using fresh plasmas from 60 patients stabilized on oral anticoagulants and 20 healthy subjects. This procedure is demanding, particularly for those who have no easy access to patients. The alternative use of a smaller number of lyophilized plasmas has already been considered, but one important issue, the number of repeated measurements to be carried out, has never been addressed. Two commercial rabbit thromboplastins, A and B, were calibrated in 3 laboratories against CRM 149R. On each of 10 working days, prothrombin times were measured for a different set of 8 fresh plasmas and for the same set of 8 lyophilized plasmas. The ISI values for both thromboplastins were estimated by orthogonal regression on fresh and lyophilized plasmas. The between- and within-laboratory CV values of the estimated ISI were taken as measures of precision of the calibration. In addition, ISI and CV were calculated daily on cumulative results obtained with lyophilized plasmas from day 1 to day 10. The ISI values for both thromboplastins calculated with lyophilized plasmas were not significantly different from those with fresh plasmas (mean of 3 laboratories: 1.42 vs 1.48 for A and 1.22 vs 1.20 for B). The between-laboratory precision of the calibration with lyophilized plasmas was not considerably different from that with fresh plasmas (CV for 3 labs: 5.2% vs 6.8% for A and 0.9% vs 2.2% for B). The ISI estimated with lyophilized plasmas on results of day 1 were not different from those of days 2 through 10. Good within-laboratory precision of the calibration (CV around 2%) was already achieved on day 3. In conclusion, this study shows that lyophilized plasmas pooled from normals and patients on oral anticoagulants can be used as substitutes for individual fresh plasmas to simplify the existing procedure for thromboplastin calibration.

Multi-Center Calibration of the Second Reference Material for Thromboplastin, Rabbit, Plain, Coded CRM 149R

1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (03) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
R M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Reference Material ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Standard Errors ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryIn a collaborative trial of eleven laboratories which was performed mainly within the framework of the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), a second reference material for thromboplastin, rabbit, plain, was calibrated against its predecessor RBT/79. This second reference material (coded CRM 149R) has a mean International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of 1.343 with a standard error of the mean of 0.035. The standard error of the ISI was determined by combination of the standard errors of the ISI of RBT/79 and the slope of the calibration line in this trial.The BCR reference material for thromboplastin, human, plain (coded BCT/099) was also included in this trial for assessment of the long-term stability of the relationship with RBT/79. The results indicated that this relationship has not changed over a period of 8 years. The interlaboratory variation of the slope of the relationship between CRM 149R and RBT/79 was significantly lower than the variation of the slope of the relationship between BCT/099 and RBT/79. In addition to the manual technique, a semi-automatic coagulometer according to Schnitger & Gross was used to determine prothrombin times with CRM 149R. The mean ISI of CRM 149R was not affected by replacement of the manual technique by this particular coagulometer.Two lyophilized plasmas were included in this trial. The mean slope of relationship between RBT/79 and CRM 149R based on the two lyophilized plasmas was the same as the corresponding slope based on fresh plasmas. Tlowever, the mean slope of relationship between RBT/79 and BCT/099 based on the two lyophilized plasmas was 4.9% higher than the mean slope based on fresh plasmas. Thus, the use of these lyophilized plasmas induced a small but significant bias in the slope of relationship between these thromboplastins of different species.

In-house Calibration of the International Sensitivity Index or Calibration Curve for Determination of the International Normalized Ratio

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
William F. Brien ◽  
Linda Crawford ◽  
Anne Raby ◽  
Harold Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Calibration Curve ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Improve Performance ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Method Of Assessment ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

Abstract Context.—The international normalized ratio (INR) has been used since 1983 to standardize prothrombin time results for patients on oral anticoagulants. However, significant interlaboratory variations have been noted. Attempts have been made to address these differences with the use of instrument-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI) values and in-house calibration of ISI values. Objective.—To assess the performance of laboratories using a calibration curve for INR testing. Design.—Attempts to improve performance of the INR include the use of instrument-specific ISI values, model-specific ISI values, in-house calibration of ISI values, and more recently, the preparation of a calibration curve. Several studies have shown an improvement in performance using these procedures. In this study of licensed laboratories performing routine coagulation testing in the Province of Ontario, Canada, the determination of the INR by a calibration curve was compared with the laboratories' usual method of assessment. These methods were subsequently analyzed by comparing the results to instrument-specific ISI, model-specific ISI, and in-house calibrators. International normalized ratios derived by both methods were analyzed for accuracy and precision. The stability of a calibration curve was also investigated. Results.—Performance of INR testing has improved with use of a calibration curve or in-house calibrators. Conclusion.—The results confirm that either in-house calibrators or the calibration curve improve performance of INR testing. The calibration curve may be easier to use and appears stable up to 4 months.

The Dependence of the International Sensitivity Index on the Coagulometer Used to Perform the Prothrombin Time

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (03) ◽  
pp. 424-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Ray ◽  
I R Smith
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Optical Instruments ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThis study was designed to detect any effect that different types of coagulation instrument may have on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of a thromboplastin.Manufacturers of commercial thromboplastins now calibrate their reagents against the World Health Organization international reference preparation to assign them an IST. This enables the prothrombin time (PT) estimated with that reagent to be expressed as an International Normalised Ratio (INR).One batch of Thromborel S was calibrated against the Australasian Reference Thromboplastin (ART). The Thromborel S was used on three photo-optical instruments, the Automated Coagulation Laboratory (ACL) (Instrumentation Laboratory), the Cobas Fibro (Roche), and the Coag-a-Pet (General Diagnostics). PTs using ART were performed manually using the reference method.The ISIs calibrated in our laboratory when the ACL and Cobas Fibro were used were not significantly different at the 95% level, being 1.102 ± 0.018 and 1.134 ± 0.022 respectively. The ISI with the Coag-a-Pet of 1.223 ± 0.023 was significantly different to that of the ACL and the Cobas Fibro at the 95% level.The flowcharts for a computer program to perform the necessary calculations are provided. The program allows for the entry and editing of data from the calibration procedure, and provides a mean normal PT and normal range, the ISI and 95% confidence limits of the calibration, and a chart for the conversion of the test PTs to INRs.The authors have made available an IBM compatible program for the calibration of thromboplastins.

A Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate Method Dependency of the International Sensitivity Index of Bovine Thromboplastin

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (02) ◽  
pp. 166-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H M Peters ◽  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
F M F G Olthuis
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Manual Method ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
International Sensitivity Index ◽  
Detailed Protocol

SummaryIn The Netherlands, a particular coagulometer method for prothrombin time (PT) determination with reduced sample and reagent volumes is used by 62% of the laboratories controlling oral anticoagulant therapy. This “micro-method” has been calibrated against the manual tilt-tube technique for PT determination by six Dutch laboratories. Each laboratory tested 20 fresh normal blood samples and 60 fresh patient blood samples using both methods with the same batch of bovine thromboplastin reagent, according to a detailed protocol. Both methods were comparable as to their precision, but PTs measured by the micromethod were significantly prolonged (p <0.001, Student’s t-test) as compared to the manual method. This effect is stronger for samples of normal subjects than for patients’ samples. It was assumed that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the bovine thromboplastin for the manual method was 1.00 in each laboratory. The ISI-values of the bovine thromboplastin for the micro-method determined by the six laboratories ranged from 1.00 to 1.07 (mean 1.03, SD 0.03). Our results indicate that any other laboratory, using this thromboplastin and the micromethod, should obtain accurate assessment of the International Normalized Ratio from their own mean normal PT and an ISI which is 3% higher than the ISI supplied by the thromboplastin manufacturer for the manual tilt-tube method.

The Effect of Some Instruments for Prothrombin Time Testing on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of Two Rabbit Tissue Thromboplastin Reagents

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 868-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Poggio ◽  
Antonius M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
Edo A van der Velde ◽  
Rogier M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Optical Instruments ◽  
Rabbit Tissue ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryTwo commercial rabbit tissue thromboplastins were calibrated against the International Reference Preparation for rabbit thromboplastin (coded RBT/79) by one laboratory using the manual technique, a semi-automatic electro-mechanical coagulometer and three different automatic photo-optical instruments. The calibration of the two reagents was performed in three and two different exercises, respectively, and showed good reproducibility of the procedure. The purpose of calibration is providing a formula for the assessment of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for patients receiving oral anticoagulants. The World Health Organization (WHO) model for thromboplastin calibration leads to the equation INR = RISI, in which R is the prothrombin time ratio and ISI the International Sensitivity Index of the calibrated thromboplastin/instrument system. This equation was adequate for one reagent, but not for the other when it was used in combination with the four instruments. At therapeutic intensities of anticoagulation, the deviation from the WHO-model observed for the second reagent was clinically insignificant. The WHO model was fully adequate when the second reagent was used with the manual technique. For both thromboplastins, there were statistically significant differences in ISI between the four instruments. The largest difference-amounting to approximately 10%-was observed between two photo-optical instruments. The order of instruments with increasing ISI was the same for the two reagents. It is recommended that thromboplastin manufacturers specify the instruments used for calibration of their reagent.

The Prothrombin Time Test: Effect of Varying Citrate Concentration

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. I. C Ingram ◽  
M Hills
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Trisodium Citrate ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Citrate Solution ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Citrate Concentration ◽  
Time Test ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients ◽  
Cacl2 Solution

SummaryBlood samples from 12 normal subjects and 46 patients on oral anticoagulants were divided so that each was anticoagulated with four concentrations of trisodium citrate solution in the range 0.09–0.15 M, 9 vol blood being added to 1 vol citrate solution in each case. Citrated blood haematocrit and plasma prothrombin time was measured on each subsample; 0.025 M CaCl2-solution was used for recalcification throughout. Three laboratories participated, each using a different prothrombin-time technique.The haematocrit of the citrated blood fell progressively as the molarity of the citrate increased, showing a mean reduction of 0.2%/0.01 increase in molarity in the citrate reagent. With rising citrate concentration, two laboratories showed a progressive lengthening of the prothrombin time in the plasmas of anticoagulated patients, but one did not.A uniform concentration of trisodium citrate solution should be used: 3.2% trisodium citrate. 2H20 (0.109 M) is suggested. A chart is provided for obtaining a constant proportion between citrate and plasma volumes, from the patient’s haematocrit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document