Posttranslational Protein Translocation Across the Membrane of the Endoplasmic Reticulum

1999 ◽  
Vol 380 (10) ◽  
pp. 1143-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom A. Rapoport ◽  
Kent E.S. Matlack ◽  
Kathrin Plath ◽  
Benjamin Misselwitz ◽  
Oliver Staeck
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Specific Site ◽  
Small Segment ◽  
Transmembrane Channel ◽  
Multiple Copies ◽  
Protein Components

AbstractPosttranslational protein translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by the Sec complex. This complex includes a transmembrane channel formed by multiple copies of the Sec61 protein. Translocation of a polypeptide begins when the signal sequence binds at a specific site within the channel. Binding results in the insertion of the substrate into the channel, possibly as a loop with a small segment exposed to the lumen. While bound, the signal sequence is in contact with both protein components of the channel and the lipid of the membrane. Subsequent movement of the polypeptide through the channel occurs when BiP molecules interact transiently with a luminal domain of the Sec complex, hydrolyze ATP, and bind to the substrate. Bound BiP promotes translocation by preventing the substrate from diffusing backwards through the channel, and thus acts as a molecular ratchet.

The protein translocation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum

1982 ◽  
Vol 300 (1099) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Integral Membrane Proteins ◽  
Multiple Copies ◽  
And Function ◽  
Lysosomal Proteins

The rough endoplasmic reticulum (r.e.r.) has been postulated to possess a single translation-coupled translocation system (in multiple copies) that effects signal sequence-mediated translocation of all secretory and lysosomal proteins and integration of all integral membrane proteins whose port of entry is the rough endoplasmic reticulum (G. Blobel 1980 Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 1496—1500). Two proteins have been isolated that are components of the r.e.r. translocation system. Their properties and function in protein translocation across and integration into membranes are discussed.

scholarly journals Targeting of the hepatitis B virus precore protein to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane: after signal peptide cleavage translocation can be aborted and the product released into the cytoplasm.

1988 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1093-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
P D Garcia ◽  
J H Ou ◽  
W J Rutter ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Core Protein ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Peptidase ◽  
Amino Terminus ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Nucleic Acid Binding ◽  
Precore Region ◽  
B Virus

The major hepatitis B virus (HBV) core protein is a viral structural protein involved in nucleic acid binding. Its coding sequence contains an extension of 29 codons (the "precore" region) at the amino terminus of the protein which is present in a fraction of the viral transcripts. This region is evolutionarily conserved among mammalian and avian HBVs, suggesting it has functional importance, although at least for duck HBV it has been shown to be nonessential for replication of infectious virions. Using in vitro assays for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, we found that the precore region of the HBV genome encodes a signal sequence. This signal sequence was recognized by signal recognition particle, which targeted the nascent precore protein to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane with efficiencies comparable to those of other mammalian secretory proteins. A 19-amino acid signal peptide was removed by signal peptidase on the lumenal side of the microsomal membrane, generating a protein similar to the HBV major core protein, but containing 10 additional amino acids from the precore region at its amino terminus. Surprisingly, we found that 70-80% of this signal peptidase-cleaved product was localized on the cytoplasmic side of the microsomal vesicles and was not associated with the membranes. We conclude that translocation was aborted by an unknown mechanism, then the protein disengaged from the translocation machinery and was released back into the cytoplasm. Thus, a cytoplasmically disposed protein was created whose amino terminus resulted from signal peptidase cleavage. The remaining 20-30% appeared to be completely translocated into the lumen of the microsomes. A deletion mutant lacking the carboxy-terminal nucleic acid binding domain of the precore protein was similarly partitioned between the lumen of the microsomes and the cytoplasmic compartment, indicating that this highly charged domain is not responsible for the aborted translocation. We discuss the implications of our findings for the protein translocation process and suggest a possible role in the virus life cycle.

scholarly journals Detection of Transient In Vivo Interactions between Substrate and Transporter during Protein Translocation into the Endoplasmic Reticulum

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Dünnwald ◽  
Alexander Varshavsky ◽  
Nils Johnsson
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Polypeptide Chain ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Identical Test ◽  
Split Ubiquitin

The split-ubiquitin technique was used to detect transient protein interactions in living cells. Nub, the N-terminal half of ubiquitin (Ub), was fused to Sec62p, a component of the protein translocation machinery in the endoplasmic reticulum ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Cub, the C-terminal half of Ub, was fused to the C terminus of a signal sequence. The reconstitution of a quasi-native Ub structure from the two halves of Ub, and the resulting cleavage by Ub-specific proteases at the C terminus of Cub, serve as a gauge of proximity between the two test proteins linked to Nub and Cub. Using this assay, we show that Sec62p is spatially close to the signal sequence of the prepro-α-factor in vivo. This proximity is confined to the nascent polypeptide chain immediately following the signal sequence. In addition, the extent of proximity depends on the nature of the signal sequence. Cub fusions that bore the signal sequence of invertase resulted in a much lower Ub reconstitution with Nub-Sec62p than otherwise identical test proteins bearing the signal sequence of prepro-α-factor. An inactive derivative of Sec62p failed to interact with signal sequences in this assay. These in vivo findings are consistent with Sec62p being part of a signal sequence-binding complex.

Sec62p, A Component of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein Translocation Machinery, Contains Multiple Binding Sites for the Sec-Complex

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 3859-3871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Wittke ◽  
Martin Dünnwald ◽  
Nils Johnsson
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Oligomeric Protein ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein

SEC62 encodes an essential component of the Sec-complex that is responsible for posttranslational protein translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The specific role of Sec62p in translocation was not known and difficult to identify because it is part of an oligomeric protein complex in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. An in vivo competition assay allowed us to characterize and dissect physical and functional interactions between Sec62p and components of the Sec-complex. We could show that Sec62p binds via its cytosolic N- and C-terminal domains to the Sec-complex. The N-terminal domain, which harbors the major interaction site, binds directly to the last 14 residues of Sec63p. The C-terminal binding site of Sec62p is less important for complex stability, but adjoins the region in Sec62p that might be involved in signal sequence recognition.

Role of lipids in the translocation of proteins across membranes

2000 ◽  
Vol 347 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank VAN VOORST ◽  
Ben DE KRUIJFF
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Intimate Relationship ◽  
Membrane Lipid ◽  
Membrane Lipid Composition ◽  
Sorting Signals ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Protein Components

The architecture of cells, with various membrane-bound compartments and with the protein synthesizing machinery confined to one location, dictates that many proteins have to be transported through one or more membranes during their biogenesis. A lot of progress has been made on the identification of protein translocation machineries and their sorting signals in various organelles and organisms. Biochemical characterization has revealed the functions of several individual protein components. Interestingly, lipid components were also found to be essential for the correct functioning of these translocases. This led to the idea that there is a very intimate relationship between the lipid and protein components that enables them to fulfil their intriguing task of transporting large biopolymers through a lipid bilayer without leaking their contents. In this review we focus on the Sec translocases in the endoplasmic reticulum and the bacterial inner membrane. We also highlight the interactions of lipids and proteins during the process of translocation and integrate this into a model that enables us to understand the role of membrane lipid composition in translocase function.

scholarly journals Signal Sequence Recognition in Cotranslational Translocation by Protein Components of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

1998 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walther Mothes ◽  
Berit Jungnickel ◽  
Josef Brunner ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Detergent Solution ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Protein Components

We have investigated the role of membrane proteins and lipids during early phases of the cotranslational insertion of secretory proteins into the translocation channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. We demonstrate that all steps, including the one during which signal sequence recognition occurs, can be reproduced with purified translocation components in detergent solution, in the absence of bulk lipids or a bilayer. Photocross-linking experiments with native membranes show that upon complete insertion into the channel signal sequences are both precisely positioned with respect to the protein components of the channel and contact lipids. Together, these results indicate that signal sequences are bound to a specific binding site at the interface between the channel and the surrounding lipids, and are recognized ultimately by protein–protein interactions. Our data also suggest that at least some signal sequences reach the binding site by transfer through the interior of the channel.

scholarly journals Direct probing of the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle by specific cross-linking.

1987 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wiedmann ◽  
T V Kurzchalia ◽  
H Bielka ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have studied the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle (SRP) during the initial events in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A new method of affinity labeling was used, whereby lysine residues, carrying the photoreactive group 4-(3-trifluoromethyldiazirino) benzoic acid in their side chains, are incorporated into a protein by means of modified lysyl-tRNA, and cross-linking to the interacting component is induced by irradiation. SRP interacts through its Mr 54,000 polypeptide component with the signal sequences of nascent preprolactin chains containing about 70 residues, and with decreasing affinity with longer chains as well; it causes inhibition of elongation. Binding of SRP is reversible and requires the nascent chain to be bound to a functional ribosome. SRP cross-linked to the signal sequence still inhibits elongation but does not prevent it completely. We conclude that SRP does not block the exit site of the polypeptide chain on the ribosome. The SRP receptor of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane displaces the signal sequence from SRP and, even if SRP is cross-linked, releases elongation arrest.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Ribosome–Membrane Junction at Early Stages of Presecretory Protein Translocation in the Mammalian Endoplasmic Reticulum

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (7) ◽  
pp. 1697-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher V. Nicchitta ◽  
Tianli Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Membrane Topology ◽  
Hydrophobic Core ◽  
Conducting Channel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Potential Mode

A series of fusion protein constructs were designed to investigate the contribution of secretory nascent chains to regulation of the ribosome–membrane junction in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. As a component of these studies, the membrane topology of the signal sequence was determined at stages of protein translocation immediately after targeting and before signal sequence cleavage. Truncated translation products were used to delimit the analysis to defined stages of translocation. In a study of secretory protein precursors, formation of a protease-resistant ribosome–membrane junction, currently thought to define the pathway of the translocating nascent chain, was observed to be precursor- and stage-dependent. Analysis of the binding of early intermediates indicated that the nascent chain was bound to the membrane independent of the ribosome, and that the binding was predominately electrostatic. The membrane topology of the signal sequence was determined as a function of the stage of translocation, and was found to be identical for all assayed intermediates. Unexpectedly, the hydrophobic core of the signal sequence was observed to be accessible to the cytosolic face of the membrane at stages of translocation immediately after targeting as well as stages before signal sequence cleavage. Removal of the ribosome from bound intermediates did not disrupt subsequent translocation, suggesting that the active state of the protein-conducting channel is maintained in the absence of the bound ribosome. A model describing a potential mode of regulation of the ribosome–membrane junction by the nascent chain is presented.

scholarly journals An ATP-binding membrane protein is required for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
D L Zimmerman ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Microsomal Membrane ◽  
Atp Binding ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Receptor Complex

The role of nucleotides in providing energy for polypeptide transfer across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is still unknown. To address this question, we treated ER-derived mammalian microsomal vesicles with a photoactivatable analogue of ATP, 8-N3ATP. This treatment resulted in a progressive inhibition of translocation activity. Approximately 20 microsomal membrane proteins were labeled by [alpha 32P]8-N3ATP. Two of these were identified as proteins with putative roles in translocation, alpha signal sequence receptor (SSR), the 35-kDa subunit of the signal sequence receptor complex, and ER-p180, a putative ribosome receptor. We found that there was a positive correlation between inactivation of translocation activity and photolabeling of alpha SSR. In contrast, our data demonstrate that the ATP-binding domain of ER-p180 is dispensable for translocation activity and does not contribute to the observed 8-N3ATP sensitivity of the microsomal vesicles.

scholarly journals SEC62 encodes a putative membrane protein required for protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum.

1989 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 2653-2664 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Deshaies ◽  
R Schekman
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Alpha Helix ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cytosol Fraction ◽  
Arginine Residues ◽  
Mutant Cells

Yeast sec62 mutant cells are defective in the translocation of several secretory precursor proteins into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (Rothblatt et al., 1989). The deficiency, which is most restrictive for alpha-factor precursor (pp alpha F) and preprocarboxypeptidase Y, has been reproduced in vitro. Membranes isolated from mutant cells display low and labile translocation activity with pp alpha F translated in a wild-type cytosol fraction. The defect is unique to the membrane fraction because cytosol from mutant cells supports translocation into membranes from wild-type yeast. Invertase assembly is only partly affected by the sec62 mutation in vivo and is nearly normal with mutant membranes in vitro. A potential membrane location for the SEC62 gene product is supported by evaluation of the molecular clone. DNA sequence analysis reveals a 32-kD protein with no obvious NH2-terminal signal sequence but with two domains of sufficient length and hydrophobicity to span a lipid bilayer. Sec62p is predicted to display significant NH2- and COOH-terminal hydrophilic domains on the cytoplasmic surface of the ER membrane. The last 30 amino acids of the COOH terminus may form an alpha-helix with 14 lysine and arginine residues arranged uniformly about the helix. This domain may allow Sec62p to interact with other proteins of the putative translocation complex.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document