scholarly journals Reading Strategy Instruction and Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Unkyoung Maeng
2018 ◽  
Vol 198 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilhan Ilter

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the context clue instruction program to infer meaning from context as a way to enhance reading comprehension. Participants were fifth-grade middle school students (four boys) who were at a frustration reading level (initial comprehension score range = 40%-48%) at their grade level. In addition, one student served as a control participant and did not any receive instruction in this study. A multiple-baseline across-students design was used. All the instruction for the three experimental participants was one on one using the direct instruction method. Maintenance of treatment effects was probed at 2, 4, and 6 weeks following the intervention for Participants 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The results demonstrated that the instructional program produced increases in all three experimental participants’ comprehension scores to above 70% (range = 75%-82%) as measured by the short-answer questions; thus, they found they achieved an instructional level score in their comprehension after the instruction. The social validity results confirmed that participants enjoyed the intervention, and had a better understanding of what they read through individual experience on the strategy of learning from context. The information gained from this study suggested that a strategy instruction concerning the use of context clues may be a useful component (Tier 2 setting) of response to intervention (RTI) model for students who struggle with reading comprehension.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Azadeh Rajaei ◽  
Seyed Hassan Talebi ◽  
Shirin Abadikhah

In an EFL context reading is a very important skill in language learning. This study aims at finding if instruction of reading strategies in two different collaborative and non-collaborative approaches affects reading comprehension and attitude toward reading differently. Forty-five Iranian adult female EFL learners at pre-intermediate general English proficiency level in Iran Language Institute (ili) were selected and divided into three groups of 15 students. One group functioning as the control group did not receive any strategy instruction; the second group, as the first experimental group, received reading strategy instruction in collaborative groups (Collaborative Strategic Reading or csr), and the third group considered as the second experimental group received reading strategy instruction in a non-collaborative way. A reading comprehension test and a reading attitude questionnaire were given to all three groups at the beginning of the term as pretests and after the experiment as posttests. The results obtained through one-way anova indicated that though both experimental groups outperformed the control group, there was no significant difference between the two experimental groups in reading comprehension and attitude toward reading. Therefore, it is up to teachers to weigh the advantages of using the collaborative approach to teaching reading against its disadvantages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document