The impacts of reading strategy instruction on improving the reading comprehension of students with different learning styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-432
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Tadayonifar ◽  
Mohammadreza Valizadeh ◽  
Mahnaz Entezari ◽  
Mosfata Bahraman
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Training ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Post Test

Abstract The current study explores the short- and long-term impacts of explicit reading strategy instruction for improving reading comprehension of students with different learning styles. Sixty Iranian EFL learners took part in this study. They took the Cambridge ECCE reading test as the pre-test and were divided into five groups according to learner type based on Flemings’s VARK questionnaire. The participants underwent 12 weeks of explicit reading strategy instruction and took a post-test to determine the immediate effects of reading strategy training. Three months later, they took a delayed post-test to check the long-term effects of the training. The results of paired samples T-Test and ANOVA using SPSS indicated that there were significant differences in the pre-and post-test scores for all groups in all tests. The results of the post hoc analysis indicated that the auditory type showed the most and the visual type showed the least amount of improvement. The study thus suggests equipping students with appropriate reading strategies that are tailored to their perceived learning style in order to lead to better comprehension and subsequently more enjoyment when reading.

scholarly journals The Effects of Collaborative and Non- Collaborative Approaches to Teaching Reading Strategies on Iranian efl Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Attitude toward Reading

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Azadeh Rajaei ◽  
Seyed Hassan Talebi ◽  
Shirin Abadikhah
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Teaching Reading ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Experimental Group

In an EFL context reading is a very important skill in language learning. This study aims at finding if instruction of reading strategies in two different collaborative and non-collaborative approaches affects reading comprehension and attitude toward reading differently. Forty-five Iranian adult female EFL learners at pre-intermediate general English proficiency level in Iran Language Institute (ili) were selected and divided into three groups of 15 students. One group functioning as the control group did not receive any strategy instruction; the second group, as the first experimental group, received reading strategy instruction in collaborative groups (Collaborative Strategic Reading or csr), and the third group considered as the second experimental group received reading strategy instruction in a non-collaborative way. A reading comprehension test and a reading attitude questionnaire were given to all three groups at the beginning of the term as pretests and after the experiment as posttests. The results obtained through one-way anova indicated that though both experimental groups outperformed the control group, there was no significant difference between the two experimental groups in reading comprehension and attitude toward reading. Therefore, it is up to teachers to weigh the advantages of using the collaborative approach to teaching reading against its disadvantages.

Can reading strategies be successfully taught?

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Carrell
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Strategy Training ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Context Sensitive ◽  
Comprehensive Survey

The purpose of this article is to examine whether and how reading strategies can be successfully taught in second or foreign language reading instruction. A number of researchers agree that it is important for second or foreign language readers to become ‘strategic’ readers. Yet, there is disagreement among these same researchers as to how to accomplish this goal. Part of the problem is that there are no inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’ reading strategies. What is a good strategy in one situation for one reader, may be a bad strategy in a different situation or for a different reader. Successful and unsuccessful strategy use is apparently context and text dependent. In this article I present a comprehensive survey of the research which has been done on reading strategy training, and confront the critical issue of how to make reading strategy instruction appropriately text and context sensitive rather than the mindless teaching of lists of strategies.

scholarly journals The Impact of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Comprehension Monitoring among Moroccan EFL University Learners

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arab World English Journal ◽  
Mohammed Msaddek
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Strategy Training ◽  
Metacognitive Strategy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
First Semester ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Metacognitive Strategy Training ◽  
The Impact

This experimental study is intended to uncover how the meaning-checking procedure is conducted by Moroccan English as a foreign language (EFL) learners and explore the perceived impact of metacognitive strategy instruction on the way they monitor their comprehension act in textual processing. Predicated on a pre-post-test design, the study is a manifestation of the extent to which the learners’ monitoring behaviour during the reading process can be subject to utter improvement through the conduct of an instructional intervention. To investigate this issue at length and provide plausible, pertinent evidence, a sample of 113 of Moroccan first-semester students majoring in English Studies were targeted. The data were elicited through the usage of such research instruments as reading comprehension texts (i.e., narrative, expository), ‘self-report questionnaire’ and reading comprehension tests (i.e., pre-test, post-test). The findings evinced that, owing to strategy instruction, the comprehension-checking behavior among the experimental group (n=63) significantly improved at post-test compared to the control group (n=50). Finally, some practical implications are brought forward and a few limitations confronting the study under focus are cited.

scholarly journals The Text Type Effect on Moroccan EFL University Learners’ Reading Achievement

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Mohammed Msaddek
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Achievement ◽  
Text Processing ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Strategy Training ◽  
Text Type ◽  
Text Genre ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Explicit Mention ◽  
Influential Variable

This study is a potential endeavor to make an inquiry into the perceived effect of text typology on reading achievement gains among Moroccan English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. It also evinces whether strategy instruction can be an influencing variable on learners’ reading achievement with regards to text type (i.e., narrative, expository). Indeed, incorporating two primary text genres (i.e., narrative, expository) in the conduct of this current research, the study is intended to substantiate any marked interrelatedness existing between text typology and reading achievement at the pre- and post-testing stages among EFL university learners. For assuring a thorough, rich investigation of this stated postulate, two sampled Moroccan EFL groups (n=113), as first-year English majors, were addressed. The obtained data were collected by means of a corpus of research instruments such as reading comprehension tests (i.e., pre-test, post-test), strategy training and reading comprehension texts (i.e., narrative, expository). The findings showcased that text genre is not a significant, influential variable on reading achievement scores among the control (n=50) and treatment groups (n=63). Finally, the study puts forward some useful implications pertaining to EFL text processing/ analysis and an explicit mention of some limitations, which encountered the undertaken study, is made.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Academic Reading Strategy Instruction among Adult English as an Additional Language Students: A Professional Development Opportunity Through Action Research

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-103
Author(s):  
Raj Khatri
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Academic Reading

This action research project empirically evaluated the efficacy of reading strategy instruction to help advance adult English as an additional language (EAL) students’ development of academic reading skills and strategy use. The study involved 16 adult participants attending English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programs in British Columbia. These participants received reading strategy instruction over nine sessions during a 6-week period. To capture participants’ reading strategy use, Mokhtari and Sheorey’s Survey of Reading Strategies instrument was used in the pre- and post-intervention stages. Similarly, to measure participants’ reading comprehension abilities, an identical, standardized reading comprehension test was administered in the pre- and post- intervention stages. Participants’ weekly post-task verbal reflections and post-intervention interviews provided qualitative data for the study. Findings showed that reported reading strategy use obtained from the instrument and reading performance increased significantly after the intervention. The results from the analysis of participants’ reflections and interviews revealed a positive association between participants’ strategy use and reading performance. Conducted as a part of professional development, this study aims to resolve EAP professionals’ practical concerns about the use of reading strategies in academic reading as well as provide action researchers with suggestions for future implementation. Ce projet de recherche-action a permis d’effectuer une évaluation empirique de l’efficacité de l’enseignement de stratégies de lecture afin de faire avancer le développement des compétences académiques de lecture et du recours aux stratégies de lecture chez les étudiants adultes inscrits à un cours d’anglais comme langue additionnelle. Ont participé à l’étude 16 adultes inscrits à des programmes d’anglais académique en Colombie-Britannique. Ces participants ont pris part à neuf séances d’enseignement de stratégies de lecture sur une période de 6 semaines. L’instrument de mesure Reading Strategies de Mokhtari et Sheorey a été utilisé pour évaluer le recours des participants aux stratégies de lecture avant et après la période d’intervention. Un test identique et standardisé de compréhension de la lecture a également été administré avant et après la période d’intervention afin d’évaluer les capacités de compréhension des participants. Les réflexions verbales offertes par les participants après les exercices et les entrevues réalisées après l’intervention ont produit des données qualitatives pour l’étude. Celle-ci a permis de constater un accroissement significatif du recours aux stratégies de lecture fournies par l’instrument et de la performance de lecture suite à l’intervention. Les résultats de l’analyse des réflexions et des entrevues des participants ont permis de constater une association positive entre l’utilisation de stratégies de lecture et la performance de lecture des participants. Menée dans le cadre du perfectionnement professionnel, cette étude vise à répondre aux inquiétudes pratiques des professionnels de l’enseignement de l’anglais académique relativement au recours aux stratégies de lecture tout en fournissant aux praticiens et praticiennes de la recherche-action des suggestions à mettre en œuvre dans le futur.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document