Letter in reply to the letter to the editor of Geerts N and Schanhorst V with the title “Roche Troponin T hs-STAT meets all expert opinion analytical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome”

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Dupuy ◽  
Anne Sophie Bargnoux ◽  
François Roubille ◽  
Jean Paul Cristol
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Analytical Laboratory ◽  
Laboratory Practice ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Letter To The Editor

AbstractOver the period from December 3rd, 2019 to March 13th, 2020, after the urgent field safety notice reported by Roche, we performed double determinations of all troponins from the same tube in parallel and in the same run. We used the same Elecsys troponin T hs reagent (ref 08469873190), first result was obtained with the current hs-cTnT application (18 min) and the second measurement was with the STAT application (9 min). On the 11,388 results in the range from 3 to 500 ng/L, we observed 4.18% discordant results (above 18.8% RCV). Overall, we observed an overestimation of the hs-cTnT STAT assay. The Elecsys Troponin T hs STAT assay demonstrated good analytical performances on Cobas e801 analyzer. However, its use according to the ESC recommendations for the 0 h/1 h algorithm should be carefully evaluated and requires further studies with serial cTn testing.

A comparison of cardiac troponin T delta change methods and the importance of the clinical context in the assessment of acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-707
Author(s):  
Paul Simpson ◽  
Rosy Tirimacco ◽  
Penelope Cowley ◽  
May Siew ◽  
Narelle Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Clinical Context ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Delta Change

Background The management of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is a significant challenge for clinicians. Guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction require a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin, along with other criteria. Knowing what constitutes a significant delta change from baseline is still unclear and the literature is varied. Methods We compared three methods for determining cardiac troponin delta changes (relative, absolute and z-scores) for detecting acute myocardial infarction in 806 patients presenting to an emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Blood specimens were collected at admission and 2, 3, 4 and 6 h postadmission and tested on the Roche Elecsys high-sensitivity troponin T assay. Results A positive diagnosis for acute myocardial infarction was found in 39 (4.8%) patients. ROC AUC showed better performance for the absolute and z-score delta change (0.959–0.988 and 0.956–0.988, respectively) compared with relative delta change (0.921–0.960) at all time points in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Optimal timing for the second sample was at 4–6 h postadmission. Conclusions Although not statistically significant, the results show a trend of absolute and z-score delta change performing better than relative delta change for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The z-score approach allows for a single cut-off value across multiple high-sensitivity assays which could be useful in the clinical setting. Our study also highlighted the importance of interpreting cardiac troponin changes in the clinical context with a combination of the patient’s clinical history and electrocardiogram.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document