Structural Alternatives of Russia’s Social and Economic Development

2008 ◽  
pp. 71-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shastitko ◽  
S. Afontsev ◽  
S. Plaksin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Competitive Markets ◽  
Russian Government ◽  
Social And Economic Development

The article contains a general comparative study of four strategies of social and economic development: "Inertia", "Renter", "Mobilization", and "Modernization". The context for comparison is explanation of correlation between adaptive features of Russia’s contemporary economic system and particularities of the mentioned strategies with corresponding ways of managing economic development problems. The comparison is based on description of strategies essence, ways and tools to achieve results. Perspectives of achieving strategic purposes as well as expected results of implementation of each strategy are shown. Special comparative study of four strategies on the base of development of competitive markets as one of strategic aims of the Russian government is presented.

SYSTEMIC CAUSES OF THE APPEARANCE OF “COBRA EFFECT” IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
M. S. Mokiy ◽  
E. K. Borzenko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Gross National Product ◽  
The Family ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Energy Consuming ◽  
The Right ◽  
Goals And Objectives ◽  
Least Energy

The article on the basis of extrapolation of system laws of management of social and economic development illustrates the system reason of the Cobra effect, that is, a situation where, despite the rather attractive goals that managers formulate, the result of the activities of subordinates is opposite to what was intended. The main problem of management is the development of a system of indicators, in which, working on the indicator, employees would change the state in the right direction. The reason for the Cobra effect is the manifestation of systemic patterns of socio-economic development. The main system regularity is the desire of the system for stability and self-preservation. This state of the system is achieved using the least energy-consuming way. It is shown that any worker, realizing system regularities, aspires to stability and self-preservation. Therefore, the employee is always forced to work for achieving the indicator. The article analyzes the manifestation of these laws at the level of enterprises and state. When managers understand these patterns explicitly or covertly, changes in the economic system are moving in the right direction. It is shown that the existing system of target indicators used as indicators to assess the effectiveness of management does not meet the goals and objectives of socio-economic development. At the meso- and macrolevel, absolute, volumetric indicators, such as gross national product and others, reduce the range of benefits to the population. The article defines the vector of change in the system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of management at the regional and state levels, based on the fact that the key element is the family. At the same time, the targets should be indicators to assess the availability of benefits for households.

Spatial polarization of peripheral territories of Stavropol Krai on the level of social and economic development

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
M. U. Kazakov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Special Interest ◽  
Composite Indicator ◽  
Natural Process ◽  
Diagnostic Approach ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
System Differentiation ◽  
Stavropol Krai

The research of a condition of peripheral territories is of special interest within formation of a spatial paradigm of development of regional social and economic system. Differentiation of level of social and economic development of peripheral territories is natural process and is subject to complex studying for formation of adequate instruments of management within spatial social and economic policy. In article special attention is paid to formation of system and diagnostic approach for identification of level of social and economic development of territories on the basis of the composite indicator and also to justification and calculation of indicators of unevenness of development of peripheral territories.

scholarly journals MACROECONOMIC ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMY

2019 ◽  
pp. 108-115
Author(s):  
S. A. Bakhodurova
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
State Policy ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Gross Regional Product ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Regional Product

The essence and indicators of a concept of sustainable development of economy have been considered. Dynamics of an indicator of social and economic development of the region (gross regional product) has been analyzed and the stability indicator has been сalculated. Macroeconomic aspects of unstable development of economy have been revealed through imbalances of inflows and outflows in the two-sector, closed and opened economic systems. The reasons and consequences of disproportions of an economic system have been identified. Measures and directions of state policy in the field of stimulating the development of small and medium-sized businesses, creating a favorable business environment, stimulating export-oriented production, improving migration policies, which will reduce these imbalances, have been proposed. Accounting of regularity of macroeconomic interrelations will allow you to assess a situation of economic systems, and studying of the existing imbalances will promote creation of the mechanism of their regulation.

scholarly journals ESSENCE AND CHARACTERISTIC OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
L. V. Borovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Bifurcation Point ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Institutional Changes ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Republic

The structure of the national model of social and economic development is considered in the composition of types and subtypes of the economic system, taking into account the types of macroeconomic policy and the sector of the national economy, the nature of institutional transformations and institutional changes in the national economy is described, types of modern transformations or choice of alternative development options are identified. The difference between institutional changes and institutional transformations is revealed, namely institutional transformations and institutional changes are associated with the replacement of institutions, but it is the result of the former that the institutions that predetermine the functioning of the main components (predetermining attributes) of the economic system are replaced. It has been established that as a result of institutional transformations, changes take place in the system-forming institutions that predetermine the nature and characteristics of social and economic development. The transformations that took place or are potentially possible are determined in the context of the problem of managing the socio-economic development of the Republic of Crimea. It is determined that in the case of institutional transformations, there is necessarily a specific bifurcation point, characterized by the occurrence of a certain event or group of events, and is the starting platform for a specific institutional transformation. A scheme of various variants (scenarios) of the passage of the bifurcation point in the process of development of the national economy under the influence of external and internal factors is constructed, and changes in the states of development of the national economy during the passage of the bifurcation point are determined. The internal critical instability of the current state of development of the national economy has been studied. It is determined that institutional changes without the flow of institutional transformations represent a combination of the replacement of institutions in certain areas or spheres of socio-economic development. At the same time, the bifurcation point is absolutely not an obligatory condition, as a result of which institutional changes can take place constantly, thus constantly modernizing the institutional environment, taking into account new agreements, decision-making features and many other factors.

Deformation of Institution of Ownership in Ukraine and Problems of Effective Owner Formation in Inefficient State

2010 ◽  
pp. 123-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. Kindzersky
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
System Development ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Economic Basis ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Ukrainian Society

The article analyzes changes in ownership relations in post-Soviet Ukraine from the point of view of their adequacy to the goals of the Ukrainian society and countrys economic system development. The author considers deformations in reforming the corresponding institution that impose restrictions on achieving desirable parameters of social and economic development and forming the effective owner. The attention is focused on the impossibility of overcoming deviations in ownership relations development without ousting structural, organizational and technological backwardness of the Ukrainian industry. Recommendations are given on further reforming ownership relations that are based on the idea of subordination of ownership institutions separate components to the tasks of modernization of the countrys economic basis.

Social and economic development of Russia: finding new dynamics

2016 ◽  
pp. 5-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Medvedev
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Import Substitution ◽  
Sustainable Growth ◽  
Structural Reforms ◽  
Russian Government ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Stimulation Of

The paper deals with Russian economic development and economic policy in2015-2016. The analysis is focused on external and domestic challenges as well as on anti-crisis policy of the Russian government. Special attention is paid to key elements of a new model of economic growth in Russia. The paper discusses priorities of economic policy of sustainable growth including: budget efficiency, structural reforms and import substitution, stimulation of entrepreneurship, efficiency of public administration, modernization of welfare state.

Russian Federalism at the Critical Stage of Development

2008 ◽  
pp. 70-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bukhvald
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations ◽  
Critical Stage ◽  
Municipal Reform ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Basic Course

Transformations in the sphere of federal relations concern the most important directions of the reforming processes in the country. However, not all proposed and actually developing components of the federal reform seem well-argued and corresponding to long-term, strategic interests of the Russian statehood. The basic course of reform should meet the objective requirements of further decentralization of governing economic and social processes and the need to ensure strengthening the responsibility of RF subjects’ executive bodies and local self-management for steady social and economic development of their territories. The solution of these problems calls for a new model of federal policy of regional development, specification of some important components of the municipal reform as well as inserting certain amendments into the system of intergovernmental fiscal relations in order to stir up their stimulating function.

Waiting for a New Model of Growth: Russia’s Social and Economic Development in 2013

2014 ◽  
pp. 4-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mau
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Global Crisis ◽  
New Model ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Economic Risks

The paper deals with Russian social and economic development in 2013 and prospects for the next year or two. The author discusses the logic and trends of the global crisis started in 2008. This is the basis for further analysis of current Russian economic performance with special emphasis on the problem of growth rates deceleration. Special attention is paid to economic risks and priorities of economic policy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document