scholarly journals Evaluation of Facial Trauma Severity in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Using FISS Scoring System

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristaninta Bangun ◽  
Ayu Diah Kesuma
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Facial Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Documentation System ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
Degree Of Severity

Many scoring systems were introduced to search prognostic value in trauma patients. Facial trauma is a special trauma because it can cause many disabilities in facial function. There have been several reports on facial severity scoring system, such as Facial Injury Severity Score (FISS) and Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score (MFISS). Although these scoring systems have been introduced in many journals, they are not yet used by many clinicians because of their unawareness of its beneficiary. In this study, we want to introduce and apply these scoring systems in our maxillofacial data, thus it can be used for documentation system, as a research tool, and have prediction value for prognosis We retrospectively collected data on patients with facial trauma in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in 2009. The data collected were age, gender, etiology, use of helmet, type of fracture and treatment given. Each patient then evaluated by FISS score to obtain their degree of severity. Using FISS score introduced by Bagheri, we found the average FISS score ini this evaluation was 3,37 ± 1,9, with minimum value 1 and maximum value 9. Most patients have FISS score 2 (24,7%). From FISS scoring system, we found that most of maxillofacial trauma in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital in 2009 was mild trauma. In order to evaluate if FISS scoring system has predictive value for prognosis, a large sample and complete maxillofacial database are needed.

scholarly journals The significance of the levels of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products for predicting trauma severity

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Murata ◽  
Shuichi Hagiwara ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Jun Nakajima ◽  
Kiyohiro Oshima
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Degradation Products ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Fibrinogen Degradation Products ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
D Dimer

Background: On initial treatment in the emergency room, trauma patients should be assessed using simple clinical indicators that can be measured quickly. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the injury severity score and blood test parameters measured on emergency room arrival in trauma patients. Methods: Trauma patients transferred to Gunma University Hospital between May 2013 and April 2014 were evaluated in this prospective, observational study. Blood samples were collected immediately on their arrival at our emergency room and their hematocrit, platelet, international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and D-dimer were measured. We evaluated the correlations between the injury severity score and those biomarkers, and examined whether the correlation varied according to the injury severity score value. We also evaluated the correlations between the biomarkers and the abbreviated injury scale values of six regions. Results: We analyzed 371 patients. Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer showed the greatest coefficients of correlation with injury severity score (0.556 and 0.543, respectively). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was larger in patients with injury severity score ⩾ 9 than in those with injury severity score ⩾ 4; however, patients with injury severity score ⩾ 9 or ⩾16 showed no significant differences. The area under the curve of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products was larger than that of D-dimer at all injury severity score values. The chest abbreviated injury scale had the strongest relationship with fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products. Conclusion: Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer were positively correlated with injury severity score, and the relationships varied according to trauma severity. Chest trauma contributed most strongly to fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product elevation.

scholarly journals The Most Common Tools to Measure Trauma Severity: A review Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbasali Dehghani Tafti ◽  
Khadijeh Nasiriani ◽  
Majid Hajimaghsoudi ◽  
Mehri Maki ◽  
Samaneh Mirzaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Physiological Parameters ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
Trauma Scoring ◽  
Trauma Score

Introduction: Due to the increasing mortality rate from trauma, determining the severity of injury has a very important role in the prognosis of the injured person. On the other hand, the quality of medical care provided to the casualties is evaluated using the Trauma Scoring System. Various scales were used to determine the trauma severity of injured. In this study, the most commonly used tools are investigated. Methods: This review was conducted by searching throughout the Persian data bases of Magiran, Barakat, SID and English databases of Scopus, Web of sciences, PubMed, and Google scholar. To conduct the search, the following keywords were used: "Severity of Trauma", "Trauma scoring", and "Trauma Scoring System" without considering any time intervals. Our early search resulted in 2125 articles. Finally, 17 articles were analyzed and different functions of traumatic assessment tools were compared and studied. Results: Traumatic assessment methods vary based on the anatomical and physiological parameters and composition of these two methods. In this study, the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were considered as anatomical parameters; Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as physiological parameters; Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOST) were mentioned as a hybrid ranking system. Conclusion: Application of accurate scientific evaluations in trauma severity assessment methods and application of each method in its appropriate position would result in appropriate improvements in the development of trauma care.  In addition, these systems can play an important role in providing care to patients with traumatic injuries in the present and future.

Trauma Severity Scoring Systems as Predictors of Nosocomial Infection

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silom Jamulitrat ◽  
Montha Na Narong ◽  
Somchit Thongpiyapoom
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Common Site ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Severity Scoring

Objectives:To describe the patterns of nosocomial infections in patients with traumatic injuries and to compare the associations between injury severity, derived from various severity scoring systems, and subsequent nosocomial infections.Design:Prospective observational study.Setting:A 750-bed university hospital serving as a medical school and referral center for the southern part of Thailand.Participants:All trauma patients admitted to the hospital for more than 3 days during 1996 to 1999 were eligible for this study.Methods:The severity of injuries was measured in terms of injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), new injury severity score (NISS), and trauma injury severity score (TRISS). Infections acquired during hospitalization were categorized using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. The association between severity of injury and nosocomial infection was examined with Poisson regression models.Results:There were 222 nosocomial infections identified among 146 patients, yielding an infection rate of 0.8 infections per 100 patient-days. Surgical-site infection was the most common site-specific infection, accounting for 31.1% of all infections. The incidence of intravenous catheter–related bloodstream infection was 1.6 infections per 100 catheter-days. The bladder catheter–related urinary tract infection rate was 2.8 infections per 100 catheter-days. The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was 3.2 infections per 100 ventilator-days. The incidence of infection correlated well with injury severity. The infection incidence rate ratios for one severity category increment of ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS were 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI95, 1.42 to 1.92), 1.79 (CI95, 1.55 to 2.05), 1.64 (CI95, 1.43 to 1.88), and 1.32 (CI95, 1.14 to 1.52), respectively.Conclusions:Surgical-site infection was the most common site-specific nosocomial infection. The NISS might be the most appropriate severity scoring system for adjustment of infection rates in trauma patients.

scholarly journals Aplikasi revised trauma score, injury severity score, dan trauma and injury severity score dalam memrediksi mortalitas pada pasien multitrauma di IRDB BLU RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jassy S. R. Ranti ◽  
Heber B. Sapan ◽  
Laurens T. B. Kalesaran
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Correlation Study ◽  
Trauma Studies ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Trauma Score

Abstract: Trauma is the main cause of deaths among teenagers and young adults. Most of the cases are due to traffic accidents, therefore, a scoring system that can transforms the trauma quality to numbers is very valuable. This scoring system is needed to predict mortality, compare therapeutic methods, function as a triage tool pre hospitalization and during the way to the hospital, evaluate quality improvement and prevention program, and as a tool in trauma studies. There are several available scoring systems usually used in trauma studies, as follows: Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS). This study aimed to obtain the easiest applicable scoring system to multitraumatic patients in Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado. This was an observational correlation study. Evaluation of mortality was done by using the scoring systems and then was compared to the results in the field. There were 37 multitraumatic patients consisted of 30 males and 7 females. Five patients died during this study. By using RTS, of score >7 there was 1 death; of score 6-7 there were 3 deaths; and of score-5 there was 1 death. By using ISS, all dead patients had score ≥25, meanwhile by using TRISS, 2 dead patients had score 81-100,1 dead patient had score 61-80, and 2 dead patients had score 41-60. Conclusion: RTS is the easiest applicable scoring system at triage and pre-hospitalization, and is recommended to be a part of management of multitraumatic patients. Along with ISS, RTS can be used as a mortality predictor among multitraumatic patients.Keywords: trauma, RTS, ISS, TRISS, mortalityAbstrak: Trauma merupakan penyebab kematian utama pada usia remaja dan dewasa muda. Sistim penilaian (skoring) yang dapat mengubah kualitas trauma ke dalam bentuk nilai diperlukan agar dapat meramalkan mortalitas, membandingkan metode terapi, merupakan alat triase pre- dan antar rumah sakit, menilai perbaikan kualitas dan program pencegahan, serta merupakan alat dalam studi trauma. Beberapa sistem skoring yang sering digunakan dalam penelitian ialah Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), dan Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan pilihan sistim skoring yang paling mudah diaplikasikan pada pasien multitrauma di BLU RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou, Manado. Jenis penelitian ialah observasional korelatif. Penilaian ini mengaplikasikan masing-masing skor terhadap angka mortalitas dan dibandingkan dengan hasil yang diperoleh di lapangan. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat 37 pasien multitrauma, terdiri dari 30 laki-laki dan 7 perempuan. Jumlah pasien yang meninggal selama penelitian ialah 5 orang. Untuk RTS, dari pasien dengan skor >7 terdapat 1 kematian; dari pasien dengan skor 6-7 terdapat 3 kematian, dan dari pasien dengan skor 5 terdapat 1 kematian. Untuk ISS, semua pasien yang meninggal memiliki skor ≥25, sedangkan untuk TRISS, 2 pasien yang meninggal dengan skor 81-100, 1 pasien dengan skore 61-80, dan 2 pasien yang meninggal dengan skor 41-60. Simpulan: RTS paling mudah diaplikasikan saat triase dan fase pre rumah sakit, serta direkomendasikan untuk menjadi bagian dari pedoman penanganan kasus multitrauma. Bersama-sama dengan ISS, RTS dapat diaplikasikan sebagai prediktor mortalitas pasien multitrauma.Kata kunci: trauma, RTS, ISS, TRISS, mortalitas

Non-Selective Thoracic Computed Tomography in Trauma Patients Results in Injury Severity Score Inflation

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110249
Author(s):  
Leonardo Alaniz ◽  
Omaer Muttalib ◽  
Juan Hoyos ◽  
Cesar Figueroa ◽  
Cristobal Barrios
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Mortality Benefit ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Score Inflation

Introduction Extensive research relying on Injury Severity Scores (ISS) reports a mortality benefit from routine non-selective thoracic CTs (an integral part of pan-computed tomography (pan-CT)s). Recent research suggests this mortality benefit may be artifact. We hypothesized that the use of pan-CTs inflates ISS categorization in patients, artificially affecting admission rates and apparent mortality benefit. Methods Eight hundred and eleven patients were identified with an ISS >15 with significant findings in the chest area. Patient charts were reviewed and scores were adjusted to exclude only occult injuries that did not affect treatment plan. Pearson chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare adjusted cases vs non-adjusted cases. Results After adjusting for inflation, 388 (47.8%) patients remained in the same ISS category, 378 (46.6%) were reclassified into 1 lower ISS category, and 45 (5.6%) patients were reclassified into 2 lower ISS categories. Patients reclassified by 1 category had a lower rate of mortality ( P < 0.001), lower median total hospital LOS ( P < .001), ICU days ( P < .001), and ventilator days ( P = 0.008), compared to those that remained in the same ISS category. Conclusion Injury Severity Score inflation artificially increases survival rate, perpetuating the increased use of pan-CTs. This artifact has been propagated by outdated mortality prediction calculation methods. Thus, prospective evaluations of algorithms for more selective CT scanning are warranted.

Predictors of blunt diaphragm injury in Australia

Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862110418
Author(s):  
Annelise M Cocco ◽  
Vignesh Ratnaraj ◽  
Benjamin PT Loveday ◽  
Kellie Gumm ◽  
Phillip Antippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Missed Injury ◽  
Diaphragm Injury ◽  
Trauma Service

Introduction Blunt diaphragm injury (BDI) is an uncommon, potentially fatal consequence of blunt torso injury. While associations between BDI and other factors such as mechanism of injury or other injuries have been described elsewhere, little recent research has been done in Australia into BDI. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence rate of BDI in our centre, identify how it was diagnosed, determine rates of missed injury and identify predictive factors for BDI. The hypothesis was that patients with BDI would significantly differ to those without BDI. Methods All major trauma patients with blunt torso injuries at our Level 1 major trauma service from 2010 to 2018 were included. Data for patient demographics, other injuries, diagnosis and treatment of BDI were extracted. Patients with BDI were compared with patients without BDI in order to identify differences that could be used to predict BDI in future patients. Results Of 5190 patients with a blunt torso injury, 51 (0.98%) had a BDI at a mean age of 53 ± 19.6 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 27(IQR 21–38.5) compared with 5139 patients with a mean age of 48.2 ± 20.7 years and median ISS of 21.9(IQR 14–26) who did not have a BDI. The diagnosis of BDI was made at CT ( n = 35), surgery ( n = 14) or autopsy ( n = 2). Blunt diaphragm injury was missed on index imaging for 11 of 43 patients (25.6%). On multivariate analysis, each point increase in ISS (OR 1.03, p = 0.02); rib fractures (OR 4.65, p = 0.004); splenic injury (OR 2.60, p = 0.004); and liver injury (OR 2.78, p = 0.003) were independently associated with BDI. Conclusion Injury Severity Score, rib fractures and solid abdominal organ injury increase the likelihood of BDI. In patients with these injuries, BDI should be considered even in the presence of normal CT findings.

scholarly journals Applicability of Anatomic and Physiologic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Outcome in Polytraumatized Patients with Blunt Aortic Injuries

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2156
Author(s):  
Alexander Omar ◽  
Marcel Winkelmann ◽  
Emmanouil Liodakis ◽  
Jan-Dierk Clausen ◽  
Tilman Graulich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Aortic Injuries ◽  
Receiver Operating

Background: Most patients with blunt aortic injuries, who arrive alive in a clinic, suffer from traumatic pseudoaneurysms. Due to modern treatments, the perioperative mortality has significantly decreased. Therefore, it is unclear how exact the prediction of commonly used scoring systems of the outcome is. Methods: We analyzed data on 65 polytraumatized patients with blunt aortic injuries. The following scores were calculated: injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), revised trauma score coded (RTSc) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II). Subsequently, their predictive value was evaluated using Spearman´s and Kendall´s correlation analysis, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: A proportion of 83% of the patients suffered from a thoracic aortic rupture or rupture with concomitant aortic wall dissection (54/65). The overall mortality was 24.6% (16/65). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated as the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC): NISS 0.812, ISS 0.791, APACHE II 0.884, RTSc 0.679 and TRISS 0.761. Logistic regression showed a slightly higher specificity to anatomical scoring systems (ISS 0.959, NISS 0.980, TRISS 0.957, APACHE II 0.938). The sensitivity was highest in the APACHE II with 0.545. Sensitivity and specificity for the RTSc were not significant. Conclusion: The predictive abilities of all scoring systems were very limited. All scoring systems, except the RTSc, had a high specificity but a low sensitivity. In our study population, the RTSc was not applicable. The APACHE II was the most sensitive score for mortality. Anatomical scoring systems showed a positive correlation with the amount of transfused blood products.

Proteinuria as a Predictor of Renal Dysfunction in Trauma Patients Receiving Intravenous Contrast

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 1194-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin J. Clark ◽  
Linda L. Wong ◽  
Fedor Lurie ◽  
Brad K. Kamitaki
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Renal Dysfunction ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Fresh Frozen Plasma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Intravenous Contrast ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Enhanced Imaging

Trauma patients have unknown comorbidities, multiple injuries, and incomplete laboratory testing, yet require contrast-enhanced imaging to identify potentially life-threatening problems. Our goal was to characterize contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in this population. We retrospectively reviewed characteristics of 402 patients who presented to a Level II trauma center and received contrast-enhanced imaging. CIN was defined as creatinine rise of 0.5 mg/dL or greater or 25 per cent or greater from baseline within 48 hours. CIN occurred in 7.7 per cent and four patients required hemodialysis. Patients with CIN were older, had lower admission hemoglobin, higher Injury Severity Score, and received more blood products. Factors that predicted CIN included: male sex, age older than 46 years, body mass index less than 27 kg/m2, glomerular filtration rate less than 109 mL/min/1.73 m2, hemoglobin less than 12 mg/dL, hematocrit less than 36 per cent, proteinuria, 2 units or more of fresh-frozen plasma in 48 hours, and alcohol use. Odds ratio for developing CIN with two, five, or six of these factors was 3.39, 6.54, and 8.38, respectively. A match-controlled analysis for Injury Severity Score and age in patients with CIN versus non-CIN patients revealed the strongest predictor of CIN was proteinuria (relative risk, 2.5; confidence interval, 1.1 to 5.8). Although it is difficult to truly differentiate CIN from renal dysfunction related to injury severity in trauma patients, proteinuria may be an important factor in identifying nephropathy in this population.

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 1173-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om P. Sharma ◽  
Michael F. Oswanski ◽  
Rusin J. Joseph ◽  
Peter Tonui ◽  
Libby Westrick Pa-C ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Deep Vein

Serial venous duplex scans (VDS) were done in 507 trauma patients with at least one risk factor (RF) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during a 2-year study period. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was detected in 31 (6.1%) patients. This incidence was 3.1 per cent in low (1–2 RFs), 3.4 per cent in moderate (3–5 RFs), and 7.7 per cent in high (≥6 RFs) VTE scores ( P = 0.172). Incidence was statistically different (3% vs 7.2%, P = 0.048) on reanalyzing patients in two risk categories, low-risk (1–4 RFs) and high-risk (≥5 RFs). Only 4 of 16 RFs had statistically higher incidence of DVT in patients with or without RFs: previous VTE (27.3% vs 5.6%, odds ratio (OR) 6.628, P = 0.024), spinal cord injury (22.6% vs 5%, OR 5.493, P = 0.001), pelvic fractures (11.4% vs 5.1%, OR 2.373, P = 0.042), and head injury with a greater than two Abbreviated Injury Score (10.5% vs 4.2%, OR 2.639, P = 0.014). On reanalyzing patients with ≥5 RFs vs <5RFs, obesity (14.3 vs 6.1%, P = 0.007), malignancy (5.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.006), coagulopathy (10.8% vs 1.8%, P = 0.000), and previous VTE (3.2% vs 0%, P = 0.019) were significant on univariate analysis. Patients with DVT had 3.70 ± 1.75 RFs and a 9.61 ± 4.93 VTE score, whereas, patients without DVT had 2.66 ± 1.50 RFs and a 6.83 ± 3.91 VTE score ( P = 0.000). DVTs had a direct positive relationship with higher VTE scores, length of stay, and number of VDS (>1 r, P ≤ 0.001). Increasing age was a weak risk factor (0.03 r, P = 0.5). First two VDS diagnosed 77 per cent of DVTs. Patients with injury severity score of ≥15 and 25 had higher DVTs compared with the ones with lower injury severity score levels ( P ≤ 0.05). Pulmonary embolism was silent in 63 per cent and DVTs were asymptomatic in 68 per cent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document