16 Social and Economic Development of Industrial Parks in the Context of Digitalization

Author(s):  
Svetlana N. Kuznetsova ◽  
Ekaterina P. Garina ◽  
Victor P. Kuznetsov ◽  
Sergey N. Yashin
2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-96

The study examines the effects of industrial parks and technoparks at the regional level. Based on the financial and economic indicators of residents of industrial parks and technoparks, the geography of their activities at the level of the Russian Federation constituent entities is considered. To perform this study the author’s database on residents is used, created on the basis of information from the commercial database Orbis for the period 2010 – 2018, as well as the open data from the Federal Tax Service and statistics from the Rosstat. There is a strong concentration of the market for industrial parks and technology parks in several regions of Russia, including city of Moscow, Moscow and Kaluga regions and the Republic of Tatarstan. This fact can be explained with objective reasons, including the agglomeration effect, capacious sales and labor markets, as well as other indicators of investment attractiveness. Most industrial parks and technoparks currently do not have a significant influence on development of the regions in which they are created, which may be caused by such factors as the insufficiently competent investment-resident policy of management structures. According to the results of the study, a conclusion is made that the role of industrial parks and technoparks in social and economic development is significant only in a few regions with high competitive advantages, and in regions without such advantages parks do not impact on the development significantly.


2008 ◽  
pp. 70-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bukhvald

Transformations in the sphere of federal relations concern the most important directions of the reforming processes in the country. However, not all proposed and actually developing components of the federal reform seem well-argued and corresponding to long-term, strategic interests of the Russian statehood. The basic course of reform should meet the objective requirements of further decentralization of governing economic and social processes and the need to ensure strengthening the responsibility of RF subjects’ executive bodies and local self-management for steady social and economic development of their territories. The solution of these problems calls for a new model of federal policy of regional development, specification of some important components of the municipal reform as well as inserting certain amendments into the system of intergovernmental fiscal relations in order to stir up their stimulating function.


2014 ◽  
pp. 4-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mau

The paper deals with Russian social and economic development in 2013 and prospects for the next year or two. The author discusses the logic and trends of the global crisis started in 2008. This is the basis for further analysis of current Russian economic performance with special emphasis on the problem of growth rates deceleration. Special attention is paid to economic risks and priorities of economic policy.


2008 ◽  
pp. 71-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shastitko ◽  
S. Afontsev ◽  
S. Plaksin

The article contains a general comparative study of four strategies of social and economic development: "Inertia", "Renter", "Mobilization", and "Modernization". The context for comparison is explanation of correlation between adaptive features of Russia’s contemporary economic system and particularities of the mentioned strategies with corresponding ways of managing economic development problems. The comparison is based on description of strategies essence, ways and tools to achieve results. Perspectives of achieving strategic purposes as well as expected results of implementation of each strategy are shown. Special comparative study of four strategies on the base of development of competitive markets as one of strategic aims of the Russian government is presented.


Author(s):  
M. S. Mokiy ◽  
E. K. Borzenko

The article on the basis of extrapolation of system laws of management of social and economic development illustrates the system reason of the Cobra effect, that is, a situation where, despite the rather attractive goals that managers formulate, the result of the activities of subordinates is opposite to what was intended. The main problem of management is the development of a system of indicators, in which, working on the indicator, employees would change the state in the right direction. The reason for the Cobra effect is the manifestation of systemic patterns of socio-economic development. The main system regularity is the desire of the system for stability and self-preservation. This state of the system is achieved using the least energy-consuming way. It is shown that any worker, realizing system regularities, aspires to stability and self-preservation. Therefore, the employee is always forced to work for achieving the indicator. The article analyzes the manifestation of these laws at the level of enterprises and state. When managers understand these patterns explicitly or covertly, changes in the economic system are moving in the right direction. It is shown that the existing system of target indicators used as indicators to assess the effectiveness of management does not meet the goals and objectives of socio-economic development. At the meso- and macrolevel, absolute, volumetric indicators, such as gross national product and others, reduce the range of benefits to the population. The article defines the vector of change in the system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of management at the regional and state levels, based on the fact that the key element is the family. At the same time, the targets should be indicators to assess the availability of benefits for households.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document