Virtual groups: An analysis of new forms of connection

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elijah Smith

In this probe, I seek to analyse the characteristics and tendencies of virtual groups, which I define as any group of people that are connected in a decentralized and persistent manner, via the internet or cellular networks. By analysing two dimensions that shape virtual groups – their size and their velocity of communication – we can understand some intrinsic environments that are formed, by nature of the medium itself. The velocity of a platform can be understood as how quickly ideas are transferred and a response is expected – consider reading a forum post versus participating in a video chat. Slow-velocity mediums, by nature of the eye, tend to promote an individualistic view and refined thoughts. High-velocity mediums, corresponding to the ear and occurring in real time, promote more unity and collective views. The second dimension (the size or openness of a platform) is determined both by how many members are in the group, but also by how access is controlled. Small and private groups, like a close-knit tribe, function as a whole and promote familial harmony. Large or public groups struggle to maintain a collective vision but benefit from a wide variety of view points. By analysing these dimensions together and looking at specific examples, we can strive to understand deep-seated issues within virtual groups and make predictions for what the future of decentralized gatherings will look like.

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240
Author(s):  
Jesus Antonio Alvarez-Cedillo ◽  
Elizabeth Acosta Gonzaga ◽  
Mario Aguilar-Fernández ◽  
Patricia Perez-Romero

The Internet is currently the largest network of communication worldwide and is where technological advances could be observed. The original creation of the Internet was based on the idea that this network would be formed mainly by multiple independent networks with an arbitrary design. The Internet is the place where all countries communicate and disseminate information in real time, this phenomenon directly affects economies, businesses, and society. This article shows what the future of the Internet is, our research carries out a qualitative prospective analysis on projects and investigations in which the scientific community is currently working, the information is analyzed, and the highlighted topics are shown.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Hetland

<p>When journalists popularize a highly topical new technology, such as the Internet, they situate their popularization within technological expectations; when researchers popularize it, they situate their popularization within both a retrospective and prospective understanding of technological change. Following this, journalists are inclined to appeal to emotionally involved users or pioneers, and researchers are inclined to appeal to responsible citizens. Hence, journalists immodestly dramatize the future by boosting a new technology or turning its risks into threats, while researchers acting as “modest witnesses” pour oil in troubled waters, indicating skepticism about the journalistic approach. Consequently, the technology popularization field is structured in two dimensions: from public appreciation of technology via public engagement to critical understanding of technology in public, and from expectation-based argumentation to research-based argumentation. </p><p> </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
Sulkhiya Gazieva ◽  

The future of labor market depends upon several factors, long-term innovation and the demographic developments. However, one of the main drivers of technological change in the future is digitalization and central to this development is the production and use of digital logic circuits and its derived technologies, including the computer,the smart phone and the Internet. Especially, smart automation will perhaps not cause e.g.regarding industries, occupations, skills, tasks and duties


Author(s):  
Robin M. Boylorn

This chapter considers the role, importance, and impact of public intellectualism on the future of qualitative research. The chapter argues that the move toward technology and the public dissemination of information via the internet requires a shift in how and what we research with an expressed intention of reaching a broader and nonacademic audience. The chapter considers the relationship between the private and public sphere, and the so-called “bastardization” of intellectualism to explain the role and rise of public intellectualism in qualitative research. By considering issues such as personal subjectivity, accountability, representation, and epistemological privilege, the chapter discusses how public contexts inform qualitative research and, conversely, how qualitative research can inform the public.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document