On Russian Soil

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieka Erley
Keyword(s):  
Russian Soil

scholarly journals Improving the efficiency of using Russian soil resources

2021 ◽  
Vol 650 (1) ◽  
pp. 012069
Author(s):  
A F Razin ◽  
R A Meshcheryakova ◽  
O A Razin ◽  
T N Surikhina ◽  
G A Telegina
Keyword(s):  
Soil Resources ◽  
Russian Soil

Ecological niches of major soil types in Russia: Geographical aspects of the new Russian soil classification system

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. D. Tonkonogov ◽  
I. I. Lebedeva ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova ◽  
S. F. Khokhlov
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Soil Classification ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Russian Soil

scholarly journals Peat soils of boreal regressive bogs in West Siberia: Problems of biological diagnostics and systematics

2016 ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Shishkonakova ◽  
N. A. Avetov ◽  
T. Yu. Tolpysheva
Keyword(s):  
Soil Classification ◽  
West Siberia ◽  
Botanical Composition ◽  
Peat Soils ◽  
Surface Horizon ◽  
The North ◽  
Sphagnum Bogs ◽  
Russian Soil ◽  
Peat Surface ◽  
The Difference

In this paper we consider plant (geobotanical) indicators of soils, occurring in regressive bogs in the north taiga subzone of West Siberia. The specificity of regressive bogs is the difference between current vegetation and botanical composition of the peat surface horizon, which complicates their biological diagnostics. The data on peat botanical composition, degree of decomposition and thickness are presented. Destructive oligotrophic peat soils, the allocation of which is provided in the actual Russian soil classification at the level of subtype, occur in palsa bogs under shrub-lichen vegetation. Their indicators include lichens: Cladonia stellaris, C. rangiferina, C. stygia, C. arbuscula, C. mitis, Alectoria ochroleuca, Сetraria islandica, C. laevigata, Flavocetraria cucullata, F. nivalis, Govardia nigricans. A new subtype - peat oligotrophic regressive soils - which occurs in non-freezing bog is suggested. The indicators of this soil subtype in pine-shrub-sphagnum bogs are lichens Cladonia cenotea, C. chlorophaea, C. coniocraea, C. cornuta, C. crispata, C. deformis, C. gracilis, C. fimbriata, C. mitis, C. ochrochlora, C. pleurota, C. polydactyla, C. pyxidata, C. rangiferina, C. stellaris, C. subulata, C. sulphurina and liverwort Mylia anomala . The indicators of regressive soils in bog hollows are mainly liverwort Cladopodiella fluitans , mosses Warnstorfia fluitans , W. exannulata , and lichen Cetrariella delisei .

scholarly journals ON STANDARDIZATION OF LABORATORY SOIL TESTING IN OFFSHORE GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

Gruntovedenie ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (16) ◽  
pp. 16-52
Author(s):  
E.A. Voznesensky ◽  
◽  
A.S. Loktev ◽  
M.S. Nikitin ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Soil Testing ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Complete Section ◽  
Testing Practice ◽  
Russian Soil

Issues of laboratory soil studies standardization in offshore geotechnical survey are discussed in connection with the end of expertise of two new regulative documents – new edition of the Code of practice and Russian national standard developed on the basis of international ISO standard. Since these documents of different level belong also to different categories (geotechnical survey and oil and gas industry), the authors analyze their interrelation and consistency, from one hand, and the preparedness of Russian soil testing practice to implementation of the new standard which results from harmonization with international ones, from the other. Complete section of the standard draft related to soil laboratory testing is presented, preceded by commentary on some important issues regarding the implementation of its specific methodic statements. It is concluded that the new national GOST draft «Petroleum and natural gas industries. Specific requirements for offshore structures. Marine soil investigations» developed on ISO basis will be a useful document supported in general by Russian normative base but expanding a possible range of voluntary methods into well time-tested foreign approaches. This documents can be considered to be a toolkit annex to the Code of practice describing testing approaches beyond the scope of typical tasks

scholarly journals Konstantin Stepanovich Veselovskii. To the 200th anniversary of his birth

2019 ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
O. V. Chernitsova
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Graphical Representation ◽  
European Russia ◽  
Soil Map ◽  
Geographical Patterns ◽  
Russian Soil ◽  
History Of ◽  
Meteorological Observations ◽  
The 19Th Century ◽  
Statistical Atlas

The paper considers the contribution of K.S. Veselovskii (20.05.1819–03.11.1901), the Russian statistician of the 19th century, to the development of geographical science. Compiled under his editorship and with his direct participation, the Economic-Statistical Atlas of the European Russia, the first Russian economic atlas, summarized key information on agriculture as the basis for the Russian economy of the mid-19th century. The method of graphical representation of statistical data on the maps of the Atlas was innovative and contributed to the development of world cartography. The history of compiling the earliest Russian soil map is discussed in detail. The map depicted the geographical patterns of soil distribution in European Russia and their relation to climate. The generalized map was included in the Economic-Statistical Atlas and it became the first soil map of the country in the world. The study “On the Climate of Russia,” in which K.S. Veselovskii collected and critically processed all available observations of air temperature, winds and precipitation played a significant role in the development of geographical science. The role of K.S. Veselovskii in the organization of meteorological observations in Russia is also shown.

Russian Enlightenment as a Source of National Philosophy Formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2-1) ◽  
pp. 213-236
Author(s):  
Ivan Kokovin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Analytical Description ◽  
Russian Philosophy ◽  
The West ◽  
Xviii Century ◽  
The Enlightenment ◽  
Russian Soil ◽  
Cultural Origins ◽  
Philosophical Understanding

The study is devoted to the philosophical understanding of the problem of the cultural origins of Russian philosophy. In the author’s opinion, the source of diversity of modern approaches to the phenomenon of Russian Philosophy is, first of all, the absence of a unified methodological approach. The diversity of research on the phenomenon of the Russian philosophy origins is also a consequence of research susceptibility to certain methodological influences. The paper aims to identify a number of philosophical, historical, literary approaches to the problem of the genesis of the eighteenth century Russian Enlightenment. It is necessary to clarify the mechanisms and procedures for the reception of Western European ideas and concepts by Russian Enlightenment during the eighteenth century. On the basis of adaptation of natural law terms, the author considers certain trends in the theory of reconstruction of the Enlightenment phenomenon in Russia. He reveals a number of significant features of the process of reconstruction of the Enlightenment ideology formation on Russian soil, including the idea that European concepts and theories are assimilated by the domestic semiosphere in the form in which they existed in the culture of the West. The author highlights the idea, that researchers were convinced that Russia of the XVIII century already had a national philosophy. The paper also draws attention to the lack of analytical interest in the problems of transformation of the language of expression of political phenomena. In the same row, there is also the idea that the process of reception of the enlightenment heritage of the West had a revolutionary, not an evolutionary, specificity, and was devoid of cultural prerequisites. Basing on the material of historical and historical-philosophical studies, the author considers the possibilities of constructing a methodologically integral reconstruction, chronologically covering the entire period of the XVIII century. The research methodology is based on the approach that includes an analytical description of the problems of the thematic fields of discourse, concepts and theories of the Enlightenment on the Russian soil. The result of the analysis is the systematization of contradictions in the process of analyzing the phenomena of the Russian Enlightenment in the XVIII century.

“Black soils” in the Russian Soil Classification system, the US Soil Taxonomy and the WRB: Quantitative correlation and implications for pedodiversity assessment

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 104824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Sorokin ◽  
Phillip Owens ◽  
Vince Láng ◽  
Zhuo-Dong Jiang ◽  
Erika Michéli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Soil Classification ◽  
Soil Taxonomy ◽  
Quantitative Correlation ◽  
The Us ◽  
Russian Soil

Problems of the Cryogenic Soils’ Diagnostics in the Recent Russian Soil Classification System

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1170-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Lupachev ◽  
S. V. Gubin ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Soil Classification ◽  
Cryogenic Soils ◽  
Russian Soil

The Power of the Weak Opponent: The Diplomacy of Alexander I in Tilsit

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-223
Author(s):  
Claus Scharf
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Ottoman Empire ◽  
Black Sea ◽  
The Black Sea ◽  
The Political ◽  
French Army ◽  
Bargaining Position ◽  
Russian Soil ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Napoleonic Era

Not only in Soviet patriotic historiography the conduct of war and the foreign policy of Alexander i were regarded as heroic only from the battle of Borodino onward. The earlier years of the Napoleonic Era and the retreat of Russian armies during the summer of 1812 appeared in a negative light. Revisionist research in Russia and abroad offers another interpretation. When the French army in 1807 after some victorious battles reached the Russian border Alexander maintained a much better bargaining position in talks with Napoleon than disappointed critics among the Russian elite recognized. The emperor of the French was not prepared to continue the war on Russian soil and did not make territorial demands on Russia. Napoleon wanted not only an armistice and peace, but also an alliance with Russia against Britain. Thus Alexander, using the power of the weak opponent, succeeded in winning time. Russia was able not only to maintain her strategic goals against the Ottoman Empire in the Rumanian principalities and in the Black Sea, but also to defend the political existence of Prussia as a possible Russian ally in a future coalition with Austria against Napoleon, which meant a sacrifice of Polish interests by Russia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document