scholarly journals PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF AN ACTIVITY OF CONCERNED PERSONS AT REALIZATION OF COURT DECISIONS ABOUT IMPOSITION/CANCELATION OF PROPERTY ARREST IN CIVIL PROCEDURE

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Halyna Marchenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions

scholarly journals Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa Catatan Masukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Dwi Maryono ◽  
Muhamad Azhar
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions

Abstract This paper aims to describe the existence of the decisions of the industrial relations court, especially related to the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. This article only elaborates on the empirical issues that have become the problem in carrying out the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. The interim findings show that efforts must be made to provide space for the execution of the industrial relations court. So far, the execution of barren industrial relations court decisions has not been implemented. One reason is the lack of regulation on the procedure for the execution of industrial relations court decisions in Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes. The solution is left to the execution procedure at Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Keywords: Decision Execution, Industrial Relations Court, Indonesian Civil Procedure  Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan keberadaan putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial, khusunya terkait dengan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Tulisan ini hanya menguraikan sekilan permasalahan empiris yang menjadi kendalam dalam melaksanakan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Hasil temuan sementara menunjukan bahwa harus ada upaya untuk memberikan ruang bagi pelaksanaan eksekusi pengadilan hubungan industrial. Selama ini eksekusi putusan  pengadilan hubungan industrial mandul, tidak dapat dilaksanakan. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah tidak adanya pengaturan tata cara eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam Undang Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Penyelesaiannya diserahkan kepada tatacara eksekusi pada Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) dan Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Kata Kunci: Eksekusi Putusan, Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial, RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

scholarly journals Realization of res judicata principle in civil proceedings: the experience of foreign countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Tetiana Tsuvina
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Res Judicata ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Subject

  The article is devoted to the analysis of res judicata as an essential element of the legal certainty. Res judicata is considered to be one of the main guaranties of the legal certainty principle in civil procedure which allows a stability of the court decisions in democratic society and increase the public confidence to judiciary.  The author analyzes national characteristics of the realization of the principle of res judicata in civil procedure of foreign countries. The author explores the preclusion effect of court decisions, highlighting two effects of the res judicata principle: positive and negative one. The negative effect of res judicata is aimed at preventing the re-consideration of identical disputes between the parties if the dispute has already been resolved by the court, in turn, the positive effect of res judicata allows the parties to refer to circumstances that have already been established by a court decision in the dispute between them, in new proceedings, where they are involved. It is concluded that there are significant differences in the understanding of this principle in common law and civil law legal systems. The common law countries have a broad understanding of the res judicata principle, which includes positive and negative effects, and is implemented through such institutions as the claim preclusion and the issue preclusion. Civil law countries follow a narrow approach to understanding of res judicata principle, which is limited only by the negative effect and is reflected in the claim preclusion, which blocks filing an identical claim if there is a final court decision on the dispute between the parties. In common law jurisdiction there is a wider conception of the “claim”, according to which it is understood in the context of entire dispute and comprise all claims based on the legal relationship between the parties, whether or not they were the subject of court proceedings. At the same time in civil law countries identity of the claims can be notified with the help of the triple identity test, which contains the identity of the subject of the claim, the identity of the cause of action and the identity of the parties of the claim.

scholarly journals Civil Procedure and Practice: Recent Developments

1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1100
Author(s):  
Glen H. Poelman ◽  
Alan S. Rudakoff
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Environment ◽  
Going Concern ◽  
The Past ◽  
Recent Developments

An on-going concern for all lawyers is staying abreast of developments affecting the practice of law in their respective jurisdictions. Within this paper, the authors review Alberta Court decisions relating to civil procedure and synthesize them so as to give the reader an outline of the trends that have developed in Alberta civil procedure over the past two years. The authors effectively provide a sense of the current legal environment.

scholarly journals Urgency Application Of Proof Decisoir Eed Related With Judicial Conditions In The Civil Case Evidence In The Court (Case Study of Decision No. 47 / Pdt.G / 2012 / PN Lsk and Decision No. 16/Pdt.G/2012/PN Stb)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Efa Laela Fakhriah ◽  
Yustika Tatar Fauzi Harahap
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Case ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
The Law

Abstract:Implementation of the law that related civil law to the procedure of settlement of the legal dispute in court is regulated by formal law that named law of civil procedure. The aim of this study to determine how the application of proof decisoir eed in Civil Case Evidence in Court? and how the factors that affect the consideration of the judge in deciding decisoir eed as evidence?. There are some references for this research, court decisions, both decisoir eed application by either party in order to convince the judge and decisoir eed as the only evidence of the evidentiary process. The results showed that contradictory opinions: 1. In practice there are judicial decisions that apply oath breaker even if the parties have filed written evidence and witnesses and 2. decisoir eed can be applied if one of the parties did not submit evidence. The next discussion is the existence of subjective factors and objective factors for the judge to consider the granting of the decisoir eed by the parties. The conclusion of this research is the application of the decisoir eed of the civil event is irrelevant because of the low sense of legal certainty.Keywords: Proof, Decisoir Eed, Judge Abstrak:Implementasi hukum yang berhubungan di bidang keperdataan terhadap tata cara penyelesaian sengketa hukum di pengadilan diatur oleh hukum formil yang disebut dengan hukum acara perdata. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan alat bukti sumpah pemutus dalam pembuktian perkara perdata di Pengadilan dan bagaimana faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terhadap keyakinan Hakim dalam memutuskan sumpah pemutus. Materi pembahasan penelitian ini adalah permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh salah satu pihak dengan tujuan untuk meyakinkan Hakim dalam menilai kebenaran alat bukti dan permohonan sumpah pemutus sebagai alat bukti satu-satunya dalam proses pembuktian. Hasil analisis menunjukan 2 (dua) pendapat saling kontradiktif yaitu dalam Putusan No. 47/Pdt.G/2012/PN Lsk Majelis Hakim yang mengabulkan permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh Penggugat meskipun Penggugat telah memiliki alat bukti lain dan dalam Putusan No. 16/Pdt.G/2012/PN Stb Majelis Hakim tidak mengabulkan permohonan sumpah pemutus dalam perkara tersebut karena Pihak Lawan memiliki bukti surat dan saksi. Pembahasan berikutnya sehubugan dengan faktor subyektif dan faktor obyektif dari Hakim dalam mempertimbangkan permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh para pihak. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah penerapan alat bukti sumpah pemutus dalam acara perdata sudah tidak relevan karena jauh dari rasa kepastian hukum dan paradigma hukum yang berkembang dalam penanganan perkara perdata di samping mencari kebenaran formal mulai mengarah kepada terwujudnya kebenaran materiil terbatas. Hakim harus melakukan pencarian kebenaran terhadap fakta yang dipersengketakan demi terwujudnya keadilan dan kepastian hukum.Kata kunci: Alat Bukti, Sumpah Pemutus, Hakim

scholarly journals On the issue of violation of the uniformity of judicial practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
N. Sh. Gadzhialieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Changes

The article is devoted to such grounds for the cancellation or amendment of court decisions in the supervisory procedure, as a violation of the uniformity of judicial practice. The author analyzes the provisions of the current civil procedure legislation, the explanations of the Plenum and the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of paragraph 3 of Article 391.9 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The article identifies such problems as the lack of normative consolidation of the terms "judicial practice" "unity of judicial practice", the uncertainty of the legal status of acts of the highest judicial instance, the possibility of bringing judges to disciplinary responsibility for violating the unity of judicial practice. Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that comprehensive legislative changes are necessary to achieve the unity of judicial practice

scholarly journals Model zażalenia w świetle nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 4 lipca 2019 r.

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 136-149
Author(s):  
Anna Kościółek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Similar Solution ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Legislative Changes

The following paper includes an analysis of the model of a complaint in the polish civil proceedings. This issue is discussed especially in the light of essential legislative changes introduced by the Act of 4 July 2019 amending the Act – the Code of Civil Procedure and some other acts. These changes fundamentally altered the model for reviewing court decisions in incidental matters, which are not conclusive for the entire proceedings. The Act, in particular, significantly limited the catalogue of decisions of courts of first instance which can be appealed againts to the court of second instance, reshaping this particular model of control into an exception to the simultaneously introduced principle of examining a complaint by different judges of the same court. On the other hand, the act expanded the scope of decisions of courts of second instance which are examined by different judges of the same court. A similar solution was introduced also in in the enforcement proceedings. Therefore, in the current legal status, majority of incidental decisions in civil proceedings has been covered by the so called horizontal complaint. In consequence, a complaint lost its devolutive nature and thus ceased to be an appelate messure.

scholarly journals Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 486
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Mills ◽  
Brian Beck
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Offshore Drilling ◽  
Fiduciary Duties

This article is a compilation of recent Canadian court decisions pertaining to oil and gas law. Case law in the following areas has been surveyed: (1) contracts and torts; (2) lands, leases and titles; (3) royalty agreements; (4) surface rights; (5) offshore drilling; (6) administrative law; (7) environmental law; (8) tax; (9) directors' liability; (10) fiduciary duties; and (11) civil procedure.

scholarly journals The Legal Nature of the Judgement Issued Pursuant to Article 425 of the Code of Commercial Companies: Declaratory or Constitutive?

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Malarewicz-Jakubów ◽  
Damian Gierasimczuk
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Commercial Law ◽  
Historical Interpretation ◽  
Legal Nature

<p>For many years there has been a dispute in the field of commercial law concerning the nature of the ruling issued as part of an action for annulment of a resolution of the general meeting under Article 425 of the Code of Commercial Companies (hereinafter: CCC). The multitude of both studies of the representatives of the doctrine and opinions expressed in the court decisions, allows this dispute to be included in two opposing theses, which, together with the arguments for their support, the authors presented in this article. The supporters of the declarative character of the judgement indicate the necessity to carry out a linguistic, systemic and historical interpretation of the norm, as well as to refer to Article 58 of the Civil Code and adopt the indicated model of absolute nullity. Part of the doctrine also indicates that the standard of Article 425 CCC is a special regulation in relation to Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On the side of the thesis about the constitutive ruling, it is indicated that Article 425 CCC is a special regulation in relation to Article 58 CCC, and therefore it is not of absolute nullity nature. Moreover, arguments are also raised about the concurrence with the sanction contained in Article 422 CCC and about the necessity to secure legal turnover thanks to a constitutive ruling. The article also presents the evolution of the jurisprudence line towards the adoption of a constitutive position and its domination in the jurisprudence of the Polish Supreme Court based on the security of legal transactions. The authors of this article, through the analysis of the Polish jurisprudence as well as the views of the doctrine contained in the comments, scientific articles and monographs, have set themselves the goal of collecting, summarizing and organizing the most popular positions and their arguments.</p>

scholarly journals The history of formation and development of court decisions review in the civil procedural law of Ukraine

1970 ◽  
pp. 233-238
Author(s):  
Daryna Meniuk
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
The Right

The article presents the historical aspects of the formation and development of the institution of the review of court decisions in the civil process of Ukraine. The civil procedural rulings that govern the procedure for reviewing court decisions in each period of civil procedural law history are analysed, and the main reforms of the civil procedural legislation that have influenced on the development of the institution of the review of court decisions due to newly discovered or exceptional circumstances are identified. It draws attention to the fact that for a long time the formation of procedural law took place without the institutions of review of court rulings, in particular, the review of newly discovered circumstances. For instance, in the Kyivan Rus' judgments could be enforced immediately after their proclamation. The period of staying of Ukrainian lands under the rule of the Polish and Lithuanian legislature and was referred to as the "domination of foreign law". During this period, we adhere to the Second Lithuanian statute of rules that enable a person to seek of judicial review. The most prominent monument of procedural law of the Cossack Hetmanate era was the Ukrainian Code of 1743, also known as «The Rights under which Little Russian people are suing», which also provided for the possibility of review in an extraordinary way of review and revocation of court rulings. The next period of civil procedural law development should be considered in view of the division of Ukrainian lands and the corresponding influence of the Austrian and Russian empires on the law of our state. The Austrian Civil Procedure Code of 1895 provided for the possibility of reviewing court decisions in the form of an appeal and cassation. On the territory of Ukraine, which was part of the Russian Empire, the main act was the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864 which provided for the possibility of judicial review in the event of the opening of new circumstances or falsification of acts on the basis of which a decision was made; and where the judgment is taken against a defendant who did not appear for trial and whose whereabouts were unknown. The events of 1917 initiated the so-called "soviet" or "socialist" law. For a long period, court decisions were either not reviewed or reviewed in exceptional circumstances. Only after the declaration of independence of Ukraine the judicial reforms were began, also for the institution of judicial review as one of the elements of the right to a fair trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document