scholarly journals A survey of outpatient Internal Medicine clinician perceptions of diagnostic error

Diagnosis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
John C. Matulis ◽  
Susan N. Kok ◽  
Eugene C. Dankbar ◽  
Andrew J. Majka
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Diagnostic Error ◽  
System Level ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Referral Practice ◽  
Question Survey

AbstractBackgroundLittle is known about how practicing Internal Medicine (IM) clinicians perceive diagnostic error, and whether perceptions are in agreement with the published literature.MethodsA 16-question survey was administered across two IM practices: one a referral practice providing care for patients traveling for a second opinion and the other a traditional community-based primary care practice. Our aim was to identify individual- and system-level factors contributing to diagnostic error (primary outcome) and conditions at greatest risk of diagnostic error (secondary outcome).ResultsSixty-five of 125 clinicians surveyed (51%) responded. The most commonly perceived individual factors contributing to diagnostic error included atypical patient presentations (83%), failure to consider other diagnoses (63%) and inadequate follow-up of test results (53%). The most commonly cited system-level factors included cognitive burden created by the volume of data in the electronic health record (EHR) (68%), lack of time to think (64%) and systems that do not support collaboration (40%). Conditions felt to be at greatest risk of diagnostic error included cancer (46%), pulmonary embolism (43%) and infection (37%).ConclusionsInadequate clinician time and sub-optimal patient and test follow-up are perceived by IM clinicians to be persistent contributors to diagnostic error. Clinician perceptions of conditions at greatest risk of diagnostic error may differ from the published literature.

Ontario COVID-19 assessment centre practices in patient counselling, education, and follow-up care: A provincial survey

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200052
Author(s):  
Helen Genis ◽  
Scott MacPhee ◽  
Nancy Vandenbergh ◽  
Chris Yu ◽  
Nisha Andany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
High Volume ◽  
System Level ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Educational Materials ◽  
Patient Counselling ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Assessment Centre

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, COVID-19 assessment centres were launched across the province of Ontario to facilitate COVID-19 testing outside of emergency departments. We aimed to study the degree to which assessment centres provide education and follow-up care for patients with suspected COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of Ontario COVID-19 assessment centre directors between September 15 and October 15, 2020. The primary outcomes studied were the types of educational modalities employed and information conveyed, methods and frequency of test result communication, and any follow-up care that was offered. Survey respondents were also asked to provide descriptions of barriers to patient education and test communication. RESULTS: A total of 56 directors (representing 73 assessment centres) completed the survey. The most frequent educational modalities employed were educational handouts (92%), direct in-person counselling (89%), and referral to website (72%). Seventy-one percent of respondents indicated patients with positive test results would be notified, and 61% of respondents indicated that follow-up care would be offered. The most frequently reported barriers to patient education were insufficient time and high volume of tests, while the most frequently reported barriers to communication of test results were difficulty accessing online health portals and high volume of tests. CONCLUSION: The ability of many assessment centres to provide patient education is limited by both individual patient and system-level factors. Assessment centres may benefit from standardization of educational materials, improved accessibility to test results for patients in marginalized groups, and virtual pathways to facilitate additional counselling and care for individuals who test positive.

scholarly journals Behavioural responses to SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in England: REACT-2 study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Rozlyn Redd ◽  
Emily Cooper ◽  
Christina Atchison ◽  
Isabella Pereira ◽  
Polly Hollings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Programme ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Prevalence Studies ◽  
Behavioural Responses ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Community Transmission

Background:  This study assesses the behavioural responses to SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results as part of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-2 (REACT-2) research programme, a large community-based surveillance study of antibody prevalence in England. Methods: A follow-up survey was conducted six weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 antibody test. The follow-up survey included 4500 people with a positive result and 4039 with a negative result. Reported changes in behaviour were assessed using difference-in-differences models. A nested interview study was conducted with 40 people to explore how they thought through their behavioural decisions. Results: While respondents reduced their protective behaviours over the six weeks, we did not find evidence that positive test results changed participant behaviour trajectories in relation to the number of contacts the respondents had, for leaving the house to go to work, or for leaving the house to socialise in a personal place. The qualitative findings supported these results. Most people did not think that they had changed their behaviours because of their test results, however they did allude to some changes in their attitudes and perceptions around risk, susceptibility, and potential severity of symptoms. Conclusions: We found limited evidence that knowing your antibody status leads to behaviour change in the context of a research study. While this finding should not be generalised to widespread self-testing in other contexts, it is reassuring given the importance of large prevalence studies, and the practicalities of doing these at scale using self-testing with lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA).

scholarly journals Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence (PROMPT): a feasibility mixed methods community-based participatory action research project in Ottawa, Canada

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e018416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smita Pakhale ◽  
Tina Kaur ◽  
Catherine Charron ◽  
Kelly Florence ◽  
Tiffany Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Tobacco Dependence ◽  
Community Research ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Polysubstance Use

ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of a Community-Based Participatory Tobacco Dependence Strategy (PROMPT) in the inner city population of Ottawa (Canada).DesignA feasibility mixed methods prospective cohort study following principles of community-based participatory action research.InterventionRecruited 80 people whouse drugs, followed them for 6 months while providing access to counselling, nicotine replacement therapy and peer-support in a community setting.SettingCommunity research office in downtown Ottawa, adjacent to low-income housing, shelter services and street-based drug consumption.Primary outcomeRetention rate at 6-month follow-up.Secondary outcomeBiochemically validated 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 26 weeks, self-reported abstinence in the past 7 days with exhaled carbon monoxide ≤10 ppm.ResultsThe average age of participants was 43.8 years. The 6-month follow-up rate was 42.5%. The mean number of smoking years reported was 27.3 years. The participants were 70% male, 33.7% reported less than a high-school education, 21% identified as indigenous and 43.8% reported an income between US$1000 and US$1999 per month. The baseline mean daily cigarette use was 20.5 and 9.3 cigarettes at study end, with mean reduction of 11.2 cigarettes at 6 months (P=0.0001). There was a considerable reduction in self-reported illicit substance use (18.8%), including a reduction in the opioids heroin (6.3%), fentanyl (2.6%) and Oxycontin (3.8%). The study findings also reveal psycho-socioeconomic benefits such as improved health, return to work and greater community engagement.ConclusionsThe PROMPT project describes socioeconomic variables associated with tobacco and polysubstance use. A programme focused on tobacco dependence, easily accessible in the community and led by community peers with lived experience is feasible to implement and has the potential to support positive life changes. PROMPT’s patient engagement model is an effective harm-reduction strategy for the growing opioid use crisis and can improve the health outcomes of marginalised at-risk populations worldwide.

Patient Notification of Test Results in a Primary Care Setting

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-123
Author(s):  
Caroline Sulllivan ◽  
Janice Smolowitz
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Quality Health Care ◽  
Improvement Project

The ordering and management of diagnostic test results is an important aspect of the plan of care in the primary care setting. The process involves a series of steps beginning with ordering the test and appropriate communication to ensure patient follow-up. Patient–provider communication and documentation is essential to achieve high-quality health care outcomes. The failure to communicate diagnostic test results and develop follow-up plans is an important patient safety issue. This quality improvement project examined management of diagnostic tests in a primary care practice for the purpose of improving processes of care and outcomes. The project focused on current practices, patient satisfaction, and patients’ preference relating to laboratory result communication.

scholarly journals FAMILY CAREGIVER SCREENING IN PRIMARY CARE: CLINICIAN AND CAREGIVER PERSPECTIVES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S207-S207
Author(s):  
Catherine Riffin
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Multidisciplinary Practice ◽  
Depth Interviews ◽  
Community Based Services

Abstract Despite broad appreciation of family caregivers’ relevance to older adults’ health care, few primary care-based interventions have incorporated mechanisms to facilitate systematic caregiver identification, screening, and support. Actionable knowledge regarding how such interventions may be incorporated into clinical practice is remarkably limited. This study used in-depth interviews to elucidate clinicians’ (N=25) and caregivers’ (N=20) perspectives on and suggestions for integrating caregiver screening into primary care practice. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Participants emphasized the importance of tailoring the caregiver screening intervention to local circumstances and to patient and caregiver preferences. They advocated for an action-oriented approach that would link identified risks with a concrete plan for follow-up (e.g., referral to training) and outcomes relevant to the patient’s care plan. Overall, participants advised that integrating the intervention into practice would require the support of multidisciplinary practice staff, stronger connections between medical and community-based services, and appropriate reimbursement for clinicians.

scholarly journals Behavioural responses to SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in England: REACT-2 study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Rozlyn Redd ◽  
Emily Cooper ◽  
Christina Atchison ◽  
Isabella Pereira ◽  
Polly Hollings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Programme ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Prevalence Studies ◽  
Behavioural Responses ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Community Transmission

Background:  This study assesses the behavioural responses to SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results as part of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-2 (REACT-2) research programme, a large community-based surveillance study of antibody prevalence in England. Methods: A follow-up survey was conducted six weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 antibody test. The follow-up survey included 4500 people with a positive result and 4039 with a negative result. Reported changes in behaviour were assessed using difference-in-differences models. A nested interview study was conducted with 40 people to explore how they thought through their behavioural decisions. Results: While respondents reduced their protective behaviours over the six weeks, we did not find evidence that positive test results changed participant behaviour trajectories in relation to the number of contacts the respondents had, for leaving the house to go to work, or for leaving the house to socialise in a personal place. The qualitative findings supported these results. Most people did not think that they had changed their behaviours because of their test results, however they did allude to some changes in their attitudes and perceptions around risk, susceptibility, and potential severity of symptoms. Conclusions: We found limited evidence that knowing your antibody status leads to behaviour change in the context of a research study. While this finding should not be generalised to widespread self-testing in other contexts, it is reassuring given the importance of large prevalence studies, and the practicalities of doing these at scale using self-testing with lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA).

Prevalence of HPV 16/18 genotypes and histopathologic follow-up outcomes in women with negative cytology and positive high-risk HPV test results

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Woodard ◽  
R. Marshall Austin ◽  
Zaibo Li ◽  
Joseph Beere ◽  
Chengquan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv Test ◽  
High Risk Hpv

scholarly journals Biomarkers-based personalized follow-up in chronic heart failure improves patient’s outcomes and reduces care associate cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Leon-Justel ◽  
Jose I. Morgado Garcia-Polavieja ◽  
Ana Isabel Alvarez-Rios ◽  
Francisco Jose Caro Fernandez ◽  
Pedro Agustin Pajaro Merino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major and growing medical and economic problem, with high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide. Cardiac Biomarker is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods This is a before and after interventional study, that assesses the impact of a personalized follow-up procedure for HF on patient’s outcomes and care associated cost, based on a clinical model of risk stratification and personalized management according to that risk. A total of 192 patients were enrolled and studied before the intervention and again after the intervention. The primary objective was the rate of readmissions, due to a HF. Secondary outcome compared the rate of ED visits and quality of life improvement assessed by the number of patients who had reduced NYHA score. A cost-analysis was also performed on these data. Results Admission rates significantly decreased by 19.8% after the intervention (from 30.2 to 10.4), the total hospital admissions were reduced by 32 (from 78 to 46) and the total length of stay was reduced by 7 days (from 15 to 9 days). The rate of ED visits was reduced by 44% (from 64 to 20). Thirty-one percent of patients had an improved functional class score after the intervention, whereas only 7.8% got worse. The overall cost saving associated with the intervention was € 72,769 per patient (from € 201,189 to € 128,420) and €139,717.65 for the whole group over 1 year. Conclusions A personalized follow-up of HF patients led to important outcome benefits and resulted in cost savings, mainly due to the reduction of patient hospitalization readmissions and a significant reduction of care-associated costs, suggesting that greater attention should be given to this high-risk cohort to minimize the risk of hospitalization readmissions.

scholarly journals The Effect of Javanese Language Videos with a Community Based Interactive Approach Method as an Educational Instrument for Knowledge, Perception, and Adherence amongst Tuberculosis Patients

Pharmacy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Fauna Herawati ◽  
Yuni Megawati ◽  
Aslichah ◽  
Retnosari Andrajati ◽  
Rika Yulia
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Group ◽  
Personal Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interactive Approach ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Tuberculosis Patients ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
The Impact

The long period of tuberculosis treatment causes patients to have a high risk of forgetting or stopping the medication altogether, which increases the risk of oral anti-tuberculosis drug resistance. The patient’s knowledge and perception of the disease affect the patient’s adherence to treatment. This research objective was to determine the impact of educational videos in the local language on the level of knowledge, perception, and adherence of tuberculosis patients in the Regional General Hospital (RSUD) Bangil. This quasi-experimental study design with a one-month follow-up allocated 62 respondents in the intervention group and 60 in the control group. The pre- and post-experiment levels of knowledge and perception were measured with a validated set of questions. Adherence was measured by pill counts. The results showed that the intervention increases the level of knowledge of the intervention group higher than that of the control group (p-value < 0.05) and remained high after one month of follow-up. The perceptions domains that changed after education using Javanese (Ngoko) language videos with the Community Based Interactive Approach (CBIA) method were the timeline, personal control, illness coherence, and emotional representations (p-value < 0.05). More than 95% of respondents in the intervention group take 95% of their pill compared to 58% of respondents in the control group (p-value < 0.05). Utilization of the local languages for design a community-based interactive approach to educate and communicate is important and effective.

scholarly journals Qualitative investigation of trace-based communication: how are traces conceptualised in healthcare teamwork?

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e038406
Author(s):  
Sayra Cristancho ◽  
Emily Field
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Constructivist Grounded Theory ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Qualitative Investigation ◽  
Qualitative Nature ◽  
Saving Face ◽  
Critical Process ◽  
Biological Literature

ObjectivesThis interview-based qualitative study aims to explore how healthcare providers conceptualise trace-based communication and considers its implications for how teams work. In the biological literature, trace-based communication refers to the non-verbal communication that is achieved by leaving ‘traces’ in the environment and other members sensing them and using them to drive their own behaviour. Trace-based communication is a key component of swam intelligence and has been described as a critical process that enables superorganisms to coordinate work and collectively adapt. This paper brings awareness to its existence in the context of healthcare teamwork.DesignInterview-based study using Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology.SettingThis study was conducted in multiple team contexts at one of Canada’s largest acute-care teaching hospitals.Participants25 clinicians from across professions and disciplines. Specialties included surgery, anesthesiology, psychiatry, internal medicine, geriatrics, neonatology, paramedics, nursing, intensive care, neurology and emergency medicine.InterventionNot relevant due to the qualitative nature of the study.Primary and secondary outcomeNot relevant due to the qualitative nature of the study.ResultsThe dataset was analysed using the sensitising concept of ‘traces’ from Swarm Intelligence. This study brought to light novel and unique elements of trace-based communication in the context of healthcare teamwork including focused intentionality, successful versus failed traces and the contextually bounded nature of the responses to traces. While participants initially felt ambivalent about the idea of using traces in their daily teamwork, they provided a variety of examples. Through these examples, participants revealed the multifaceted nature of the purposes of trace-based communication, including promoting efficiency, preventing mistakes and saving face.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that clinicians pervasively use trace-based communication despite differences in opinion as to its implications for teamwork and safety. Other disciplines have taken up traces to promote collective adaptation. This should serve as inspiration to at least start exploring this phenomenon in healthcare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document