scholarly journals Effect of weed management practices on weed cover in field pea (pisum sativum l.)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
István Kristó ◽  
Melinda Tar ◽  
Katalin Irmes ◽  
Marianna Vályi-Nagy ◽  
Attila Rácz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Great Part ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Weed Cover

Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) are planted on small area in Hungary, although it is a precious source of protein (22-28%), and it also plays a significant role like a component in fodder mixture and green forage. It is a great part in crop rotation as a short growing-season legume. Furthermore, it has beneficial effects of nitrogen-fixing nodules being able to obtain N derived from air. One of the most critical limiting factors is to find out weed management practise for control of weeds in field pea. Our field experiment was carried out on site of the National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, the Department of Field Crops Research in Öthalom for comparing weed management strategies by evaluate their efficacy and weed flora. We used 6 herbicides or herbicid combination and observed weed density in 5 times during the growing season. The most important weeds were: common chickweed (Stellaria media), wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis), branching lackspur (Consolida regalis), meldweed (Chenopodium album). Among the treatments the highest weed cover was the weedy check, followed by Stomp Super, obtained maximum weed control and long lasting effect. With the application of Basagran 480 SL and Pulsar 40 SL have a significantly lower weed density was recorded than preemergence applications. In case of Corum application, it was the lowest weed cover of all even at harvesting time. According to our experiments use of Dash does not control weeds considerably.

Impact of management practices on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivation in baksa district of assam

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-150
Author(s):  
Kanku Deka ◽  
Dinku Bora ◽  
Debajit Deka ◽  
Utpal Jyoti Sarma ◽  
Ranjit Kumer Saud
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

scholarly journals Impact of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Semidry Rice

2020 ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
V. Soujanya ◽  
M. Goverdhan ◽  
T. Ram Prakash ◽  
A. Srinivas
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Weight Yield ◽  
Chlorimuron Ethyl ◽  
Hand Weeding

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2019 at Agricultural Research Station, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad to study the effect of integrated weed management practices on weed density, weed dry weight, yield and economics of semidry rice. Among all the treatments pyrazosulfuron ethyl @ 20 g a.i ha-1 fb chlorimuron ethyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 4 g a.i ha-1 + fenoxaprop-p-ethyl @ 60 g a.i ha-1 fb mechanical weeding at 50 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight with highest weed control efficiency. Grain yield and B:C ratio were also recorded highest from the same treatment in semidry rice system of cultivation. This treatment was statistically comparable with hand weeding plot.

Mitigation Effects of 24-Epibrassinolide and Thiourea in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Drought Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Garg ◽  
◽  
A. Hemantaranjan ◽  
Jyostnarani Pradhan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

DS Admiral field pea

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Andersen ◽  
T. Warkentin ◽  
O. Philipp ◽  
A. Xue ◽  
A. Sloan
Keyword(s):  
Powdery Mildew ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Powdery Mildew Resistance ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Mildew Resistance ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
Good Yielding ◽  
Growing Region

DS Admiral, a yellow cotyledon field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivar, was released in 2000 by Agriprogress Inc., Morden, Manitoba. DS Admiral has a semileafless leaf type, powdery mildew resistance, medium sized, round seeds, and good yielding ability. DS Admiral is adapted to the field-pea-growing region of western Canada. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., cultivar description, powdery mildew resistance

BELLEVUE FIELD PEA

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-806
Author(s):  
A. E. SLINKARD ◽  
R. A. A. MORRALL
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Seed Weight ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Cultivar Description

Bellevue field pea (Pisum sativum L.) was licensed in 1986. It is about 15% higher yielding than the check cultivars Century and Trapper. Bellevue has smooth seeds with yellow cotyledons. It has the le gene for shortened internodes and is about 6 d later maturing than Century and Trapper. Seed weight is about 179 g/1000 seeds, intermediate between Century and Trapper.Key words: Cultivar description, pea (field), Pisum sativum L.

Proximate and mineral composition of field peas

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Warkentin ◽  
A. G. Sloan ◽  
S. T. Ali-Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Mineral Composition ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Total Protein ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Pea Seeds ◽  
Proximate And Mineral Composition

Field pea seeds from 10 cultivars grown at two locations in Manitoba in 1986 and 1987 were analyzed for proximate and mineral profiles. Cultivars differed significantly in their level of total protein, crude fat, ADF, and all minerals tested. However, differences were not extremely large and were comparable to European reports. Location-year also had a significant effect on the levels of total protein, ADF, and all minerals tested. In most cases, the warmest location-year produced relatively higher levels of minerals, ash, and total protein, and lower seed yield than the coolest location-year. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., mineral

Seasonal Incidence of Pulse Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) and its Natural Enemies on Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Relation to Some Abiotic Factors in Alluvial Zone of West Bengal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pal ◽  
S. Samanta ◽  
A. Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Natural Enemies ◽  
West Bengal ◽  
Insect Pests ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pest Population ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Aphis Craccivora Koch ◽  
Weather Parameters

Background: Field pea, Pisum sativum L. is an important winter-season pulse crop. It is subjected to damage by both field and storage insect pests and approximately 10-15 per cent reduction in yield was reported due to the infestation of different insect pests. Among these, pulse aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) affects plant physiology directly by removal of nutrients or indirectly by dispersal of various viral diseases. The present investigation has been aimed to study the seasonal fluctuations of aphids and their natural enemies as well as their correlation. Another objective was to know the effect of various weather parameters on pulse aphids and their natural enemies which ultimately would be helpful to develop a forewarning model.Methods: The field experiment was conducted at the A-B Block Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal using two varieties of field pea (KPMR 935 and IFPD 122) during rabi seasons of two consecutive years of 2017-18 and 2018-19 following a Randomized Block Design with three replications. After recording the total population of both pests (nymphs and adults) and their natural enemies across the season, the mean population was worked out and used for correlation and regression studies along with the weather parameters. Result: Maximum aphid population was noticed during the peak pod formation stage of the crop irrespective of the varieties. The pest population was very strongly correlated with the incidence of coccinellid and ant population in both test varieties. Among the weather parameters, both maximum and minimum temperature and sunshine hour showed a positive correlation with the pest population and their natural enemies but relative humidity and rainfall showed a negative correlation. Regression studies indicated that temperature and relative humidity were the most influencing factors over the incidence of aphid in both the seasons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document