scholarly journals Reframing Writing Instruction in Physical Learning Environments: Making Connections Between Digital and Nondigital Technologies

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-98
Author(s):  
Andy Buchenot ◽  
Tiffany Anne Roman
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Writing Instruction ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Student Writing ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Composition Course ◽  
Technological Affordances ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Active Learning Classrooms provide several advantages for teaching and learning by offering many physical and technological affordances that one can choose from when designing instruction. For courses where student writing is central activity to course learning outcomes, a challenge exists in that the innovative digital technologies may hide the opportunity to incorporate non-digital tools, such as paper-based student writing. We argue that treating student writing as a technology can increase opportunities for active learning within technology-enhanced learning environments. In this article, we describe an approach to writing instruction that builds intentional connections between paper-based texts and digital technologies, describing the rationale for the design decisions in an introductory composition course through a design case model. Classroom applications are discussed for physical learning spaces where student writing is incorporated into overall course learning activities.

Using the COVA Approach to Promote Active Learning in Digital Learning Environments

2018 ◽  
pp. 22-44
Author(s):  
Cindy Cummings ◽  
Dwayne Harapnuik ◽  
Tilisa Thibodeaux
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Authentic Learning ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Digital Learning ◽  
Master's Program ◽  
Learning Principles ◽  
Digital Learning Environments

Active learning pedagogies using digital technologies hold much promise. Yet over the past several decades despite all the advances we see in how technology impacts most aspects of society, the advances in our educational institutions have been much smaller. Why? We have focused on the technology as a quick fix and have not focused on the learning. Rather than look to the latest teaching trend or hottest activity of the day, we must reimagine all aspects of our teaching and learning and purposefully build our programs as significant digital learning environments that inspire, foster, and facilitate deeper learning. This chapter reveals how we have built a Master's program that uses the active learning principles of choice, ownership, and voice through authentic learning (COVA approach) and how we have created a significant learning environment (CSLE) that fully engages and equips our learners to be digital leaders.

scholarly journals Developing a competency taxonomy for teacher design knowledge in technology-enhanced learning environments: a literature review

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Song Kim
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Design Knowledge ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Design Work ◽  
Teacher Design ◽  
Enhanced Learning

AbstractRecent research in technology-enhanced learning environments has indicated the need to redefine the role of teachers as designers. This supports successful learners better able to adapt to twenty-first century education, in particular STEM education. However, such a repositioning of teaching as a design science challenges teachers to reconceptualize educational practice as an act of design, not in the artistic meaning of the word. Our recent research finding also indicated that teacher design knowledge (TDK) processes are often invisible to both the teacher educators and the teachers. To respond to these challenges, this paper will define TDK for STEM teachers by making TDK visible in the form of a TDK competency taxonomy. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the characteristics of teaching practices in technology-enhanced learning environments. This TDK competency taxonomy consists of four main categories drawing on existing literature on teacher design work and teacher instructional design: data practice, design practice, knowledge creation practice, and professional teaching practice. The implications of these findings were discussed.

Meeting the Realities in Technology Enhanced Learning

2010 ◽  
pp. 224-245
Author(s):  
Sibitse Mirriam Tlhapane ◽  
Sibongile Simelane
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Computer Literacy ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Computer Training ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Cd Rom ◽  
Geographically Dispersed ◽  
The University ◽  
Enhanced Learning

The case discusses the challenges of introducing technology-enhanced learning in geographically dispersed learners, most of who are situated in rural areas. These are post-diploma nursing learners with minimal computer literacy. They also have limited or even no access to computers at the university because they attend part time, have full-time jobs and stay far from the university and so cannot even visit computer labs after hours. Despite these challenges, these students end up being motivated to learn computers so that they can access learning material and also use them for lifelong learning. The case also covers computer training, e-applications used, online learning, studies done, partnerships between faculty and the directorate and teaching and learning with technology. The value of simple, cheap technologies like an interactive CD-ROM in initiating students to e-learning and overcoming their bandwidth problems is emphasised, including the gains made from the project. Both staff and managerial challenges are discussed and recommendations are made.

Emerging Edtech

2011 ◽  
pp. 1880-1891
Author(s):  
Ching-Huei Chen ◽  
Manetta Calinger ◽  
Bruce C. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Educational Technologies ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Emergent Technologies ◽  
Practice Models ◽  
How People Learn ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Design principles are universal and may be translated onto the newest trends and emergent technologies. In this research study, the authors combined the perspectives provided by two sources to create a set of recommended design principles for technology-enhanced learning environments. One source was the How People Learn framework (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). The second source was a series of interviews conducted with pacesetters in the field of educational technologies. With the knowledge gained from these two sources, the authors created our own set of design principles. These principles may be used to guide evaluation, instructional design efforts, or best practice models for exemplary use of educational technologies in the classroom.

Principled Construction and Reuse of Learning Designs

2011 ◽  
pp. 869-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Paquette ◽  
Olga Mariño ◽  
Karin Lundgren-Cayrol ◽  
Michel Léonard
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Research Center ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning Design ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Enhanced Learning

This chapter summarizes the work on instructional engineering and educational modeling accomplished since 1992 at the LICEF Research Center of Télé-université by the researchers of the CICE Research Chair. Recent results on learning design modeling and learning objects reusability processes are thoroughly presented using examples drawn from many projects conducted in the last 3 years. These are discussed to uncover the importance of a principled approach for the modeling of learning design and the of learning objects in technology enhanced learning environments. Finally, delivery and dissemination issues are discussed and a summary of on-going and future directions for research is presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document